🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Depraved leftists celebrate abortion...

"
Parents should be allowed to have their newborn babies killed because they are “morally irrelevant” and ending their lives is no different to abortion, a group of medical ethicists linked to Oxford University has argued."

"Rather than being “actual persons”, newborns were “potential persons”. They explained: “Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’ in the sense of ‘subject of a moral right to life’."

Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say
 
and it is a sight to see.

It is difficult even to know what, if anything, there is to say:




One almost has to question and reevaluate one's bearing in reality in the face of this level of departure from normal. So taking a new bearing while wading through such horror is difficult to say the least. Somewhere over the past sixty or so years moral facts accepted and venerated for millennia have been philosophized away to a point where some insist basic, indelible, fundamental human right and wrong do not exist. We've lost something vital to our primordial species birth--it's become a black hole in humanity's collective heart and is only growing.

And the way advocates of infanticide sneer and condemn or dismiss the moment opposition is expressed. They're like skeletal parrots who memorized a few lines of few arguments. I have to ask myself where these people learned that killing unborn children is not just okay (in their minds), but also normal and healthy. Some voices are louder than others and I am certain most of the loudest here are diehard idealists who have never personally come close to the issue. Still, the level of mockery from those who would weep for immigrant children or reference the Holocaust to smear their President and nation--it's funereal really.


they are not unborn children. They are fetuses. You are no pro life, just pro birth, unless you are will for your tax dollars to feed, house and give medical care to infants that the mother can't give.


This is one of many pretentious arguments delivered with an absolutistic sense of self-righteousness and repeated on queue as if by silent command. Firstly, you are not God. Being not-God you cannot know or predict the chances of survival for a child born unwanted by his or her parents. If life is a maze, is it not better to have entry into the chaos of confined space rather than never having been given the chance to solve it?

In your platitudinal argument an unborn child should be slaughtered in his mother's womb rather than be given chance to exist at all if you say his chances of living a good life are low. Personal responsibility is really what your kind fear most. You blame the society for the conception, and ultimately, life of the developing child and you would rather let the unborn child suffer the consequence of his existence, rather than the mother. No. Abortion is a mother's ultimate betrayal of her unborn child. Selfishness. Cowardice. Murder.

Potential life is stopped in its tracks every day, all over the world. There is a drive to create/grow and a drive to destroy/die. A fetus is a sprouted seed, not a tomato plant and definitely not a tomato.
 
and it is a sight to see.

It is difficult even to know what, if anything, there is to say:




One almost has to question and reevaluate one's bearing in reality in the face of this level of departure from normal. So taking a new bearing while wading through such horror is difficult to say the least. Somewhere over the past sixty or so years moral facts accepted and venerated for millennia have been philosophized away to a point where some insist basic, indelible, fundamental human right and wrong do not exist. We've lost something vital to our primordial species birth--it's become a black hole in humanity's collective heart and is only growing.

And the way advocates of infanticide sneer and condemn or dismiss the moment opposition is expressed. They're like skeletal parrots who memorized a few lines of few arguments. I have to ask myself where these people learned that killing unborn children is not just okay (in their minds), but also normal and healthy. Some voices are louder than others and I am certain most of the loudest here are diehard idealists who have never personally come close to the issue. Still, the level of mockery from those who would weep for immigrant children or reference the Holocaust to smear their President and nation--it's funereal really.


they are not unborn children. They are fetuses. You are no pro life, just pro birth, unless you are will for your tax dollars to feed, house and give medical care to infants that the mother can't give.


This is one of many pretentious arguments delivered with an absolutistic sense of self-righteousness and repeated on queue as if by silent command. Firstly, you are not God. Being not-God you cannot know or predict the chances of survival for a child born unwanted by his or her parents. If life is a maze, is it not better to have entry into the chaos of confined space rather than never having been given the chance to solve it?

In your platitudinal argument an unborn child should be slaughtered in his mother's womb rather than be given chance to exist at all if you say his chances of living a good life are low. Personal responsibility is really what your kind fear most. You blame the society for the conception, and ultimately, life of the developing child and you would rather let the unborn child suffer the consequence of his existence, rather than the mother. No. Abortion is a mother's ultimate betrayal of her unborn child. Selfishness. Cowardice. Murder.

Potential life is stopped in its tracks every day, all over the world. There is a drive to create/grow and a drive to destroy/die. A fetus is a sprouted seed, not a tomato plant and definitely not a tomato.


So your argument is that because it happens in other places, it's okay?

Or is it that humanity is determined by age and size?
 
and it is a sight to see.

It is difficult even to know what, if anything, there is to say:




One almost has to question and reevaluate one's bearing in reality in the face of this level of departure from normal. So taking a new bearing while wading through such horror is difficult to say the least. Somewhere over the past sixty or so years moral facts accepted and venerated for millennia have been philosophized away to a point where some insist basic, indelible, fundamental human right and wrong do not exist. We've lost something vital to our primordial species birth--it's become a black hole in humanity's collective heart and is only growing.

And the way advocates of infanticide sneer and condemn or dismiss the moment opposition is expressed. They're like skeletal parrots who memorized a few lines of few arguments. I have to ask myself where these people learned that killing unborn children is not just okay (in their minds), but also normal and healthy. Some voices are louder than others and I am certain most of the loudest here are diehard idealists who have never personally come close to the issue. Still, the level of mockery from those who would weep for immigrant children or reference the Holocaust to smear their President and nation--it's funereal really.


they are not unborn children. They are fetuses. You are no pro life, just pro birth, unless you are will for your tax dollars to feed, house and give medical care to infants that the mother can't give.


