Do Hillary Supporters Have Any Personal Integrity?

Media are exploiting news that two emails Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton turned over to the State Department from her time as secretary of state may be retroactively classified as "top secret" to push myths about Clinton's handling of government information and scandalize her email use. Here are the facts.

FACT: None Of The Emails Sent To Clinton Were Labeled As "Classified" Or "Top Secret"

FACT: Emails Originated In State Dept. System, And Questions About Retroactive Classification Would Have Occurred Regardless Of Clinton's Server Use

FACT: Experts Have Debunked Any Comparison Between Clinton's Email Use And David Petraeus' Crimes

FACT: IG Referral To Justice Department Was Not Criminal, And FBI Isn't Targeting Clinton Herself

Much more factual information with source links.

Mediamatters LMAO.

FBI says all investigations are criminal in nature. LMAO

And if the bitch doesn't realize satellite and operational information is classified she has no business being commander in chief.

What "satellite and operational information"?

How do you know what was contained in Hillary's emails?

That's what they said the two that were classified as top secret contained. Look it up.

Here I'll save ya the trouble.



Who is "they"?

The IG report doesn't mention anything about the content of the emails.


Which one, Kelly was talking about information from the IG for the intel community. Or did you not bother to watch?
 
Media are exploiting news that two emails Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton turned over to the State Department from her time as secretary of state may be retroactively classified as "top secret" to push myths about Clinton's handling of government information and scandalize her email use. Here are the facts.

FACT: None Of The Emails Sent To Clinton Were Labeled As "Classified" Or "Top Secret"

FACT: Emails Originated In State Dept. System, And Questions About Retroactive Classification Would Have Occurred Regardless Of Clinton's Server Use

FACT: Experts Have Debunked Any Comparison Between Clinton's Email Use And David Petraeus' Crimes

FACT: IG Referral To Justice Department Was Not Criminal, And FBI Isn't Targeting Clinton Herself

Much more factual information with source links.

Mediamatters LMAO.

FBI says all investigations are criminal in nature. LMAO

And if the bitch doesn't realize satellite and operational information is classified she has no business being commander in chief.

What "satellite and operational information"?

How do you know what was contained in Hillary's emails?

That's what they said the two that were classified as top secret contained. Look it up.

Here I'll save ya the trouble.



Who is "they"?

The IG report doesn't mention anything about the content of the emails.


Which one, Kelly was talking about information from the IG for the intel community. Or did you not bother to watch?


I watched it. Standard TV pundit nonsense.

I've read the IG's letter to Congress, which is what she was talking about. There is no discussion of the content of the emails, just their classification. Everything else is just a figment of Megyn Kelly's imagination.
 
I have asked if any of them can come up with an legitimate excuse for Hillary to conduct official government business on her personal server and then try to destroy evidence of her seemingly illegal conduct. So far, I have not heard a single explanation other than she she has not (yet) been convicted of any wrongdoing.

What can one say about putative Americans who willingly ignore (or praise) her long history of unethical conduct? These people may switch their allegiance to someone else if she is forced to abandon her quest for the presidency, but they will effectively remain a 5th column in this country who are willing to subvert the rule of law for their own political objectives.

Was Hillary's use of a private email server shady? Of course.

Was it illegal? Nope.


How do you know?

Because was no law against doing so at the time.
 
Was Hillary's use of a private email server shady? Of course.

Was it illegal? Nope.
Can you tell us what the difference is?...Besides one being a lying, murderous, bitch, and the other a War hero!

CLfd5kPUwAAEJGR.jpg

The difference is intent.

Petraeus willfully acted contrary to the law by copying Top Secret information into illegal, secret notebooks - and then shared them with his mistress, who did not have the clearance to see them.

There is no evidence that the same is true for Hillary.
Of course there is...Sid Blumenthal, had direct access to classified info sent to him by Hillary. Hillary was told by Obama NOT to do business with Sid Vicious, BUT she did anyway!
Hillary Clinton 2016: New State Department emails show ...
Politics Policy Political News - POLITICO/story/2015/06/state-dept-releases-new-tranche-of...
Jun 30, 2015 · ... Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was in contact with ... “What is latest re Sid Blumenthal?” she ... 9 p.m. Hillary Clinton email ...

