Dershowitz: ‘You Cannot Charge a President With Obstruction for Exercising His Constitutional Power’

[IM2]

This is for all the forum idiots who think Mueller can charge Trump with obstruction of justice:

Dershowitz: 'You Cannot Charge a President With Obstruction of Justice for Exercising His Constitutional Power' - Breitbart​

Monday on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz batted down the merit of obstruction of justice charges aimed at President Donald Trump for what he said was exercising his constitutional power and authority regarding the firing of then-FBI Director James Comey and instructing the Department of Justice what to and not to investigate.

“If Congress were to ever charge him with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional authority under Article 2, we’d have a constitutional crisis,” he explained. “You cannot charge a president with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional power to fire Comey and his constitutional authority to tell the Justice Department who to investigate, who not to investigate. That’s what Thomas Jefferson did. That’s what Lincoln did. That’s what Roosevelt did. We have precedents that clearly establish that.”

​

He can charge Trump with obstruction of justice. Dershowitz is wrong.

. Nope, because the original charge and/or the investigation that sought to find the act of cullusion, and all in order for Trump himself to be found guilty of cullusion with the Russians ummmm wasn't found. No cullusion, then the whole case dies, and nothing else matters because it was all a bogus political hit job on Trump and his team by some super corrupt individuals in which had gathered together in order to try and fix an election, but when that failed "the Russians did it, the Russians did it", and that mean ole nasty Trump must have helped them, yes he must have helped them, I mean he had to have helped them right, it's got to be true, it's just got to be, waaaah waahhhh whaaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaahhh booooo hoooooooo, boooo hoooooooo snucker snucker goes Madonna, and that NASTY Woman Ashley Judd, Joy Behar, Morning Joe coffee hangover , Miley Cyrus, and well all the rest of the crying good time gang... LOL.

It doesn't seem this is the case. If the investigation was for collusion and the investigation had not been closed and was ongoing, then anything that is designed to stop that investigation is obstruction of justice and a crime. So the case does not die. Instead a count of obstruction is now added to the case.

. What case ??? No cullusion, no case.. Period.

Well that doesn't seem to be the reality happening. Seems that we are seeing a case.

 

[beagle9]

In fact a counter investigation should start immediately to determine who orchastrated this lie of cullusion, and a hot pursuit of these people should take place for what this ruse has since cost the tax payers.

 

[beagle9]

This is for all the forum idiots who think Mueller can charge Trump with obstruction of justice:

Dershowitz: 'You Cannot Charge a President With Obstruction of Justice for Exercising His Constitutional Power' - Breitbart​

Monday on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz batted down the merit of obstruction of justice charges aimed at President Donald Trump for what he said was exercising his constitutional power and authority regarding the firing of then-FBI Director James Comey and instructing the Department of Justice what to and not to investigate.

“If Congress were to ever charge him with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional authority under Article 2, we’d have a constitutional crisis,” he explained. “You cannot charge a president with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional power to fire Comey and his constitutional authority to tell the Justice Department who to investigate, who not to investigate. That’s what Thomas Jefferson did. That’s what Lincoln did. That’s what Roosevelt did. We have precedents that clearly establish that.”

​

He can charge Trump with obstruction of justice. Dershowitz is wrong.

. Nope, because the original charge and/or the investigation that sought to find the act of cullusion, and all in order for Trump himself to be found guilty of cullusion with the Russians ummmm wasn't found. No cullusion, then the whole case dies, and nothing else matters because it was all a bogus political hit job on Trump and his team by some super corrupt individuals in which had gathered together in order to try and fix an election, but when that failed "the Russians did it, the Russians did it", and that mean ole nasty Trump must have helped them, yes he must have helped them, I mean he had to have helped them right, it's got to be true, it's just got to be, waaaah waahhhh whaaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaahhh booooo hoooooooo, boooo hoooooooo snucker snucker goes Madonna, and that NASTY Woman Ashley Judd, Joy Behar, Morning Joe coffee hangover , Miley Cyrus, and well all the rest of the crying good time gang... LOL.

