Jarhead
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2010
- 20,670
- 2,378
- 245
Are you claiming that the conservative consensus around here is an endorsement of Nancy Pelois's 'qualifications' and an endorsement of the laws she writes?
that's a good one.
Look...I dont know what the heck you are talking about. I dont care what the conservative consensus is around here.
I heard what she said and the context it was said. I believe it was blown way oput of proportion and spun.
But I know the point she was making....and I wanted to debate the point itself.
And I asked a valid question......
Why is Pelosi qualified to write law for those same people, but Anne Romeny is not qualified to offer her opinion regarding those same people
and that is twice you have read the question and twice you have diverted from it. You have the right not to answer it....that is fine..
But I must question what your reason is to not answer it.
To be frank....in 2 days NOT ONE PERSON on the left has answered it.
Ann Romney can advise all she wants. But tell me what makes her particularly qualified to give EXPERT advise on how hard it is for women in this job market to find and hold jobs?
You diverted from my question.
Rosen claims that Ann Romney is not qualified to give her opinion becuase she does not experience the same anxiety and concerns that your typical American experiences.
I understand that criticism. I may even agree with it....so I am fishing for more infomration to make an educated decision......
So I am asking anyone on the left who agrees with that criticism to explain why, if such is true, the why is Nancy Pelosi qualified to write laws for those people as she has the same "mark" against her that Anne Romeny does...
It is not a loaded question...I am comparing apples to apples...
Can rich people write laws, advise, or have an opinion as it pertains to those that deal with financial anxieties?
And if yes for Pelosi, then why not for Romney?
WHy is no one answering the question?
Is it that no one wants to deabte?