Donald Trump is such a threat to the nation.

[jc456]

So ima sit on these articles of impeachment because it's so important that we try to remove him....

So, do you believe the two Articles of Impeachment presented by the House, rendering this *pResident impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional? If you don't, can you please provide details why you think so?

impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional?

Unanimous? Dude!

 

[Billiejeens]

Too bad. She knew when she started it wasn't gonna go anywhere. Reminds me of the 2000 election. The rules didn't work in their favor so they tried to change them retroactively. Doesn't work that way.

Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things. She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House. Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.

Wrong. She has no influence in the Senate.

She does. McConnell wants this to end yesterday. It hasn't.

Wrong again. She has no say in how Mitch runs the Senate.

You are delusional.

She has political influence such as holding off the impeachment articles and letting McConnell stew as he wants to move on even though it appears Trump wants a long drawn out trial as he thinks it's politically best for him. Kind of puts Mitch in a little bit of a bind.

Anyway, influence...yes.

None.

 

[HappyJoy]

Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things.

No shit?

She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House.

No, she only oversees one and has no influence in the other. She doesn't have anything to say about the rest of it.

Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.

What's painful to watch is Nancy flopping around like a fish out of water. Painful but funny as hell. LOL

Political influence, she has political influence on the process. Just as others outside the senate have like Trump. It's not complicated.

 

[Billiejeens]

Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things.

No shit?

She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House.

No, she only oversees one and has no influence in the other. She doesn't have anything to say about the rest of it.

Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.

What's painful to watch is Nancy flopping around like a fish out of water. Painful but funny as hell. LOL

Zero pain, for me.

 

[Nostra]

Wrong. She has no influence in the Senate.

She does. McConnell wants this to end yesterday. It hasn't.

Wrong again. She has no say in how Mitch runs the Senate.

You are delusional.

She has political influence such as holding off the impeachment articles and letting McConnell stew as he wants to move on even though it appears Trump wants a long drawn out trial as he thinks it's politically best for him. Kind of puts Mitch in a little bit of a bind.

Anyway, influence...yes.

How is Mitch in a bind? He gets to sit back and watch Nazi try to juggle her clusterfuck, and go on the Senate floor to club her over the head every once in a while.

Because he's made it quite clear he wants to dismiss it as soon as possible. Trump on the other hand does not.

Where did he say that? Gotta link?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

So ima sit on these articles of impeachment because it's so important that we try to remove him....

So, do you believe the two Articles of Impeachment presented by the House, rendering this *pResident impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional? If you don't, can you please provide details why you think so?

Unanimous vote? You really are clueless.

Who has the majority in the House, genius? Do you even understand how government works? Unanimous. Get a clue.

 

[Billiejeens]

Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things.

No shit?

She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House.

No, she only oversees one and has no influence in the other. She doesn't have anything to say about the rest of it.

Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.

What's painful to watch is Nancy flopping around like a fish out of water. Painful but funny as hell. LOL

Political influence, she has political influence on the process. Just as others outside the senate have like Trump. It's not complicated.

Yet it completely escapes you.

 

[Nostra]

Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things.

No shit?

She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House.

No, she only oversees one and has no influence in the other. She doesn't have anything to say about the rest of it.

Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.

What's painful to watch is Nancy flopping around like a fish out of water. Painful but funny as hell. LOL

Political influence, she has political influence on the process. Just as others outside the senate have like Trump. It's not complicated.

You are delusional. Mitch has already laughed in her face. She has no say in how he runs the Senate.

 

[Nostra]

So ima sit on these articles of impeachment because it's so important that we try to remove him....

So, do you believe the two Articles of Impeachment presented by the House, rendering this *pResident impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional? If you don't, can you please provide details why you think so?

Unanimous vote? You really are clueless.

Who has the majority in the House, genius? Do you even understand how government works? Unanimous. Get a clue.

Apparently, you have no clue what "unanimous" means. Most Libtards have trouble with big words, so don't feel bad.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

So ima sit on these articles of impeachment because it's so important that we try to remove him....

So, do you believe the two Articles of Impeachment presented by the House, rendering this *pResident impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional? If you don't, can you please provide details why you think so?

impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional?

Unanimous? Dude!

So, having the majority of votes to impeach isn't unanimous anymore? Who controls the house?

 

[Billiejeens]

Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things.

No shit?

She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House.

No, she only oversees one and has no influence in the other. She doesn't have anything to say about the rest of it.

Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.

What's painful to watch is Nancy flopping around like a fish out of water. Painful but funny as hell. LOL

Political influence, she has political influence on the process. Just as others outside the senate have like Trump. It's not complicated.

You are delusional. Mitch has already laughed in her face. She has no say in how he runs the Senate.

She's a poster child for the total failure of our educational system.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

She wants to know what the rules are going to be in the senate so that McConnell doesn't attempt to kill any impeachment trial thus rendering what she feels is important for our country to fall by the way side. You don't have to agree with her to recognize the obvious.