It doesn't seem this is the case. If the investigation was for collusion and the investigation had not been closed and was ongoing, then anything that is designed to stop that investigation is obstruction of justice and a crime. So the case does not die. Instead a count of obstruction is now added to the case.

. What case ??? No cullusion, no case.. Period.

Well that doesn't seem to be the reality happening. Seems that we are seeing a case.

. A case built from what ? A lie ? A false accusation, a scheme to over throw an election for Hillary like was done against Bernie Sanders ??

 

[Lewdog]

This is for all the forum idiots who think Mueller can charge Trump with obstruction of justice:

Dershowitz: 'You Cannot Charge a President With Obstruction of Justice for Exercising His Constitutional Power' - Breitbart​

Monday on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz batted down the merit of obstruction of justice charges aimed at President Donald Trump for what he said was exercising his constitutional power and authority regarding the firing of then-FBI Director James Comey and instructing the Department of Justice what to and not to investigate.

“If Congress were to ever charge him with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional authority under Article 2, we’d have a constitutional crisis,” he explained. “You cannot charge a president with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional power to fire Comey and his constitutional authority to tell the Justice Department who to investigate, who not to investigate. That’s what Thomas Jefferson did. That’s what Lincoln did. That’s what Roosevelt did. We have precedents that clearly establish that.”

​

He helped defend a guilty man named Orenthal James Simpson. You ever heard of him?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Clinton was impeached for obstructing justice, so now why all of a sudden can't Trump be charged with it?

Clinton was charge with trying to coach witnesses not with exercising his given power to fire an appointee to his government.

Trump fired Comey because Comey would not slack off his investigation. That's obstruction of justice.

No it isn't Trump can fire an appointee for ANY reason. ANY reason means just that and no Nixon was not charged with obstruction for firing anyone so don't try that lie.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Dershowitz: ‘You Cannot Charge a President With Obstruction for Exercising His Constitutional Power’

Please quote from the Constitution where it authorizes a president to obstruct justice and break the law.

BE SPECIFIC and quote law or Constitution that declares the President can not fire an appointee for ANY reason?

 

[IM2]

Clinton was impeached for obstructing justice, so now why all of a sudden can't Trump be charged with it?

Clinton was charge with trying to coach witnesses not with exercising his given power to fire an appointee to his government.

Trump fired Comey because Comey would not slack off his investigation. That's obstruction of justice.

No it isn't Trump can fire an appointee for ANY reason. ANY reason means just that and no Nixon was not charged with obstruction for firing anyone so don't try that lie.

But Nixon was. And Trump cannot impede an investigation.

Look fool, you can do all the bellowing you want, but this investigation s is continuing and apparently Mueller has evidence that shows him he can continue. You don't have that information therefore you really have nothing to say.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Clinton was impeached for obstructing justice, so now why all of a sudden can't Trump be charged with it?

Clinton was charge with trying to coach witnesses not with exercising his given power to fire an appointee to his government.

Trump fired Comey because Comey would not slack off his investigation. That's obstruction of justice.

The thing is, Trump could have fired him early on, but his own actions, TWEETS, and big mouth has put him in this position of not finish his term! What incompetent who had such an easy transition with no drama from a failing economy, high unemployment, or budget crisis! This TOOL couldn't even staff the gov't properly because he's so busy watching TV, posting online, and undermining all the institutions that are only trying to keep him in check! Disparaging the MSM, the FBI, Intel, and even the NFL proves he has too much time on his hands! A normal president would be so busy, he would worry about what's being said of him! That's all TRUMP is; always about him and it has to be a flattering portrait for him to be satisfied! If this guy can't be truth when things are going well, how can you possibly believe anything he has to say when Mueller's closing in on his and his entire corrupt admin.?

