Did Obama Wiretap Trump? Voters React

[

what's funny is, he is violating law, because without a warrant, he isn't allowed to look at it or report on it. So let's see the warrant or go to jail.

There was a FISA application in November, so he probably did have a warrant. BUT this means he openly lied in his testimony, so he might have caught himself in a trap.

Trump going to war with these people is a dangerous game, Comey, Clapper, et al. are killers and thugs by definition. I hope he knows what he's doing, and springs the trap on these rats soon.
well he said there was no FISA application. so which is it? Why would he need one? what is the probable cause, got to have that! why is it all of this is undermining our country? fk him and his intelligence agency. Let's see the evidence!!!@!
 
This whole Democrat-manufactured farce is based on the revelation Putin despised Clinton and wanted her to lose. But that's a big no-brainer. Everyone knew that.

It wasn't a valid justification for the Democrats to order 'Investigations' and surveillance on the Trump Campaign. It was incredibly dirty. Whoever ordered it, should be punished.
sonny, they did not do that. That is the dog whistle for the brain dead alt right seditionists.
sure they did.
 
This whole Democrat-manufactured farce is based on the revelation Putin despised Clinton and wanted her to lose. But that's a big no-brainer. Everyone knew that.

It wasn't a valid justification for the Democrats to order 'Investigations' and surveillance on the Trump Campaign. It was incredibly dirty. Whoever ordered it, should be punished.
sonny, they did not do that. That is the dog whistle for the brain dead alt right seditionists.
sure they did.
Nope. Now Roger Stone wants to get pummeled. Dog whistle and jc and the rest of the seditionists come running to get a beating.
 
Keep in mind, Comey only denied 'Wiretapping' Donald Trump. He openly admitted they've been 'investigating' the Trump Campaign for awhile. And obviously, some sort of surveillance was conducted. However, Trump may have been off on him being 'Wiretapped' directly.

But there seems to be no doubt the Democrats did order some sort of surveillance on his Campaign. And if so, that constitutes an unprecedented egregious attack on our Democratic Process. Ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, goes well beyond being dirty. It's a brazen attack on our Democracy.

Pretty much depends on the purpose of the investigation. If it was for political purposes, why didn't any of the large amount of direct connections to Russia come out during the election?

It was only political. Putin despising Clinton and not wanting her to win, doesn't justify ordering 'Investigations' of the Trump Campaign. This amounts to Watergate ten-fold. A vicious brazen attack on our Democratic Process. We can't tolerate it. Those who ordered it, should be held accountable.

No, Putin despising Clinton is not a reason to investigate the Trump campaign. The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason. Obviously there was something there, because the investigation is still ongoing. If the investigation was a purely political action to harm the opposing candidate (Trump), I would agree with you 100%, but there is no reason to believe that is what happened.
The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason.

how do you or anyone know this without surveillance? D'OH!!!!!


Several of trump's people as well trump himself announced it. Several times.

Assuage broke in the RNC but did not publicize his findings.

Several of trump's people, as well as trump himself lied about their visits and connections. Hell, even his daughter lied about it.

For starters.
 
This whole Democrat-manufactured farce is based on the revelation Putin despised Clinton and wanted her to lose. But that's a big no-brainer. Everyone knew that.

It wasn't a valid justification for the Democrats to order 'Investigations' and surveillance on the Trump Campaign. It was incredibly dirty. Whoever ordered it, should be punished.
sonny, they did not do that. That is the dog whistle for the brain dead alt right seditionists.
sure they did.
Nope. Now Roger Stone wants to get pummeled. Dog whistle and jc and the rest of the seditionists come running to get a beating.
sure they did. They are fking democrats, it's what they do.
 
Keep in mind, Comey only denied 'Wiretapping' Donald Trump. He openly admitted they've been 'investigating' the Trump Campaign for awhile. And obviously, some sort of surveillance was conducted. However, Trump may have been off on him being 'Wiretapped' directly.

But there seems to be no doubt the Democrats did order some sort of surveillance on his Campaign. And if so, that constitutes an unprecedented egregious attack on our Democratic Process. Ordering surveillance on the opposition's Candidate for President, goes well beyond being dirty. It's a brazen attack on our Democracy.

Pretty much depends on the purpose of the investigation. If it was for political purposes, why didn't any of the large amount of direct connections to Russia come out during the election?

It was only political. Putin despising Clinton and not wanting her to win, doesn't justify ordering 'Investigations' of the Trump Campaign. This amounts to Watergate ten-fold. A vicious brazen attack on our Democratic Process. We can't tolerate it. Those who ordered it, should be held accountable.

