Did Obama Wiretap Trump? Voters React

[jc456]

So, the FBI, the NSA, the CIA and all other intelligence gathering organizations have become politicized. The media has become politicized. The nation at large has become polarized by these new political distinctions. And the level of polarization is beyond comprehension.

Polarization to the point where America and our national ideals have become polarized. Our institutions have become polarized.

On one side stand the Democrats, Liberals, if you will who see Trump as a charlatan, a huckster and a buffoon. A rank amateur trying to 'shake things up' with disastrous effect. His thin skin coupled with his short temper has caused him to say, or Tweet, things no previous president dared do. Some see that behavior as irresponsibility while...

On the other side are the True Believers in Trump. They see a savior, a maverick who is following up on his campaign promises. Someone who cut his political teeth on the Birther issue re-enforcing every suspicion, every fear, every doubt they ever had about Washington and political power. They do not flinch in the face of the havoc Trump has raised, the furthering of polarization, the rash and unpredictable behavior and statements. They see all that as fresh air, a new beginning and they may all agree that kicking down doors will cause some damage. It's all worth it.

But, can we as a nation survive if we adopt this new reality as a new normal? Can we keep moving if weighed down by suspicions and fears and doubt? There are two possible courses of action before us. Either we let Trump be Trump and further erode our national confidence, or we rebuke him in the strongest possible terms telling him that if he wants to govern effectively, he must start acting responsibly.

Every expert, everyone who should know has said that there was no wiretapping of Trump. Not by us, not by the Brits. To claim it is so without providing proof is irresponsible at best, utterly reckless at least and a clear danger to our national security at worst,.

ohhh look at you all butt hurt, need some butt hurt salve?

We'll take it then that you are siding with recklessness, havoc and irresponsibility.

that's ok, you have the market on recklessness, havoc and irresponsibility. you can't project on our goodness.

 

[BULLDOG]

No, Putin despising Clinton is not a reason to investigate the Trump campaign. The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason. Obviously there was something there, because the investigation is still ongoing. If the investigation was a purely political action to harm the opposing candidate (Trump), I would agree with you 100%, but there is no reason to believe that is what happened.

The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason.

how do you or anyone know this without surveillance? D'OH!!!!!

Several of trump's people as well trump himself announced it. Several times.

Assuage broke in the RNC but did not publicize his findings.

Several of trump's people, as well as trump himself lied about their visits and connections. Hell, even his daughter lied about it.

For starters.

well let's see your evidence son!!!! or is it you can't handle the truth and therefore lie? ohhhhhhhh I see, you are a liar.

You just respond to the

Comey told you yesterday, and all you and the rest of the Alt Right can do is "no, uh uh, man."

he said nothing so, not sure exactly what you think happened, but you keep hanging in the bus with your cats there felix.

All I know, is he confirmed Trump's tweet. he didn't even know it.

Yep, just like all RWNJs. You hear what you want to hear, no matter what is actually said.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason.

how do you or anyone know this without surveillance? D'OH!!!!!

Several of trump's people as well trump himself announced it. Several times.

Assuage broke in the RNC but did not publicize his findings.

Several of trump's people, as well as trump himself lied about their visits and connections. Hell, even his daughter lied about it.

For starters.

well let's see your evidence son!!!! or is it you can't handle the truth and therefore lie? ohhhhhhhh I see, you are a liar.

You just respond to the

Comey told you yesterday, and all you and the rest of the Alt Right can do is "no, uh uh, man."

he said nothing so, not sure exactly what you think happened, but you keep hanging in the bus with your cats there felix.

All I know, is he confirmed Trump's tweet. he didn't even know it.

Yep, just like all RWNJs. You hear what you want to hear, no matter what is actually said.

jc and the rest hear what they want to hear.

Doesn't matter now. Trump is getting battered with his own untruths.

 

[Geaux4it]

Several of trump's people as well trump himself announced it. Several times.

Assuage broke in the RNC but did not publicize his findings.

Several of trump's people, as well as trump himself lied about their visits and connections. Hell, even his daughter lied about it.

