Do you notice how RWs never establish a line on their 2nd amendment rights?

[Ringel05]

Of course, what question they can’t answer is where they draw the line.

What's the line on your 1st Amendment rights?

That’s easy. It’s illegal to create or own child pornography. Defamation of character is also illegal.

Thanks.
Murdering people with a gun is illegal.
I guess we can keep both Amendments as is.

The same logic applies to restriction on gun ownership just as you are restricted from certain expressions of speech.

He is? Wonder which expressions of speech he can't use that the rest of us can?

We both know I didn’t imply that, but I guess that doesn’t stop you from desperately trying to be clever.

I don't have to try hard with you, you make it easy.
Now back to your claim, you didn't imply, you stated it outright. Therefore I don't know how you meant it, I don't live in your paradigm bubble.

 

[gipper]

I fucking hunt. I hunt. When I lived in Tennessee I fucking hunted. I'm in Canada now. I FUCKING HUNT MY FOOD.

FUCK OFF.

You hunt. You live in Canada. They have supermarkets in Canada, don't they? We have a problem here in Yankeeland with gun toting madmen, perhaps you haven't noticed. Some of us yanks have had enough of this gunmania and want to really end that. Repealing the 2nd amendment to the American constitution.

have fun getting it removed.

What do you think is going to happen, should the Second be repealed?

Think everyone is going to load all their firearms in the car, and take them down to the police station and turn them in?

Your post and the logic behind it exposes why Americans are afraid to stand up to gun owners. They will shoot us. We are intimidated by you people. And you don't see that. You can live a perfectly healthy full life with out firearms. And society would be better off without firearms.

Big government elites love minions like you.

 

[ColonelAngus]

OP is a fucking jackass.

Educate yourself.

District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia

Read the SCOTUS decision on D.C.vs. Heller.

Then make your arguments.



District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held, in a 5–4 decision, that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and that Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban and requirement that lawfully-owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee. Due to Washington, D.C.'s special status as a federal district, the decision did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment's protections are incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment against the states,[1] which was addressed two years later by McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) in which it was found that they are. It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.[2]

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

RWs have a child-like fantasy when it comes to guns. They delude themselves into dreaming of one day being an armed hero. This can range from taking down a home intruder to shooting fascist thugs trying to steal their liberty! The truth of the matter is that when it comes to pulling the trigger, many wouid puss out in such situations. The idea of it just gives them the feels so they insist on no gun control whatsoever.

Of course, what question they can’t answer is where they draw the line.

Do they want ANYONE to be able to carry fully automatic weapons anywhere, anytime? If that hypothetical is answered as a “no”, then what does that say about their 2nd amendment rights? It’s fallacious thinking, but these are republicans afterall.

Of course, what question they can’t answer is where they draw the line.

What's the line on your 1st Amendment rights?

That’s easy. It’s illegal to create or own child pornography. Defamation of character is also illegal.

Thanks.
Murdering people with a gun is illegal.
I guess we can keep both Amendments as is.

The same logic applies to restriction on gun ownership just as you are restricted from certain expressions of speech.

Felons can't have guns.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Do they want ANYONE to be able to carry fully automatic weapons anywhere, anytime?

Yes. So do libertarians. And we should. And we MOTHERFUCKING WILL!!!

Fuck off, commie. We're getting our fully automatic, belt-fed machine guns, and you can suck it.

 

[KissMy]

Fully automatic weapons are illegal for civilians to own or purchase and have been for some time now this fact has been brought to you by reality.

Ban on fully automatic weapons was by President Ronald Reagan!

 

[xotoxi]

I fucking hunt. I hunt. When I lived in Tennessee I fucking hunted. I'm in Canada now. I FUCKING HUNT MY FOOD.

FUCK OFF.

Did you just call yourself a fuckin' ****?

 

[fncceo]

all I can think is how much I hate guns

Such a one track mind. Try to spend your time thinking of nice things.

 

[MaryL]

I love you guys. I will start this off with that. We are a family, we want what is best for all of us. Guns are becoming an affliction, and addiction and it's time for a wake up call or a intervention here. Guns are killing innocent people, and they aren't doing much else. So let's get real here.

 

[Billy000]

OP is a fucking jackass.

Educate yourself.

District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia

Read the SCOTUS decision on D.C.vs. Heller.

Then make your arguments.



