Does your God have limitations?

[ding]

Unless of course his power for creating and lifting were infinite.

thats logically paradoxical. almost hope it was a joke.

Yes. It creates a second paradox. You like paradoxes, right?

 

[OldLady]

God is the file drawer where we put those things we can't explain. Logic is fine in its place, but it will never explain the unexplainable. Nonbelievers and believers are on the wrong path trying to use human logic to explain or unexplain God.

God is that fuzzy feeling when you're unexpectedly touched by an act of human kindness or the feeling of awe on an early spring day when the first shoots of your perennials begin appearing in the garden after winter. A seed germinating. A baby being born with all ten fingers, ten toes and yowling in outrage. Love. Hope. Handel's Messiah. Michelangelo's Pieta.
We still can't put a finger on it. Our imaginations are bigger than A=A.

Just ignore me. I just had to say it, illogical as it may be.

God defies human logic. Ants would have a better chance of understanding humans.

Did you and I just say the same thing, kind of?

 

[G.T.]

Unless of course his power for creating and lifting were infinite.

thats logically paradoxical. almost hope it was a joke.

Yes. It creates a second paradox. You like paradoxes, right?

no, its literally a reiteration of the first

and no, troll, paradoxes arent a like or dislike, thats twatty commentary

 

[G.T.]

Actually, upon reflection Ive also got to amend an earlier comment Ive made.

If a programmer cannot be logically inconsistent, then it doesnt have all powerful control over its program but instead must follow the framework of logic.

Namely, the law of identity, the law of non contradiction and the law of excluded middle could not be violated for the program to remain logically consistent.

So, this too would have to be a Programmer that operates outside the Laws of Logic, and this too does not apply to the OP in the first place.

 

[ding]

If God's ability to create a rock is unlimited and his ability to lift a rock is unlimited, then by definition neither is limited. So whether he could or could not lift the rock is irrelevant because both powers are unlimited.

 

[G.T.]

If God's ability to create a rock is unlimited and his ability to lift a rock is unlimited, then by definition neither is limited. So whether he could or could not lift the rock is irrelevant because both powers are unlimited.

That makes no sense, ding.

You imposed a "could not" after an "unlimited," and committed a logical fallacy.

 

[ding]

Unless of course his power for creating and lifting were infinite.

thats logically paradoxical. almost hope it was a joke.

Yes. It creates a second paradox. You like paradoxes, right?

no, its literally a reiteration of the first

and no, troll, paradoxes arent a like or dislike, thats twatty commentary

Take it easy, Janeen.

 

[G.T.]

Unless of course his power for creating and lifting were infinite.

thats logically paradoxical. almost hope it was a joke.

Yes. It creates a second paradox. You like paradoxes, right?

no, its literally a reiteration of the first

and no, troll, paradoxes arent a like or dislike, thats twatty commentary

Take it easy, Janeen.

Trolling is literally your only capability, man.

 

[ding]

If God's ability to create a rock is unlimited and his ability to lift a rock is unlimited, then by definition neither is limited. So whether he could or could not lift the rock is irrelevant because both powers are unlimited.

That makes no sense, ding.

You imposed a "could not" after an "unlimited," and committed a logical fallacy.

The powers are independent. They are both unlimited. Problem solved.

 

[ding]

Unless of course his power for creating and lifting were infinite.

thats logically paradoxical. almost hope it was a joke.

Yes. It creates a second paradox. You like paradoxes, right?

no, its literally a reiteration of the first

and no, troll, paradoxes arent a like or dislike, thats twatty commentary

Take it easy, Janeen.

Trolling is literally your only capability, man.

If you don't want it back, don't dish it out.

 

[G.T.]

If God's ability to create a rock is unlimited and his ability to lift a rock is unlimited, then by definition neither is limited. So whether he could or could not lift the rock is irrelevant because both powers are unlimited.

That makes no sense, ding.

You imposed a "could not" after an "unlimited," and committed a logical fallacy.

The powers are independent. They are both unlimited. Problem solved.

That doesnt make any sense whatsoever. You followed an unlimited by a could not. Could not literally means "unable to," which is why its a paradox.

Unlimited and unable to are mutually exclusive.

You would flunk introduction to logic in the 4th grade.

 

[G.T.]

thats logically paradoxical. almost hope it was a joke.

Yes. It creates a second paradox. You like paradoxes, right?

no, its literally a reiteration of the first

and no, troll, paradoxes arent a like or dislike, thats twatty commentary

Take it easy, Janeen.

Trolling is literally your only capability, man.

If you don't want it back, don't dish it out.

I can do both. Its really not that difficult, especially considering the circumstances of you failing to understand any discussion youre involved in.

