harmonica
Diamond Member
- Sep 1, 2017
- 43,841
- 20,017
- 2,300
I could go into a lot of aspects here ....again --the car analogy is ridiculous --there is no comparisonwe want to make it harder to kill yes??Even if they haven't they have to be intelligent enough to know if someone wants to kill they will use whatever they have access to to do it.
You're correct.
Too many gun haters live in a false reality and do not realize a killer will kill and the weapon of choice is whatever is the easiest to get for the least amount of money that will do the max amount of killing...
Remove firearms plan for truck bombs and the sad part is our society has no damn clue what to do about this problen of mass murder in this country...
much harder to kill with a bonb
most murders/mass shootings are done with gunsAnswer the poll honestly if you are capable. Show us your logic or be exposed for running on emotion.
Will it stop school shootings?
No.
Why?
Banning of certain firearms will not stop mass murders and they will either go for pump action shotguns or worst the Tim McVeigh route and say forget the gun because they have a truck bomb...
so, because they could use a bomb [much more difficult to build and use ] we should just let the mass shootings/murder continue and do NOTHING ???!!!!
we should do nothing?? let them do the easier route--guns??
I have a better chance being killed by a driver on a cellphone than being killed by some nass shooter...
So I demand you start arresting every driver that drive with their cellphone glue to their ear because they are more dangerous than the average citizen that own a damn gun!
try something else
hshahhahahahah
we shouldn't try to cut down mass SHOOTINGS--shootings--because we might make it more difficult for them to go to bombs???!!!??????
because there are car deaths [ which isn't even comparable ] we shouldn't try to stop mass SHOOTINGS???!!!!
because some women have red hair, because there are knives/bats/pools/we should not try to cut down mass shootings--this is like what you are saying
If banning AR-15s would have a minute effect in reducing mass shootings, you might have a point. But, it won't, and consequently, you don't have a point. First, there are too many of them already in the population, and second, there are too many substitutes with the same firepower.
1. it might take time for the effect to be felt--you just don't cure polio overnight!!!
2. bans do work--the countries most comparable to the US--France, Germany, and the UK have murder rates many times lower than the US
3.grenades/C4/tanks/MGs are highly restricted--and we don't see many murders committed by those weapons
I'm not talking about just banning ARs/etc
if there was a law to buy guns for only 21 and over--it would've been much harder for this guy and the Columbine shooters---
if there was a law of no gifting, it would've been harder for the Columbine shooters--and a lot of other murderers
..there is NO infringement if you are not able to gift a gun
you can have your gun--but there is nothing in the Constitution saying you have to be able to give it to someone...be a certain age
.
no--you can't stop it entirely--but we want it to be harder for them to get these ''tools'' designed to kill very fast and effectively--yes?
!! a lot of these school shooters are very young....