Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
Is that supposed to be a threat?You will abide by the Laws of the United States.
Guarantee
You will fuck off or be ready to die trying to enforce your immoral and unconstitutional new bullshit law.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is that supposed to be a threat?You will abide by the Laws of the United States.
Guarantee
Will you bet your life on it? We will.And the duly constituted laws passed under the aegis of the Constitution.
Guarantee
Maybe so, but it will not be for the lack of your commie-ass ilk trying.Lol you people are such drama queens. I don’t care what this democrat says - the government will NEVER come for your guns. You just entertain this idea because you want to play out some child-like fantasy of being a hero with a gun.
They don’t. Democrats don’t ever say this besides this guy. Of course you should know, Australia did this a few decades ago and it actually worked.Lol you people are such drama queens. I don’t care what this democrat says - the government will NEVER come for your guns. You just entertain this idea because you want to play out some child-like fantasy of being a hero with a gun.Republicans are really just all talk. They like to think they are tough and manly when it comes to their guns vs the gubmint, but more than likely they would puss out and hand them over."Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell of California wants to ban assault weapons, instate a federal gun buy-back program for those who own them and criminally prosecute those who refuse to hand them over.
The representative wrote an op-ed in USA Today Thursday rolling out what he feels is the gun control policy America should adopt:"
"“Reinstating the federal assault weapons ban that was in effect from 1994 to 2004 would prohibit manufacture and sales, but it would not affect weapons already possessed. This would leave millions of assault weapons in our communities for decades to come,” Swalwell wrote.
“Instead, we should ban possession of military-style semiautomatic assault weapons, we should buy back such weapons from all who choose to abide by the law, and we should criminally prosecute any who choose to defy it by keeping their weapons.”"
Raise your hand out there if you think this would end peacefully, with law-abiding citizens simply handing over their (until that moment) legally-owned guns to a bunch of Liberals trampling on the Constitution in their continued effort to dis-arm the American people (Because you KNOW the Liberals would not stop there...)?
Yeah, that's what I thought. Not going to happen / end well....
Eric Swalwell Unloads Gun Platform Liberals Really Want
Try me asshole....
Than why do they keep saying they want to?
The government will have rendered itself useless, authority will be forced to kindly fuck off, and we will issue extermination orders for any commie in U.S. territory.Pass a law that strips a constitutional right and makes all gun owners criminals and suddenly being law abiding doesn’t mean anything to those targeted.
Republicans are really just all talk. They like to think they are tough and manly when it comes to their guns vs the gubmint, but more than likely they would puss out and hand them over."Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell of California wants to ban assault weapons, instate a federal gun buy-back program for those who own them and criminally prosecute those who refuse to hand them over.
The representative wrote an op-ed in USA Today Thursday rolling out what he feels is the gun control policy America should adopt:"
"“Reinstating the federal assault weapons ban that was in effect from 1994 to 2004 would prohibit manufacture and sales, but it would not affect weapons already possessed. This would leave millions of assault weapons in our communities for decades to come,” Swalwell wrote.
“Instead, we should ban possession of military-style semiautomatic assault weapons, we should buy back such weapons from all who choose to abide by the law, and we should criminally prosecute any who choose to defy it by keeping their weapons.”"
Raise your hand out there if you think this would end peacefully, with law-abiding citizens simply handing over their (until that moment) legally-owned guns to a bunch of Liberals trampling on the Constitution in their continued effort to dis-arm the American people (Because you KNOW the Liberals would not stop there...)?
Yeah, that's what I thought. Not going to happen / end well....
Eric Swalwell Unloads Gun Platform Liberals Really Want
We know how to build guns. You think we will sit back and abide that motherfucking bullshit again? We let that and a number of other things slide over the decades. Now that your total-ban objective is clear, no more. And we will win the battle or feast, drink, fuck, and fight in the halls of Valhalla. Bet your VW on it.Years ago tommy guns were banned . Did they have to be confiscated? Or was it a gr
Or vice versa.A good person with a gun can stop a bad person with a gun, quickly.It won't pass.