 

[ding]

If God's ability to create a rock is unlimited and his ability to lift a rock is unlimited, then by definition neither is limited. So whether he could or could not lift the rock is irrelevant because both powers are unlimited.

That makes no sense, ding.

You imposed a "could not" after an "unlimited," and committed a logical fallacy.

The powers are independent. They are both unlimited. Problem solved.

That doesnt make any sense whatsoever. You followed an unlimited by a could not. Could not literally means "unable to," which is why its a paradox.

Unlimited and unable to are mutually exclusive.

You would flunk introduction to logic in the 4th grade.

The could or could not doesn't matter GT because they are both unlimited. If you start from that assumption which is what you asked us to do, then the solution can never be anything but unlimited.

Let's do the math and use mass.

God can create infinite mass and God can lift infinite mass.

Can God lift it?

infinity mass created - infinity mass lifted = 0

The answer is true.

 

[G.T.]

If God's ability to create a rock is unlimited and his ability to lift a rock is unlimited, then by definition neither is limited. So whether he could or could not lift the rock is irrelevant because both powers are unlimited.

That makes no sense, ding.

You imposed a "could not" after an "unlimited," and committed a logical fallacy.

The powers are independent. They are both unlimited. Problem solved.

That doesnt make any sense whatsoever. You followed an unlimited by a could not. Could not literally means "unable to," which is why its a paradox.

Unlimited and unable to are mutually exclusive.

You would flunk introduction to logic in the 4th grade.

The could or could not doesn't matter GT because they are both unlimited. If you start from that assumption which is what you asked us to do, then the solution can never be anything but unlimited.

Let's do the math and use mass.

God can create infinite mass and God can lift infinite mass.

Can God lift it?

infinity mass created - infinity mass lifted = 0

The answer is yes.

If god has unlimited POWER, the paradox stands in that he could not create a rock that he could not lift.

This is quite literally the textbook example of a true paradox, in logic.

You can look it up. You also called it a paradox, yourself ...a handful of posts ago and so the troll temperature on planet jupiter musta dropped. Have a good day.

 

[G.T.]

If God's ability to create a rock is unlimited and his ability to lift a rock is unlimited, then by definition neither is limited. So whether he could or could not lift the rock is irrelevant because both powers are unlimited.

That makes no sense, ding.

You imposed a "could not" after an "unlimited," and committed a logical fallacy.

The powers are independent. They are both unlimited. Problem solved.

That doesnt make any sense whatsoever. You followed an unlimited by a could not. Could not literally means "unable to," which is why its a paradox.

Unlimited and unable to are mutually exclusive.

You would flunk introduction to logic in the 4th grade.

The could or could not doesn't matter GT because they are both unlimited. If you start from that assumption which is what you asked us to do, then the solution can never be anything but unlimited.

Let's do the math and use mass.

God can create infinite mass and God can lift infinite mass.

Can God lift it?

infinity mass created - infinity mass lifted = 0

The answer is true.

You literally changed the syllogism from "can god create something he CANT lift..."


to god can lift unlimited
god can create unlimited

which completely ignores the paradox


and you thought it was its answer


the paradox is that he created something he CANT lift.

do you know what "cant" means? it means if he has UNLIMITED lifting power ....."cant" is not an option.

thus the paradox


cant believe the easiest one is over your head

 

[ding]

If God's ability to create a rock is unlimited and his ability to lift a rock is unlimited, then by definition neither is limited. So whether he could or could not lift the rock is irrelevant because both powers are unlimited.

That makes no sense, ding.

You imposed a "could not" after an "unlimited," and committed a logical fallacy.

The powers are independent. They are both unlimited. Problem solved.

That doesnt make any sense whatsoever. You followed an unlimited by a could not. Could not literally means "unable to," which is why its a paradox.

Unlimited and unable to are mutually exclusive.

You would flunk introduction to logic in the 4th grade.

The could or could not doesn't matter GT because they are both unlimited. If you start from that assumption which is what you asked us to do, then the solution can never be anything but unlimited.

Let's do the math and use mass.

God can create infinite mass and God can lift infinite mass.

Can God lift it?

infinity mass created - infinity mass lifted = 0

The answer is yes.

If god has unlimited POWER, the paradox stands in that he could not create a rock that he could not lift.

This is quite literally the textbook example of a true paradox, in logic.

You can look it up. You also called it a paradox, yourself ...a handful of posts ago and so the troll temperature on planet jupiter musta dropped. Have a good day.

I told you I question the question.

If God has unlimited power then he has unlimited power to create rocks and unlimited power to lift rocks.

Solve it from there.

 

[ding]

If God's ability to create a rock is unlimited and his ability to lift a rock is unlimited, then by definition neither is limited. So whether he could or could not lift the rock is irrelevant because both powers are unlimited.

