Do you Believe Kavanaugh's Rape Accuser?

[Crixus]

This story just broke. How do you know she’s got none of that? Why don’t we just wait and see

She can’t remember time or place, and so far everyone she has pointed to as a witness says she is wrong.

Everyone she has pointed to says she is wrong? You mean the two boys that she is accusing of assault?! Can you be any more misleading?! She described the general time and place and I’m sure she will be questioned further about that along with who, if anybody, she told about it back in the day. There is much more to uncover and it is way too premature to be making a conclusion like you are. Makes your partisan colors shine bright.

Then she needs to expose this information ahead of time so it can be vetted prior to the hearing. If not, it simply looks like a stalling tactic.

The Left is going to politicize it because it is being used to block a SCOTUS nomination. No denying that. But that doesn’t mean everything should be dismissed. There are things that give credibility to her story so it needs to play out.

One of which is that she talked with this trauma with her therapist back in 2012 (there are records of this).

How diabolical would she have to be to tell it to her shrink, wait 6 years, and then try to sink Kavanaugh?

Like I said before, she probably didn't pursue it because she didn't want to contact Kavanaugh, nor did she know where he was at, and simply let it lay until he popped up on the national scene as a SC nominee.

There are issues with the therapists account to. And still, she remembers Kavanaugh, and Dord who rebuked her account and she can’t remember a time or place? She is a liar.

 

[Slade3200]

She can’t remember time or place, and so far everyone she has pointed to as a witness says she is wrong.

Everyone she has pointed to says she is wrong? You mean the two boys that she is accusing of assault?! Can you be any more misleading?! She described the general time and place and I’m sure she will be questioned further about that along with who, if anybody, she told about it back in the day. There is much more to uncover and it is way too premature to be making a conclusion like you are. Makes your partisan colors shine bright.

Then she needs to expose this information ahead of time so it can be vetted prior to the hearing. If not, it simply looks like a stalling tactic.

The Left is going to politicize it because it is being used to block a SCOTUS nomination. No denying that. But that doesn’t mean everything should be dismissed. There are things that give credibility to her story so it needs to play out.

One of which is that she talked with this trauma with her therapist back in 2012 (there are records of this).

How diabolical would she have to be to tell it to her shrink, wait 6 years, and then try to sink Kavanaugh?

Like I said before, she probably didn't pursue it because she didn't want to contact Kavanaugh, nor did she know where he was at, and simply let it lay until he popped up on the national scene as a SC nominee.

I'm wondering why she isn't after the other three she says were part of this attempted rape??

They get a pass??

They aren’t nominated for SCOTUS.

 

[pismoe]

and WHY are womens SPECIAL status of Rape victims hidden away but accused rapists are trotted out for the world to see Slade ??

 

[Crixus]

and WHY are womens SOECIAL status of Rape victims hidden away but accused rapists are trotted out for the world to see Slade .

That’s how a character assassination go’s.

 

[ABikerSailor]

She can’t remember time or place, and so far everyone she has pointed to as a witness says she is wrong.

Everyone she has pointed to says she is wrong? You mean the two boys that she is accusing of assault?! Can you be any more misleading?! She described the general time and place and I’m sure she will be questioned further about that along with who, if anybody, she told about it back in the day. There is much more to uncover and it is way too premature to be making a conclusion like you are. Makes your partisan colors shine bright.

Then she needs to expose this information ahead of time so it can be vetted prior to the hearing. If not, it simply looks like a stalling tactic.

The Left is going to politicize it because it is being used to block a SCOTUS nomination. No denying that. But that doesn’t mean everything should be dismissed. There are things that give credibility to her story so it needs to play out.

One of which is that she talked with this trauma with her therapist back in 2012 (there are records of this).

How diabolical would she have to be to tell it to her shrink, wait 6 years, and then try to sink Kavanaugh?

Like I said before, she probably didn't pursue it because she didn't want to contact Kavanaugh, nor did she know where he was at, and simply let it lay until he popped up on the national scene as a SC nominee.

I'm wondering why she isn't after the other three she says were part of this attempted rape??

They get a pass??

What three guys? She claimed that Kavanaugh tried to rape her, and he might have succeeded if Kavanaugh's friend, Judge, hadn't jumped on him and stopped him. As far as I've read, there was only 2 at the time, and Judge was just watching until he stopped it.

Here..................a link from FOX News......................

Who is Christine Blasey Ford, the professor who accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct?

