Zone1 does wokeness and LGBTQ+ deserve anymore attention in highschool than dissecting a frog?

No, at best you gave examples of schools that want the book in their library. Nothing about it being required reading for young children.
the fact that a child(!), curious about sex, encouters sexually explicit material in a school library, with introductions (eventually) provided by the school, is UNACCEPTABLE to most hetros.
just so you FREAKS know.
 
By using the same illogic of the site Stalinists, children should not be prevented from entering adult porn shops. If they happen to wander into one of the booths, even better.

Nobody would be forcing them to do it, after all, and we sure to hate those "book burners", don't we?
 
it just occurred to me : the LGBTQ+ers are grooming (once again) youths everywhere to 'consider themselves as being in the LGBTQI+ spectrum'.

and such indoctrination attempts really piss me off.
 
the fact that a child(!), curious about sex, encouters sexually explicit material in a school library, with introductions (eventually) provided by the school, is UNACCEPTABLE to most hetros.
just so you FREAKS know.

Once again, your claim was that children are "being force-fed sexually explicit material".

That you cannot show that happening cannot be changed by you having a hissy fit
 
Once again, your claim was that children are "being force-fed sexually explicit material".

That you cannot show that happening cannot be changed by you having a hissy fit
your attempt at declaring victory is a load of stinking toxic hubris.

you (and other pro-LGBTQI+ers) want to be the one to define basic words into whatever meaning YOU give it.
that's called "playing a dictionary game".
and it's extremely stupid.

so i've said what i wanted to say, and i won't be afraid to repeat it in the future, especially if you pinko commie ass-F***ers attempt to dominate discussions on this forum, as you do increasingly throughout society.

THIS is where the resistance against gay influence towards straights and youths takes shape.
and you're gonna laugh at this.
but wait until the verbal gut-punches start showing up as permanent damage.
you'll be needing a diaper for adults on a daily basis.
 
your attempt at declaring victory is a load of stinking toxic hubris.

you (and other pro-LGBTQI+ers) want to be the one to define basic words into whatever meaning YOU give it.
that's called "playing a dictionary game".
and it's extremely stupid.

so i've said what i wanted to say, and i won't be afraid to repeat it in the future, especially if you pinko commie ass-F***ers attempt to dominate discussions on this forum, as you do increasingly throughout society.

THIS is where the resistance against gay influence towards straights and youths takes shape.
and you're gonna laugh at this.
but wait until the verbal gut-punches start showing up as permanent damage.
you'll be needing a diaper for adults on a daily basis.

once again, throwing a hissy fit does not change the fact you cannot support your claim.

but it is entertaining to read.

reading your post is like watching this...

5d6ec1933d477490912a36efdd4fb424.gif
 
once again, throwing a hissy fit does not change the fact you cannot support your claim.

but it is entertaining to read.

reading your post is like watching this...

5d6ec1933d477490912a36efdd4fb424.gif
you bluffed, i called, you called, i raised.
expanded the boundaries of what i consider unacceptable behavior by the "LGBTQI+ community".
you fags need to accept that we hetros just call you fags and want nothing to do with you.

keep your sexuality indoors and off public internet channels.
you don't see straight porn getting advertised on major sites either.

so why would grooming of youths by fags be acceptable?
it's not.
 
no dude... while i'm not totally anti-gay, i think gays should not be planting sexually explicit books in kid's libraries :D
The 80s were a miserable time for Gay folk. They have a right to an education as well.
I grew up in the 70s and 80s and I would have appreciated a bit of information about Gay folk. It would have made me a better person. I think most reasonable folk would.
 
you bluffed, i called, you called, i raised.
expanded the boundaries of what i consider unacceptable behavior by the "LGBTQI+ community".
you fags need to accept that we hetros just call you fags and want nothing to do with you.

keep your sexuality indoors and off public internet channels.
you don't see straight porn getting advertised on major sites either.

so why would grooming of youths by fags be acceptable?
it's not.

You still have not given a single example of anyone being forced to read these books.

since you cannot support your claim you choose to attack me and try to make it personal.

But I am not a person controlled by my emotions so it will never work on me.

But damn if it is not fun to watch you rant and rave.

My wife of 31 years will get a kick out of you calling me gay.
 
The 80s were a miserable time for Gay folk. They have a right to an education as well.
i'm not disputing that. but after puberty has taken hold of a class in school.
and i recommend at least a basic level of government-control be applied to which p0rn sites get advertised by schools to kids.
something with romance built into it, and specific content for specific age groups in the teenager range, instead of bullshit-scenario based raw sex that's currently prevalent in the adult p0rn industry...

I grew up in the 70s and 80s and I would have appreciated a bit of information about Gay folk. It would have made me a better person. I think most reasonable folk would.
well i really have always been a bit homophobic; just awkward around, and repulsed by, gays.
 
Last edited:
your attempt at declaring victory is a load of stinking toxic hubris.

you (and other pro-LGBTQI+ers) want to be the one to define basic words into whatever meaning YOU give it.
that's called "playing a dictionary game".
and it's extremely stupid.

so i've said what i wanted to say, and i won't be afraid to repeat it in the future, especially if you pinko commie ass-F***ers attempt to dominate discussions on this forum, as you do increasingly throughout society.

THIS is where the resistance against gay influence towards straights and youths takes shape.
and you're gonna laugh at this.
but wait until the verbal gut-punches start showing up as permanent damage.
you'll be needing a diaper for adults on a daily basis.
An interesting post, but you didn't provide an example as requested.
 
i'm not disputing that. but after puberty has taken hold of a class in school.
and i recommend at least a basic level of government-control be applied to which p0rn sites get advertised by schools to kids.
something with romance built into it, and specific content for specific age groups in the teenager range, instead of bullshit-scenario based raw sex that's currently prevalent in the adult p0rn industry...


well i really have always been a bit homophobic; just awkward around, and repulsed by, gays.
What porn sites are schools promoting ? That seems a dubious claim.
 
What porn sites are schools promoting ? That seems a dubious claim.
maybe the US leading LGBTQers want to play it through 'open market space'.
i'm not sure they'll start promoting porn sites in classes,
i'm warning we might be headed in that direction,
with all criticism of gays now getting attacked by gays and their supporters.
 

Forum List

Back
Top