Donald Trump is such a threat to the nation.

[HappyJoy]

No shit?
No, she only oversees one and has no influence in the other. She doesn't have anything to say about the rest of it.
What's painful to watch is Nancy flopping around like a fish out of water. Painful but funny as hell. LOL

Political influence, she has political influence on the process. Just as others outside the senate have like Trump. It's not complicated.

You are delusional. Mitch has already laughed in her face. She has no say in how he runs the Senate.

She's a poster child for the total failure of our educational system.

She is?

You are doofus.

A doofus?

 

[jc456]

Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things.

No shit?

She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House.

No, she only oversees one and has no influence in the other. She doesn't have anything to say about the rest of it.

Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.

What's painful to watch is Nancy flopping around like a fish out of water. Painful but funny as hell. LOL

Political influence, she has political influence on the process. Just as others outside the senate have like Trump. It's not complicated.

how? Explain to the class how this influence works. what is it she can actually do? hold the articles. have at it, she's the one that wants them passed. not Mitch. why does he care? Why does Trump care? your TDS has crawled all the way through your bowels friend.

BTW, it is very complicated for you. too fking funny son.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

So ima sit on these articles of impeachment because it's so important that we try to remove him....

So, do you believe the two Articles of Impeachment presented by the House, rendering this *pResident impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional? If you don't, can you please provide details why you think so?

impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional?

Unanimous? Dude!

So, having the majority of votes to impeach isn't unanimous anymore? Who controls the house?

It never was, moron.

Oh! You're just butt hurt about facts! Got it.

 

[Nostra]

So ima sit on these articles of impeachment because it's so important that we try to remove him....

So, do you believe the two Articles of Impeachment presented by the House, rendering this *pResident impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional? If you don't, can you please provide details why you think so?

Unanimous vote? You really are clueless.

Who has the majority in the House, genius? Do you even understand how government works? Unanimous. Get a clue.

Apparently, you have no clue what "unanimous" means. Most Libtards have trouble with big words, so don't feel bad.

Unanimous means in full agreement. In the House, the majority voted for impeachment. You can't change the meaning of words because they offend your feelings. Unanimous. Maybe English isn't your first language. Maybe you're just an idiot, I won't speculate.

230-197 is "full agreement"? "Unanimous"?

You really are dumb.

 

[HappyJoy]

She has political influence such as holding off the impeachment articles and letting McConnell stew as he wants to move on even though it appears Trump wants a long drawn out trial as he thinks it's politically best for him. Kind of puts Mitch in a little bit of a bind.

Anyway, influence...yes.

How is Mitch in a bind? He gets to sit back and watch Nazi try to juggle her clusterfuck, and go on the Senate floor to club her over the head every once in a while.

Because he's made it quite clear he wants to dismiss it as soon as possible. Trump on the other hand does not.

Where did he say that? Gotta link?

Really?

Mitch McConnell wants a quick Trump impeachment trial, but wildcard Republican senators say not so fast

I missed where he said he wants to "dismiss" it as soon as possible. Wanna show us that quote?

Pretty much holding the trial without any witnesses greatly reduces it's length. When I say 'dismiss', I mean get it over with, end it. Not in a legal sense of dismissing a case.

 

[Nostra]

So ima sit on these articles of impeachment because it's so important that we try to remove him....

So, do you believe the two Articles of Impeachment presented by the House, rendering this *pResident impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional? If you don't, can you please provide details why you think so?

impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional?

Unanimous? Dude!

So, having the majority of votes to impeach isn't unanimous anymore? Who controls the house?

It never was, moron.

Oh! You're just butt hurt about facts! Got it.

What facts would those be?

 

[S.J.]

Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things.

No shit?

She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House.

No, she only oversees one and has no influence in the other. She doesn't have anything to say about the rest of it.

Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.

What's painful to watch is Nancy flopping around like a fish out of water. Painful but funny as hell. LOL

Political influence, she has political influence on the process. Just as others outside the senate have like Trump. It's not complicated.

Once the House takes a vote on it she has no influence. Her part is done. If she doesn't send them to the Senate, the impeachment is done. She painted herself into a corner and can't get out. This is great fun to watch.

 

[Nostra]

How is Mitch in a bind? He gets to sit back and watch Nazi try to juggle her clusterfuck, and go on the Senate floor to club her over the head every once in a while.

Because he's made it quite clear he wants to dismiss it as soon as possible. Trump on the other hand does not.

Where did he say that? Gotta link?

Really?

Mitch McConnell wants a quick Trump impeachment trial, but wildcard Republican senators say not so fast

I missed where he said he wants to "dismiss" it as soon as possible. Wanna show us that quote?

