- Thread starter
- #421
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
7 March 2003 – Top United Nations weapons inspector Hans Blix told the Security Council today that over the past month Iraq has displayed "active" or even "proactive" cooperation, which has allowed the inspection process to make significant progress, although a number of key disarmament tasks remained to be resolved.
Blix welcomes accelerated cooperation by Iraq, but says unresolved issues remain
7 March 2003 Top United Nations weapons inspector Hans Blix told the Security Council today that over the past month Iraq has displayed "active" or even "proactive" cooperation, which has allowed the inspection process to make significant progress, although a number of key disarmament tasks remained to be resolved.
JRK tries to use the UN to justify the invasion while the UN says the invasion was illegal and Blix even said it was "proactive" cooperation with inspectors.
Why did Bush invade again?
What is the official justification for his invasion?
For all of you who still are asking why we invaded
o,
they have not complied with resolution 1441 or any other resolution over a period of over 12 years they did anything but; they went to great lengths to avoid complying with the resolution. 1. Decides that Iraq has been and remains in material breach of its obligations under relevant resolutions, including resolution 687 (1991), in particular through Iraqs failure to cooperate with United Nations inspectors and the IAEA, and to complete the actions required under paragraphs 8 to 13 of resolution 687 (1991);
In addition, blix made these comments about Saddam's corporation weeks prior to invading
Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptancenot even todayof the disarmament, which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace. Additionally, Blix reports that it is still too early to determine whether or not Iraq has or is developing weapons of mass destruction, noting that Iraq has still not answered several questions concerning unaccounted for weapons. [UNITED NATIONS, 1/27/2003; NEW YORK TIMES, 1/27/2003; WASHINGTON POST, 1/28/2003; LONDON TIMES, 1/28/2003; NEW YORK TIMES, 1/28/2003]
Having trouble with these facts I see
back on ignore
We did pretty much win it.
What did we really win?
For all of you who still are asking why we invaded
o,
they have not complied with resolution 1441 or any other resolution over a period of over 12 years they did anything but; they went to great lengths to avoid complying with the resolution. 1. Decides that Iraq has been and remains in material breach of its obligations under relevant resolutions, including resolution 687 (1991), in particular through Iraqs failure to cooperate with United Nations inspectors and the IAEA, and to complete the actions required under paragraphs 8 to 13 of resolution 687 (1991);
In addition, blix made these comments about Saddam's corporation weeks prior to invading
Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptancenot even todayof the disarmament, which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace. Additionally, Blix reports that it is still too early to determine whether or not Iraq has or is developing weapons of mass destruction, noting that Iraq has still not answered several questions concerning unaccounted for weapons. [UNITED NATIONS, 1/27/2003; NEW YORK TIMES, 1/27/2003; WASHINGTON POST, 1/28/2003; LONDON TIMES, 1/28/2003; NEW YORK TIMES, 1/28/2003]
Having trouble with these facts I see
back on ignore
The thing is most people don't care about the UN resolutions Saddam violated and they don't see that as good enough reason to go war.
For all of you who still are asking why we invaded
o,
they have not complied with resolution 1441 or any other resolution over a period of over 12 years they did anything but; they went to great lengths to avoid complying with the resolution. 1. Decides that Iraq has been and remains in material breach of its obligations under relevant resolutions, including resolution 687 (1991), in particular through Iraqs failure to cooperate with United Nations inspectors and the IAEA, and to complete the actions required under paragraphs 8 to 13 of resolution 687 (1991);
In addition, blix made these comments about Saddam's corporation weeks prior to invading
Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptancenot even todayof the disarmament, which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace. Additionally, Blix reports that it is still too early to determine whether or not Iraq has or is developing weapons of mass destruction, noting that Iraq has still not answered several questions concerning unaccounted for weapons. [UNITED NATIONS, 1/27/2003; NEW YORK TIMES, 1/27/2003; WASHINGTON POST, 1/28/2003; LONDON TIMES, 1/28/2003; NEW YORK TIMES, 1/28/2003]
Having trouble with these facts I see
back on ignore
The thing is most people don't care about the UN resolutions Saddam violated and they don't see that as good enough reason to go war.
