Mudda
Silver Member
- Oct 23, 2015
- 8,015
- 341
- 95
- Banned
- #61
Yes, you are offering proof "If He were accountable to mans' demands, He would be controllable, and thus replicated in the lab" and you're saying that your invisible being can't be replicated so therefore it exists with its own free will. Which makes no sense at all. It actually shows the reverse to be truer to sane people.I'm not offering you proof in that statement. Perhaps that's why you're confused. Here's a question for you. Exactly what proof of God's existence would you accept? Be as specific as possible.So that fact that your invisible being can't be replicated in a lab is proof that it exists? Your logic is so weak that I'm afraid for your sanity.If He were accountable to mans' demands, He would be controllable, and thus replicated in the lab. Thus, He is free to act in one circumstance and not in another, though we think they are the same.He (god) is a sovereign being, unaccountable to mans' demands.
And you know that how?![]()
As for what proof I'd accept personally? Something tangible that proves a god. I'm agnostic, I see no real proof so far for a god but will gladly change my mind if irrefutable proof ever arises. Can't be any fairer than that.