Donald Trump Signs Congressional Resolution Condemning White Supremacists in Charlottesville

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,150
Great...NOW WHEN DOES CONGRESS AUTHOR LEGISLATION CONDEMNING SELF-PROCLAIMED ANTI-AMERICAN ANARCHIST / FASCIST ANTIFA FOR TRUMP TO SIGN?


Donald Trump Signs Congressional Resolution Condemning White Supremacists in Charlottesville

"The resolution condemning the violence and describing it as a “domestic terrorist attack” was pressed by Republicans and Democrats in Congress in reaction to the controversy over the president’s remarks.

The statement specifically condemns white nationalists, white supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, and “other hate groups” but does not mention violent leftist groups like Antifa.

The resolution urges Trump to “use all available resources” to address the threats posed by white nationalist groups."



There are a few immediately noticeable problems with this article and this legislation Trump signed.

1. The legislation describes the violence in Charlottesville as 'domestic terrorism' but pretty much targets / attacks the VICTIMS of that terrorism as being the perpetrators.

Don't try to mis-interpret or twist what I am saying - the white supremacists did engage in violence in Charlottesville, but they were NOT the instigators. Antifa's leader in Charlottesville openly admitted Antifa showed up in Charlottesville with the intent to instigate the violence and did so! 'Violence had to be used to protect non-violence' was her absurd justification for physically beginning the violence against the white supremacists who were exercising their Constitutional Rights to assemble and of Free Speech, no matter how vile that speech is. Charlottesville, however, as reported, was only the 1st of repeated violent attacks by the Left / Antifa in which they used violence to strip Americans of the Constitutional Rights.

Trump was rabidly attacked by the left fro correctly declaring that 'both sides' were to blame...as it turns out, he was right.

2. Attack on the Constitution?

In other articles I saw 'experts' wondered if signing this specific legislation was an attack on the Constitution and protected rights. They pointed to the fact that the white supremacists had the Constitutional and legal right to peacefully assemble, protest, and speak, that those rights were 'infringed upon' and denied by the violent attacks by Antifa that started the violence.

Leftists learned at Berkeley that violence successfully strips Americans of their constitutional Rights and silences the voices of those who oppose the Liberal agenda. This lesson was simply taken from the Berkeley campus and local community on the road to Charlottesville and follow-on locations, where it has also successfully worked.


They argue - and I agree - that a self-identified Anti-American Anarchist fascist group using violence strip Americans of their Constitutional rights and silence the voices and opinions of others is a much larger threat to this country and Americans' Constitutional Rights than a bunch of ignorant racists exercising their constitutional Right to assemble and speak,


The follow-on legislation to this one should be one that labels Antifa what they are - terrorists / enemies of the state - and condemns their existence / actions as well....but it will never happen. Don't hold your breath as the Left supports Antifa. As long as it is not the LIBERAL Agenda / Their voices / their Rights being violated, they are ok with it.
 
Hahahahaha. Did he use one of those menu holders with a Sharpie, and show it off to the fawning crowds? Poor Down and Out President "Donnie Dangerously"!
 
Great...NOW WHEN DOES CONGRESS AUTHOR LEGISLATION CONDEMNING SELF-PROCLAIMED ANTI-AMERICAN ANARCHIST / FASCIST ANTIFA FOR TRUMP TO SIGN?


Donald Trump Signs Congressional Resolution Condemning White Supremacists in Charlottesville

"The resolution condemning the violence and describing it as a “domestic terrorist attack” was pressed by Republicans and Democrats in Congress in reaction to the controversy over the president’s remarks.

The statement specifically condemns white nationalists, white supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, and “other hate groups” but does not mention violent leftist groups like Antifa.

The resolution urges Trump to “use all available resources” to address the threats posed by white nationalist groups."



There are a few immediately noticeable problems with this article and this legislation Trump signed.

1. The legislation describes the violence in Charlottesville as 'domestic terrorism' but pretty much targets / attacks the VICTIMS of that terrorism as being the perpetrators.