For all of you who still are asking why we invaded
o,
they have not complied with resolution 1441 or any other resolution over a period of over 12 years they did anything but; they went to great lengths to avoid complying with the resolution. 1. Decides that Iraq has been and remains in material breach of its obligations under relevant resolutions, including resolution 687 (1991), in particular through Iraqs failure to cooperate with United Nations inspectors and the IAEA, and to complete the actions required under paragraphs 8 to 13 of resolution 687 (1991);
In addition, blix made these comments about Saddam's corporation weeks prior to invading
Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptancenot even todayof the disarmament, which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace. Additionally, Blix reports that it is still too early to determine whether or not Iraq has or is developing weapons of mass destruction, noting that Iraq has still not answered several questions concerning unaccounted for weapons. [UNITED NATIONS, 1/27/2003; NEW YORK TIMES, 1/27/2003; WASHINGTON POST, 1/28/2003; LONDON TIMES, 1/28/2003; NEW YORK TIMES, 1/28/2003]
Having trouble with these facts I see
back on ignore
The thing is most people don't care about the UN resolutions Saddam violated and they don't see that as good enough reason to go war.
This view is after 8 years of lies daily along with no poles being took now we are leaving and the Iraqi govt has taken over
we had US senators on the floor of the senate stating this war was lost in 2007
Reid Says Iraq War Lost - ABC News
For all of you who still are asking why we invaded
o,
they have not complied with resolution 1441 or any other resolution over a period of over 12 years they did anything but; they went to great lengths to avoid complying with the resolution. 1. Decides that Iraq has been and remains in material breach of its obligations under relevant resolutions, including resolution 687 (1991), in particular through Iraqs failure to cooperate with United Nations inspectors and the IAEA, and to complete the actions required under paragraphs 8 to 13 of resolution 687 (1991);
In addition, blix made these comments about Saddam's corporation weeks prior to invading
Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptancenot even todayof the disarmament, which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace. Additionally, Blix reports that it is still too early to determine whether or not Iraq has or is developing weapons of mass destruction, noting that Iraq has still not answered several questions concerning unaccounted for weapons. [UNITED NATIONS, 1/27/2003; NEW YORK TIMES, 1/27/2003; WASHINGTON POST, 1/28/2003; LONDON TIMES, 1/28/2003; NEW YORK TIMES, 1/28/2003]
Having trouble with these facts I see
back on ignore
The thing is most people don't care about the UN resolutions Saddam violated and they don't see that as good enough reason to go war.
I thought the fact he was a Nazi like dictator was enough - that and the fact he kept attacking nations for no reason was enough for me. Plus his sons were pretty friendly with the ladies..
I'll digress -
Here is a typical day in Udays life - get drunk, go out and have a rape-athon, stab your limo driver in front of your dads palace, crash your dads formal dinner party by stumbling in the door start groping woman and then have your dictator father so embarrassed that he sentences you to death on the spot because you embarrassed him in front of a bunch of foreign elitists (he was later only given a prison term and then released, he was pretty much grounded for a few months)....
The thing is most people don't care about the UN resolutions Saddam violated and they don't see that as good enough reason to go war.
I thought the fact he was a Nazi like dictator was enough - that and the fact he kept attacking nations for no reason was enough for me. Plus his sons were pretty friendly with the ladies..
I'll digress -
Here is a typical day in Udays life - get drunk, go out and have a rape-athon, stab your limo driver in front of your dads palace, crash your dads formal dinner party by stumbling in the door start groping woman and then have your dictator father so embarrassed that he sentences you to death on the spot because you embarrassed him in front of a bunch of foreign elitists (he was later only given a prison term and then released, he was pretty much grounded for a few months)....