Pretty much holding the trial without any witnesses greatly reduces it's length. When I say 'dismiss', I mean get it over with, end it. Not in a legal sense of dismissing a case.

Ok, we found another word you don't know the meaning of...."dismiss".

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

So ima sit on these articles of impeachment because it's so important that we try to remove him....

So, do you believe the two Articles of Impeachment presented by the House, rendering this *pResident impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional? If you don't, can you please provide details why you think so?

impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional?

Unanimous? Dude!

So, having the majority of votes to impeach isn't unanimous anymore? Who controls the house?

You clearly of no idea what unanimous means.
Did you go to even elementary school?

Did you? In that particular chamber of Congress, the majority was in full agreement and voted for impeachment. Your feelings won't change that permanent asterisk on this *pResident's record.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

She wants to know what the rules are going to be in the senate so that McConnell doesn't attempt to kill any impeachment trial thus rendering what she feels is important for our country to fall by the way side. You don't have to agree with her to recognize the obvious.

Right....

Even though they totally obscured and ignored ALL the rules that pertained to Trump's Defense. Total sham and disregarded the Constitution 100%
Even so far as having Closed Door secret meetings to exclude Republicans from the process.

Now you Jackass Tyrants are demanding that the Senate do everything for you that you flat refused to budge on in the House?

Might just be my opinion,...but your side is committing what many might call Capital Offenses.


I swear, if the Right EVER allows you first class criminals to gain power.....they will get what they deserve in Spades.

 

[HappyJoy]

Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things.

No shit?

She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House.

No, she only oversees one and has no influence in the other. She doesn't have anything to say about the rest of it.

Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.

What's painful to watch is Nancy flopping around like a fish out of water. Painful but funny as hell. LOL

Political influence, she has political influence on the process. Just as others outside the senate have like Trump. It's not complicated.

how? Explain to the class how this influence works. what is it she can actually do? hold the articles. have at it, she's the one that wants them passed. not Mitch. why does he care? Why does Trump care? your TDS has crawled all the way through your bowels friend.

By calling attention to McConnell not wanting to call witnesses or take the trail seriously. So, holding out for a better deal as moderate Republicans are getting calls from their own constituents wanting a full trail.

As for the impeachment articles they have already passed.

I'm pretty sure the most narcissistic president this country has ever known cares a great deal about how his impeachment trail will make him look.

 

[S.J.]

Unanimous means in full agreement. In the House, the majority voted for impeachment.

Not unanimously.

 

[jc456]

Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things.

No shit?

She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House.

No, she only oversees one and has no influence in the other. She doesn't have anything to say about the rest of it.

Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.

What's painful to watch is Nancy flopping around like a fish out of water. Painful but funny as hell. LOL

Political influence, she has political influence on the process. Just as others outside the senate have like Trump. It's not complicated.

You are delusional. Mitch has already laughed in her face. She has no say in how he runs the Senate.

She's a poster child for the total failure of our educational system.

She is?

she is!!!

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

So, do you believe the two Articles of Impeachment presented by the House, rendering this *pResident impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional? If you don't, can you please provide details why you think so?

Unanimous vote? You really are clueless.

Who has the majority in the House, genius? Do you even understand how government works? Unanimous. Get a clue.

Apparently, you have no clue what "unanimous" means. Most Libtards have trouble with big words, so don't feel bad.

Unanimous means in full agreement. In the House, the majority voted for impeachment. You can't change the meaning of words because they offend your feelings. Unanimous. Maybe English isn't your first language. Maybe you're just an idiot, I won't speculate.

230-197 is "full agreement"? "Unanimous"?

You really are dumb.

So, do you believe the two Articles of Impeachment presented by the House, rendering this *pResident impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional? If you don't, can you please provide details why you think so?

Unanimous vote? You really are clueless.

Who has the majority in the House, genius? Do you even understand how government works? Unanimous. Get a clue.

Apparently, you have no clue what "unanimous" means. Most Libtards have trouble with big words, so don't feel bad.

Unanimous means in full agreement. In the House, the majority voted for impeachment. You can't change the meaning of words because they offend your feelings. Unanimous. Maybe English isn't your first language. Maybe you're just an idiot, I won't speculate.

230-197 is "full agreement"? "Unanimous"?

You really are dumb.

Is 230 a larger number than 197? Take your time...

 

[HappyJoy]

Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things.

No shit?

She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House.

No, she only oversees one and has no influence in the other. She doesn't have anything to say about the rest of it.

Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.

