Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Wrong again.Wrong. She knows she has a major clusterfuck in her hands and is desperately trying to figure out how to make it go away.She wants to know what the rules are going to be in the senate so that McConnell doesn't attempt to kill any impeachment trial thus rendering what she feels is important for our country to fall by the way side. You don't have to agree with her to recognize the obvious.
She has no say in Senate rules.
Clusterfuck? I honestly don't see how the impeachment thing changes anyone's opinion so hardly a clusterfuck as the country is close to evenly divided on this. It's no secret that Pelosi initially did not want to impeach the president and then when the Ukraine call came up there really wasn't much choice. If she think there was reason to impeach she could have just kept the same posture as during the Mueller investigation.
If she wanted it to go away she'd just send them on up to the senate and wash her hands of it.
Probably the same room Schiff had his hearingTrumpublicans just need to pass a "Protect Trumpybear" resolution to reiterate to the country that no mater what the Dog Waging POS does they will protect him from removal. They only need 34 votes for it to be effective.
Pretty sure it was a handshake in a backroom somewhere.
She has one out. Withdraw the articles and start all over.Wrong. She knows she has a major clusterfuck in her hands and is desperately trying to figure out how to make it go away.She wants to know what the rules are going to be in the senate so that McConnell doesn't attempt to kill any impeachment trial thus rendering what she feels is important for our country to fall by the way side. You don't have to agree with her to recognize the obvious.
She has no say in Senate rules.
Wrong again. She has no say in how Mitch runs the Senate.Wrong. She has no influence in the Senate.Too bad. She knew when she started it wasn't gonna go anywhere. Reminds me of the 2000 election. The rules didn't work in their favor so they tried to change them retroactively. Doesn't work that way.She wants to know what the rules are going to be in the senate so that McConnell doesn't attempt to kill any impeachment trial thus rendering what she feels is important for our country to fall by the way side. You don't have to agree with her to recognize the obvious.
Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things. She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House. Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.
She does. McConnell wants this to end yesterday. It hasn't.
So ima sit on these articles of impeachment because it's so important that we try to remove him....
Trumpublicans just need to pass a "Protect Trumpybear" resolution to reiterate to the country that no mater what the Dog Waging POS does they will protect him from removal. They only need 34 votes for it to be effective.
Pretty sure it was a handshake in a backroom somewhere.
So ima sit on these articles of impeachment because it's so important that we try to remove him....
So, do you believe the two Articles of Impeachment presented by the House, rendering this *pResident impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional? If you don't, can you please provide details why you think so?
Probably the same room Schiff had his hearingTrumpublicans just need to pass a "Protect Trumpybear" resolution to reiterate to the country that no mater what the Dog Waging POS does they will protect him from removal. They only need 34 votes for it to be effective.
Pretty sure it was a handshake in a backroom somewhere.
But it's So Urgent, like when one has to run to the bathroom to take a dump before they shit their pants and when they look in to the toilet, they see the Brown Eyes of Nazi Pelosi staring back up at them.Trumpublicans just need to pass a "Protect Trumpybear" resolution to reiterate to the country that no mater what the Dog Waging POS does they will protect him from removal. They only need 34 votes for it to be effective.
Yah, that urgent. Why, it's a matter of National Security, why The Constitution is under attack, The Flag is being defiled, our Republic is in Danger.....
Nancy looks at her watch.....Oh it's Martini time.... See Yah all in 3 weeks....or maybe longer.
Nancy trying to tell us why The Articles aren't at The Senate yet.
Long Version:
Too bad. She knew when she started it wasn't gonna go anywhere. Reminds me of the 2000 election. The rules didn't work in their favor so they tried to change them retroactively. Doesn't work that way.She wants to know what the rules are going to be in the senate so that McConnell doesn't attempt to kill any impeachment trial thus rendering what she feels is important for our country to fall by the way side. You don't have to agree with her to recognize the obvious.
So ima sit on these articles of impeachment because it's so important that we try to remove him....
So, do you believe the two Articles of Impeachment presented by the House, rendering this *pResident impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional? If you don't, can you please provide details why you think so?