You would think killing 1 million of your own people would at least put our president at that time even with him
I am serious, these guys have spent all of this energy hating and attacking GWB and let this murdering SOB a free pass
its nuts
For all of you who still are asking why we invaded
o,
they have not complied with resolution 1441 or any other resolution over a period of over 12 years they did anything but; they went to great lengths to avoid complying with the resolution. 1. Decides that Iraq has been and remains in material breach of its obligations under relevant resolutions, including resolution 687 (1991), in particular through Iraqs failure to cooperate with United Nations inspectors and the IAEA, and to complete the actions required under paragraphs 8 to 13 of resolution 687 (1991);
In addition, blix made these comments about Saddam's corporation weeks prior to invading
Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptancenot even todayof the disarmament, which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace. Additionally, Blix reports that it is still too early to determine whether or not Iraq has or is developing weapons of mass destruction, noting that Iraq has still not answered several questions concerning unaccounted for weapons. [UNITED NATIONS, 1/27/2003; NEW YORK TIMES, 1/27/2003; WASHINGTON POST, 1/28/2003; LONDON TIMES, 1/28/2003; NEW YORK TIMES, 1/28/2003]
Having trouble with these facts I see
back on ignore
The thing is most people don't care about the UN resolutions Saddam violated and they don't see that as good enough reason to go war.
I thought the fact he was a Nazi like dictator was enough - that and the fact he kept attacking nations for no reason was enough for me. Plus his sons were pretty friendly with the ladies..
I'll digress -
Here is a typical day in Udays life - get drunk, go out and have a rape-athon, stab your limo driver in front of your dads palace, crash your dads formal dinner party by stumbling in the door start groping woman and then have your dictator father so embarrassed that he sentences you to death on the spot because you embarrassed him in front of a bunch of foreign elitists (he was later only given a prison term and then released, he was pretty much grounded for a few months)....
You would think killing 1 million of your own people would at least put our president at that time even with him
I am serious, these guys have spent all of this energy hating and attacking GWB and let this murdering SOB a free pass
its nuts
Not as bad as Pol Pot, Mao, Ho Chi Minh, Stalin or Hitler tho...
Pol Pot took it to another level tho.... Progressives like Hanoi Jane made sure we got our asses kicked in Nam so 4,000,000 Cambodians were murdered...
Yeah, only in progressive land is an 8-year-old a general and is capable of carrying out executions...
Of course that was around the time Prairie Fire was written by the Weatherman.
You would think killing 1 million of your own people would at least put our president at that time even with him
I am serious, these guys have spent all of this energy hating and attacking GWB and let this murdering SOB a free pass
its nuts
Not as bad as Pol Pot, Mao, Ho Chi Minh, Stalin or Hitler tho...
Pol Pot took it to another level tho.... Progressives like Hanoi Jane made sure we got our asses kicked in Nam so 4,000,000 Cambodians were murdered...
Yeah, only in progressive land is an 8-year-old a general and is capable of carrying out executions...
Of course that was around the time Prairie Fire was written by the Weatherman.
1 in 33 with Saddam
Hanoi Jane, I guess those on this message board who would attack Bush and ignore Saddam's ruthlessness about in the same place she is if you think about it, just alike
Never thought about it that way
Not as bad as Pol Pot, Mao, Ho Chi Minh, Stalin or Hitler tho...
Pol Pot took it to another level tho.... Progressives like Hanoi Jane made sure we got our asses kicked in Nam so 4,000,000 Cambodians were murdered...
Yeah, only in progressive land is an 8-year-old a general and is capable of carrying out executions...
Of course that was around the time Prairie Fire was written by the Weatherman.
1 in 33 with Saddam
Hanoi Jane, I guess those on this message board who would attack Bush and ignore Saddam's ruthlessness about in the same place she is if you think about it, just alike
Never thought about it that way
Cambodia is what happens without US intervention....
I'm a libertarian as well so that probably seems odd...
1 in 33 with Saddam
Hanoi Jane, I guess those on this message board who would attack Bush and ignore Saddam's ruthlessness about in the same place she is if you think about it, just alike
Never thought about it that way
Cambodia is what happens without US intervention....
I'm a libertarian as well so that probably seems odd...
Why aren't you clamoring for us to invade Iran, China or North Korea?
Using you're logic we'd never stop invading countries.
Oh, almost forgot, to invade for the purpose of regime change is a war of aggression and illegal..