Too bad. She knew when she started it wasn't gonna go anywhere. Reminds me of the 2000 election. The rules didn't work in their favor so they tried to change them retroactively. Doesn't work that way.

Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things. She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House. Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.

Wrong. She has no influence in the Senate.

She does. McConnell wants this to end yesterday. It hasn't.

Joe is begging for this to end yesterday.

 

[Nostra]

So ima sit on these articles of impeachment because it's so important that we try to remove him....

So, do you believe the two Articles of Impeachment presented by the House, rendering this *pResident impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional? If you don't, can you please provide details why you think so?

impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional?

Unanimous? Dude!

So, having the majority of votes to impeach isn't unanimous anymore? Who controls the house?

It never was, moron.

 

[Billiejeens]

So ima sit on these articles of impeachment because it's so important that we try to remove him....

So, do you believe the two Articles of Impeachment presented by the House, rendering this *pResident impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional? If you don't, can you please provide details why you think so?

impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional?

Unanimous? Dude!

So, having the majority of votes to impeach isn't unanimous anymore? Who controls the house?

You clearly of no idea what unanimous means.
Did you go to even elementary school?

 

[HappyJoy]

She does. McConnell wants this to end yesterday. It hasn't.

Wrong again. She has no say in how Mitch runs the Senate.

You are delusional.

She has political influence such as holding off the impeachment articles and letting McConnell stew as he wants to move on even though it appears Trump wants a long drawn out trial as he thinks it's politically best for him. Kind of puts Mitch in a little bit of a bind.

Anyway, influence...yes.

How is Mitch in a bind? He gets to sit back and watch Nazi try to juggle her clusterfuck, and go on the Senate floor to club her over the head every once in a while.

Because he's made it quite clear he wants to dismiss it as soon as possible. Trump on the other hand does not.

Where did he say that? Gotta link?

Really?

Mitch McConnell wants a quick Trump impeachment trial, but wildcard Republican senators say not so fast

 

[HappyJoy]

Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things.

No shit?

She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House.

No, she only oversees one and has no influence in the other. She doesn't have anything to say about the rest of it.

Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.

What's painful to watch is Nancy flopping around like a fish out of water. Painful but funny as hell. LOL

Political influence, she has political influence on the process. Just as others outside the senate have like Trump. It's not complicated.

You are delusional. Mitch has already laughed in her face. She has no say in how he runs the Senate.

She's a poster child for the total failure of our educational system.

She is?

 

[Billiejeens]

Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things.

No shit?

She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House.

No, she only oversees one and has no influence in the other. She doesn't have anything to say about the rest of it.

Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.

What's painful to watch is Nancy flopping around like a fish out of water. Painful but funny as hell. LOL

Political influence, she has political influence on the process. Just as others outside the senate have like Trump. It's not complicated.

You are delusional. Mitch has already laughed in her face. She has no say in how he runs the Senate.

She's a poster child for the total failure of our educational system.

She is?

You are doofus.

 

[HappyJoy]

She wants to know what the rules are going to be in the senate so that McConnell doesn't attempt to kill any impeachment trial thus rendering what she feels is important for our country to fall by the way side. You don't have to agree with her to recognize the obvious.

Too bad. She knew when she started it wasn't gonna go anywhere. Reminds me of the 2000 election. The rules didn't work in their favor so they tried to change them retroactively. Doesn't work that way.

Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things. She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House. Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.

Wrong. She has no influence in the Senate.

She does. McConnell wants this to end yesterday. It hasn't.

Joe is begging for this to end yesterday.

Biden? I don't know, has he said as much?

 

[Nostra]

Wrong again. She has no say in how Mitch runs the Senate.

You are delusional.

She has political influence such as holding off the impeachment articles and letting McConnell stew as he wants to move on even though it appears Trump wants a long drawn out trial as he thinks it's politically best for him. Kind of puts Mitch in a little bit of a bind.

Anyway, influence...yes.

How is Mitch in a bind? He gets to sit back and watch Nazi try to juggle her clusterfuck, and go on the Senate floor to club her over the head every once in a while.

Because he's made it quite clear he wants to dismiss it as soon as possible. Trump on the other hand does not.

Where did he say that? Gotta link?

Really?

Mitch McConnell wants a quick Trump impeachment trial, but wildcard Republican senators say not so fast

I missed where he said he wants to "dismiss" it as soon as possible. Wanna show us that quote?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

So ima sit on these articles of impeachment because it's so important that we try to remove him....

So, do you believe the two Articles of Impeachment presented by the House, rendering this *pResident impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional? If you don't, can you please provide details why you think so?

Unanimous vote? You really are clueless.

Who has the majority in the House, genius? Do you even understand how government works? Unanimous. Get a clue.

Apparently, you have no clue what "unanimous" means. Most Libtards have trouble with big words, so don't feel bad.

Unanimous means in full agreement. In the House, the majority voted for impeachment. You can't change the meaning of words because they offend your feelings. Unanimous. Maybe English isn't your first language. Maybe you're just an idiot, I won't speculate.