Did Obama Wiretap Trump? Voters React

[jc456]

Keep in mind, Comey only denied 'Wiretapping' Donald Trump. He openly admitted they've been 'investigating' the Trump Campaign for awhile. And obviously, some sort of surveillance was conducted. However, Trump may have been off on him being 'Wiretapped' directly.

But there seems to be no doubt the Democrats did order some sort of surveillance on his Campaign. And if so, that constitutes an unprecedented egregious attack on our Democratic Process. Ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, goes well beyond being dirty. It's a brazen attack on our Democracy.

Comey said that the entire DOJ had no evidence of anyone tapping Trump.

Comey said the FBI was investigating the Trump campaign and stuff connections with the Russians.

Trump and his people are attacking American Democracy.

That's what i said. He only denied 'Wiretapping' Trump. He freely admitted to 'Investigating' the Trump Campaign for awhile. There had to be some sort of surveillance conducted.

They may not have 'Wiretapped' in the sense most think of it as. But they obviously surveilled in some way. So Trump's 'lines' may not have been tapped, but he likley was surveilled in some way. Very dirty stuff.

In other Donald Trump lied when he claimed that President Obama had him wire tapped.

As Comey has said.

Ordering an 'Investigation' on the opposition's Candidate for President is unprecedented and very dangerous. It's a brazen attack on our Democratic Process.

They may not have 'Wiretapped' Trump, but ordering an 'Investigation' on his Campaign, was as dirty as it gets. And i'm confident in my belief that surveillance was conducted in some fashion. It had to be included in their 'Investigation.'

Except of course that yesterday they both said that President Obama had not authority to order such an investigation.

Why exactly do you think that if the Justice Department suspected members of the Trump campaign of a crime, that those people should have been immune from investigation?

why would the Justice department think members of trumps campaign committed a crime? from where would that come from exactly?

And how can it be Putin and not Obummer?

 

[MisterBeale]

The sweep up of the Alt Right will not end with the removal of Trump.

You must really admire the hell out of Stalin, eh?

Where should we send the entire alt right, to the ANWR?

 

[BULLDOG]

Keep in mind, Comey only denied 'Wiretapping' Donald Trump. He openly admitted they've been 'investigating' the Trump Campaign for awhile. And obviously, some sort of surveillance was conducted. However, Trump may have been off on him being 'Wiretapped' directly.

But there seems to be no doubt the Democrats did order some sort of surveillance on his Campaign. And if so, that constitutes an unprecedented egregious attack on our Democratic Process. Ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, goes well beyond being dirty. It's a brazen attack on our Democracy.

Pretty much depends on the purpose of the investigation. If it was for political purposes, why didn't any of the large amount of direct connections to Russia come out during the election?

It was only political. Putin despising Clinton and not wanting her to win, doesn't justify ordering 'Investigations' of the Trump Campaign. This amounts to Watergate ten-fold. A vicious brazen attack on our Democratic Process. We can't tolerate it. Those who ordered it, should be held accountable.

No, Putin despising Clinton is not a reason to investigate the Trump campaign. The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason. Obviously there was something there, because the investigation is still ongoing. If the investigation was a purely political action to harm the opposing candidate (Trump), I would agree with you 100%, but there is no reason to believe that is what happened.

 

[Dschrute3]

Keep in mind, Comey only denied 'Wiretapping' Donald Trump. He openly admitted they've been 'investigating' the Trump Campaign for awhile. And obviously, some sort of surveillance was conducted. However, Trump may have been off on him being 'Wiretapped' directly.

But there seems to be no doubt the Democrats did order some sort of surveillance on his Campaign. And if so, that constitutes an unprecedented egregious attack on our Democratic Process. Ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, goes well beyond being dirty. It's a brazen attack on our Democracy.

Comey said that the entire DOJ had no evidence of anyone tapping Trump.

Comey said the FBI was investigating the Trump campaign and stuff connections with the Russians.

Trump and his people are attacking American Democracy.

That's what i said. He only denied 'Wiretapping' Trump. He freely admitted to 'Investigating' the Trump Campaign for awhile. There had to be some sort of surveillance conducted.

They may not have 'Wiretapped' in the sense most think of it as. But they obviously surveilled in some way. So Trump's 'lines' may not have been tapped, but he likley was surveilled in some way. Very dirty stuff.

In other Donald Trump lied when he claimed that President Obama had him wire tapped.

As Comey has said.

Ordering an 'Investigation' on the opposition's Candidate for President is unprecedented and very dangerous. It's a brazen attack on our Democratic Process.

