FA_Q2
Gold Member
I thought so too. However, the piss poor third party performance in ideal circumstances (Trump vs Hillary) has proven to me that the average joe is utterly uninterested in such.Outstanding post.If so, what's your story?
Is it anything like this guy who was forced to leave the party he's been a part of since 1979 due to the fact that it's gone completely off the deep end?
What's your story?
Former Republican? I was regularly a delegate to the state conventions in Texas, was president of the College Republicans on my campus and was employed by the Reagan-Bush '84 and Bill Clements re-election campaigns. In that period I was a regular listener to Limbaugh, Liddy, and Hannity. Though I didn't care for them personally, I grudgingly accepted GHWB and Dole as nominees because they "earned" it through long service. I backed Buchanan in 92 and my governor for president in 2000. As curriculum vitae is that sufficient?
Once upon a time, not so long ago, I would have been considered a center right Repub. As RR once said, “I didn’t leave the Democrat Party, they left me.” My points of view haven’t changed. Unlike those who claim the conservative label in this day and time, I have read Russell Kirk, John Locke, and Hobbes. To my reading list I have added Nock, Spooner, Bastiat, Herbert Spencer and Rothbard. This is why I hold both major political parties, and their rabid mindless acolytes, in such great disdain. Each is full of that ‘my country right or wrong’ thinking, just as long as it’s their party in charge at the moment. When it is the other bunch in charge they are ready to scream that the whole shootin’ match is going to the hot place in a hand basket. They are two sides of the same coin. Theirs is organised theft. It is theft by force of arms. They exist only to remove money, which they have not earned and have no right to, from productive people and make it available to the leaches. There is no difference in the social programs of the left’s nanny state or the military industrial complex and corporate welfare on the right.
I have never been an active anti-abortion advocate, but am inclined in that direction. My belief is that this is something that belongs under the preview of the states and as such support the overturning of RvW. Now this has been a fundraising cash cow of the GOP since the late 1970’s. Cynically they have avoided actually doing anything about this every time they have had the power to do so. Simply stripping the jurisdiction of the federal courts, which the congress has the power to do, in this matter is doable and does not require a majority on the SC.
While he was still Governor of Texas, I was as excited as any Bushie that he might seek the White House. He had been a fine Governor, his leadership was strong and his ability to reach across the aisle and work with the opposition party for the betterment of Texas showed great promise for the future.
Once elected what had President Bush done? He had allowed discretionary spending rise at a rate that would have given Bill Clinton pause. He made war on terrorists in the name of supporting freedom, and left inconvenient democracy movements to wither while at home he signed legislation that went further to restrict liberties than any preceding president. After decades of advocating the devolving of power to the state and local governments, Ted Kennedy got to write the Education Bill and set national standards in education. The national chairman of the GO.P. went to New Hampshire in 2004 and told conservatives that they can lump it if they didn't like it, because wasn’t like they had anywhere else to go. Then they pushed Part D through the congress and made it law.
Wars without end were launched with the most spurious and transparent of false justifications. When the towers were destroyed, Saudi officials and their families were quickly spirited out of the country. Surprise! Most of the actors in the attack were Saudi citizens. Anybody within the fold that questioned the motivations for the attack was ostracized and kicked to the side of the road. The most vicious attacks were set aside for Congressman Ron Paul, an unassuming and soft spoken fellow who could have easily been patted on the head, smiled at, and patronized like an elderly uncle. He wasn’t going to win, he was no threat to the status quo but he was treated like a klansman at a NAACP meeting.
They only opposed Obama around the fringes, with cynical votes to end national healthcare that they knew would accomplish nothing. Once they had the means to do something, they refused to do so. Obama did two things worthy of a pat on the back, his reaching out to Cuba and the Iran nuclear deal. These were the first things to be reversed as soon as possible.
I find a perverse pleasure in the administration of Donald Trump. I agree with almost nothing, but he does throw the pestilent and parasitical types into a real tizzy and I am greatly amused by the show. Y’all ran that old unelectable douche bag on purpose and that’s why you ended up with the annoying orange. That shit is on you.
Trump is vile, his enemies and detractors more so.
There is nothing of the small government, live and let live, western GOP, libertarian Reaganite views left in the party. So I quit. I won’t vote for their neocon warmongering, government has the answers, boom and bust cycle fascist corporatism. The last national election in which I cast a vote was in 2004 and it was for a third party candidate.
For all their faults, as detestable as I find the GOP, I hold the dimocraps in even lower esteem.
Reagan's "I didn't leave them, they left me" statement has come to my mind hundreds of times in recent years, except this time in the context of the Republican party.
I didn't leave it, it left me.
Like you, I hold the Democrats in low esteem, and always have. So I find myself a man without a party.
I do believe our country is ripe for a new major party.
Politics is sports now. No one seems to care what they do as long as they can 'win' and cheer their team on.