Does anyone care we won the war in IRAQ?

[JRK]

I see those on the ignore list have nothing to say this morning
Good Morning any ways

 

[G.T.]

Ignore lists are for people with no self control to simply skip a post.

 

[JRK]

I have realized that the liberals are going to do what ever it takes to taint the great victory in Iraq
Does anyone realize that war is over and it looks like we will be 100% gone in 6 months?
That there is a republic in place?
and that women vote and hold office?
I had no idea that the liberal media and there cock suckers would go to the level they have to make the troops look bad and make the success they fought hard for look like, well ask Drock and that crew
I dont even know how to explain it
DOES ANYBODY CARE WE WON?

We will not be gone in 6 months. We are going to be there untill A) we cannot get credit anymore to sustain the empire B) We elect Ron Paul or C) The sun burns out.

Iraq is a victory. We have successfully overthrown a dictator and allowed our economic interest to take over the country. We have installed a status quo with a few people profiting greatly from the resources, they will assure our business interests are taken care of for many years into the future. We have shown the population enough horror that they will accept any form of government, no matter how much the population suffers.

BTW, the same business interests have bankrupted our own economy for their agenda. Soon the dollar will fall from the unfunded war. And now more people hate our guts.

Why you libs dont do your DD is beyond me
You read one of my threads, I have done the best can to make it accurate

In a statement issued Tuesday, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki announced that all U.S. forces would leave Iraq "as scheduled" at the end of the year, and that there will be no "permanent U.S. bases" beyond that.

It was a dramatic change from just two weeks ago, when Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta announced that he was pretty sure that Iraq had already approved the extension of the U.S. occupation beyond December.

Unless Baghdad and Washington reach a new accord, all of the roughly 46,000 U.S. troops still in the country must leave by December 31, under the terms of a 2008 security agreement. AFP
PressTV - Iraq PM: US troops to leave Iraq 'as scheduled'

Ok next
most of the fighting in Iraq was fighting Al Qaeda, not Iraqis
al-Qaeda in Iraq - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Attacks across Iraq kill more than 80 - The Washington Post
Al Qaeda Found Responsible For Iraq Bomb Attacks Killing 66 at Pat Dollard

Last but not least, if its dollars that concern you, then we have to take off the monies saved on the bases in Saudi and Kuwait we closed as well as the 12 years we funded the UN while Saddam lied to us
in addition
Little-known fact: Obama's failed stimulus program cost more than the Iraq war | Examiner Staff Writer | Beltway Confidential | Washington Examiner

 

[Dr.Drock]

His point wasn't that we are bullies dipshit his point was our strength versus theirs is like a high school wrestler versus a first grader, and he's right. We took down their army very fucking swiftly.

Yeah touting the U.S. military defeating the Iraqi military is stupid, that was a foregone conclusion.

Here's a way to put the Iraq war, it's LSU vs Mount Union, LSU wins 70-0, but their 3 best players get hurt, so it screws them them over for awhile. Like the War in Afghanistan (which I was against after a few months), hurts america financially, hurts the injured soldiers long term, hurts the families of the dead soldiers, and on and on and on.

 

[Wry Catcher]

4,500 dead, ten times that amount wounded, many for life; a cost of over one trillion dollars - not counting the interest on the debt. We won? Only if one feels a pyrrhic victory is a win.

 

[Dr.Drock]

4,500 dead, ten times that amount wounded, many for life; a cost of over one trillion dollars - not counting the interest on the debt. We won? Only if one feels a pyrrhic victory is a win.

Bishops describes plight of Iraqi Christians to EU president « Persecution News


"In their meeting with Mr Van Rompuy on Tuesday, 13 September, Archbishops Bashar Warda of Erbil and Amil Nona of Mosul said there was no religious freedom in Iraq."

The Silent Extermination of Iraq's 'Christian Dogs' :: Middle East Forum

"Last week an Iraqi Muslim scholar issued a fatwa that, among other barbarities, asserts that "it is permissible to spill the blood of Iraqi Christians." Inciting as the fatwa is, it is also redundant. While last October's Baghdad church attack which killed some sixty Christians is widely known—actually receiving some MSM coverage—the fact is, Christian life in Iraq has been a living hell ever since U.S. forces ousted the late Saddam Hussein in 2003.