That makes no sense, ding.

You imposed a "could not" after an "unlimited," and committed a logical fallacy.

The powers are independent. They are both unlimited. Problem solved.

That doesnt make any sense whatsoever. You followed an unlimited by a could not. Could not literally means "unable to," which is why its a paradox.

Unlimited and unable to are mutually exclusive.

You would flunk introduction to logic in the 4th grade.

The could or could not doesn't matter GT because they are both unlimited. If you start from that assumption which is what you asked us to do, then the solution can never be anything but unlimited.

Let's do the math and use mass.

God can create infinite mass and God can lift infinite mass.

Can God lift it?

infinity mass created - infinity mass lifted = 0

The answer is true.

You literally changed the syllogism from "can god create something he CANT lift..."


to god can lift unlimited
god can create unlimited

which completely ignores the paradox


and you thought it was its answer


the paradox is that he created something he CANT lift.

do you know what "cant" means? it means if he has UNLIMITED lifting power ....."cant" is not an option.

thus the paradox


cant believe the easiest one is over your head

I did what you asked in the OP.

I explained it.

 

[G.T.]

That makes no sense, ding.

You imposed a "could not" after an "unlimited," and committed a logical fallacy.

The powers are independent. They are both unlimited. Problem solved.

That doesnt make any sense whatsoever. You followed an unlimited by a could not. Could not literally means "unable to," which is why its a paradox.

Unlimited and unable to are mutually exclusive.

You would flunk introduction to logic in the 4th grade.

The could or could not doesn't matter GT because they are both unlimited. If you start from that assumption which is what you asked us to do, then the solution can never be anything but unlimited.

Let's do the math and use mass.

God can create infinite mass and God can lift infinite mass.

Can God lift it?

infinity mass created - infinity mass lifted = 0

The answer is yes.

If god has unlimited POWER, the paradox stands in that he could not create a rock that he could not lift.

This is quite literally the textbook example of a true paradox, in logic.

You can look it up. You also called it a paradox, yourself ...a handful of posts ago and so the troll temperature on planet jupiter musta dropped. Have a good day.

I told you I question the question.

If God has unlimited power then he has unlimited power to create rocks and unlimited power to lift rocks.

Solve it from there.

he doesnt have unlimited power to create rocks if he cannot create the one he cannot lift

derpp

 

[G.T.]

That makes no sense, ding.

You imposed a "could not" after an "unlimited," and committed a logical fallacy.

The powers are independent. They are both unlimited. Problem solved.

That doesnt make any sense whatsoever. You followed an unlimited by a could not. Could not literally means "unable to," which is why its a paradox.

Unlimited and unable to are mutually exclusive.

You would flunk introduction to logic in the 4th grade.

The could or could not doesn't matter GT because they are both unlimited. If you start from that assumption which is what you asked us to do, then the solution can never be anything but unlimited.

Let's do the math and use mass.

God can create infinite mass and God can lift infinite mass.

Can God lift it?

infinity mass created - infinity mass lifted = 0

The answer is true.

You literally changed the syllogism from "can god create something he CANT lift..."


to god can lift unlimited
god can create unlimited

which completely ignores the paradox


and you thought it was its answer


the paradox is that he created something he CANT lift.

do you know what "cant" means? it means if he has UNLIMITED lifting power ....."cant" is not an option.

thus the paradox


cant believe the easiest one is over your head

I did what you asked in the OP.

I explained it.

Okie. Cool explanation. I dont concur.

 

[ding]

The powers are independent. They are both unlimited. Problem solved.

That doesnt make any sense whatsoever. You followed an unlimited by a could not. Could not literally means "unable to," which is why its a paradox.

Unlimited and unable to are mutually exclusive.

You would flunk introduction to logic in the 4th grade.

The could or could not doesn't matter GT because they are both unlimited. If you start from that assumption which is what you asked us to do, then the solution can never be anything but unlimited.

Let's do the math and use mass.

God can create infinite mass and God can lift infinite mass.

Can God lift it?

infinity mass created - infinity mass lifted = 0

The answer is yes.

If god has unlimited POWER, the paradox stands in that he could not create a rock that he could not lift.

This is quite literally the textbook example of a true paradox, in logic.

You can look it up. You also called it a paradox, yourself ...a handful of posts ago and so the troll temperature on planet jupiter musta dropped. Have a good day.

I told you I question the question.

If God has unlimited power then he has unlimited power to create rocks and unlimited power to lift rocks.

Solve it from there.

he doesnt gave unlimited power to create rocks if he cannot create the one he cannot lift

derpp

Two independent powers which you have erroneously linked.