But Ford publicly came forward in an interview with The Washington Post over the weekend, saying her “civic responsibility is outweighing my anguish and terror about retaliation.”


She has accused Kavanaugh of pinning her to a bed during a house party in Maryland in the early 1980s, attempting to remove her clothes and putting his hand over her mouth when she tried to scream. At the time of the alleged incident, Ford was 15 and Kavanaugh was 17, she said, adding that Kavanaugh was drunk.


“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” Ford said. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”

She said she was able to escape when Mark Judge – a friend of Kavanaugh’s who has come to his defense after the allegations became public – jumped on top of them.

 

[Slade3200]

Recollections of drunkenness from more than 30 years ago are hardly reliable

So your argument is that because she was drunk, it was okay for him to attempt to rape her?

You go with that buddy.... you totally go with that.

We have no reason to think her claim is credible.

seriously if you were a woman and was assaulted would you wait almost 40 YEARS to say something?

It doesn't take a bloodhound to smell a rat here

I agree. Hell I'd have called the police and been screaming bloody murder.

This whole thing doesn't pass the stink test.

Now she isn't going to testify and what happened to the other three men?? How come she isn't after them for something she says happened over 30 years ago.

Woman is looking more and more like a nut job to me. Why anyone left or right would believe her is beyond me.

3 other men? You need to get your facts straight before criticizing others for being unreliable. There were two boys and her

Like Shitting Bull you like spouting your bullshit without researching what you are talking about.

She said she got locked in a closet by four men. You really need to research before you make a fool of yourself.

Blow it out your ass.

Ford said that on the night of the party, she left the family room to use the bathroom, which was at the top of a narrow stairway. She doesn’t remember whether Kavanaugh and Judge were behind her or already upstairs, but she remembers being pushed into a bedroom and then onto a bed. Rock-and-roll music was playing with the volume turned up high, she said.

 

[Claudette]

Everyone she has pointed to says she is wrong? You mean the two boys that she is accusing of assault?! Can you be any more misleading?! She described the general time and place and I’m sure she will be questioned further about that along with who, if anybody, she told about it back in the day. There is much more to uncover and it is way too premature to be making a conclusion like you are. Makes your partisan colors shine bright.

Then she needs to expose this information ahead of time so it can be vetted prior to the hearing. If not, it simply looks like a stalling tactic.

The Left is going to politicize it because it is being used to block a SCOTUS nomination. No denying that. But that doesn’t mean everything should be dismissed. There are things that give credibility to her story so it needs to play out.

One of which is that she talked with this trauma with her therapist back in 2012 (there are records of this).

How diabolical would she have to be to tell it to her shrink, wait 6 years, and then try to sink Kavanaugh?

Like I said before, she probably didn't pursue it because she didn't want to contact Kavanaugh, nor did she know where he was at, and simply let it lay until he popped up on the national scene as a SC nominee.

I'm wondering why she isn't after the other three she says were part of this attempted rape??

They get a pass??

What three guys? She claimed that Kavanaugh tried to rape her, and he might have succeeded if Kavanaugh's friend, Judge, hadn't jumped on him and stopped him. As far as I've read, there was only 2 at the time, and Judge was just watching until he stopped it.

Here..................a link from FOX News......................

Who is Christine Blasey Ford, the professor who accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct?

But Ford publicly came forward in an interview with The Washington Post over the weekend, saying her “civic responsibility is outweighing my anguish and terror about retaliation.”


She has accused Kavanaugh of pinning her to a bed during a house party in Maryland in the early 1980s, attempting to remove her clothes and putting his hand over her mouth when she tried to scream. At the time of the alleged incident, Ford was 15 and Kavanaugh was 17, she said, adding that Kavanaugh was drunk.


“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” Ford said. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”

She said she was able to escape when Mark Judge – a friend of Kavanaugh’s who has come to his defense after the allegations became public – jumped on top of them.

OMG buddy. Don't tell me you don't know about the four men. She says they locked her in a closet and there were four of them.

Holy shit. Look it up.

 

[Crixus]

Everyone she has pointed to says she is wrong? You mean the two boys that she is accusing of assault?! Can you be any more misleading?! She described the general time and place and I’m sure she will be questioned further about that along with who, if anybody, she told about it back in the day. There is much more to uncover and it is way too premature to be making a conclusion like you are. Makes your partisan colors shine bright.