No, Putin despising Clinton is not a reason to investigate the Trump campaign. The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason. Obviously there was something there, because the investigation is still ongoing. If the investigation was a purely political action to harm the opposing candidate (Trump), I would agree with you 100%, but there is no reason to believe that is what happened.
The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason.

how do you or anyone know this without surveillance? D'OH!!!!!


Several of trump's people as well trump himself announced it. Several times.

Assuage broke in the RNC but did not publicize his findings.

Several of trump's people, as well as trump himself lied about their visits and connections. Hell, even his daughter lied about it.

For starters.
well let's see your evidence son!!!! or is it you can't handle the truth and therefore lie? ohhhhhhhh I see, you are a liar.
 
well he said there was no FISA application. so which is it? Why would he need one? what is the probable cause, got to have that! why is it all of this is undermining our country? fk him and his intelligence agency. Let's see the evidence!!!@!

Trump tends to play these fascists; so it may be that the FISA warrant ends up in Rachel Maddow's mailbox or something. Maddow is too dumb to grasp what that would do to the carefully crafted narrative and BAM, the whole bunch of them are caught.

It would be a VERY Trump move.
 
Pretty much depends on the purpose of the investigation. If it was for political purposes, why didn't any of the large amount of direct connections to Russia come out during the election?

It was only political. Putin despising Clinton and not wanting her to win, doesn't justify ordering 'Investigations' of the Trump Campaign. This amounts to Watergate ten-fold. A vicious brazen attack on our Democratic Process. We can't tolerate it. Those who ordered it, should be held accountable.

No, Putin despising Clinton is not a reason to investigate the Trump campaign. The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason. Obviously there was something there, because the investigation is still ongoing. If the investigation was a purely political action to harm the opposing candidate (Trump), I would agree with you 100%, but there is no reason to believe that is what happened.
The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason.

how do you or anyone know this without surveillance? D'OH!!!!!


Several of trump's people as well trump himself announced it. Several times.

Assuage broke in the RNC but did not publicize his findings.

Several of trump's people, as well as trump himself lied about their visits and connections. Hell, even his daughter lied about it.

For starters.
well let's see your evidence son!!!! or is it you can't handle the truth and therefore lie? ohhhhhhhh I see, you are a liar.
You just respond to the

DogWhistleGoinCrazy.jpg


Comey told you yesterday, and all you and the rest of the Alt Right can do is "no, uh uh, man." :lol:
 
[

Several of trump's people as well trump himself announced it. Several times.

Assuage broke in the RNC but did not publicize his findings.

Several of trump's people, as well as trump himself lied about their visits and connections. Hell, even his daughter lied about it.

For starters.

Actually Pillowbite, you're just lying. The RNC servers were secure, which is WHY they let the NSA audit them, unlike you fascist democrats who refused.

Republican National Committee Security Foiled Russian Hackers
 
It was only political. Putin despising Clinton and not wanting her to win, doesn't justify ordering 'Investigations' of the Trump Campaign. This amounts to Watergate ten-fold. A vicious brazen attack on our Democratic Process. We can't tolerate it. Those who ordered it, should be held accountable.

No, Putin despising Clinton is not a reason to investigate the Trump campaign. The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason. Obviously there was something there, because the investigation is still ongoing. If the investigation was a purely political action to harm the opposing candidate (Trump), I would agree with you 100%, but there is no reason to believe that is what happened.
The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason.

how do you or anyone know this without surveillance? D'OH!!!!!


Several of trump's people as well trump himself announced it. Several times.

Assuage broke in the RNC but did not publicize his findings.

Several of trump's people, as well as trump himself lied about their visits and connections. Hell, even his daughter lied about it.

For starters.
well let's see your evidence son!!!! or is it you can't handle the truth and therefore lie? ohhhhhhhh I see, you are a liar.
You just respond to the

DogWhistleGoinCrazy.jpg


Comey told you yesterday, and all you and the rest of the Alt Right can do is "no, uh uh, man." :lol:
he said nothing so, not sure exactly what you think happened, but you keep hanging in the bus with your cats there felix.

All I know, is he confirmed Trump's tweet. he didn't even know it.
 
No, Putin despising Clinton is not a reason to investigate the Trump campaign. The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason. Obviously there was something there, because the investigation is still ongoing. If the investigation was a purely political action to harm the opposing candidate (Trump), I would agree with you 100%, but there is no reason to believe that is what happened.
The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason.

how do you or anyone know this without surveillance? D'OH!!!!!


Several of trump's people as well trump himself announced it. Several times.

Assuage broke in the RNC but did not publicize his findings.

Several of trump's people, as well as trump himself lied about their visits and connections. Hell, even his daughter lied about it.

For starters.
well let's see your evidence son!!!! or is it you can't handle the truth and therefore lie? ohhhhhhhh I see, you are a liar.
You just respond to the

DogWhistleGoinCrazy.jpg


Comey told you yesterday, and all you and the rest of the Alt Right can do is "no, uh uh, man." :lol:
he said nothing so, not sure exactly what you think happened, but you keep hanging in the bus with your cats there felix.

