Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
Guns need to be prosecuted for murder.Guns are killing innocent people, and they aren't doing much else.
Guns also prevent the killing of innocent people.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Guns need to be prosecuted for murder.Guns are killing innocent people, and they aren't doing much else.
Guns also prevent the killing of innocent people.
I love you guys. I will start this off with that. We are a family, we want what is best for all of us. Guns are becoming an affliction, and addiction and it's time for a wake up call or a intervention here. Guns are killing innocent people, and they aren't doing much else. So let's get real here.
Guns are killing innocent people, and they aren't doing much else. So let's get real here.
Dear Idiot - All those gun toting citizens & police in vegas could not stop 1 man from shooting 600 people.Yes. So do libertarians. And we should. And we MOTHERFUCKING WILL!!!Do they want ANYONE to be able to carry fully automatic weapons anywhere, anytime?
Fuck off, commie. We're getting our fully automatic, belt-fed machine guns, and you can suck it.
You can't block a sucker punch either.
So, what's your point?
I fucking hunt. I hunt. When I lived in Tennessee I fucking hunted. I'm in Canada now. I FUCKING HUNT MY FOOD.
FUCK OFF.
Even if you didn’t, it’s really no ones business .
Oh for fuck sake. You people really struggle with nuance huh? I never said it was illegal to own a gun nor am I against your right to do it. I’m just pointing out your fallacious reasoning when it comes to any kind of gun control.OP is a fucking jackass.
Educate yourself.
District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia
Read the SCOTUS decision on D.C.vs. Heller.
Then make your arguments.
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held, in a 5–4 decision, that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and that Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban and requirement that lawfully-owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee. Due to Washington, D.C.'s special status as a federal district, the decision did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment's protections are incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment against the states,[1] which was addressed two years later by McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) in which it was found that they are. It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.[2]
Who gives a rat fuck?Obviously you have never been at gunpoint. They never give you warning so you can grab yours. When is it not a sucker punch?
You failed to mention the $200 tax stamp.but automatic weapons manufactured before 1986 were grandfathered.Fully automatic weapons are illegal for civilians to own or purchase and have been for some time now this fact has been brought to you by reality.
Ban on fully automatic weapons was by President Ronald Reagan!
wade thru the red tape, and you can purchase one
You failed to mention the $200 tax stamp.
Dear Idiot - All those gun toting citizens & police in vegas could not stop 1 man from shooting 600 people.Yes. So do libertarians. And we should. And we MOTHERFUCKING WILL!!!Do they want ANYONE to be able to carry fully automatic weapons anywhere, anytime?
Fuck off, commie. We're getting our fully automatic, belt-fed machine guns, and you can suck it.
You can't block a sucker punch either.
So, what's your point?
Obviously you have never been at gunpoint. They never give you warning so you can grab yours. When is it not a sucker punch?
Stop it, for all we know you will be the next mass shooter. End it.Guns are killing innocent people, and they aren't doing much else. So let's get real here.
You can have my gun just as soon as it kills an innocent person. Until then... hands off.
You will be the one who is fucked in a gunfight. Why couldn't all those guns save the 600 in Vegas???Who gives a rat fuck?Obviously you have never been at gunpoint. They never give you warning so you can grab yours. When is it not a sucker punch?
We get machine guns and that's final. Fuck off.
GOOD!!!!I love you guys. I will start this off with that. We are a family, we want what is best for all of us. Guns are becoming an affliction, and addiction and it's time for a wake up call or a intervention here. Guns are killing innocent people, and they aren't doing much else. So let's get real here.
You will be the one who is fucked in a gunfight. Why couldn't all those guns save the 600 in Vegas???Who gives a rat fuck?Obviously you have never been at gunpoint. They never give you warning so you can grab yours. When is it not a sucker punch?
We get machine guns and that's final. Fuck off.
Because, fuck you.You will be the one who is fucked in a gunfight. Why couldn't all those guns save the 600 in Vegas???
Was that answer because the police we must worship are a bunch of pussies that took over an hour to approach a dead man?You will be the one who is fucked in a gunfight. Why couldn't all those guns save the 600 in Vegas???Who gives a rat fuck?Obviously you have never been at gunpoint. They never give you warning so you can grab yours. When is it not a sucker punch?
We get machine guns and that's final. Fuck off.
That question has been answered. Thickheaded much?
Stop it, for all we know you will be the next mass shooter.
Dear commie -- it makes not one bit of fucking difference. 5,000,000 people could have died and it wouldn't matter one cocksucking bit.Dear Idiot - All those gun toting citizens & police in vegas could not stop 1 man from shooting 600 people.
Way to go queer fucktard!Because, fuck you.You will be the one who is fucked in a gunfight. Why couldn't all those guns save the 600 in Vegas???
Who gives a flying frog fuck?
That has ZERO to do with my right to have guns and to fuck them if I choose.
I don't give a aardvark anus fuck if 14,000,000,000,000 children and twice as many puppies die from gun violence ever motherfucking day.
We are not surrendering ANYTHING. We're going the other way. Fuck you.
My issue is common sense gun control laws that prevent guns from getting to the mentally ill.Oh for fuck sake. You people really struggle with nuance huh? I never said it was illegal to own a gun nor am I against your right to do it. I’m just pointing out your fallacious reasoning when it comes to any kind of gun control.OP is a fucking jackass.
Educate yourself.
District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia
Read the SCOTUS decision on D.C.vs. Heller.
Then make your arguments.
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held, in a 5–4 decision, that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and that Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban and requirement that lawfully-owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee. Due to Washington, D.C.'s special status as a federal district, the decision did not address the question of whether the Second Amendment's protections are incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment against the states,[1] which was addressed two years later by McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) in which it was found that they are. It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.[2]
What are your specific issues with this decision by SCOTUS?