Then she needs to expose this information ahead of time so it can be vetted prior to the hearing. If not, it simply looks like a stalling tactic.

The Left is going to politicize it because it is being used to block a SCOTUS nomination. No denying that. But that doesn’t mean everything should be dismissed. There are things that give credibility to her story so it needs to play out.

One of which is that she talked with this trauma with her therapist back in 2012 (there are records of this).

How diabolical would she have to be to tell it to her shrink, wait 6 years, and then try to sink Kavanaugh?

Like I said before, she probably didn't pursue it because she didn't want to contact Kavanaugh, nor did she know where he was at, and simply let it lay until he popped up on the national scene as a SC nominee.

I'm wondering why she isn't after the other three she says were part of this attempted rape??

They get a pass??

What three guys? She claimed that Kavanaugh tried to rape her, and he might have succeeded if Kavanaugh's friend, Judge, hadn't jumped on him and stopped him. As far as I've read, there was only 2 at the time, and Judge was just watching until he stopped it.

Here..................a link from FOX News......................

Who is Christine Blasey Ford, the professor who accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct?

But Ford publicly came forward in an interview with The Washington Post over the weekend, saying her “civic responsibility is outweighing my anguish and terror about retaliation.”


She has accused Kavanaugh of pinning her to a bed during a house party in Maryland in the early 1980s, attempting to remove her clothes and putting his hand over her mouth when she tried to scream. At the time of the alleged incident, Ford was 15 and Kavanaugh was 17, she said, adding that Kavanaugh was drunk.


“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” Ford said. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”

She said she was able to escape when Mark Judge – a friend of Kavanaugh’s who has come to his defense after the allegations became public – jumped on top of them.

Yup, and that “friend” don’t back the woman’s account at all. Then, she can’t say exactly where it happened, only that she did. Can’t say when it happened, only that it did. She has a history of being weird, and I’m thinking more will come out. This woman is
nothing but a political operative and a liar.

 

[pismoe]

and WHY are womens SOECIAL status of Rape victims hidden away but accused rapists are trotted out for the world to see Slade .

That’s how a character assassination go’s.

----------------------------------- yeah , character asassination of the unproven alleged male or any rapist i guess but the poor SPECIAL widdle woman is hidden away and hidden away by the emotional law . Whats up with that Slade ??

 

[ABikerSailor]

Then she needs to expose this information ahead of time so it can be vetted prior to the hearing. If not, it simply looks like a stalling tactic.

The Left is going to politicize it because it is being used to block a SCOTUS nomination. No denying that. But that doesn’t mean everything should be dismissed. There are things that give credibility to her story so it needs to play out.

One of which is that she talked with this trauma with her therapist back in 2012 (there are records of this).

How diabolical would she have to be to tell it to her shrink, wait 6 years, and then try to sink Kavanaugh?

Like I said before, she probably didn't pursue it because she didn't want to contact Kavanaugh, nor did she know where he was at, and simply let it lay until he popped up on the national scene as a SC nominee.

I'm wondering why she isn't after the other three she says were part of this attempted rape??

They get a pass??

What three guys? She claimed that Kavanaugh tried to rape her, and he might have succeeded if Kavanaugh's friend, Judge, hadn't jumped on him and stopped him. As far as I've read, there was only 2 at the time, and Judge was just watching until he stopped it.

Here..................a link from FOX News......................

Who is Christine Blasey Ford, the professor who accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct?

But Ford publicly came forward in an interview with The Washington Post over the weekend, saying her “civic responsibility is outweighing my anguish and terror about retaliation.”


She has accused Kavanaugh of pinning her to a bed during a house party in Maryland in the early 1980s, attempting to remove her clothes and putting his hand over her mouth when she tried to scream. At the time of the alleged incident, Ford was 15 and Kavanaugh was 17, she said, adding that Kavanaugh was drunk.


“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” Ford said. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”

She said she was able to escape when Mark Judge – a friend of Kavanaugh’s who has come to his defense after the allegations became public – jumped on top of them.

OMG buddy. Don't tell me you don't know about the four men. She says they locked her in a closet and there were four of them.

Holy shit. Look it up.

Post a link then. I did. Why can't you?

 

[sealybobo]

For Christ's sake, why would she wait for 40+ years to do anything about it?

This kind of nonsense is unbelievable, IMO.

She doesn't think a deplorable like him should sit on the high court. Neither do I. He is a liar.

