berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 16,578
- 13,897
Nothing about that post is remotely true.Your problem is that you deny the obvious:
1) Zuckerberg admitted that the FBI wanted him to suppress the negative news story on Biden, which he did. Fully 80 million Facebook users were thus deprived of an opportunity to learn the truth of Hunter’s bribes from the Communist Party, and 10% to the Big Guy.
2) Polls have shown that between 10% and 15% of uninformed voters who went for Biden would NOT have done so if they had learned about the story that the liberal media suppressed.
The Facebook cofounder said the FBI is a "legitimate institution" and that the warning prompted him to "take that seriously." The story was allowed to remain on Facebook, albeit with limited exposure, Zuckerberg said.
In a statement Friday night, the FBI said it has provided companies with “foreign threat indicators” to help protect their platforms and customers, but that it “cannot ask, or direct, companies to take action on information received.”
“The FBI routinely notifies U.S. private sector entities, including social media providers, of potential threat information, so that they can decide how to better defend against threats,” the agency said.
FBI responds to Mark Zuckerberg claims in Joe Rogan show
Zuckerberg told Rogan that Facebook limited the exposure of a story ahead of the 2020 election after the FBI warned him to beware of polarizing content.The question you need to be asking yourself is how you came to your conclusions since they don't come close to reflecting the facts.