For starters.

well let's see your evidence son!!!! or is it you can't handle the truth and therefore lie? ohhhhhhhh I see, you are a liar.

You just respond to the

Comey told you yesterday, and all you and the rest of the Alt Right can do is "no, uh uh, man."

he said nothing so, not sure exactly what you think happened, but you keep hanging in the bus with your cats there felix.

All I know, is he confirmed Trump's tweet. he didn't even know it.

Yep, just like all RWNJs. You hear what you want to hear, no matter what is actually said.

jc and the rest hear what they want to hear.

Doesn't matter now. Trump is getting battered with his own untruths.

Changes nothing... You're still a very fortunate American to have Mr Trump as your POTUS

Rejoice

-Geaux

 

[JakeStarkey]

well let's see your evidence son!!!! or is it you can't handle the truth and therefore lie? ohhhhhhhh I see, you are a liar.

You just respond to the

Comey told you yesterday, and all you and the rest of the Alt Right can do is "no, uh uh, man."

he said nothing so, not sure exactly what you think happened, but you keep hanging in the bus with your cats there felix.

All I know, is he confirmed Trump's tweet. he didn't even know it.

Yep, just like all RWNJs. You hear what you want to hear, no matter what is actually said.

jc and the rest hear what they want to hear.

Doesn't matter now. Trump is getting battered with his own untruths.

Changes nothing... You're still a very fortunate American to have Mr Trump as your POTUS Rejoice -Geaux

^^^

 

[playtime]

Your claim holds no water. Comey vs Clinton investigation.

The 50-50 nation marches on. Republicans and Trump supporters in general strongly suspect that the Obama administration was wiretapping the Trump campaign last year; Democrats and Trump opponents strongly disagree. While the director of the FBI has reportedly disputed President Trump’s wiretapping claim, a lot of voters are wondering about the FBI’s impartiality.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 44% of all Likely U.S. Voters consider it likely the Obama administration tapped telephones in Trump Tower during last year’s presidential campaign, with 26% who say it’s Very Likely. Fifty-three percent (53%) view that claim as unlikely, including 40% who say it’s Not At All Likely. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Did Obama Wiretap Trump? Voters React - Rasmussen Reports™

It is interesting that Comey's denial of the wiretap followed by his refusal to answer questions about it has damaged his own credibility.

he refused because it is an on going investigation. the questioning yesterday was for the good citizen's of this country - who still have the right to know as Americans under the FOI act. to divulge sensitive evidence of what may or may not have happened as far as treason etc... would be incredibly stupid & irresponsible.

nothing he said to the general public was classified.

 

[playtime]

Comey's cred is not damaged in the slightest. PredFan and dschrute are exactly why we need someone like Comey at the feeb. He will not put up with their conspiracy nonsense, will not let it interfere in the slightest as Comey roots out the deep state of the Alt Right infiltrators.

so can you explain why comey is investigating trump?

paul manafort
michael flynn
roger stone
rex tillerson
carter page
felix sater

to start.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Comey's cred is not damaged in the slightest. PredFan and dschrute are exactly why we need someone like Comey at the feeb. He will not put up with their conspiracy nonsense, will not let it interfere in the slightest as Comey roots out the deep state of the Alt Right infiltrators.

so can you explain why comey is investigating trump?

paul manafort
michael flynn
roger stone
rex tillerson
carter page
felix sater

to start.

to start

 

[my2¢]

Obama could stand in the middle of the street and shoot Donald Trump and to most it wouldn't matter.

 

[BULLDOG]

Obama could stand in the middle of the street and shoot Donald Trump and to most it wouldn't matter.

Don't be ridiculous. That would matter a lot. There would at least be a ticker tape parade and ceremony to thank him and honor his service to America.

 

[Nosmo King]

So, the FBI, the NSA, the CIA and all other intelligence gathering organizations have become politicized. The media has become politicized. The nation at large has become polarized by these new political distinctions. And the level of polarization is beyond comprehension.

Polarization to the point where America and our national ideals have become polarized. Our institutions have become polarized.