24 Emails from Sid Blumenthal to Hillary Clinton Released ...
The Weekly Standard A Weekly Conservative Magazine and Blog of News and Opinion.Blog
May 21, 2015 · You are here: Blog / 24 Emails from Sid Blumenthal to Hillary Clinton Released . The Blog. ... Type in your email address to get started: Politics.

House Republicans, Sid Blumenthal, and the Ghosts of ...
NationalJournal.com/2016-elections/house-republicans-sid...
Jun 15, 2015 · ... Sid Blumenthal, and the Ghosts of Clinton’s Past ... Want access to this content? ... focus on the longtime Clinton family ally's email exchanges ...

Dershowitz Warns Clintons: Blumenthal's a Problem for 2016
Breitbart News Network/big-government/2013/11/08/dershowitz-warns...
... themselves from Sid Blumenthal unless he ... Sid Blumenthal is waging an email campaign ... Blumenthal also advised Hillary Clinton during her 2008 ...


1. Sidney Blumenthal almost certainly has "Top Secret" clearance.
2. What evidence do you have that Hillary emailed any classified information to Blumenthal?


Link indicting Blumenthal has top secret clearance?

Security clearance levels are not public information. There's no "link" for me to show you. But he's been working in intel for decades now, so it's a pretty safe bet.
 
Mediamatters LMAO.

FBI says all investigations are criminal in nature. LMAO

And if the bitch doesn't realize satellite and operational information is classified she has no business being commander in chief.

What "satellite and operational information"?

How do you know what was contained in Hillary's emails?

That's what they said the two that were classified as top secret contained. Look it up.

Here I'll save ya the trouble.



Who is "they"?

The IG report doesn't mention anything about the content of the emails.


Which one, Kelly was talking about information from the IG for the intel community. Or did you not bother to watch?


I watched it. Standard TV pundit nonsense.

I've read the IG's letter to Congress, which is what she was talking about. There is no discussion of the content of the emails, just their classification. Everything else is just a figment of Megyn Kelly's imagination.


What ever, she was reading the terms from something she had in front of her. Accept it or not, I really don't care. BTW there were 2 IG reports.
 
Can you tell us what the difference is?...Besides one being a lying, murderous, bitch, and the other a War hero!

CLfd5kPUwAAEJGR.jpg

The difference is intent.

Petraeus willfully acted contrary to the law by copying Top Secret information into illegal, secret notebooks - and then shared them with his mistress, who did not have the clearance to see them.

There is no evidence that the same is true for Hillary.
Of course there is...Sid Blumenthal, had direct access to classified info sent to him by Hillary. Hillary was told by Obama NOT to do business with Sid Vicious, BUT she did anyway!
Hillary Clinton 2016: New State Department emails show ...
Politics Policy Political News - POLITICO/story/2015/06/state-dept-releases-new-tranche-of...
Jun 30, 2015 · ... Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was in contact with ... “What is latest re Sid Blumenthal?” she ... 9 p.m. Hillary Clinton email ...

24 Emails from Sid Blumenthal to Hillary Clinton Released ...
The Weekly Standard A Weekly Conservative Magazine and Blog of News and Opinion.Blog
May 21, 2015 · You are here: Blog / 24 Emails from Sid Blumenthal to Hillary Clinton Released . The Blog. ... Type in your email address to get started: Politics.

House Republicans, Sid Blumenthal, and the Ghosts of ...
NationalJournal.com/2016-elections/house-republicans-sid...
Jun 15, 2015 · ... Sid Blumenthal, and the Ghosts of Clinton’s Past ... Want access to this content? ... focus on the longtime Clinton family ally's email exchanges ...

Dershowitz Warns Clintons: Blumenthal's a Problem for 2016
Breitbart News Network/big-government/2013/11/08/dershowitz-warns...
... themselves from Sid Blumenthal unless he ... Sid Blumenthal is waging an email campaign ... Blumenthal also advised Hillary Clinton during her 2008 ...


1. Sidney Blumenthal almost certainly has "Top Secret" clearance.
2. What evidence do you have that Hillary emailed any classified information to Blumenthal?


Link indicting Blumenthal has top secret clearance?