Don't try to mis-interpret or twist what I am saying - the white supremacists did engage in violence in Charlottesville, but they were NOT the instigators. Antifa's leader in Charlottesville openly admitted Antifa showed up in Charlottesville with the intent to instigate the violence and did so! 'Violence had to be used to protect non-violence' was her absurd justification for physically beginning the violence against the white supremacists who were exercising their Constitutional Rights to assemble and of Free Speech, no matter how vile that speech is. Charlottesville, however, as reported, was only the 1st of repeated violent attacks by the Left / Antifa in which they used violence to strip Americans of the Constitutional Rights.

Trump was rabidly attacked by the left fro correctly declaring that 'both sides' were to blame...as it turns out, he was right.

2. Attack on the Constitution?

In other articles I saw 'experts' wondered if signing this specific legislation was an attack on the Constitution and protected rights. They pointed to the fact that the white supremacists had the Constitutional and legal right to peacefully assemble, protest, and speak, that those rights were 'infringed upon' and denied by the violent attacks by Antifa that started the violence.

Leftists learned at Berkeley that violence successfully strips Americans of their constitutional Rights and silences the voices of those who oppose the Liberal agenda. This lesson was simply taken from the Berkeley campus and local community on the road to Charlottesville and follow-on locations, where it has also successfully worked.


They argue - and I agree - that a self-identified Anti-American Anarchist fascist group using violence strip Americans of their Constitutional rights and silence the voices and opinions of others is a much larger threat to this country and Americans' Constitutional Rights than a bunch of ignorant racists exercising their constitutional Right to assemble and speak,


The follow-on legislation to this one should be one that labels Antifa what they are - terrorists / enemies of the state - and condemns their existence / actions as well....but it will never happen. Don't hold your breath as the Left supports Antifa. As long as it is not the LIBERAL Agenda / Their voices / their Rights being violated, they are ok with it.
Good to see our DC leadership working on the important issues facing Americans. Glad they are not wasting their time on silly meaningless crap like healthcare, DACA, taxes, jobs, low wages, crime.........
 
Good to see our DC leadership working on the important issues facing Americans. Glad they are not wasting their time on silly meaningless crap like healthcare, DACA, taxes, jobs, low wages, crime.........
ACA Replacement?
Tax Reform?
North Korea Threat?
Job Creation?
Illegal Immigration?

Nah, let's write legislation to condemn 1 small section / sub-division of ALL the known hate groups in the United States....

:clap:
 
Great...NOW WHEN DOES CONGRESS AUTHOR LEGISLATION CONDEMNING SELF-PROCLAIMED ANTI-AMERICAN ANARCHIST / FASCIST ANTIFA FOR TRUMP TO SIGN?


Donald Trump Signs Congressional Resolution Condemning White Supremacists in Charlottesville

"The resolution condemning the violence and describing it as a “domestic terrorist attack” was pressed by Republicans and Democrats in Congress in reaction to the controversy over the president’s remarks.

The statement specifically condemns white nationalists, white supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, and “other hate groups” but does not mention violent leftist groups like Antifa.

The resolution urges Trump to “use all available resources” to address the threats posed by white nationalist groups."



There are a few immediately noticeable problems with this article and this legislation Trump signed.

1. The legislation describes the violence in Charlottesville as 'domestic terrorism' but pretty much targets / attacks the VICTIMS of that terrorism as being the perpetrators.

Don't try to mis-interpret or twist what I am saying - the white supremacists did engage in violence in Charlottesville, but they were NOT the instigators. Antifa's leader in Charlottesville openly admitted Antifa showed up in Charlottesville with the intent to instigate the violence and did so! 'Violence had to be used to protect non-violence' was her absurd justification for physically beginning the violence against the white supremacists who were exercising their Constitutional Rights to assemble and of Free Speech, no matter how vile that speech is. Charlottesville, however, as reported, was only the 1st of repeated violent attacks by the Left / Antifa in which they used violence to strip Americans of the Constitutional Rights.

Trump was rabidly attacked by the left fro correctly declaring that 'both sides' were to blame...as it turns out, he was right.

2. Attack on the Constitution?

In other articles I saw 'experts' wondered if signing this specific legislation was an attack on the Constitution and protected rights. They pointed to the fact that the white supremacists had the Constitutional and legal right to peacefully assemble, protest, and speak, that those rights were 'infringed upon' and denied by the violent attacks by Antifa that started the violence.

