Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2017
- 46,062
- 29,789
The police are racist pussies. Thus, we need machine guns.Was that answer because the police we must worship are a bunch of pussies that took over an hour to approach a dead man?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The police are racist pussies. Thus, we need machine guns.Was that answer because the police we must worship are a bunch of pussies that took over an hour to approach a dead man?
Was that answer because the police we must worship are a bunch of pussies that took over an hour to approach a dead man?You will be the one who is fucked in a gunfight. Why couldn't all those guns save the 600 in Vegas???Who gives a rat fuck?Obviously you have never been at gunpoint. They never give you warning so you can grab yours. When is it not a sucker punch?
We get machine guns and that's final. Fuck off.
That question has been answered. Thickheaded much?
You scared?Way to go queer fucktard!
prevent guns from getting to the mentally ill
As usual, retarded liberals don't understand that the line is at "shall not be infringed." If you faggots don't like that, pass a constitutional amendment. Otherwise, shut your fag ass up.
They don't even see how they make our arguments for us. It's comical.If you think cops are pussies, you must be a serious supporter of the 2nd amendment.
My issue is common sense gun control laws that prevent guns from getting to the mentally ill.Oh for fuck sake. You people really struggle with nuance huh? I never said it was illegal to own a gun nor am I against your right to do it. I’m just pointing out your fallacious reasoning when it comes to any kind of gun control.OP is a fucking jackass.
Educate yourself.
District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia
Read the SCOTUS decision on D.C.vs. Heller.
Then make your arguments.
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held, in a 5–4 decision, that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and that Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban and requirement that lawfully-owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee. Due to Washington, D.C.'s special status as a federal district, the decision did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment's protections are incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment against the states,[1] which was addressed two years later by McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) in which it was found that they are. It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.[2]
What are your specific issues with this decision by SCOTUS?
Sure thing. Go for it.Do I have to start carrying my nuclear armed ICBM with me everywhere I go?
I wonder if I can hide it under my shirt..........
prevent guns from getting to the mentally ill
Who gets to decide who is, or is not, mentally ill? Is there due process? Is their right of appeal?
If I get help doing my taxes, am I too mentally impaired to exercise my Constitutional rights?
Ask Rambo a liberal hero.RWs have a child-like fantasy when it comes to guns. They delude themselves into dreaming of one day being an armed hero. This can range from taking down a home intruder to shooting fascist thugs trying to steal their liberty! The truth of the matter is that when it comes to pulling the trigger, many wouid puss out in such situations. The idea of it just gives them the feels so they insist on no gun control whatsoever.
Of course, what question they can’t answer is where they draw the line.
Do they want ANYONE to be able to carry fully automatic weapons anywhere, anytime? If that hypothetical is answered as a “no”, then what does that say about their 2nd amendment rights? It’s fallacious thinking, but these are republicans afterall.
Do I have to start carrying my nuclear armed ICBM with me everywhere I go?
I wonder if I can hide it under my shirt..........
Personally give me 9 shots in a 9mm and I can take care of myself. Carry on.RWs have a child-like fantasy when it comes to guns. They delude themselves into dreaming of one day being an armed hero. This can range from taking down a home intruder to shooting fascist thugs trying to steal their liberty! The truth of the matter is that when it comes to pulling the trigger, many wouid puss out in such situations. The idea of it just gives them the feels so they insist on no gun control whatsoever.
Of course, what question they can’t answer is where they draw the line.
Do they want ANYONE to be able to carry fully automatic weapons anywhere, anytime? If that hypothetical is answered as a “no”, then what does that say about their 2nd amendment rights? It’s fallacious thinking, but these are republicans afterall.
I don't know what the fuck he is talking about "child-like" fantasies about guns.Ask Rambo a liberal hero.RWs have a child-like fantasy when it comes to guns. They delude themselves into dreaming of one day being an armed hero. This can range from taking down a home intruder to shooting fascist thugs trying to steal their liberty! The truth of the matter is that when it comes to pulling the trigger, many wouid puss out in such situations. The idea of it just gives them the feels so they insist on no gun control whatsoever.
Of course, what question they can’t answer is where they draw the line.
Do they want ANYONE to be able to carry fully automatic weapons anywhere, anytime? If that hypothetical is answered as a “no”, then what does that say about their 2nd amendment rights? It’s fallacious thinking, but these are republicans afterall.
The field of psychiatry should be utilized, of course.prevent guns from getting to the mentally ill
Who gets to decide who is, or is not, mentally ill? Is there due process? Is there right of appeal?
If I get help doing my taxes, am I too mentally impaired to exercise my Constitutional rights?
Wow, that's all I can say.I don't know what the fuck he is talking about "child-like" fantasies about guns.Ask Rambo a liberal hero.RWs have a child-like fantasy when it comes to guns. They delude themselves into dreaming of one day being an armed hero. This can range from taking down a home intruder to shooting fascist thugs trying to steal their liberty! The truth of the matter is that when it comes to pulling the trigger, many wouid puss out in such situations. The idea of it just gives them the feels so they insist on no gun control whatsoever.
Of course, what question they can’t answer is where they draw the line.
Do they want ANYONE to be able to carry fully automatic weapons anywhere, anytime? If that hypothetical is answered as a “no”, then what does that say about their 2nd amendment rights? It’s fallacious thinking, but these are republicans afterall.
I have SEXUAL fantasies about guns, and fuck them on a daily basis.
We will have machine guns soon, commies.
How long will it take the fucking commies to infiltrate and deem everyone unfit to own a gun?The field of psychiatry should be utilized, of course
Cool!!Sure thing. Go for it.Do I have to start carrying my nuclear armed ICBM with me everywhere I go?
I wonder if I can hide it under my shirt..........
When you have idiots trying to guilt you into giving up rights, you have to go ahead and embrace their stupid, wild allegations about your alleged obsession with guns. Forget the whole freedom angle. It MUST be sexual in nature, so fuck it.Wow, that's all I can say.