Among other atrocities, beheading and crucifying Christians are not irregular occurrences; messages saying "you Christian dogs, leave or die," are typical. Islamists see the church as an "obscene nest of pagans" and threaten to "exterminate Iraqi Christians." John Eibner, CEO of Christian Solidarity International, summarized the situation well in a recent letter to President Obama:


Iraqi man grieves at the funeral of his two brothers, slain for being Christian.

The threat of extermination is not empty. Since the collapse of Saddam Hussein's regime, more than half the country's Christian population has been forced by targeted violence to seek refuge abroad or to live away from their homes as internally displaced people. According to the Hammurabi Human Rights Organization, over 700 Christians, including bishops and priests, have been killed and 61 churches have been bombed. Seven years after the commencement of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Catholic Archbishop Louis Sako of Kirkuk reports: "He who is not a Muslim in Iraq is a second-class citizen. Often it is necessary to convert or emigrate, otherwise one risks being killed." This anti-Christian violence is sustained by a widespread culture of Muslim supremacism that extends far beyond those who pull the triggers and detonate the bombs.

The grand irony, of course, is that Christian persecution has increased exponentially under U.S. occupation. As one top Vatican official put it, Christians, "paradoxically, were more protected under the dictatorship" of Saddam Hussein."

and it continues..........................

"Conversely, by empowering "the people," the U.S. has unwittingly undone Iraq's Christian minority. Naively projecting Western values on Muslims, U.S. leadership continues to think that "people-power" will naturally culminate into a liberal, egalitarian society—despite all the evidence otherwise. The fact is, in the Arab/Muslim world, "majority rule" traditionally means domination by the largest tribe or sect; increasingly, it means Islamist domination."

and further....................(left some paragraphs out, for message board copyright issues)

"Another indicator that empowering Muslim masses equates Christian suffering is the fact that, though Iraqi Christians amount to a mere 5% of the population, they make up nearly 40% of the refugees fleeing Iraq. It is now the same in Egypt: "A growing number of Egypt's 8-10 million Coptic Christians are looking for a way to get out as Islamists increasingly take advantage of the nationalist revolution that toppled long-standing dictator Hosni Mubarak in February."

 

[JRK]

4,500 dead, ten times that amount wounded, many for life; a cost of over one trillion dollars - not counting the interest on the debt. We won? Only if one feels a pyrrhic victory is a win.

It was not our issue that Al Qaeda attacked us 9-11-2001
were we suppose to ignore this?
Most all of the casualties and the expense in Iraq came from fighting Al Qaeda, not Iraqis

There is also evidence that around this time Bin Ladin sent out a number
of feelers to the Iraqi regime, offering some cooperation. None are reported
to have received a significant response.According to one report, Saddam Hussein’s efforts at this time to rebuild relations with the Saudis and other Middle
Eastern regimes led him to stay clear of Bin Ladin.74
In mid-1998,the situation reversed;it was Iraq that reportedly took the initiative.In March 1998,after Bin Ladin’s public fatwa against the United States,
two al Qaeda members reportedly went to Iraq to meet with Iraqi intelligence. In July, an Iraqi delegation traveled to Afghanistan to meet first with
the Taliban and then with Bin Ladin. Sources reported that one, or perhaps
both, of these meetings was apparently arranged through Bin Ladin’s Egyptian deputy, Zawahiri, who had ties of his own to the Iraqis. In 1998, Iraq was
under intensifying U.S. pressure, which culminated in a series of large air
attacks in December.75
Similar meetings between Iraqi officials and Bin Ladin or his aides may have
occurred in 1999 during a period of some reported strains with the Taliban.
According to the reporting,Iraqi officials offered Bin Ladin a safe haven in Iraq.
Bin Ladin declined, apparently judging that his circumstances in Afghanistan
remained more favorable than the Iraqi alternative. The reports describe
friendly contacts and indicate some common themes in both sides’ hatred of
the United States. But to date we have seen no evidence that these or the earlier contacts ever developed into a collaborative operational relationship. Nor
have we seen evidence indicating that Iraq cooperated with al Qaeda in developing or carrying out any attacks against the United States.(Nor have they found evidence that this did not occur, any way this is from the 9-11 commission)
http://wanews.org/docs/911report.pdf

