- Thread starter
- #361
You're assuming the rich are managing their own funds. Ordinary people who might have some money might be doing that. But the richest of the rich are not.
Not at all. I'd assume the opposite in most cases. Effective delegation is an extremely important skill for any sane human being.
Nobody's disputing that running a business or managing active investments isn't work. I'm saying the richest of the rich are not doing that.
They're either doing it, delegating it effectively - or they're losing their money. And in the latter case, they won't stay wealthy for long.
In any case someone must do it. If you don't like the fact that, in the current system, individual owners of capital are making those decisions, what are you suggesting replacing it with? This is the question I never really find socialists willing to address. Do you really think the state can make resource allocation decisions as well as a distributed networked of motivated investors?
First of all, I'm not a socialist. I'm a liberal Democrat. There's a difference. One of them being we don't advocate socialism. (We do advocate taxing the rich, but that's another story.)
Here's the thing. Conservatives have a sickness. Many of their positions are symptoms of the sickness, but you don't cure a disease by treating the symptoms. You have to go at root causes.
One of those root causes is the failure to distinguish between the source of wealth (work) and its destination (income). In other words, the difference between producing and consuming. Many conservatives seem to feel goods and services are produced by money.
The point is, having an income - even a gargantuan one - does not, in and of itself, mean you're contributing anything.
Not that there's anything wrong with being part of the leisure class.
But if you are, you should pay your taxes and be grateful you're not someone who has to work longer, harder hours, at shittier jobs, for less pay, in order to make your lifestyle possible.
Anyway. I could make a smart remark about "effective delegation," but since I'm not actually advocating socialism - though the scheduled expiration of the supposedly temporary Bush tax cuts would be a good idea - I'll refrain.