What's painful to watch is Nancy flopping around like a fish out of water. Painful but funny as hell. LOL

Political influence, she has political influence on the process. Just as others outside the senate have like Trump. It's not complicated.

Once the House takes a vote on it she has no influence. Her part is done. If she doesn't send them to the Senate, the impeachment is done. She painted herself into a corner and can't get out. This is great fun to watch.

Her part being done as leader of the House is done, doesn't mean she can't influence further outcomes.

Also, the impeachment is already done, he was impeached. Remember?

 

[jc456]

Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things.

No shit?

She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House.

No, she only oversees one and has no influence in the other. She doesn't have anything to say about the rest of it.

Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.

What's painful to watch is Nancy flopping around like a fish out of water. Painful but funny as hell. LOL

Political influence, she has political influence on the process. Just as others outside the senate have like Trump. It's not complicated.

how? Explain to the class how this influence works. what is it she can actually do? hold the articles. have at it, she's the one that wants them passed. not Mitch. why does he care? Why does Trump care? your TDS has crawled all the way through your bowels friend.

By calling attention to McConnell not wanting to call witnesses or take the trail seriously. So, holding out for a better deal as moderate Republicans are getting calls from their own constituents wanting a full trail.

As for the impeachment articles they have already passed.

I'm pretty sure the most narcissistic president this country has ever known cares a great deal about how his impeachment trail will make him look.

huh? what is her leverage son? come on beat us down with this genius of yours. Mitch gives two shits if she uses that paper for wiping her ass. how is it she has leverage/ this isn't his thing it's hers. dude, you are very confused. hly fk.

Mitch didn't ask her to perform the impeachment. that was her. so she kidnapped her own kid and wants some bad guy to give her money for her kid. too fking funny.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

So, do you believe the two Articles of Impeachment presented by the House, rendering this *pResident impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional? If you don't, can you please provide details why you think so?

impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional?

Unanimous? Dude!

So, having the majority of votes to impeach isn't unanimous anymore? Who controls the house?

It never was, moron.

Oh! You're just butt hurt about facts! Got it.

What facts would those be?

That the House majority unanimously voted to impeach.

 

[Nostra]

Unanimous vote? You really are clueless.

Who has the majority in the House, genius? Do you even understand how government works? Unanimous. Get a clue.

Apparently, you have no clue what "unanimous" means. Most Libtards have trouble with big words, so don't feel bad.

Unanimous means in full agreement. In the House, the majority voted for impeachment. You can't change the meaning of words because they offend your feelings. Unanimous. Maybe English isn't your first language. Maybe you're just an idiot, I won't speculate.

230-197 is "full agreement"? "Unanimous"?

You really are dumb.

Unanimous vote? You really are clueless.

Who has the majority in the House, genius? Do you even understand how government works? Unanimous. Get a clue.

Apparently, you have no clue what "unanimous" means. Most Libtards have trouble with big words, so don't feel bad.

Unanimous means in full agreement. In the House, the majority voted for impeachment. You can't change the meaning of words because they offend your feelings. Unanimous. Maybe English isn't your first language. Maybe you're just an idiot, I won't speculate.

230-197 is "full agreement"? "Unanimous"?

You really are dumb.

Is 230 a larger number than 197? Take your time...

Really dude? You are a complete moron.

Keep it up, this is hilarious.

 

[Nostra]

impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional?

Unanimous? Dude!

So, having the majority of votes to impeach isn't unanimous anymore? Who controls the house?

It never was, moron.

Oh! You're just butt hurt about facts! Got it.

What facts would those be?

That the House majority unanimously voted to impeach.

Actually moron, some of the House majority voted against impeachment.

Man, you just can't get anything right.

 

[HappyJoy]

She wants to know what the rules are going to be in the senate so that McConnell doesn't attempt to kill any impeachment trial thus rendering what she feels is important for our country to fall by the way side. You don't have to agree with her to recognize the obvious.

Right....

Even though they totally obscured and ignored ALL the rules that pertained to Trump's Defense. Total sham and disregarded the Constitution 100%
Even so far as having Closed Door secret meetings to exclude Republicans from the process.

Now you Jackass Tyrants are demanding that the Senate do everything for you that you flat refused to budge on in the House?

Might just be my opinion,...but your side is committing what many might call Capital Offenses.


I swear, if the Right EVER allows you first class criminals to gain power.....they will get what they deserve in Spades.

Right....

Like I said you don't have to agree with her or the results of the impeachment to understand that by holding off sending this to the house is somehow an acknowledgement that she doesn't think Trump is a danger to the country. Which was the point of the OP. It's pure fantasy.