Security clearance levels are not public information. There's no "link" for me to show you. But he's been working in intel for decades now, so it's a pretty safe bet.


He's been working in intel? WTF??? He is an attorney in private practice. He does not work in intel and never has to my knowledge.

Here is his wiki profile. I see nothing about Kendall working in intel for decades. If you find a link indicating that I would be interested in reading it.

David E. Kendall - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
 
I have asked if any of them can come up with an legitimate excuse for Hillary to conduct official government business on her personal server and then try to destroy evidence of her seemingly illegal conduct. So far, I have not heard a single explanation other than she she has not (yet) been convicted of any wrongdoing.

What can one say about putative Americans who willingly ignore (or praise) her long history of unethical conduct? These people may switch their allegiance to someone else if she is forced to abandon her quest for the presidency, but they will effectively remain a 5th column in this country who are willing to subvert the rule of law for their own political objectives.

Probably similar to Trump supporters who always talk away his Mexican/captured soldiers/women comments.

People like to support a team no matter what. It leads to bad politics.
 
Media are exploiting news that two emails Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton turned over to the State Department from her time as secretary of state may be retroactively classified as "top secret" to push myths about Clinton's handling of government information and scandalize her email use. Here are the facts.

FACT: None Of The Emails Sent To Clinton Were Labeled As "Classified" Or "Top Secret"

FACT: Emails Originated In State Dept. System, And Questions About Retroactive Classification Would Have Occurred Regardless Of Clinton's Server Use

FACT: Experts Have Debunked Any Comparison Between Clinton's Email Use And David Petraeus' Crimes

FACT: IG Referral To Justice Department Was Not Criminal, And FBI Isn't Targeting Clinton Herself

Much more factual information with source links.


sorry...she did it.......but the person who will investigate...the current attorney General...owes the clinton's so don't expect the truth.
 
The difference is intent.

Petraeus willfully acted contrary to the law by copying Top Secret information into illegal, secret notebooks - and then shared them with his mistress, who did not have the clearance to see them.

There is no evidence that the same is true for Hillary.
Of course there is...Sid Blumenthal, had direct access to classified info sent to him by Hillary. Hillary was told by Obama NOT to do business with Sid Vicious, BUT she did anyway!
Hillary Clinton 2016: New State Department emails show ...
Politics Policy Political News - POLITICO/story/2015/06/state-dept-releases-new-tranche-of...
Jun 30, 2015 · ... Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was in contact with ... “What is latest re Sid Blumenthal?” she ... 9 p.m. Hillary Clinton email ...

24 Emails from Sid Blumenthal to Hillary Clinton Released ...
The Weekly Standard A Weekly Conservative Magazine and Blog of News and Opinion.Blog
May 21, 2015 · You are here: Blog / 24 Emails from Sid Blumenthal to Hillary Clinton Released . The Blog. ... Type in your email address to get started: Politics.

House Republicans, Sid Blumenthal, and the Ghosts of ...
NationalJournal.com/2016-elections/house-republicans-sid...
Jun 15, 2015 · ... Sid Blumenthal, and the Ghosts of Clinton’s Past ... Want access to this content? ... focus on the longtime Clinton family ally's email exchanges ...

Dershowitz Warns Clintons: Blumenthal's a Problem for 2016
Breitbart News Network/big-government/2013/11/08/dershowitz-warns...
... themselves from Sid Blumenthal unless he ... Sid Blumenthal is waging an email campaign ... Blumenthal also advised Hillary Clinton during her 2008 ...


1. Sidney Blumenthal almost certainly has "Top Secret" clearance.
2. What evidence do you have that Hillary emailed any classified information to Blumenthal?


Link indicting Blumenthal has top secret clearance?

Security clearance levels are not public information. There's no "link" for me to show you. But he's been working in intel for decades now, so it's a pretty safe bet.


He's been working in intel? WTF??? He is an attorney in private practice. He does not work in intel and never has to my knowledge.

Here is his wiki profile. I see nothing about Kendall working in intel for decades. If you find a link indicating that I would be interested in reading it.

David E. Kendall - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

We're talking about Sidney Blumenthal, not David Kendall.

David Kendall almost certainly has clearance also, though.
 