And what was he going to fire Comey for? But I agree with all of what you have said. People here can hide behind the excuse of him using his constitutional right to fire someone but his constitutional right to fire doesn't preclude the reality that if he's firing someone investigating a crime because he wants the investigation to stop its obstruction of justice.

NO it isn't. Clinton fired an attorney that was investigating democrats. NO president has ever been accused of obstruction for firing an appointee. And no charge such as that will ever fly.

 

[IM2]

Dershowitz: ‘You Cannot Charge a President With Obstruction for Exercising His Constitutional Power’

Please quote from the Constitution where it authorizes a president to obstruct justice and break the law.

BE SPECIFIC and quote law or Constitution that declares the President can not fire an appointee for ANY reason?

You can stop trying to use the constitution as an excuse at any time.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Clinton was impeached for obstructing justice, so now why all of a sudden can't Trump be charged with it?

Clinton was charge with trying to coach witnesses not with exercising his given power to fire an appointee to his government.

Trump fired Comey because Comey would not slack off his investigation. That's obstruction of justice.

No it isn't Trump can fire an appointee for ANY reason. ANY reason means just that and no Nixon was not charged with obstruction for firing anyone so don't try that lie.

But Nixon was. And Trump cannot impede an investigation.

Look fool, you can do all the bellowing you want, but this investigation s is continuing and apparently Mueller has evidence that shows him he can continue. You don't have that information therefore you really have nothing to say.

Sorry retard but Nixon was not accused of Obstruction for firing anyone.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The president can be charged with obstruction of Justice.

Not for firing an appointee.

 

[IM2]

Clinton was impeached for obstructing justice, so now why all of a sudden can't Trump be charged with it?

Clinton was charge with trying to coach witnesses not with exercising his given power to fire an appointee to his government.

Trump fired Comey because Comey would not slack off his investigation. That's obstruction of justice.

The thing is, Trump could have fired him early on, but his own actions, TWEETS, and big mouth has put him in this position of not finish his term! What incompetent who had such an easy transition with no drama from a failing economy, high unemployment, or budget crisis! This TOOL couldn't even staff the gov't properly because he's so busy watching TV, posting online, and undermining all the institutions that are only trying to keep him in check! Disparaging the MSM, the FBI, Intel, and even the NFL proves he has too much time on his hands! A normal president would be so busy, he would worry about what's being said of him! That's all TRUMP is; always about him and it has to be a flattering portrait for him to be satisfied! If this guy can't be truth when things are going well, how can you possibly believe anything he has to say when Mueller's closing in on his and his entire corrupt admin.?

And what was he going to fire Comey for? But I agree with all of what you have said. People here can hide behind the excuse of him using his constitutional right to fire someone but his constitutional right to fire doesn't preclude the reality that if he's firing someone investigating a crime because he wants the investigation to stop its obstruction of justice.

NO it isn't. Clinton fired an attorney that was investigating democrats. NO president has ever been accused of obstruction for firing an appointee. And no charge such as that will ever fly.

Well actually it is obstruction of justice. Trump would not have thought about firing Comey if Comey was not investigating him. We all know that, including you. Now just stop lying to yourself and face the fact that Trump is facing obstruction of justice charges and deal with it.

 

[beagle9]

Clinton was charge with trying to coach witnesses not with exercising his given power to fire an appointee to his government.

Trump fired Comey because Comey would not slack off his investigation. That's obstruction of justice.

The thing is, Trump could have fired him early on, but his own actions, TWEETS, and big mouth has put him in this position of not finish his term! What incompetent who had such an easy transition with no drama from a failing economy, high unemployment, or budget crisis! This TOOL couldn't even staff the gov't properly because he's so busy watching TV, posting online, and undermining all the institutions that are only trying to keep him in check! Disparaging the MSM, the FBI, Intel, and even the NFL proves he has too much time on his hands! A normal president would be so busy, he would worry about what's being said of him! That's all TRUMP is; always about him and it has to be a flattering portrait for him to be satisfied! If this guy can't be truth when things are going well, how can you possibly believe anything he has to say when Mueller's closing in on his and his entire corrupt admin.?