Also
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...-across-iraq/2011/08/15/gIQAHYtWGJ_story.html
Al Qaeda Found Responsible For Iraq Bomb Attacks Killing 66 at Pat Dollard
Al-Qaeda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Suicide attackers and car bombs hit cities across Iraq on Monday, killing at least 60 people in apparently coordinated assaults authorities blamed on al Qaeda affiliates intent on destabilizing the government.
Bombs, attacks hit Iraqi cities, at least 60 dead | Reuters

 

[Dr.Drock]

Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda link allegations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the lead up to the Iraq War, U.S. President George W. Bush alleged that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and militant group al-Qaeda might conspire to launch terrorist attacks on the United States,[2] basing the administration's rationale for war, in part, on this allegation and others. The consensus of intelligence experts has been that these contacts never led to an operational relationship, and that consensus is backed up by reports from the independent 9/11 Commission and by declassified Defense Department reports[3] as well as by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, whose 2006 report of Phase II of its investigation into prewar intelligence reports concluded that there was no evidence of ties between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda.

JRK's insanity will never end, the 9/11 commission, the Defense Department, the Senate Select Committe on Intelligence, all outspokenly agreed that there was no link between Saddam and Al-Qaeda.

Saddam and Osama hated each other, Bin Laden called Saddam an infidel.

Bin Laden Labels Saddam an Infidel - Jazeera TV

While urging Muslims to support the Iraqi people and repel any attack on their country, the tape said Saddam's secular "socialist" government had lost credibility.

"Socialists are infidels wherever they are," the statement said. But it added: "It does not hurt that in current circumstances, the interests of Muslims coincide with the interests of the socialists in the war against crusaders."

 

[JRK]

If one was to read the thread from the 9-11 commission from above and ask the question "is there any evidence that Saddam did not help OBL in the 9-11 attack" the answer would have to be the same

There is as much evidence he helped OBL as there he did not when it comes to 9-11
none

 

[Dr.Drock]

If one was to read the thread from the 9-11 commission from above and ask the question "is there any evidence that Saddam did not help OBL in the 9-11 attack" the answer would have to be the same

There is as much evidence he helped OBL as there he did not when it comes to 9-11
none

Osama and Saddam were enemies, Saddam isn't going to support someone who directly calls him an infidel.

Every single gov't agency disagrees with your assertion that the 2 were linked.

 

[BlindBoo]

4,500 dead, ten times that amount wounded, many for life; a cost of over one trillion dollars - not counting the interest on the debt. We won? Only if one feels a pyrrhic victory is a win.

It was not our issue that Al Qaeda attacked us 9-11-2001
were we suppose to ignore this?
Most all of the casualties and the expense in Iraq came from fighting Al Qaeda, not Iraqis

There is also evidence that around this time Bin Ladin sent out a number
of feelers to the Iraqi regime, offering some cooperation. None are reported
to have received a significant response.According to one report, Saddam Hussein’s efforts at this time to rebuild relations with the Saudis and other Middle
Eastern regimes led him to stay clear of Bin Ladin.74
In mid-1998,the situation reversed;it was Iraq that reportedly took the initiative.In March 1998,after Bin Ladin’s public fatwa against the United States,
two al Qaeda members reportedly went to Iraq to meet with Iraqi intelligence. In July, an Iraqi delegation traveled to Afghanistan to meet first with
the Taliban and then with Bin Ladin. Sources reported that one, or perhaps
both, of these meetings was apparently arranged through Bin Ladin’s Egyptian deputy, Zawahiri, who had ties of his own to the Iraqis. In 1998, Iraq was
under intensifying U.S. pressure, which culminated in a series of large air
attacks in December.75
Similar meetings between Iraqi officials and Bin Ladin or his aides may have
occurred in 1999 during a period of some reported strains with the Taliban.
According to the reporting,Iraqi officials offered Bin Ladin a safe haven in Iraq.
Bin Ladin declined, apparently judging that his circumstances in Afghanistan
remained more favorable than the Iraqi alternative. The reports describe
friendly contacts and indicate some common themes in both sides’ hatred of
the United States. But to date we have seen no evidence that these or the earlier contacts ever developed into a collaborative operational relationship. Nor
have we seen evidence indicating that Iraq cooperated with al Qaeda in developing or carrying out any attacks against the United States.(Nor have they found evidence that this did not occur, any way this is from the 9-11 commission)
http://wanews.org/docs/911report.pdf

Also
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...-across-iraq/2011/08/15/gIQAHYtWGJ_story.html
Al Qaeda Found Responsible For Iraq Bomb Attacks Killing 66 at Pat Dollard
Al-Qaeda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Suicide attackers and car bombs hit cities across Iraq on Monday, killing at least 60 people in apparently coordinated assaults authorities blamed on al Qaeda affiliates intent on destabilizing the government.
Bombs, attacks hit Iraqi cities, at least 60 dead | Reuters

You've lost again.