I have asked if any of them can come up with an legitimate excuse for Hillary to conduct official government business on her personal server and then try to destroy evidence of her seemingly illegal conduct. So far, I have not heard a single explanation other than she she has not (yet) been convicted of any wrongdoing.

What can one say about putative Americans who willingly ignore (or praise) her long history of unethical conduct? These people may switch their allegiance to someone else if she is forced to abandon her quest for the presidency, but they will effectively remain a 5th column in this country who are willing to subvert the rule of law for their own political objectives.

Was Hillary's use of a private email server shady? Of course.

Was it illegal? Nope.

For storing classified documents? Yes it was illegal.
 
I have asked if any of them can come up with an legitimate excuse for Hillary to conduct official government business on her personal server and then try to destroy evidence of her seemingly illegal conduct. So far, I have not heard a single explanation other than she she has not (yet) been convicted of any wrongdoing.

What can one say about putative Americans who willingly ignore (or praise) her long history of unethical conduct? These people may switch their allegiance to someone else if she is forced to abandon her quest for the presidency, but they will effectively remain a 5th column in this country who are willing to subvert the rule of law for their own political objectives.

Was Hillary's use of a private email server shady? Of course.

Was it illegal? Nope.
Can you tell us what the difference is?...Besides one being a lying, murderous, bitch, and the other a War hero!

CLfd5kPUwAAEJGR.jpg

The difference is intent.

Petraeus willfully acted contrary to the law by copying Top Secret information into illegal, secret notebooks - and then shared them with his mistress, who did not have the clearance to see them.

There is no evidence that the same is true for Hillary.

Intent doesn't matter in the case of violating the laws on classified information. She should have known. Therefor she's guilty.
 
"Do Hillary Supporters Have Any Personal Integrity?"

Does the OP understand what a loaded question fallacy is, and that the premise of his thread fails as a consequence.

A question can't be a fallacy, numskull.

Once again with your hilarious understanding of logic.
 
I have asked if any of them can come up with an legitimate excuse for Hillary to conduct official government business on her personal server and then try to destroy evidence of her seemingly illegal conduct. So far, I have not heard a single explanation other than she she has not (yet) been convicted of any wrongdoing.

What can one say about putative Americans who willingly ignore (or praise) her long history of unethical conduct? These people may switch their allegiance to someone else if she is forced to abandon her quest for the presidency, but they will effectively remain a 5th column in this country who are willing to subvert the rule of law for their own political objectives.

Was Hillary's use of a private email server shady? Of course.

Was it illegal? Nope.
Can you tell us what the difference is?...Besides one being a lying, murderous, bitch, and the other a War hero!

CLfd5kPUwAAEJGR.jpg

The difference is intent.

Petraeus willfully acted contrary to the law by copying Top Secret information into illegal, secret notebooks - and then shared them with his mistress, who did not have the clearance to see them.

There is no evidence that the same is true for Hillary.

Intent doesn't matter in the case of violating the laws on classified information. She should have known. Therefor she's guilty.

Of course it matters. Read the statutes.
 
Media are exploiting news that two emails Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton turned over to the State Department from her time as secretary of state may be retroactively classified as "top secret" to push myths about Clinton's handling of government information and scandalize her email use. Here are the facts.

FACT: None Of The Emails Sent To Clinton Were Labeled As "Classified" Or "Top Secret"

FACT: Emails Originated In State Dept. System, And Questions About Retroactive Classification Would Have Occurred Regardless Of Clinton's Server Use

FACT: Experts Have Debunked Any Comparison Between Clinton's Email Use And David Petraeus' Crimes

FACT: IG Referral To Justice Department Was Not Criminal, And FBI Isn't Targeting Clinton Herself

Much more factual information with source links.

Mediamatters LMAO.

FBI says all investigations are criminal in nature. LMAO

And if the bitch doesn't realize satellite and operational information is classified she has no business being commander in chief.

What "satellite and operational information"?

How do you know what was contained in Hillary's emails?

It's implied by the way the FBI described it. She obviously had photos from spy satellites stored in her email.

The Spy Satellite Secrets in Hillary s Emails - The Daily Beast

“TOP SECRET//SI//TK//NOFORN,” according to the Inspector General’s report.