They may not have 'Wiretapped' Trump, but ordering an 'Investigation' on his Campaign, was as dirty as it gets. And i'm confident in my belief that surveillance was conducted in some fashion. It had to be included in their 'Investigation.'

Except of course that yesterday they both said that President Obama had not authority to order such an investigation.

Why exactly do you think that if the Justice Department suspected members of the Trump campaign of a crime, that those people should have been immune from investigation?

I seriously doubt they'll ever find the paper-trail showing Obama explicitly ordering an 'Investigation.' But he had to be involved. This whole thing reeks of Watergate. Ordering investigations and surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President?

It's something you wouldn't think could happen here. You think of that dirty stuff only happening in Dictatorship Police States. But it has happened here. Now we need to decide how to deal with it.

 

[jc456]

Keep in mind, Comey only denied 'Wiretapping' Donald Trump. He openly admitted they've been 'investigating' the Trump Campaign for awhile. And obviously, some sort of surveillance was conducted. However, Trump may have been off on him being 'Wiretapped' directly.

But there seems to be no doubt the Democrats did order some sort of surveillance on his Campaign. And if so, that constitutes an unprecedented egregious attack on our Democratic Process. Ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, goes well beyond being dirty. It's a brazen attack on our Democracy.

Pretty much depends on the purpose of the investigation. If it was for political purposes, why didn't any of the large amount of direct connections to Russia come out during the election?

It was only political. Putin despising Clinton and not wanting her to win, doesn't justify ordering 'Investigations' of the Trump Campaign. This amounts to Watergate ten-fold. A vicious brazen attack on our Democratic Process. We can't tolerate it. Those who ordered it, should be held accountable.

No, Putin despising Clinton is not a reason to investigate the Trump campaign. The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason. Obviously there was something there, because the investigation is still ongoing. If the investigation was a purely political action to harm the opposing candidate (Trump), I would agree with you 100%, but there is no reason to believe that is what happened.

The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason.

how do you or anyone know this without surveillance? D'OH!!!!!

 

[Uncensored2008]

Comey's cred is not damaged in the slightest. PredFan and dschrute are exactly why we need someone like Comey at the feeb. He will not put up with their conspiracy nonsense, will not let it interfere in the slightest as Comey roots out the deep state of the Alt Right infiltrators.

so can you explain why comey is investigating trump?

If you haven't figured that out by now, you're too stupid to know.

well I'm sorry, it's never been posted. please do.

Posted lots of times. No need repeating the same stuff when you refuse to accept credible proof.
View attachment 117766

You have no credible proof. You have no proof at all. You have no viable evidence.

You have partisan hatred, nothing more.

 

[BULLDOG]

Keep in mind, Comey only denied 'Wiretapping' Donald Trump. He openly admitted they've been 'investigating' the Trump Campaign for awhile. And obviously, some sort of surveillance was conducted. However, Trump may have been off on him being 'Wiretapped' directly.

But there seems to be no doubt the Democrats did order some sort of surveillance on his Campaign. And if so, that constitutes an unprecedented egregious attack on our Democratic Process. Ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, goes well beyond being dirty. It's a brazen attack on our Democracy.

Pretty much depends on the purpose of the investigation. If it was for political purposes, why didn't any of the large amount of direct connections to Russia come out during the election?

It was only political. Putin despising Clinton and not wanting her to win, doesn't justify ordering 'Investigations' of the Trump Campaign. This amounts to Watergate ten-fold. A vicious brazen attack on our Democratic Process. We can't tolerate it. Those who ordered it, should be held accountable.

No, Putin despising Clinton is not a reason to investigate the Trump campaign. The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason. Obviously there was something there, because the investigation is still ongoing. If the investigation was a purely political action to harm the opposing candidate (Trump), I would agree with you 100%, but there is no reason to believe that is what happened.

The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason.

how do you or anyone know this without surveillance? D'OH!!!!!

All communication with Russian agents is monitored. You think they just listen to one side of the conversation, and ignore the rest?

 

[jc456]

Keep in mind, Comey only denied 'Wiretapping' Donald Trump. He openly admitted they've been 'investigating' the Trump Campaign for awhile. And obviously, some sort of surveillance was conducted. However, Trump may have been off on him being 'Wiretapped' directly.

But there seems to be no doubt the Democrats did order some sort of surveillance on his Campaign. And if so, that constitutes an unprecedented egregious attack on our Democratic Process. Ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, goes well beyond being dirty. It's a brazen attack on our Democracy.

Pretty much depends on the purpose of the investigation. If it was for political purposes, why didn't any of the large amount of direct connections to Russia come out during the election?

