Do Jews Control the Media and Banking?

holston

VIP Member
Dec 17, 2012
1,188
56
83
Apparently so. At least according to these Jews.

Jews Do Control the Media and Banking - Feiler Faster
Bruce Feiler

Vanity Fair’s October issue contains its annual list of “the world’s most powerful people,” 100 of the bankers and media moguls, publishers and image makers who shape the lives of “billions.” A Jewish editor in Chicago has decided to count the number of Jews. It tops fifty percent. At a time when two writers seem to have a blockbuster book on their hands pointing out that the Jewish lobby is really powerful in Washington, now a Jewish editor is pointing out that the Jews do, indeed, have a disproportianate amount of control over media and banking in America.

Someone needs to check his spelling.
It’s an exclusive, insular club, one whose influence stretches around the globe but is concentrated strategically in the highest corridors of power.
More than half its members, at least by one count, are Jewish.
It’s a list, in other words, that would have made earlier generations of Jews jump out of their skins, calling attention, as it does, to their disproportionate influence in finance and the media. Making matters worse, in the eyes of many, would no doubt be the identity of the group behind the list – not a pack of fringe anti-Semites but one of the most mainstream, glamorous publications on the newsstands.
Yet the list doesn’t appear to have generated concern so far, instead drawing expressions of satisfaction and pride from the lone Jewish commentator who’s responded in writing.
Published between ads for Chanel and Prada, Dior and Yves Saint Laurent, it’s the 2007 version of “The Vanity Fair 100,” the glossy American magazine’s annual October ranking of the planet’s most important people. Populated by a Cohen and a Rothschild, a Bloomberg and a Perelman, the list would seem to conform to all the traditional stereotypes about areas of Jewish overrepresentation.
Joseph Aaron, the editor of The Chicago Jewish News, thinks it’s a list his readers should “feel very, very good about.”


Indeed they do!
Some people thrive on gloating.
Take me for example. I simply relish the opportunity to rub my detractors prominent noses in their own words.
 
Sounds like they got the passive-aggressive plausible deniability stereotype in the bag too.

"We all know it's true, but if you point it out, we're going to get you."
 
If only we could get Auschwitz reopened. You two morons could have guard jobs for the next few years.
 
If only we could get Auschwitz reopened. You two morons could have guard jobs for the next few years.

You know Russell Kirk, one of the most prominent conservatives of the modern age, was labeled as anti-Semitic too because he opposed pop culture, aggressive foreign policy, and wasn't fond of the pragmatism associated with those who call themselves the "chosen ones"?

The guy didn't even use computers or televisions because he didn't want to be exposed to the media.

Anyway, I just got a kick out of what you said because I've actually debated against real neo-Nazis who are racists, and they can't stand when I point out the difference between Jewish beliefs and the Jewish people in how all racial Jews don't believe in the same thing.

It's because they have the liberal belief of moral emotivism and relativism in their brains and insist on calling me naive, but hey, you tell me who's right and who's wrong.

There's also the fact that they're ruggedly individualistic feminists and believe that Jews supposedly steal women away from societies, but again, you tell me who's right and who's wrong.

Am I naive? Go ahead. Come out and say it if you want. Just remember what the implications are.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top