However, what should be done is federal rights violation charges should be filed against the authors of such a bill, and any yes votes should also be criminally prosecuted for violating the rights of the citizens in their state.
In addition, it should be a major campaign thrust to vote out anyone who supported or voted yes on such a rights violation.
Time for people to start electing people on the basis if the rights they protect, not the party they belong to.
You are strong supporter of right to quickly kill lots of people eh?
Better that a good person HAS a gun to have a chance agaist the bad guy, instead of being a meat target, no?Or vice versa
Watch is all you'll do. Taking guns is a violation of the constitution which is why we have the second amendment. You keep preaching your bullshit because that's all libstains can do.
Ya gotta love the constant claims by liberals that the police and military are going to shoot down Americans standing up for the Constitution when it's been proven over and over that the exact opposite is the likely scenario.
You’re the one predicting a blood bath…
If it were to happen it would be.
So you would kill a law enforcement officer if he came to your residence to collect your guns?
Damn right I would if he pressed the matter.
He's trying to take away my Constitutional rights and it's my duty to resist.
Fighting to protect our rights is terrorism?I’m sure the Branch Davidians felt the same way…as did McVeigh, Rudolph, and the other domestic terrorists you’re trying to emulate.
Ya gotta love the constant claims by liberals that the police and military are going to shoot down Americans standing up for the Constitution when it's been proven over and over that the exact opposite is the likely scenario.
You’re the one predicting a blood bath…
If it were to happen it would be.
So you would kill a law enforcement officer if he came to your residence to collect your guns?
Damn right I would if he pressed the matter.
He's trying to take away my Constitutional rights and it's my duty to resist.
I’m sure the Branch Davidians felt the same way…as did McVeigh, Rudolph, and the other domestic terrorists you’re trying to emulate.
Fighting to protect our rights is terrorism?I’m sure the Branch Davidians felt the same way…as did McVeigh, Rudolph, and the other domestic terrorists you’re trying to emulate.
You’re the one predicting a blood bath…
If it were to happen it would be.
So you would kill a law enforcement officer if he came to your residence to collect your guns?
Damn right I would if he pressed the matter.
He's trying to take away my Constitutional rights and it's my duty to resist.
I’m sure the Branch Davidians felt the same way…as did McVeigh, Rudolph, and the other domestic terrorists you’re trying to emulate.
What the feds did to the Branch Davidians is a good reason to not ever give up your guns.
Fighting to protect our rights is terrorism?I’m sure the Branch Davidians felt the same way…as did McVeigh, Rudolph, and the other domestic terrorists you’re trying to emulate.
You wouldn’t call someone who blows up a building a terrorist?
Most would.
You wouldn’t call those who opened fire on ATF agents a terrorist?
Most would.
What say you?
The government will have rendered itself useless, authority will be forced to kindly fuck off, and we will issue extermination orders for any commie in U.S. territory.Pass a law that strips a constitutional right and makes all gun owners criminals and suddenly being law abiding doesn’t mean anything to those targeted.
But, you're calling us terrorists for warning you that we be refusing to comply and resisting your illegal, immoral, goose-stepping commie, bullshit confiscation. Not even close to the same thing.Fighting to protect our rights is terrorism?I’m sure the Branch Davidians felt the same way…as did McVeigh, Rudolph, and the other domestic terrorists you’re trying to emulate.
You wouldn’t call someone who blows up a building a terrorist?
Most would.
You wouldn’t call those who opened fire on ATF agents a terrorist?
Most would.
What say you?
But, you're calling us terrorists for warning you that we be refusing to comply and resisting your illegal, immoral, goose-stepping commie, bullshit confiscation. Not even close to the same thing.Fighting to protect our rights is terrorism?I’m sure the Branch Davidians felt the same way…as did McVeigh, Rudolph, and the other domestic terrorists you’re trying to emulate.
You wouldn’t call someone who blows up a building a terrorist?
Most would.
You wouldn’t call those who opened fire on ATF agents a terrorist?
Most would.
What say you?
But, many more will die if you commies try it. Bank on it.