And what was he going to fire Comey for? But I agree with all of what you have said. People here can hide behind the excuse of him using his constitutional right to fire someone but his constitutional right to fire doesn't preclude the reality that if he's firing someone investigating a crime because he wants the investigation to stop its obstruction of justice.

NO it isn't. Clinton fired an attorney that was investigating democrats. NO president has ever been accused of obstruction for firing an appointee. And no charge such as that will ever fly.

Well actually it is obstruction of justice. Trump would not have thought about firing Comey if Comey was not investigating him. We all know that, including you. Now just stop lying to yourself and face the fact that Trump is facing obstruction of justice charges and deal with it.

. Good grief, so Comey lied again when he said Trump wasn't under investigation ? Are you well ?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

This is for all the forum idiots who think Mueller can charge Trump with obstruction of justice:

Dershowitz: 'You Cannot Charge a President With Obstruction of Justice for Exercising His Constitutional Power' - Breitbart​

Monday on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz batted down the merit of obstruction of justice charges aimed at President Donald Trump for what he said was exercising his constitutional power and authority regarding the firing of then-FBI Director James Comey and instructing the Department of Justice what to and not to investigate.

“If Congress were to ever charge him with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional authority under Article 2, we’d have a constitutional crisis,” he explained. “You cannot charge a president with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional power to fire Comey and his constitutional authority to tell the Justice Department who to investigate, who not to investigate. That’s what Thomas Jefferson did. That’s what Lincoln did. That’s what Roosevelt did. We have precedents that clearly establish that.”

​

He helped defend a guilty man named Orenthal James Simpson. You ever heard of him?

A jury found OJ not guilty after all the supposed facts were presented. But beside that even a guilty person is entitled to a lawyer and an effective defense. Unless of course YOU don't believe in the US Justice system and law and of course that pesky Constitution?

 

[IM2]

Clinton was impeached for obstructing justice, so now why all of a sudden can't Trump be charged with it?

Clinton was charge with trying to coach witnesses not with exercising his given power to fire an appointee to his government.

Trump fired Comey because Comey would not slack off his investigation. That's obstruction of justice.

No it isn't Trump can fire an appointee for ANY reason. ANY reason means just that and no Nixon was not charged with obstruction for firing anyone so don't try that lie.

But Nixon was. And Trump cannot impede an investigation.

Look fool, you can do all the bellowing you want, but this investigation s is continuing and apparently Mueller has evidence that shows him he can continue. You don't have that information therefore you really have nothing to say.

Sorry retard but Nixon was not accused of Obstruction for firing anyone.

And so you are stupid enough to actually believe that Trump is being looked at for obstruction just for simply firing an appointee.

Now that's retarded.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Clinton was charge with trying to coach witnesses not with exercising his given power to fire an appointee to his government.

Trump fired Comey because Comey would not slack off his investigation. That's obstruction of justice.

No it isn't Trump can fire an appointee for ANY reason. ANY reason means just that and no Nixon was not charged with obstruction for firing anyone so don't try that lie.

But Nixon was. And Trump cannot impede an investigation.

Look fool, you can do all the bellowing you want, but this investigation s is continuing and apparently Mueller has evidence that shows him he can continue. You don't have that information therefore you really have nothing to say.

Sorry retard but Nixon was not accused of Obstruction for firing anyone.

And so you are stupid enough to actually believe that Trump is being looked at for obstruction just for simply firing an appointee.

Now that's retarded.

doesn't change the fact that Trump can't be charged for firing Comey.

 

[IM2]

Trump fired Comey because Comey would not slack off his investigation. That's obstruction of justice.