All I know, is he confirmed Trump's tweet. he didn't even know it.
Yup all you know. Comey counts, you don't.
 
So, the FBI, the NSA, the CIA and all other intelligence gathering organizations have become politicized. The media has become politicized. The nation at large has become polarized by these new political distinctions. And the level of polarization is beyond comprehension.

Polarization to the point where America and our national ideals have become polarized. Our institutions have become polarized.

On one side stand the Democrats, Liberals, if you will who see Trump as a charlatan, a huckster and a buffoon. A rank amateur trying to 'shake things up' with disastrous effect. His thin skin coupled with his short temper has caused him to say, or Tweet, things no previous president dared do. Some see that behavior as irresponsibility while...

On the other side are the True Believers in Trump. They see a savior, a maverick who is following up on his campaign promises. Someone who cut his political teeth on the Birther issue re-enforcing every suspicion, every fear, every doubt they ever had about Washington and political power. They do not flinch in the face of the havoc Trump has raised, the furthering of polarization, the rash and unpredictable behavior and statements. They see all that as fresh air, a new beginning and they may all agree that kicking down doors will cause some damage. It's all worth it.

But, can we as a nation survive if we adopt this new reality as a new normal? Can we keep moving if weighed down by suspicions and fears and doubt? There are two possible courses of action before us. Either we let Trump be Trump and further erode our national confidence, or we rebuke him in the strongest possible terms telling him that if he wants to govern effectively, he must start acting responsibly.

Every expert, everyone who should know has said that there was no wiretapping of Trump. Not by us, not by the Brits. To claim it is so without providing proof is irresponsible at best, utterly reckless at least and a clear danger to our national security at worst,.
 
The Trump Campaign's connections to Russia while Russia was obviously helping the Trump campaign was a good reason.

how do you or anyone know this without surveillance? D'OH!!!!!


Several of trump's people as well trump himself announced it. Several times.

Assuage broke in the RNC but did not publicize his findings.

Several of trump's people, as well as trump himself lied about their visits and connections. Hell, even his daughter lied about it.

For starters.
well let's see your evidence son!!!! or is it you can't handle the truth and therefore lie? ohhhhhhhh I see, you are a liar.
You just respond to the

DogWhistleGoinCrazy.jpg


Comey told you yesterday, and all you and the rest of the Alt Right can do is "no, uh uh, man." :lol:
he said nothing so, not sure exactly what you think happened, but you keep hanging in the bus with your cats there felix.

All I know, is he confirmed Trump's tweet. he didn't even know it.
Yup all you know. Comey counts, you don't.
I know what I heard and now read in the transcript, and he stated:

"Comey: I have been authorized by the Department of Justice to confirm that the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and that includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia's efforts. As with any counterintelligence investigation, this will also include an assessment of whether any crimes were committed."
He can't do any of that without a warrant. Which of course he stated he doesn't have. so what is it he has? It isn't a crime to go to russia, so no warrant can be gotten, phone calls aren't illegal either. so what is it he will use? oh yeah, surveillance information. You have to have a crime. there isn't one. D'OH!
 
So, the FBI, the NSA, the CIA and all other intelligence gathering organizations have become politicized. The media has become politicized. The nation at large has become polarized by these new political distinctions. And the level of polarization is beyond comprehension.

Polarization to the point where America and our national ideals have become polarized. Our institutions have become polarized.

On one side stand the Democrats, Liberals, if you will who see Trump as a charlatan, a huckster and a buffoon. A rank amateur trying to 'shake things up' with disastrous effect. His thin skin coupled with his short temper has caused him to say, or Tweet, things no previous president dared do. Some see that behavior as irresponsibility while...

On the other side are the True Believers in Trump. They see a savior, a maverick who is following up on his campaign promises. Someone who cut his political teeth on the Birther issue re-enforcing every suspicion, every fear, every doubt they ever had about Washington and political power. They do not flinch in the face of the havoc Trump has raised, the furthering of polarization, the rash and unpredictable behavior and statements. They see all that as fresh air, a new beginning and they may all agree that kicking down doors will cause some damage. It's all worth it.

But, can we as a nation survive if we adopt this new reality as a new normal? Can we keep moving if weighed down by suspicions and fears and doubt? There are two possible courses of action before us. Either we let Trump be Trump and further erode our national confidence, or we rebuke him in the strongest possible terms telling him that if he wants to govern effectively, he must start acting responsibly.

Every expert, everyone who should know has said that there was no wiretapping of Trump. Not by us, not by the Brits. To claim it is so without providing proof is irresponsible at best, utterly reckless at least and a clear danger to our national security at worst,.
ohhh look at you all butt hurt, need some butt hurt salve?
 
