Hutch Starskey
Diamond Member
- Mar 24, 2015
- 35,393
- 9,174
- 1,340
so, why is it bad? you didn't answer the question. BTW, how do you know it doesn't?so what? how is that bad?`It interests me as well but this is not a serious effort to get to the truth. The committee could have called the judge and the applicants in to testify in closed door sessions to present and explain their rationale for the warrant. This ain't that.
True enough but I'm not looking for a smoking gun. When facts are hard to come by, even anecdotal reports like this can shed a little light on the subject.
They're just shining the light on what they want you to see.
Because it's not the whole truth.
I did answer the question.
The whole truth is the entire rationale for the warrant. Four pages in support of a narrative is not.