On one side stand the Democrats, Liberals, if you will who see Trump as a charlatan, a huckster and a buffoon. A rank amateur trying to 'shake things up' with disastrous effect. His thin skin coupled with his short temper has caused him to say, or Tweet, things no previous president dared do. Some see that behavior as irresponsibility while...

On the other side are the True Believers in Trump. They see a savior, a maverick who is following up on his campaign promises. Someone who cut his political teeth on the Birther issue re-enforcing every suspicion, every fear, every doubt they ever had about Washington and political power. They do not flinch in the face of the havoc Trump has raised, the furthering of polarization, the rash and unpredictable behavior and statements. They see all that as fresh air, a new beginning and they may all agree that kicking down doors will cause some damage. It's all worth it.

But, can we as a nation survive if we adopt this new reality as a new normal? Can we keep moving if weighed down by suspicions and fears and doubt? There are two possible courses of action before us. Either we let Trump be Trump and further erode our national confidence, or we rebuke him in the strongest possible terms telling him that if he wants to govern effectively, he must start acting responsibly.

Every expert, everyone who should know has said that there was no wiretapping of Trump. Not by us, not by the Brits. To claim it is so without providing proof is irresponsible at best, utterly reckless at least and a clear danger to our national security at worst,.

ohhh look at you all butt hurt, need some butt hurt salve?

We'll take it then that you are siding with recklessness, havoc and irresponsibility.

that's ok, you have the market on recklessness, havoc and irresponsibility. you can't project on our goodness.

"Our goodness"? You cannot concede that Trump has figuratively set fire to the Presidency?

Are you more concerned with winning, like a sports fan? Or do you have enough sense and maturity to recognize the damage left in the wake of every petulant tweet?

 

[toomuchtime_]

The 50-50 nation marches on. Republicans and Trump supporters in general strongly suspect that the Obama administration was wiretapping the Trump campaign last year; Democrats and Trump opponents strongly disagree. While the director of the FBI has reportedly disputed President Trump’s wiretapping claim, a lot of voters are wondering about the FBI’s impartiality.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 44% of all Likely U.S. Voters consider it likely the Obama administration tapped telephones in Trump Tower during last year’s presidential campaign, with 26% who say it’s Very Likely. Fifty-three percent (53%) view that claim as unlikely, including 40% who say it’s Not At All Likely. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Did Obama Wiretap Trump? Voters React - Rasmussen Reports™

It is interesting that Comey's denial of the wiretap followed by his refusal to answer questions about it has damaged his own credibility.

he refused because it is an on going investigation. the questioning yesterday was for the good citizen's of this country - who still have the right to know as Americans under the FOI act. to divulge sensitive evidence of what may or may not have happened as far as treason etc... would be incredibly stupid & irresponsible.

He began his testimony by commenting on an ongoing investigation, that he is investigating Russia's action during the election and possible connections between the Trump campaign and the Russians, but when he didn't want to answer questions after that, he claimed he couldn't comment on an ongoing investigation.

 

[toomuchtime_]

The 50-50 nation marches on. Republicans and Trump supporters in general strongly suspect that the Obama administration was wiretapping the Trump campaign last year; Democrats and Trump opponents strongly disagree. While the director of the FBI has reportedly disputed President Trump’s wiretapping claim, a lot of voters are wondering about the FBI’s impartiality.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 44% of all Likely U.S. Voters consider it likely the Obama administration tapped telephones in Trump Tower during last year’s presidential campaign, with 26% who say it’s Very Likely. Fifty-three percent (53%) view that claim as unlikely, including 40% who say it’s Not At All Likely. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Did Obama Wiretap Trump? Voters React - Rasmussen Reports™

It is interesting that Comey's denial of the wiretap followed by his refusal to answer questions about it has damaged his own credibility.

Not surprising that the Trump voters instinctively believe Trump rather than the evidence.

lol What evidence?