Bush: No Iraq link to 9/11 found - seattlepi.com

"No, we've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with September the 11th," Bush said.

Read more: Bush: No Iraq link to 9/11 found - seattlepi.com

 

[JRK]

4,500 dead, ten times that amount wounded, many for life; a cost of over one trillion dollars - not counting the interest on the debt. We won? Only if one feels a pyrrhic victory is a win.

It was not our issue that Al Qaeda attacked us 9-11-2001
were we suppose to ignore this?
Most all of the casualties and the expense in Iraq came from fighting Al Qaeda, not Iraqis

There is also evidence that around this time Bin Ladin sent out a number
of feelers to the Iraqi regime, offering some cooperation. None are reported
to have received a significant response.According to one report, Saddam Hussein’s efforts at this time to rebuild relations with the Saudis and other Middle
Eastern regimes led him to stay clear of Bin Ladin.74
In mid-1998,the situation reversed;it was Iraq that reportedly took the initiative.In March 1998,after Bin Ladin’s public fatwa against the United States,
two al Qaeda members reportedly went to Iraq to meet with Iraqi intelligence. In July, an Iraqi delegation traveled to Afghanistan to meet first with
the Taliban and then with Bin Ladin. Sources reported that one, or perhaps
both, of these meetings was apparently arranged through Bin Ladin’s Egyptian deputy, Zawahiri, who had ties of his own to the Iraqis. In 1998, Iraq was
under intensifying U.S. pressure, which culminated in a series of large air
attacks in December.75
Similar meetings between Iraqi officials and Bin Ladin or his aides may have
occurred in 1999 during a period of some reported strains with the Taliban.
According to the reporting,Iraqi officials offered Bin Ladin a safe haven in Iraq.
Bin Ladin declined, apparently judging that his circumstances in Afghanistan
remained more favorable than the Iraqi alternative. The reports describe
friendly contacts and indicate some common themes in both sides’ hatred of
the United States. But to date we have seen no evidence that these or the earlier contacts ever developed into a collaborative operational relationship. Nor
have we seen evidence indicating that Iraq cooperated with al Qaeda in developing or carrying out any attacks against the United States.(Nor have they found evidence that this did not occur, any way this is from the 9-11 commission)
http://wanews.org/docs/911report.pdf

Also
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...-across-iraq/2011/08/15/gIQAHYtWGJ_story.html
Al Qaeda Found Responsible For Iraq Bomb Attacks Killing 66 at Pat Dollard
Al-Qaeda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Suicide attackers and car bombs hit cities across Iraq on Monday, killing at least 60 people in apparently coordinated assaults authorities blamed on al Qaeda affiliates intent on destabilizing the government.
Bombs, attacks hit Iraqi cities, at least 60 dead | Reuters

You've lost again.

Bush: No Iraq link to 9/11 found - seattlepi.com

"No, we've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with September the 11th," Bush said.

Read more: Bush: No Iraq link to 9/11 found - seattlepi.com

Dude I said that exact thing
from above
"But to date we have seen no evidence that these or the earlier contacts ever developed into a collaborative operational relationship. Nor
have we seen evidence indicating that Iraq cooperated with al Qaeda in developing or carrying out any attacks against the United States.(Nor have they found evidence that this did not occur, any way this is from the 9-11 commission)
http://wanews.org/docs/911report.pdf

Now dammit you libs have got to get your act together. There is as much information that states they helped each other as there is not with 9-11
NONE

 

[JRK]

I am amazed over and over at these liberals who make stuff up as they go trying there dam-dist to dis credit people for no reason
STOP WITH THE SLANDER AND CHARACTER ASSASSINATION THAT ARE NOTHING BUT LIES

 

[JRK]

4,500 dead, ten times that amount wounded, many for life; a cost of over one trillion dollars - not counting the interest on the debt. We won? Only if one feels a pyrrhic victory is a win.