We Know Brett Kavanaugh Has Lied Already | HuffPost

This nation is suffering a significant breakdown of civility, bipartisanship and ethical behavior. For the Trump administration and the Republican leaders who enable it, truth is no longer a cherished value. To them, lying seems to be part of the strategy, a cynical weapon to be used against their opponents.

This week, we are witnessing the full depth of that cynicism, as the White House and its supporters smear a woman who makes credible, significant accusations of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. At the same time, another fact has become clear: Kavanaugh himself has a casual relationship with the truth ― and in that, he fits right in with the way President Donald Trump and his party behave.

Lying under oath cannot and must not be rewarded with a seat on the nation’s highest court.

In fact, there’s clear evidence showing that Kavanaugh lied under oath during the 2006 confirmation hearing for his spot on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. I should know: I was one of the senators on the Judiciary Committee who questioned him.

Sen. Russ Feingold: My first question is this. Did you know that Judge Pickering planned to solicit letters of support in this manner before he did so? And if not, when did you become aware that Judge Pickering had solicited these letters of support?

Brett Kavanaugh: The answer to the first question, Senator, is no. This was not one of the judicial nominees that I was primarily handling.

But newly released emails show that Kavanaugh appeared to be the primary person handling Pickering’s nomination, at least by 2003, and was heavily involved in pushing for his confirmation as early as March 2002. There are emails showing that Kavanaugh coordinated meetings with and about Pickering; that he drafted remarks, letters to people on the Hill and at least one op-ed for then-White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales about Pickering; that he advised Gonzales on Pickering strategy; and much more.

One Department of Justice official even asked for Kavanaugh’s “blessings and instructions” before calling the nominee.

Others may have been involved, but Kavanaugh played a decisive leadership role in managing Pickering’s nomination and then lied to me about it.

So for all you people who say Clinton lied under oath and that's why he got impeached, please explain why you will appoint a judge who himself has lied under oath?

You don't care as long as he's your liar. Republicans don't care about the truth. Fake news my ass.

 

[hadit]

She feels compelled to speak out against a rapist. God bless her and I hope she is heard.

She's been heard, and hasn't made a solid case that Kavenaugh is a rapist. You do know, don't you, that she didn't even say she was raped? Sounds like you're accusing without evidence.

 

[pismoe]

and WHY are womens SPECIAL status of Rape victims hidden away but accused rapists are trotted out for the world to see Slade ??

------------------------- repeat but answer that for me Slade , please .

 

[Crixus]

The Left is going to politicize it because it is being used to block a SCOTUS nomination. No denying that. But that doesn’t mean everything should be dismissed. There are things that give credibility to her story so it needs to play out.

One of which is that she talked with this trauma with her therapist back in 2012 (there are records of this).

How diabolical would she have to be to tell it to her shrink, wait 6 years, and then try to sink Kavanaugh?

Like I said before, she probably didn't pursue it because she didn't want to contact Kavanaugh, nor did she know where he was at, and simply let it lay until he popped up on the national scene as a SC nominee.

I'm wondering why she isn't after the other three she says were part of this attempted rape??

They get a pass??

What three guys? She claimed that Kavanaugh tried to rape her, and he might have succeeded if Kavanaugh's friend, Judge, hadn't jumped on him and stopped him. As far as I've read, there was only 2 at the time, and Judge was just watching until he stopped it.

Here..................a link from FOX News......................

Who is Christine Blasey Ford, the professor who accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct?

But Ford publicly came forward in an interview with The Washington Post over the weekend, saying her “civic responsibility is outweighing my anguish and terror about retaliation.”


She has accused Kavanaugh of pinning her to a bed during a house party in Maryland in the early 1980s, attempting to remove her clothes and putting his hand over her mouth when she tried to scream. At the time of the alleged incident, Ford was 15 and Kavanaugh was 17, she said, adding that Kavanaugh was drunk.


“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” Ford said. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”

She said she was able to escape when Mark Judge – a friend of Kavanaugh’s who has come to his defense after the allegations became public – jumped on top of them.

OMG buddy. Don't tell me you don't know about the four men. She says they locked her in a closet and there were four of them.

Holy shit. Look it up.

Post a link then. I did. Why can't you?

I’m feeling that over the next few days I’m thinking you will get plenty. Just remember, if it’s okay for an anonymous woman can do this to a SCOTUS nominee, will you feel the same if a woman where you work does this to you? Would you sit there and let it play out ?