The thing is, Trump could have fired him early on, but his own actions, TWEETS, and big mouth has put him in this position of not finish his term! What incompetent who had such an easy transition with no drama from a failing economy, high unemployment, or budget crisis! This TOOL couldn't even staff the gov't properly because he's so busy watching TV, posting online, and undermining all the institutions that are only trying to keep him in check! Disparaging the MSM, the FBI, Intel, and even the NFL proves he has too much time on his hands! A normal president would be so busy, he would worry about what's being said of him! That's all TRUMP is; always about him and it has to be a flattering portrait for him to be satisfied! If this guy can't be truth when things are going well, how can you possibly believe anything he has to say when Mueller's closing in on his and his entire corrupt admin.?

And what was he going to fire Comey for? But I agree with all of what you have said. People here can hide behind the excuse of him using his constitutional right to fire someone but his constitutional right to fire doesn't preclude the reality that if he's firing someone investigating a crime because he wants the investigation to stop its obstruction of justice.

NO it isn't. Clinton fired an attorney that was investigating democrats. NO president has ever been accused of obstruction for firing an appointee. And no charge such as that will ever fly.

Well actually it is obstruction of justice. Trump would not have thought about firing Comey if Comey was not investigating him. We all know that, including you. Now just stop lying to yourself and face the fact that Trump is facing obstruction of justice charges and deal with it.

. Good grief, so Comey lied again when he said Trump wasn't under investigation ? Are you well ?

You fools will try anything.

 

[Lewdog]

This is for all the forum idiots who think Mueller can charge Trump with obstruction of justice:

Dershowitz: 'You Cannot Charge a President With Obstruction of Justice for Exercising His Constitutional Power' - Breitbart​

Monday on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz batted down the merit of obstruction of justice charges aimed at President Donald Trump for what he said was exercising his constitutional power and authority regarding the firing of then-FBI Director James Comey and instructing the Department of Justice what to and not to investigate.

“If Congress were to ever charge him with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional authority under Article 2, we’d have a constitutional crisis,” he explained. “You cannot charge a president with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional power to fire Comey and his constitutional authority to tell the Justice Department who to investigate, who not to investigate. That’s what Thomas Jefferson did. That’s what Lincoln did. That’s what Roosevelt did. We have precedents that clearly establish that.”

​

He helped defend a guilty man named Orenthal James Simpson. You ever heard of him?

A jury found OJ not guilty after all the supposed facts were presented. But beside that even a guilty person is entitled to a lawyer and an effective defense. Unless of course YOU don't believe in the US Justice system and law and of course that pesky Constitution?

Sorry... using the same argument of those who said Doug Jones was guilty of having contacts with the KKK because of a guy he defended once. You dig?

 

[IM2]

Trump fired Comey because Comey would not slack off his investigation. That's obstruction of justice.

No it isn't Trump can fire an appointee for ANY reason. ANY reason means just that and no Nixon was not charged with obstruction for firing anyone so don't try that lie.

But Nixon was. And Trump cannot impede an investigation.

Look fool, you can do all the bellowing you want, but this investigation s is continuing and apparently Mueller has evidence that shows him he can continue. You don't have that information therefore you really have nothing to say.

Sorry retard but Nixon was not accused of Obstruction for firing anyone.

And so you are stupid enough to actually believe that Trump is being looked at for obstruction just for simply firing an appointee.

Now that's retarded.

doesn't change the fact that Trump can't be charged for firing Comey.

He can be charged for the reason he fired Comey.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

No it isn't Trump can fire an appointee for ANY reason. ANY reason means just that and no Nixon was not charged with obstruction for firing anyone so don't try that lie.

But Nixon was. And Trump cannot impede an investigation.

Look fool, you can do all the bellowing you want, but this investigation s is continuing and apparently Mueller has evidence that shows him he can continue. You don't have that information therefore you really have nothing to say.

Sorry retard but Nixon was not accused of Obstruction for firing anyone.

And so you are stupid enough to actually believe that Trump is being looked at for obstruction just for simply firing an appointee.

Now that's retarded.

doesn't change the fact that Trump can't be charged for firing Comey.

He can be charged for the reason he fired Comey.

No he can not it is an EXPRESSED power of the President to fire ANY appointee for ANY reason.