it was not our issue that al qaeda attacked us 9-11-2001
were we suppose to ignore this?
Most all of the casualties and the expense in iraq came from fighting al qaeda, not iraqis

there is also evidence that around this time bin ladin sent out a number
of feelers to the iraqi regime, offering some cooperation. None are reported
to have received a significant response.according to one report, saddam hussein’s efforts at this time to rebuild relations with the saudis and other middle
eastern regimes led him to stay clear of bin ladin.74
in mid-1998,the situation reversed;it was iraq that reportedly took the initiative.in march 1998,after bin ladin’s public fatwa against the united states,
two al qaeda members reportedly went to iraq to meet with iraqi intelligence. In july, an iraqi delegation traveled to afghanistan to meet first with
the taliban and then with bin ladin. Sources reported that one, or perhaps
both, of these meetings was apparently arranged through bin ladin’s egyptian deputy, zawahiri, who had ties of his own to the iraqis. In 1998, iraq was
under intensifying u.s. Pressure, which culminated in a series of large air
attacks in december.75
similar meetings between iraqi officials and bin ladin or his aides may have
occurred in 1999 during a period of some reported strains with the taliban.
According to the reporting,iraqi officials offered bin ladin a safe haven in iraq.
Bin ladin declined, apparently judging that his circumstances in afghanistan
remained more favorable than the iraqi alternative. the reports describe
friendly contacts and indicate some common themes in both sides’ hatred of
the united states. But to date we have seen no evidence that these or the earlier contacts ever developed into a collaborative operational relationship. Nor
have we seen evidence indicating that iraq cooperated with al qaeda in developing or carrying out any attacks against the united states.(nor have they found evidence that this did not occur, any way this is from the 9-11 commission)
http://wanews.org/docs/911report.pdf

also
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...-across-iraq/2011/08/15/giqahytwgj_story.html
al qaeda found responsible for iraq bomb attacks killing 66 at pat dollard
al-qaeda - wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

suicide attackers and car bombs hit cities across iraq on monday, killing at least 60 people in apparently coordinated assaults authorities blamed on al qaeda affiliates intent on destabilizing the government.
bombs, attacks hit iraqi cities, at least 60 dead | reuters

you've lost again.

bush: No iraq link to 9/11 found - seattlepi.com

"no, we've had no evidence that saddam hussein was involved with september the 11th," bush said.

Read more: bush: No iraq link to 9/11 found - seattlepi.com

do you have any idea how far over the line you are with this?
I said the exact same thing you accuse me of not saying

 

[Dr.Drock]

It was not our issue that Al Qaeda attacked us 9-11-2001
were we suppose to ignore this?
Most all of the casualties and the expense in Iraq came from fighting Al Qaeda, not Iraqis

There is also evidence that around this time Bin Ladin sent out a number
of feelers to the Iraqi regime, offering some cooperation. None are reported
to have received a significant response.According to one report, Saddam Hussein’s efforts at this time to rebuild relations with the Saudis and other Middle
Eastern regimes led him to stay clear of Bin Ladin.74
In mid-1998,the situation reversed;it was Iraq that reportedly took the initiative.In March 1998,after Bin Ladin’s public fatwa against the United States,
two al Qaeda members reportedly went to Iraq to meet with Iraqi intelligence. In July, an Iraqi delegation traveled to Afghanistan to meet first with
the Taliban and then with Bin Ladin. Sources reported that one, or perhaps
both, of these meetings was apparently arranged through Bin Ladin’s Egyptian deputy, Zawahiri, who had ties of his own to the Iraqis. In 1998, Iraq was
under intensifying U.S. pressure, which culminated in a series of large air
attacks in December.75
Similar meetings between Iraqi officials and Bin Ladin or his aides may have
occurred in 1999 during a period of some reported strains with the Taliban.
According to the reporting,Iraqi officials offered Bin Ladin a safe haven in Iraq.
Bin Ladin declined, apparently judging that his circumstances in Afghanistan
remained more favorable than the Iraqi alternative. The reports describe
friendly contacts and indicate some common themes in both sides’ hatred of
the United States. But to date we have seen no evidence that these or the earlier contacts ever developed into a collaborative operational relationship. Nor
have we seen evidence indicating that Iraq cooperated with al Qaeda in developing or carrying out any attacks against the United States.(Nor have they found evidence that this did not occur, any way this is from the 9-11 commission)
http://wanews.org/docs/911report.pdf