 

[Skull Pilot]

This story just broke. How do you know she’s got none of that? Why don’t we just wait and see

She can’t remember time or place, and so far everyone she has pointed to as a witness says she is wrong.

Everyone she has pointed to says she is wrong? You mean the two boys that she is accusing of assault?! Can you be any more misleading?! She described the general time and place and I’m sure she will be questioned further about that along with who, if anybody, she told about it back in the day. There is much more to uncover and it is way too premature to be making a conclusion like you are. Makes your partisan colors shine bright.

Then she needs to expose this information ahead of time so it can be vetted prior to the hearing. If not, it simply looks like a stalling tactic.

The Left is going to politicize it because it is being used to block a SCOTUS nomination. No denying that. But that doesn’t mean everything should be dismissed. There are things that give credibility to her story so it needs to play out.

One of which is that she talked with this trauma with her therapist back in 2012 (there are records of this).

How diabolical would she have to be to tell it to her shrink, wait 6 years, and then try to sink Kavanaugh?

Like I said before, she probably didn't pursue it because she didn't want to contact Kavanaugh, nor did she know where he was at, and simply let it lay until he popped up on the national scene as a SC nominee.

Did she mention his name back then?

She may very well think it happened and she may also very well be wrong about who was there

 

[Skull Pilot]

Some of the claims you had a fit about happened years before when he was still in Arkansas & you STILL bring them up.

So why doesn't Kavanaugh just admit it, apologize & move on? Use that "but I was just a kid" excuse.

You know, he might have gotten through it a lot easier if he had just said that. Most people would understand, because a lot of us have done things as kids we'd rather not have exposed to the light of day, they might have given him a pass.

But the denial is what is gonna kill him. Especially if someone from his HS comes forward and says that he was a party animal.

And, let's not forget......................there are times she related this incident to her therapist all the way back in 2012. Are you going to say that she planted the seeds all the way back in 2012, knowing she would be using it in 2018 against Kavanaugh?

I don't think she could be that diabolical.

Why is her memory being considered reliable?
For all we know she was blind drunk and doesn't know who was who other than a vague recollection of some of the people who were at the party?

Stop making stuff up! You’re not doing yourself any favors, just sounding dumb

I'm not making anything up ASSHOLE.

She was 15 at a party she was most likely drinking and there is the absolute possibility that her memory is more than a little hazy

If you think she wasn't there drinking then you are a naive to the point of mental retardation rube

“Most likely” “possibility” yeah you’re not making anything up! Haha

No just my entire life experience at parties

It's beyond stupid to think her memory is beyond reproach

 

[Slade3200]

This story just broke. How do you know she’s got none of that? Why don’t we just wait and see

She can’t remember time or place, and so far everyone she has pointed to as a witness says she is wrong.

Everyone she has pointed to says she is wrong? You mean the two boys that she is accusing of assault?! Can you be any more misleading?! She described the general time and place and I’m sure she will be questioned further about that along with who, if anybody, she told about it back in the day. There is much more to uncover and it is way too premature to be making a conclusion like you are. Makes your partisan colors shine bright.

Then she needs to expose this information ahead of time so it can be vetted prior to the hearing. If not, it simply looks like a stalling tactic.

The Left is going to politicize it because it is being used to block a SCOTUS nomination. No denying that. But that doesn’t mean everything should be dismissed. There are things that give credibility to her story so it needs to play out.

Like what? What lends her story credibility. Serious question. This is what I heard so far, she said he tried to rape her, and another guys saw it. No location, ( she can’t remember) and that Ford guy who she said was there said none of her claims happened. Then there is the two months DIFI sat on it? Fine, hold everything up, but make this woman testify tomorrow under oath in public. She won’t. This is fake.

See how can I take you seriously when you have the story so scrambled up?!

She said he gropped her and tried to take her close off, he covered her mouth when she tried to scream. One guy was in the room with them, his name was Judge not Ford. Ford is her last name. She said the neighborhood and summer that the party took place and described the events of the night.

You are trying to shine a spotlight on possible holes while failing to acknowledge any of the substance. There’s also the therapy notes and the polygraph. Neither is undesirable evidence but they lend weight and credibility. Open your eyes and just try and be objective

 

[Claudette]

The Left is going to politicize it because it is being used to block a SCOTUS nomination. No denying that. But that doesn’t mean everything should be dismissed. There are things that give credibility to her story so it needs to play out.