It was only political. Putin despising Clinton and not wanting her to win, doesn't justify ordering 'Investigations' of the Trump Campaign. This amounts to Watergate ten-fold. A vicious brazen attack on our Democratic Process. We can't tolerate it. Those who ordered it, should be held accountable.

No, Putin despising Clinton is not a reason to investigate the Trump campaign. The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason. Obviously there was something there, because the investigation is still ongoing. If the investigation was a purely political action to harm the opposing candidate (Trump), I would agree with you 100%, but there is no reason to believe that is what happened.

The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason.

how do you or anyone know this without surveillance? D'OH!!!!!

All communication with Russian agents is monitored. You think they just listen to one side of the conversation, and ignore the rest?

yep!!!!!! if they are listening to the other side they violate law. And that means they did surveillance. look up the definition of the word.

 

[BULLDOG]

Comey's cred is not damaged in the slightest. PredFan and dschrute are exactly why we need someone like Comey at the feeb. He will not put up with their conspiracy nonsense, will not let it interfere in the slightest as Comey roots out the deep state of the Alt Right infiltrators.

so can you explain why comey is investigating trump?

If you haven't figured that out by now, you're too stupid to know.

well I'm sorry, it's never been posted. please do.

Posted lots of times. No need repeating the same stuff when you refuse to accept credible proof.
View attachment 117766

You have no credible proof. You have no proof at all. You have no viable evidence.

You have partisan hatred, nothing more.

Obviously, I have no proof that a RWNJ will accept. The facts have been presented. Ignore them if you want to.

 

[jc456]

so can you explain why comey is investigating trump?

If you haven't figured that out by now, you're too stupid to know.

well I'm sorry, it's never been posted. please do.

Posted lots of times. No need repeating the same stuff when you refuse to accept credible proof.
View attachment 117766

You have no credible proof. You have no proof at all. You have no viable evidence.

You have partisan hatred, nothing more.

Obviously, I have no proof that a RWNJ will accept. The facts have been presented. Ignore them if you want to.

so you have shit. Dude, either put up or shut up. if you're going to talk the talk, walk the walk or you are like dog shit. something to avoid.

 

[Dschrute3]

Pretty much depends on the purpose of the investigation. If it was for political purposes, why didn't any of the large amount of direct connections to Russia come out during the election?

It was only political. Putin despising Clinton and not wanting her to win, doesn't justify ordering 'Investigations' of the Trump Campaign. This amounts to Watergate ten-fold. A vicious brazen attack on our Democratic Process. We can't tolerate it. Those who ordered it, should be held accountable.

No, Putin despising Clinton is not a reason to investigate the Trump campaign. The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason. Obviously there was something there, because the investigation is still ongoing. If the investigation was a purely political action to harm the opposing candidate (Trump), I would agree with you 100%, but there is no reason to believe that is what happened.

The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason.

how do you or anyone know this without surveillance? D'OH!!!!!

All communication with Russian agents is monitored. You think they just listen to one side of the conversation, and ignore the rest?

yep!!!!!! if they are listening to the other side they violate law. And that means they did surveillance. look up the definition of the word.

Good point. Comey didn't deny surveillance was conducted on the Trump Campaign. He was careful to only deny direct 'Wiretapping' of Donald Trump.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

Ordering an 'Investigation' on the opposition's Candidate for President is unprecedented and very dangerous. It's a brazen attack on our Democratic Process.

Yes, it's third world banana republic type shit, which is what the fascist democrat are reduced to.

They may not have 'Wiretapped' Trump, but ordering an 'Investigation' on his Campaign, was as dirty as it gets. And i'm confident in my belief that surveillance was conducted in some fashion. It had to be included in their 'Investigation.'

They might not have, but chances are that they did.

 

[jc456]

It was only political. Putin despising Clinton and not wanting her to win, doesn't justify ordering 'Investigations' of the Trump Campaign. This amounts to Watergate ten-fold. A vicious brazen attack on our Democratic Process. We can't tolerate it. Those who ordered it, should be held accountable.

No, Putin despising Clinton is not a reason to investigate the Trump campaign. The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason. Obviously there was something there, because the investigation is still ongoing. If the investigation was a purely political action to harm the opposing candidate (Trump), I would agree with you 100%, but there is no reason to believe that is what happened.

The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason.

how do you or anyone know this without surveillance? D'OH!!!!!

All communication with Russian agents is monitored. You think they just listen to one side of the conversation, and ignore the rest?

yep!!!!!! if they are listening to the other side they violate law. And that means they did surveillance. look up the definition of the word.

