Laughing leads to crying.You tell yourself whatever you want to hear...Atheist BW is wrong again. It was the 1st century when it started.
I'm not a Bible-thumper but like most Christians believe it. I guess I've become a creation science thumper. The Bible wasn't questioned as much as it is today before the 1800s, but since then it has slowly been questioned and eroded by atheist evolution science. Thus, today part of the battle is creation vs evolution and liberal vs conservative politics. Politics in the sense that atheism leads to communism.
If the atheist scientists and atheists are so dang interested in going to Mars and forsaking earth, then I am all in. What it appears will happen is that it will be a one-way trip. There won't be enough fuel to come back the first time. The plan will be survive until the second launch bring more supplies. Who will be these challengers to go so far and die as martyrs for the atheist science cause? They may fall short of the destination, have a spectacular crash landing, end up on another planet or moon or just dies trying to survive. They will be the first aliens in the universe.
.Atheist BW is wrong again. It was the 1st century when it started.
I don't think you are qualified to make any kind of intelligent opinion on this matter. So far, I've ruled out the Bible and evolution for you.
Every church had its favored books, and since there was nothing like a clearly-defined orthodoxy until the 4th century, there were in fact many simultaneous literary traditions. The illusion that it was otherwise is created by the fact that the church that came out on top simply preserved texts in its favor and destroyed or let vanish opposing documents. Hence what we call "orthodoxy" is simply "the church that won."
just simply put, the late 4th century christian bible does not reflect the events of the 1st century.
for one observation of the difference is the 1st century was a spoken religion, The Triumph of Good vs Evil was that religions entire text.
your 4th century book bond is nothing more than a political agenda disguised as a religion. raped is sugar.
I don't think you are qualified to make any kind of intelligent opinion on this matter. So far, I've ruled out the Bible and evolution for you.
I don't think you are qualified to make any kind of intelligent opinion on this matter. So far, I've ruled out the Bible and evolution for you.
I have nothing to do with the history of your phony political agenda disguised as a religion bond, your just like the other ostriches, its comforting to your mentality so why face the truth.
![]()
you continue to take out of context metamorphosis which you clearly are unable to process, the evolution of a land being into an avian by a gnomic process representing two distinct beings - the same as a transition from one to another without an intermediary stage, the record of which you insist must exist.
Nothing phony about Jesus nor religion. It's one worldview.
Anyway, I had a revelation tonight. It has to do with what happens to people when the pressure is on. Some just shutdown. Others just start reacting. They lose the ability to think in those situations. Fortunately, we have many who can stay calm, think and take the appropriate measures.
What I think has happened to the atheists is they've lost the ability to think. Atheism is a new religion with the New Atheism. Some, like you, are shutting down. Others just end up reacting.
For example, you post a photo that has been removed. It's of little importance, but yet you desperately cling to a tiny thumbnail. This is evidence of your brain shutting down by societal pressure.
You make me laugh. Are you being serious? I don't believe it. You sound like me talking about the fake moon landing