You may have seen acronym lists like these on declassified documents before—and glazed over them. This is the arcane language of the cleared cognoscenti so let me explain what this means:

TOP SECRET, as the name implies, is the highest official classification level in the U.S. government, defined as information whose unauthorized release “could cause exceptionally grave damage to national security or foreign relations.”

SI refers to Special Intelligence, meaning it is information derived from intercepted communications, which is the business of the National Security Agency, America’s single biggest source of intelligence. They’re the guys who eavesdrop on phone calls, map who’s calling who, and comb through emails. SI is a subset of what the intelligence community calls Sensitive Compartmented Information or SCI. And these materials always require special handling and protection. They are to be kept in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility or SCIF, which is a special hardened room that is safe from both physical and electronic intrusion.

TK refers to Talent Keyhole, which is an IC caveat indicating that the classified material was obtained via satellite.
 
I have asked if any of them can come up with an legitimate excuse for Hillary to conduct official government business on her personal server and then try to destroy evidence of her seemingly illegal conduct. So far, I have not heard a single explanation other than she she has not (yet) been convicted of any wrongdoing.

What can one say about putative Americans who willingly ignore (or praise) her long history of unethical conduct? These people may switch their allegiance to someone else if she is forced to abandon her quest for the presidency, but they will effectively remain a 5th column in this country who are willing to subvert the rule of law for their own political objectives.

Was Hillary's use of a private email server shady? Of course.

Was it illegal? Nope.
Can you tell us what the difference is?...Besides one being a lying, murderous, bitch, and the other a War hero!

CLfd5kPUwAAEJGR.jpg

The difference is intent.

Petraeus willfully acted contrary to the law by copying Top Secret information into illegal, secret notebooks - and then shared them with his mistress, who did not have the clearance to see them.

There is no evidence that the same is true for Hillary.

Intent doesn't matter in the case of violating the laws on classified information. She should have known. Therefor she's guilty.

Of course it matters. Read the statutes.

You read them. Intent doesn't matter. If you have a security clearance and you mishandle classified information, you are guilty.
 
Media are exploiting news that two emails Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton turned over to the State Department from her time as secretary of state may be retroactively classified as "top secret" to push myths about Clinton's handling of government information and scandalize her email use. Here are the facts.

FACT: None Of The Emails Sent To Clinton Were Labeled As "Classified" Or "Top Secret"

FACT: Emails Originated In State Dept. System, And Questions About Retroactive Classification Would Have Occurred Regardless Of Clinton's Server Use

FACT: Experts Have Debunked Any Comparison Between Clinton's Email Use And David Petraeus' Crimes

FACT: IG Referral To Justice Department Was Not Criminal, And FBI Isn't Targeting Clinton Herself

Much more factual information with source links.

Mediamatters LMAO.

FBI says all investigations are criminal in nature. LMAO

And if the bitch doesn't realize satellite and operational information is classified she has no business being commander in chief.

What "satellite and operational information"?

How do you know what was contained in Hillary's emails?

It's implied by the way the FBI described it. She obviously had photos from spy satellites stored in her email.

The Spy Satellite Secrets in Hillary s Emails - The Daily Beast

“TOP SECRET//SI//TK//NOFORN,” according to the Inspector General’s report.

You may have seen acronym lists like these on declassified documents before—and glazed over them. This is the arcane language of the cleared cognoscenti so let me explain what this means:

TOP SECRET, as the name implies, is the highest official classification level in the U.S. government, defined as information whose unauthorized release “could cause exceptionally grave damage to national security or foreign relations.”

SI refers to Special Intelligence, meaning it is information derived from intercepted communications, which is the business of the National Security Agency, America’s single biggest source of intelligence. They’re the guys who eavesdrop on phone calls, map who’s calling who, and comb through emails. SI is a subset of what the intelligence community calls Sensitive Compartmented Information or SCI. And these materials always require special handling and protection. They are to be kept in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility or SCIF, which is a special hardened room that is safe from both physical and electronic intrusion.

TK refers to Talent Keyhole, which is an IC caveat indicating that the classified material was obtained via satellite.

:lol::lol::lol:

You think she had "spy satellite" pictures in her emails?
 

Forum List

Back
Top