This is one of many pretentious arguments delivered with an absolutistic sense of self-righteousness and repeated on queue as if by silent command. Firstly, you are not God. Being not-God you cannot know or predict the chances of survival for a child born unwanted by his or her parents. If life is a maze, is it not better to have entry into the chaos of confined space rather than never having been given the chance to solve it?

In your platitudinal argument an unborn child should be slaughtered in his mother's womb rather than be given chance to exist at all if you say his chances of living a good life are low. Personal responsibility is really what your kind fear most. You blame the society for the conception, and ultimately, life of the developing child and you would rather let the unborn child suffer the consequence of his existence, rather than the mother. No. Abortion is a mother's ultimate betrayal of her unborn child. Selfishness. Cowardice. Murder.

Potential life is stopped in its tracks every day, all over the world. There is a drive to create/grow and a drive to destroy/die. A fetus is a sprouted seed, not a tomato plant and definitely not a tomato.


So your argument is that because it happens in other places, it's okay?

Or is it that humanity is determined by age and size?


Apparently, it is.

For instance, according to many pro-lifers, a fetus is worthy of the highest protection. An actual born child, not so much.
 
Republicans should use that video as a commercial in the up coming election. Say is this the type of people you want in power?
 
"
Parents should be allowed to have their newborn babies killed because they are “morally irrelevant” and ending their lives is no different to abortion, a group of medical ethicists linked to Oxford University has argued."

"Rather than being “actual persons”, newborns were “potential persons”. They explained: “Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’ in the sense of ‘subject of a moral right to life’."

Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say

They are in fact intellectualizing away all human emotion and morality. They believe they can--in a perfect or elite enough pure intellectual state--absorb and remove from humankind thousands of years of foundational right and wrong, along with original human maternal instinct and species imperative, which demands an expectant mother to defend her unborn, developing child.

Like every other issue, abortion has been weaponized by the radical left for use against the thing they fear most: religion and personal responsibility. What's ingenious about their approach is using the Supreme Court to legalize something most human beings find reprehensible and unforgiveable. That way they can con otherwise resistant, decent people into joining their cause by questioning whether or not they are law abiding citizens. What a great moral conundrum to trapped between.
 
Republicans should use that video as a commercial in the up coming election. Say is this the type of people you want in power?

Who in that video was elected to anything?

I don’t want any of those specific people in power, but then again, they aren’t running for or currently in office.
 
Republicans should use that video as a commercial in the up coming election. Say is this the type of people you want in power?
The minions of the left, as you see in this thread, refuse to look at anything that doesn't push their false narratives. If one of their leaders says that abortion is cool, they just won't watch anything that shatters that illusion.

That's what makes them useful idiots.
 
Republicans should use that video as a commercial in the up coming election. Say is this the type of people you want in power?

Who in that video was elected to anything?

I don’t want any of those specific people in power, but then again, they aren’t running for or currently in office.
Your side is full of these loonies, and you need to be voted out of power. Millions of you loons ran around in pussy hat, yelling at the sky. Because you lost an election. So my statement stands people like yourself shouldn't have any power in government.
 
Republicans should use that video as a commercial in the up coming election. Say is this the type of people you want in power?
The minions of the left, as you see in this thread, refuse to look at anything that doesn't push their false narratives. If one of their leaders says that abortion is cool, they just won't watch anything that shatters that illusion.

That's what makes them useful idiots.

Who’s a “leader” in this video?
 
Republicans should use that video as a commercial in the up coming election. Say is this the type of people you want in power?

Who in that video was elected to anything?

I don’t want any of those specific people in power, but then again, they aren’t running for or currently in office.
Your side is full of these loonies, and you need to be voted out of power. Millions of you loons ran around in pussy hat, yelling at the sky. Because you lost an election. So my statement stands people like yourself shouldn't have any power in government.

Who are “people like me”?

Do you mean those that disagree with you?
 
Republicans should use that video as a commercial in the up coming election. Say is this the type of people you want in power?
The minions of the left, as you see in this thread, refuse to look at anything that doesn't push their false narratives. If one of their leaders says that abortion is cool, they just won't watch anything that shatters that illusion.

That's what makes them useful idiots.

Who’s a “leader” in this video?

There is no *leader* in the video.

You people are insane. You can't make sense even when you try.
 
Republicans should use that video as a commercial in the up coming election. Say is this the type of people you want in power?

Who in that video was elected to anything?

I don’t want any of those specific people in power, but then again, they aren’t running for or currently in office.
Your side is full of these loonies, and you need to be voted out of power. Millions of you loons ran around in pussy hat, yelling at the sky. Because you lost an election. So my statement stands people like yourself shouldn't have any power in government.

Who are “people like me”?

Do you mean those that disagree with you?

He means crazy, baby killing ghouls.
 
Republicans should use that video as a commercial in the up coming election. Say is this the type of people you want in power?
The minions of the left, as you see in this thread, refuse to look at anything that doesn't push their false narratives. If one of their leaders says that abortion is cool, they just won't watch anything that shatters that illusion.

That's what makes them useful idiots.

Who’s a “leader” in this video?

There is no *leader* in the video.

You people are insane. You can't make sense even when you try.

Then why would this video be useful in elections?

The people in the video have no more political power than any other voter. They are expressing opinions, often in a crass way. They are not Democratic leadership.
 

Forum List

Back
Top