Several of trump's people as well trump himself announced it. Several times.

Assuage broke in the RNC but did not publicize his findings.

Several of trump's people, as well as trump himself lied about their visits and connections. Hell, even his daughter lied about it.

For starters.
well let's see your evidence son!!!! or is it you can't handle the truth and therefore lie? ohhhhhhhh I see, you are a liar.
You just respond to the

DogWhistleGoinCrazy.jpg


Comey told you yesterday, and all you and the rest of the Alt Right can do is "no, uh uh, man." :lol:
he said nothing so, not sure exactly what you think happened, but you keep hanging in the bus with your cats there felix.

All I know, is he confirmed Trump's tweet. he didn't even know it.
Yup all you know. Comey counts, you don't.
I know what I heard and now read in the transcript, and he stated:

"Comey: I have been authorized by the Department of Justice to confirm that the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and that includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia's efforts. As with any counterintelligence investigation, this will also include an assessment of whether any crimes were committed."
He can't do any of that without a warrant. Which of course he stated he doesn't have. so what is it he has? It isn't a crime to go to russia, so no warrant can be gotten, phone calls aren't illegal either. so what is it he will use? oh yeah, surveillance information. You have to have a crime. there isn't one. D'OH!
He said nothing of the sort. Your man Trump is under the gun, son.
 
So, the FBI, the NSA, the CIA and all other intelligence gathering organizations have become politicized. The media has become politicized. The nation at large has become polarized by these new political distinctions. And the level of polarization is beyond comprehension.

Polarization to the point where America and our national ideals have become polarized. Our institutions have become polarized.

On one side stand the Democrats, Liberals, if you will who see Trump as a charlatan, a huckster and a buffoon. A rank amateur trying to 'shake things up' with disastrous effect. His thin skin coupled with his short temper has caused him to say, or Tweet, things no previous president dared do. Some see that behavior as irresponsibility while...

On the other side are the True Believers in Trump. They see a savior, a maverick who is following up on his campaign promises. Someone who cut his political teeth on the Birther issue re-enforcing every suspicion, every fear, every doubt they ever had about Washington and political power. They do not flinch in the face of the havoc Trump has raised, the furthering of polarization, the rash and unpredictable behavior and statements. They see all that as fresh air, a new beginning and they may all agree that kicking down doors will cause some damage. It's all worth it.

But, can we as a nation survive if we adopt this new reality as a new normal? Can we keep moving if weighed down by suspicions and fears and doubt? There are two possible courses of action before us. Either we let Trump be Trump and further erode our national confidence, or we rebuke him in the strongest possible terms telling him that if he wants to govern effectively, he must start acting responsibly.

Every expert, everyone who should know has said that there was no wiretapping of Trump. Not by us, not by the Brits. To claim it is so without providing proof is irresponsible at best, utterly reckless at least and a clear danger to our national security at worst,.
ohhh look at you all butt hurt, need some butt hurt salve?
You, snowflake, have used it all.
 
So, the FBI, the NSA, the CIA and all other intelligence gathering organizations have become politicized. The media has become politicized. The nation at large has become polarized by these new political distinctions. And the level of polarization is beyond comprehension.

Polarization to the point where America and our national ideals have become polarized. Our institutions have become polarized.

On one side stand the Democrats, Liberals, if you will who see Trump as a charlatan, a huckster and a buffoon. A rank amateur trying to 'shake things up' with disastrous effect. His thin skin coupled with his short temper has caused him to say, or Tweet, things no previous president dared do. Some see that behavior as irresponsibility while...

On the other side are the True Believers in Trump. They see a savior, a maverick who is following up on his campaign promises. Someone who cut his political teeth on the Birther issue re-enforcing every suspicion, every fear, every doubt they ever had about Washington and political power. They do not flinch in the face of the havoc Trump has raised, the furthering of polarization, the rash and unpredictable behavior and statements. They see all that as fresh air, a new beginning and they may all agree that kicking down doors will cause some damage. It's all worth it.

But, can we as a nation survive if we adopt this new reality as a new normal? Can we keep moving if weighed down by suspicions and fears and doubt? There are two possible courses of action before us. Either we let Trump be Trump and further erode our national confidence, or we rebuke him in the strongest possible terms telling him that if he wants to govern effectively, he must start acting responsibly.

Every expert, everyone who should know has said that there was no wiretapping of Trump. Not by us, not by the Brits. To claim it is so without providing proof is irresponsible at best, utterly reckless at least and a clear danger to our national security at worst,.
ohhh look at you all butt hurt, need some butt hurt salve?
We'll take it then that you are siding with recklessness, havoc and irresponsibility.
 

Forum List

Back
Top