Lewdog
Gold Member
What kind of scientists are you talking about? The kind who keep an open mind to ALL possibilities or the kind who take government grants from liberals, then give them the results they want for political gain?
So just because the results come out in favor of what the study is for, it HAS to be false. You realize the fallacy in that right?
What results would those be? Over the past 3 decades, about a trillion dollars has been spent on climate "science" and to date
1. There is not a single piece of observed, measured evidence which supports the man made climate change hypothesis over natural variability...
2. There is not a single piece of observed, measured evidence which establishes a coherent relationship between the absorption of infrared radiation by a gas and warming in the atmosphere.
3. There has not been a single paper published in which the hypothetical warming due to the greenhouse gasses we produce has been empirically measured, quantified, and blamed on those greenhouse gasses.
Now, for a trillion dollars, isn't it reasonable to expect at least a single piece of evidence or a single paper that would satisfy any of the 3 statements above?
Which evidence are you talking about? Lets see some of it....lets see any that would satisfy any one of the 3 statements above?
There is a very simple answer to everything you just said.
Scientist know that throughout the history of the Earth there have been heat increases and cool down periods, but what they can't answer however, is exactly why because no one was alive at the time to do tests to confirm the cause. Even when comparing the last decade with other periods of time where there is better documentation, but without well collected data because science was not sophisticated enough at the time, the scientist of today can not appropriately match the data together.
So with that being said, scientist can only definitively work with the proper data collected since the field has become much more defined and armed with the proper tools. Now, because of that the data many scientist report, confirms that man made climate change has indeed disrupted the planet with the last few years including the one we are in now, are the hottest, or one of the hottest, since science has been keeping track of that. So you can argue until you are blue in the face that they have not properly proved it, but you are only correct because it is impossible for them to compare it to the history of climate on Earth that there is no proper data for. That doesn't make you right however, it just makes their hypothesis unproven... not wrong.