 

[playtime]

The 50-50 nation marches on. Republicans and Trump supporters in general strongly suspect that the Obama administration was wiretapping the Trump campaign last year; Democrats and Trump opponents strongly disagree. While the director of the FBI has reportedly disputed President Trump’s wiretapping claim, a lot of voters are wondering about the FBI’s impartiality.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 44% of all Likely U.S. Voters consider it likely the Obama administration tapped telephones in Trump Tower during last year’s presidential campaign, with 26% who say it’s Very Likely. Fifty-three percent (53%) view that claim as unlikely, including 40% who say it’s Not At All Likely. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Did Obama Wiretap Trump? Voters React - Rasmussen Reports™

It is interesting that Comey's denial of the wiretap followed by his refusal to answer questions about it has damaged his own credibility.

he refused because it is an on going investigation. the questioning yesterday was for the good citizen's of this country - who still have the right to know as Americans under the FOI act. to divulge sensitive evidence of what may or may not have happened as far as treason etc... would be incredibly stupid & irresponsible.

He began his testimony by commenting on an ongoing investigation, that he is investigating Russia's action during the election and possible connections between the Trump campaign and the Russians, but when he didn't want to answer questions after that, he claimed he couldn't comment on an ongoing investigation.

what specific detailed evidence did he present to confirm or deny actual ties?

 

[toomuchtime_]

The 50-50 nation marches on. Republicans and Trump supporters in general strongly suspect that the Obama administration was wiretapping the Trump campaign last year; Democrats and Trump opponents strongly disagree. While the director of the FBI has reportedly disputed President Trump’s wiretapping claim, a lot of voters are wondering about the FBI’s impartiality.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 44% of all Likely U.S. Voters consider it likely the Obama administration tapped telephones in Trump Tower during last year’s presidential campaign, with 26% who say it’s Very Likely. Fifty-three percent (53%) view that claim as unlikely, including 40% who say it’s Not At All Likely. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Did Obama Wiretap Trump? Voters React - Rasmussen Reports™

It is interesting that Comey's denial of the wiretap followed by his refusal to answer questions about it has damaged his own credibility.

he refused because it is an on going investigation. the questioning yesterday was for the good citizen's of this country - who still have the right to know as Americans under the FOI act. to divulge sensitive evidence of what may or may not have happened as far as treason etc... would be incredibly stupid & irresponsible.

He began his testimony by commenting on an ongoing investigation, that he is investigating Russia's action during the election and possible connections between the Trump campaign and the Russians, but when he didn't want to answer questions after that, he claimed he couldn't comment on an ongoing investigation.

what specific detailed evidence did he present to confirm or deny actual ties?

That's the point. He states there is an investigation, suggesting there was evidence of wrongdoing, but then claims he can't comment further in open session. So he leaves the impression there are ties without saying there are. In closed session he will tell Congress what the evidence is, but it will classified so no one will know. If you watched the questioning, Comey agreed that many of the leaks in the NYT and Washington Post are false, but claimed he couldn't comment on which ones are because it is about classified information. In other words, none of us who do not have high security clearances will ever know what the evidence is unless criminal charges are filed. When you sum it all up, Comey told us nothing, just as he did when questioned about giving immunity from prosecution for Clinton's top aides.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Your claim holds no water. Comey vs Clinton investigation.

The 50-50 nation marches on. Republicans and Trump supporters in general strongly suspect that the Obama administration was wiretapping the Trump campaign last year; Democrats and Trump opponents strongly disagree. While the director of the FBI has reportedly disputed President Trump’s wiretapping claim, a lot of voters are wondering about the FBI’s impartiality.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 44% of all Likely U.S. Voters consider it likely the Obama administration tapped telephones in Trump Tower during last year’s presidential campaign, with 26% who say it’s Very Likely. Fifty-three percent (53%) view that claim as unlikely, including 40% who say it’s Not At All Likely. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Did Obama Wiretap Trump? Voters React - Rasmussen Reports™

It is interesting that Comey's denial of the wiretap followed by his refusal to answer questions about it has damaged his own credibility.

he refused because it is an on going investigation. the questioning yesterday was for the good citizen's of this country - who still have the right to know as Americans under the FOI act. to divulge sensitive evidence of what may or may not have happened as far as treason etc... would be incredibly stupid & irresponsible.

nothing he said to the general public was classified.

He didn't really give us any information.