Good point. Comey didn't deny surveillance was conducted on the Trump Campaign. He was careful to only deny direct 'Wiretapping' of Donald Trump.

what's funny is, he is violating law, because without a warrant, he isn't allowed to look at it or report on it. So let's see the warrant or go to jail.

 

[BULLDOG]

Pretty much depends on the purpose of the investigation. If it was for political purposes, why didn't any of the large amount of direct connections to Russia come out during the election?

It was only political. Putin despising Clinton and not wanting her to win, doesn't justify ordering 'Investigations' of the Trump Campaign. This amounts to Watergate ten-fold. A vicious brazen attack on our Democratic Process. We can't tolerate it. Those who ordered it, should be held accountable.

No, Putin despising Clinton is not a reason to investigate the Trump campaign. The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason. Obviously there was something there, because the investigation is still ongoing. If the investigation was a purely political action to harm the opposing candidate (Trump), I would agree with you 100%, but there is no reason to believe that is what happened.

The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason.

how do you or anyone know this without surveillance? D'OH!!!!!

All communication with Russian agents is monitored. You think they just listen to one side of the conversation, and ignore the rest?

yep!!!!!! if they are listening to the other side they violate law. And that means they did surveillance. look up the definition of the word.

If you feel so strongly about that, you should write a letter to the editor of your local paper. I'm sure he will get that taken care of for you as soon as possible.

 

[jc456]

It was only political. Putin despising Clinton and not wanting her to win, doesn't justify ordering 'Investigations' of the Trump Campaign. This amounts to Watergate ten-fold. A vicious brazen attack on our Democratic Process. We can't tolerate it. Those who ordered it, should be held accountable.

No, Putin despising Clinton is not a reason to investigate the Trump campaign. The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason. Obviously there was something there, because the investigation is still ongoing. If the investigation was a purely political action to harm the opposing candidate (Trump), I would agree with you 100%, but there is no reason to believe that is what happened.

The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason.

how do you or anyone know this without surveillance? D'OH!!!!!

All communication with Russian agents is monitored. You think they just listen to one side of the conversation, and ignore the rest?

yep!!!!!! if they are listening to the other side they violate law. And that means they did surveillance. look up the definition of the word.

If you feel so strongly about that, you should write a letter to the editor of your local paper. I'm sure he will get that taken care of for you as soon as possible.

i've sent it to my congressman.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[
Obviously, I have no proof that a RWNJ will accept. The facts have been presented. Ignore them if you want to.

You have no "proof" period - nor evidence. You have slander, libel and innuendo. Such is the way of you fascists.

BTW, I tried to click your sig to see what your "practical guide for treason" was, but it didn't work?

 

[BULLDOG]

No, Putin despising Clinton is not a reason to investigate the Trump campaign. The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason. Obviously there was something there, because the investigation is still ongoing. If the investigation was a purely political action to harm the opposing candidate (Trump), I would agree with you 100%, but there is no reason to believe that is what happened.

The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason.

how do you or anyone know this without surveillance? D'OH!!!!!

All communication with Russian agents is monitored. You think they just listen to one side of the conversation, and ignore the rest?

yep!!!!!! if they are listening to the other side they violate law. And that means they did surveillance. look up the definition of the word.

If you feel so strongly about that, you should write a letter to the editor of your local paper. I'm sure he will get that taken care of for you as soon as possible.

i've sent it to my congressman.

From reading your posts, I would guess that was Louie Gomert. That just looks like a good fit for you.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

what's funny is, he is violating law, because without a warrant, he isn't allowed to look at it or report on it. So let's see the warrant or go to jail.

There was a FISA application in November, so he probably did have a warrant. BUT this means he openly lied in his testimony, so he might have caught himself in a trap.

Trump going to war with these people is a dangerous game, Comey, Clapper, et al. are killers and thugs by definition. I hope he knows what he's doing, and springs the trap on these rats soon.

 

[BULLDOG]

[
Obviously, I have no proof that a RWNJ will accept. The facts have been presented. Ignore them if you want to.

You have no "proof" period - nor evidence. You have slander, libel and innuendo. Such is the way of you fascists.

BTW, I tried to click your sig to see what your "practical guide for treason" was, but it didn't work?

I'm not familiar with any Practical Guide to Treason. Perhaps that's something that the voices in your head mentioned.

 

[JakeStarkey]

This whole Democrat-manufactured farce is based on the revelation Putin despised Clinton and wanted her to lose. But that's a big no-brainer. Everyone knew that.

It wasn't a valid justification for the Democrats to order 'Investigations' and surveillance on the Trump Campaign. It was incredibly dirty. Whoever ordered it, should be punished.

sonny, they did not do that. That is the dog whistle for the brain dead alt right seditionists.