Also
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...-across-iraq/2011/08/15/gIQAHYtWGJ_story.html
Al Qaeda Found Responsible For Iraq Bomb Attacks Killing 66 at Pat Dollard
Al-Qaeda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Suicide attackers and car bombs hit cities across Iraq on Monday, killing at least 60 people in apparently coordinated assaults authorities blamed on al Qaeda affiliates intent on destabilizing the government.
Bombs, attacks hit Iraqi cities, at least 60 dead | Reuters

You've lost again.

Bush: No Iraq link to 9/11 found - seattlepi.com

"No, we've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with September the 11th," Bush said.

Read more: Bush: No Iraq link to 9/11 found - seattlepi.com

Dude I said that exact thing
from above
"But to date we have seen no evidence that these or the earlier contacts ever developed into a collaborative operational relationship. Nor
have we seen evidence indicating that Iraq cooperated with al Qaeda in developing or carrying out any attacks against the United States.(Nor have they found evidence that this did not occur, any way this is from the 9-11 commission)
http://wanews.org/docs/911report.pdf

Now dammit you libs have got to get your act together. There is as much information that states they helped each other as there is not with 9-11
NONE

How can you find evidence that something DOESN'T occur. I don't hop on one foot for an hour a day, but i can't give you evidence that it doesn't occur.

You can't highlight where every agency says there no evidence of Iraq or Al-Qaeda being linked or not linked, and then use them being linked as an excuse to approve of the War in Iraq.

All gov't agencies agree they weren't linked, and Osama came right out and said Saddam was an infidel.

 

[JRK]

it was not our issue that al qaeda attacked us 9-11-2001
were we suppose to ignore this?
Most all of the casualties and the expense in iraq came from fighting al qaeda, not iraqis

there is also evidence that around this time bin ladin sent out a number
of feelers to the iraqi regime, offering some cooperation. None are reported
to have received a significant response.according to one report, saddam hussein’s efforts at this time to rebuild relations with the saudis and other middle
eastern regimes led him to stay clear of bin ladin.74
in mid-1998,the situation reversed;it was iraq that reportedly took the initiative.in march 1998,after bin ladin’s public fatwa against the united states,
two al qaeda members reportedly went to iraq to meet with iraqi intelligence. In july, an iraqi delegation traveled to afghanistan to meet first with
the taliban and then with bin ladin. Sources reported that one, or perhaps
both, of these meetings was apparently arranged through bin ladin’s egyptian deputy, zawahiri, who had ties of his own to the iraqis. In 1998, iraq was
under intensifying u.s. Pressure, which culminated in a series of large air
attacks in december.75
similar meetings between iraqi officials and bin ladin or his aides may have
occurred in 1999 during a period of some reported strains with the taliban.
According to the reporting,iraqi officials offered bin ladin a safe haven in iraq.
Bin ladin declined, apparently judging that his circumstances in afghanistan
remained more favorable than the iraqi alternative. the reports describe
friendly contacts and indicate some common themes in both sides’ hatred of
the united states. But to date we have seen no evidence that these or the earlier contacts ever developed into a collaborative operational relationship. Nor
have we seen evidence indicating that iraq cooperated with al qaeda in developing or carrying out any attacks against the united states.(nor have they found evidence that this did not occur, any way this is from the 9-11 commission)
http://wanews.org/docs/911report.pdf

also
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...-across-iraq/2011/08/15/giqahytwgj_story.html
al qaeda found responsible for iraq bomb attacks killing 66 at pat dollard
al-qaeda - wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

suicide attackers and car bombs hit cities across iraq on monday, killing at least 60 people in apparently coordinated assaults authorities blamed on al qaeda affiliates intent on destabilizing the government.
bombs, attacks hit iraqi cities, at least 60 dead | reuters

you've lost again.

bush: No iraq link to 9/11 found - seattlepi.com

"no, we've had no evidence that saddam hussein was involved with september the 11th," bush said.