One of which is that she talked with this trauma with her therapist back in 2012 (there are records of this).

How diabolical would she have to be to tell it to her shrink, wait 6 years, and then try to sink Kavanaugh?

Like I said before, she probably didn't pursue it because she didn't want to contact Kavanaugh, nor did she know where he was at, and simply let it lay until he popped up on the national scene as a SC nominee.

I'm wondering why she isn't after the other three she says were part of this attempted rape??

They get a pass??

What three guys? She claimed that Kavanaugh tried to rape her, and he might have succeeded if Kavanaugh's friend, Judge, hadn't jumped on him and stopped him. As far as I've read, there was only 2 at the time, and Judge was just watching until he stopped it.

Here..................a link from FOX News......................

Who is Christine Blasey Ford, the professor who accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct?

But Ford publicly came forward in an interview with The Washington Post over the weekend, saying her “civic responsibility is outweighing my anguish and terror about retaliation.”


She has accused Kavanaugh of pinning her to a bed during a house party in Maryland in the early 1980s, attempting to remove her clothes and putting his hand over her mouth when she tried to scream. At the time of the alleged incident, Ford was 15 and Kavanaugh was 17, she said, adding that Kavanaugh was drunk.


“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” Ford said. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”

She said she was able to escape when Mark Judge – a friend of Kavanaugh’s who has come to his defense after the allegations became public – jumped on top of them.

OMG buddy. Don't tell me you don't know about the four men. She says they locked her in a closet and there were four of them.

Holy shit. Look it up.

Post a link then. I did. Why can't you?

Sure since you can't seem to look it up. LOL

California professor, writer of confidential Brett Kavanaugh letter, speaks out about her allegation of sexual assault

My bad. Seems there were only two she alleges assaulted her and the notes said four.

The notes say four boys were involved, a discrepancy Ford says was an error on the therapist’s part. Ford said there were four boys at the party but only two in the room.

So why is she only after Kavanaugh and not the other boy??

 

[Slade3200]

i say , feck her and go after her for SLANDER . You say that she is a SPECIAL abuse victim in post number 355 .

Good glad we got that figured out.

 

[Skull Pilot]

For Christ's sake, why would she wait for 40+ years to do anything about it?

This kind of nonsense is unbelievable, IMO.

She doesn't think a deplorable like him should sit on the high court. Neither do I. He is a liar.

We Know Brett Kavanaugh Has Lied Already | HuffPost

This nation is suffering a significant breakdown of civility, bipartisanship and ethical behavior. For the Trump administration and the Republican leaders who enable it, truth is no longer a cherished value. To them, lying seems to be part of the strategy, a cynical weapon to be used against their opponents.

This week, we are witnessing the full depth of that cynicism, as the White House and its supporters smear a woman who makes credible, significant accusations of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. At the same time, another fact has become clear: Kavanaugh himself has a casual relationship with the truth ― and in that, he fits right in with the way President Donald Trump and his party behave.

Lying under oath cannot and must not be rewarded with a seat on the nation’s highest court.

In fact, there’s clear evidence showing that Kavanaugh lied under oath during the 2006 confirmation hearing for his spot on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. I should know: I was one of the senators on the Judiciary Committee who questioned him.

Sen. Russ Feingold: My first question is this. Did you know that Judge Pickering planned to solicit letters of support in this manner before he did so? And if not, when did you become aware that Judge Pickering had solicited these letters of support?

Brett Kavanaugh: The answer to the first question, Senator, is no. This was not one of the judicial nominees that I was primarily handling.

But newly released emails show that Kavanaugh appeared to be the primary person handling Pickering’s nomination, at least by 2003, and was heavily involved in pushing for his confirmation as early as March 2002. There are emails showing that Kavanaugh coordinated meetings with and about Pickering; that he drafted remarks, letters to people on the Hill and at least one op-ed for then-White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales about Pickering; that he advised Gonzales on Pickering strategy; and much more.

One Department of Justice official even asked for Kavanaugh’s “blessings and instructions” before calling the nominee.

Others may have been involved, but Kavanaugh played a decisive leadership role in managing Pickering’s nomination and then lied to me about it.

So for all you people who say Clinton lied under oath and that's why he got impeached, please explain why you will appoint a judge who himself has lied under oath?

You don't care as long as he's your liar. Republicans don't care about the truth. Fake news my ass.

So I take it you endeavor to find the only people on the planet who have never lied so that you can vote them into office