Wrong again. She has no say in how Mitch runs the Senate.Wrong. She has no influence in the Senate.Too bad. She knew when she started it wasn't gonna go anywhere. Reminds me of the 2000 election. The rules didn't work in their favor so they tried to change them retroactively. Doesn't work that way.She wants to know what the rules are going to be in the senate so that McConnell doesn't attempt to kill any impeachment trial thus rendering what she feels is important for our country to fall by the way side. You don't have to agree with her to recognize the obvious.
Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things. She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House. Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.
She does. McConnell wants this to end yesterday. It hasn't.
You are delusional.
How is Mitch in a bind? He gets to sit back and watch Nazi try to juggle her clusterfuck, and go on the Senate floor to club her over the head every once in a while.Wrong again. She has no say in how Mitch runs the Senate.Wrong. She has no influence in the Senate.Too bad. She knew when she started it wasn't gonna go anywhere. Reminds me of the 2000 election. The rules didn't work in their favor so they tried to change them retroactively. Doesn't work that way.
Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things. She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House. Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.
She does. McConnell wants this to end yesterday. It hasn't.
You are delusional.
She has political influence such as holding off the impeachment articles and letting McConnell stew as he wants to move on even though it appears Trump wants a long drawn out trial as he thinks it's politically best for him. Kind of puts Mitch in a little bit of a bind.
Anyway, influence...yes.
she likes chewing them.She really needs to do something about those dentures.
Wrong again. She has no say in how Mitch runs the Senate.Wrong. She has no influence in the Senate.Too bad. She knew when she started it wasn't gonna go anywhere. Reminds me of the 2000 election. The rules didn't work in their favor so they tried to change them retroactively. Doesn't work that way.
Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things. She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House. Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.
She does. McConnell wants this to end yesterday. It hasn't.
You are delusional.
No shit?Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things.
No, she only oversees one and has no influence in the other. She doesn't have anything to say about the rest of it.She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House.
What's painful to watch is Nancy flopping around like a fish out of water. Painful but funny as hell. LOLAgain, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.
But it's So Urgent, like when one has to run to the bathroom to take a dump before they shit their pants and when they look in to the toilet, they see the Brown Eyes of Nazi Pelosi staring back up at them.Trumpublicans just need to pass a "Protect Trumpybear" resolution to reiterate to the country that no mater what the Dog Waging POS does they will protect him from removal. They only need 34 votes for it to be effective.
Yah, that urgent. Why, it's a matter of National Security, why The Constitution is under attack, The Flag is being defiled, our Republic is in Danger.....
Nancy looks at her watch.....Oh it's Martini time.... See Yah all in 3 weeks....or maybe longer.
Nancy trying to tell us why The Articles aren't at The Senate yet.
Long Version:
So you're saying Trumpybear is analogous to Princess Leia?
Bullies have the thinnest skin.
Who cares if they ever hold a trial. The Trumpublicans in the Senate have always had his back.
It sure sheems that way, doeshn't it? LOLshe likes chewing them.She really needs to do something about those dentures.
So ima sit on these articles of impeachment because it's so important that we try to remove him....
So, do you believe the two Articles of Impeachment presented by the House, rendering this *pResident impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional? If you don't, can you please provide details why you think so?
impeached by unanimous vote is unconstitutional?
Unanimous? Dude!
How is Mitch in a bind? He gets to sit back and watch Nazi try to juggle her clusterfuck, and go on the Senate floor to club her over the head every once in a while.Wrong again. She has no say in how Mitch runs the Senate.Wrong. She has no influence in the Senate.Impeachment and removal from office are two separate things. She is only oversees one and only has influence in the other so she's simply looking to get the fairest trail she can for the findings that were realized in the House. Again, you can disagree with the impeachment results but the OP is making up reasons for her actions now and the wingnut stupidity is painful to watch.
She does. McConnell wants this to end yesterday. It hasn't.
You are delusional.
She has political influence such as holding off the impeachment articles and letting McConnell stew as he wants to move on even though it appears Trump wants a long drawn out trial as he thinks it's politically best for him. Kind of puts Mitch in a little bit of a bind.
Anyway, influence...yes.