Read more: bush: No iraq link to 9/11 found - seattlepi.com

do you have any idea how far over the line you are with this?
I said the exact same thing you accuse me of not saying

Well #8 has found the ignore list
good luck with who and what you are

 

[BlindBoo]

it was not our issue that al qaeda attacked us 9-11-2001
were we suppose to ignore this?
Most all of the casualties and the expense in iraq came from fighting al qaeda, not iraqis

there is also evidence that around this time bin ladin sent out a number
of feelers to the iraqi regime, offering some cooperation. None are reported
to have received a significant response.according to one report, saddam hussein’s efforts at this time to rebuild relations with the saudis and other middle
eastern regimes led him to stay clear of bin ladin.74
in mid-1998,the situation reversed;it was iraq that reportedly took the initiative.in march 1998,after bin ladin’s public fatwa against the united states,
two al qaeda members reportedly went to iraq to meet with iraqi intelligence. In july, an iraqi delegation traveled to afghanistan to meet first with
the taliban and then with bin ladin. Sources reported that one, or perhaps
both, of these meetings was apparently arranged through bin ladin’s egyptian deputy, zawahiri, who had ties of his own to the iraqis. In 1998, iraq was
under intensifying u.s. Pressure, which culminated in a series of large air
attacks in december.75
similar meetings between iraqi officials and bin ladin or his aides may have
occurred in 1999 during a period of some reported strains with the taliban.
According to the reporting,iraqi officials offered bin ladin a safe haven in iraq.
Bin ladin declined, apparently judging that his circumstances in afghanistan
remained more favorable than the iraqi alternative. the reports describe
friendly contacts and indicate some common themes in both sides’ hatred of
the united states. But to date we have seen no evidence that these or the earlier contacts ever developed into a collaborative operational relationship. Nor
have we seen evidence indicating that iraq cooperated with al qaeda in developing or carrying out any attacks against the united states.(nor have they found evidence that this did not occur, any way this is from the 9-11 commission)
http://wanews.org/docs/911report.pdf

also
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world...-across-iraq/2011/08/15/giqahytwgj_story.html
al qaeda found responsible for iraq bomb attacks killing 66 at pat dollard
al-qaeda - wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

suicide attackers and car bombs hit cities across iraq on monday, killing at least 60 people in apparently coordinated assaults authorities blamed on al qaeda affiliates intent on destabilizing the government.
bombs, attacks hit iraqi cities, at least 60 dead | reuters

you've lost again.

bush: No iraq link to 9/11 found - seattlepi.com

"no, we've had no evidence that saddam hussein was involved with september the 11th," bush said.

Read more: bush: No iraq link to 9/11 found - seattlepi.com

do you have any idea how far over the line you are with this?
I said the exact same thing you accuse me of not saying

So far that I made you write in big red letters, wow!

Could you cry me a great big tear there little one?

 

[JRK]

Did the US have the right to take action against Iraq

Yes they did. Recalling that its resolution 678 (1990) authorized Member States to use all necessary means to uphold and implement its resolution 660 (1990) of 2 August 1990 and all relevant resolutions subsequent to resolution 660 (1990) and to restore international peace and security in the area, 13. Recalls, in that context, that the Council has repeatedly warned Iraq that it will face serious consequences as a result of its continued violations of its obligations;
Resolution 1441 in full

 

[NYcarbineer]

Did the US have the right to take action against Iraq

Yes they did. Recalling that its resolution 678 (1990) authorized Member States to use all necessary means to uphold and implement its resolution 660 (1990) of 2 August 1990 and all relevant resolutions subsequent to resolution 660 (1990) and to restore international peace and security in the area, 13. Recalls, in that context, that the Council has repeatedly warned Iraq that it will face serious consequences as a result of its continued violations of its obligations;
Resolution 1441 in full

You have the right to jump off a bridge.

 

[JRK]

Did the US have the right to take action against Iraq

Yes they did. Recalling that its resolution 678 (1990) authorized Member States to use all necessary means to uphold and implement its resolution 660 (1990) of 2 August 1990 and all relevant resolutions subsequent to resolution 660 (1990) and to restore international peace and security in the area, 13. Recalls, in that context, that the Council has repeatedly warned Iraq that it will face serious consequences as a result of its continued violations of its obligations;
Resolution 1441 in full

You have the right to jump off a bridge.

How long did it take for you to think that on up
look if you want on my ignore list, just ask
You dont need to attack me
I am not sure what this group thinks it is accomplishing, dont really care
the truth has made a difference and any group that does not want to be part of it is there loss