District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held, in a 5–4 decision, that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and that Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban and requirement that lawfully-owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee. Due to Washington, D.C.'s special status as a federal district, the decision did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment's protections are incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment against the states,[1] which was addressed two years later by McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) in which it was found that they are. It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.[2]

Oh for fuck sake. You people really struggle with nuance huh? I never said it was illegal to own a gun nor am I against your right to do it. I’m just pointing out your fallacious reasoning when it comes to any kind of gun control.

 

[Auld Phart]

Fully automatic weapons are illegal for civilians to own or purchase and have been for some time now this fact has been brought to you by reality.

Ban on fully automatic weapons was by President Ronald Reagan!

but automatic weapons manufactured before 1986 were grandfathered.

wade thru the red tape, and you can purchase one

 

[KissMy]

Do they want ANYONE to be able to carry fully automatic weapons anywhere, anytime?

Yes. So do libertarians. And we should. And we MOTHERFUCKING WILL!!!

Fuck off, commie. We're getting our fully automatic, belt-fed machine guns, and you can suck it.

Dear Idiot - All those gun toting citizens & police in vegas could not stop 1 man from shooting 600 people.

 

[fncceo]

Guns are killing innocent people, and they aren't doing much else. So let's get real here.

You can have my gun just as soon as it kills an innocent person. Until then... hands off.

 

[Billy000]

RWs have a child-like fantasy when it comes to guns. They delude themselves into dreaming of one day being an armed hero. This can range from taking down a home intruder to shooting fascist thugs trying to steal their liberty! The truth of the matter is that when it comes to pulling the trigger, many wouid puss out in such situations. The idea of it just gives them the feels so they insist on no gun control whatsoever.

Of course, what question they can’t answer is where they draw the line.

Do they want ANYONE to be able to carry fully automatic weapons anywhere, anytime? If that hypothetical is answered as a “no”, then what does that say about their 2nd amendment rights? It’s fallacious thinking, but these are republicans afterall.

Of course, what question they can’t answer is where they draw the line.

What's the line on your 1st Amendment rights?

That’s easy. It’s illegal to create or own child pornography. Defamation of character is also illegal.

Thanks.
Murdering people with a gun is illegal.
I guess we can keep both Amendments as is.

The same logic applies to restriction on gun ownership just as you are restricted from certain expressions of speech.

Felons can't have guns.

No shit. My question to you is should they own guns? It is a right afterall.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Do they want ANYONE to be able to carry fully automatic weapons anywhere, anytime?

Yes. So do libertarians. And we should. And we MOTHERFUCKING WILL!!!

Fuck off, commie. We're getting our fully automatic, belt-fed machine guns, and you can suck it.

Dear Idiot - All those gun toting citizens & police in vegas could not stop 1 man from shooting 600 people.

You can't block a sucker punch either.

So, what's your point?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I love you guys. I will start this off with that. We are a family, we want what is best for all of us. Guns are becoming an affliction, and addiction and it's time for a wake up call or a intervention here. Guns are killing innocent people, and they aren't doing much else. So let's get real here.

Guns are killing innocent people, and they aren't doing much else.

Guns also prevent the killing of innocent people.

 

[KissMy]

Fully automatic weapons are illegal for civilians to own or purchase and have been for some time now this fact has been brought to you by reality.

Ban on fully automatic weapons was by President Ronald Reagan!

but automatic weapons manufactured before 1986 were grandfathered.

wade thru the red tape, and you can purchase one

You failed to mention the $200 tax stamp.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Fully automatic weapons are illegal for civilians to own or purchase and have been for some time now this fact has been brought to you by reality.

Ban on fully automatic weapons was by President Ronald Reagan!

but automatic weapons manufactured before 1986 were grandfathered.

wade thru the red tape, and you can purchase one

You failed to mention the $200 tax stamp.

Pffft. A nice lunch for two.

 

[blackhawk]

Fully automatic weapons are illegal for civilians to own or purchase and have been for some time now this fact has been brought to you by reality.

Ban on fully automatic weapons was by President Ronald Reagan!

Reagan signed into law the Firearm Owners Protection Act, which was supported by gun rights advocates. In addition to providing protections for gun owners, the act also banned ownership of any fully automatic rifles that were not already registered on the day the law was signed.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Of course, what question they can’t answer is where they draw the line.

What's the line on your 1st Amendment rights?

That’s easy. It’s illegal to create or own child pornography. Defamation of character is also illegal.

Thanks.
Murdering people with a gun is illegal.
I guess we can keep both Amendments as is.

The same logic applies to restriction on gun ownership just as you are restricted from certain expressions of speech.

Felons can't have guns.

No shit. My question to you is should they own guns? It is a right afterall.

Felons shouldn't own guns and they shouldn't vote.