Leftists learned at Berkeley that violence successfully strips Americans of their constitutional Rights and silences the voices of those who oppose the Liberal agenda. This lesson was simply taken from the Berkeley campus and local community on the road to Charlottesville and follow-on locations, where it has also successfully worked.


They argue - and I agree - that a self-identified Anti-American Anarchist fascist group using violence strip Americans of their Constitutional rights and silence the voices and opinions of others is a much larger threat to this country and Americans' Constitutional Rights than a bunch of ignorant racists exercising their constitutional Right to assemble and speak,


The follow-on legislation to this one should be one that labels Antifa what they are - terrorists / enemies of the state - and condemns their existence / actions as well....but it will never happen. Don't hold your breath as the Left supports Antifa. As long as it is not the LIBERAL Agenda / Their voices / their Rights being violated, they are ok with it.



The republicans in congress need to stop being bitches for the left.
 
America says no to white supremacists and their violent ways. Our president wasn't forced to sign this.
 
White people have the right to exist and the right to self determination. Forming your own communities and preserving your culture and heritage isn't hate. All other races are good to go when they do just that
 
America says no to white supremacists and their violent ways. Our president wasn't forced to sign this.

I, personally, would not have signed the legislation. I would have demanded a re-write of the legislation to include ALL HATE GROUPS, not one that singles out 1 small sub-section that supports Antifa's justification for violence and support for Antifa.
 
Great...NOW WHEN DOES CONGRESS AUTHOR LEGISLATION CONDEMNING SELF-PROCLAIMED ANTI-AMERICAN ANARCHIST / FASCIST ANTIFA FOR TRUMP TO SIGN?


Donald Trump Signs Congressional Resolution Condemning White Supremacists in Charlottesville

"The resolution condemning the violence and describing it as a “domestic terrorist attack” was pressed by Republicans and Democrats in Congress in reaction to the controversy over the president’s remarks.

The statement specifically condemns white nationalists, white supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, and “other hate groups” but does not mention violent leftist groups like Antifa.

The resolution urges Trump to “use all available resources” to address the threats posed by white nationalist groups."



There are a few immediately noticeable problems with this article and this legislation Trump signed.

1. The legislation describes the violence in Charlottesville as 'domestic terrorism' but pretty much targets / attacks the VICTIMS of that terrorism as being the perpetrators.

Don't try to mis-interpret or twist what I am saying - the white supremacists did engage in violence in Charlottesville, but they were NOT the instigators. Antifa's leader in Charlottesville openly admitted Antifa showed up in Charlottesville with the intent to instigate the violence and did so! 'Violence had to be used to protect non-violence' was her absurd justification for physically beginning the violence against the white supremacists who were exercising their Constitutional Rights to assemble and of Free Speech, no matter how vile that speech is. Charlottesville, however, as reported, was only the 1st of repeated violent attacks by the Left / Antifa in which they used violence to strip Americans of the Constitutional Rights.

Trump was rabidly attacked by the left fro correctly declaring that 'both sides' were to blame...as it turns out, he was right.

2. Attack on the Constitution?

In other articles I saw 'experts' wondered if signing this specific legislation was an attack on the Constitution and protected rights. They pointed to the fact that the white supremacists had the Constitutional and legal right to peacefully assemble, protest, and speak, that those rights were 'infringed upon' and denied by the violent attacks by Antifa that started the violence.

Leftists learned at Berkeley that violence successfully strips Americans of their constitutional Rights and silences the voices of those who oppose the Liberal agenda. This lesson was simply taken from the Berkeley campus and local community on the road to Charlottesville and follow-on locations, where it has also successfully worked.


They argue - and I agree - that a self-identified Anti-American Anarchist fascist group using violence strip Americans of their Constitutional rights and silence the voices and opinions of others is a much larger threat to this country and Americans' Constitutional Rights than a bunch of ignorant racists exercising their constitutional Right to assemble and speak,


The follow-on legislation to this one should be one that labels Antifa what they are - terrorists / enemies of the state - and condemns their existence / actions as well....but it will never happen. Don't hold your breath as the Left supports Antifa. As long as it is not the LIBERAL Agenda / Their voices / their Rights being violated, they are ok with it.

but....but....but...ANTIFA!
 
America says no to white supremacists and their violent ways. Our president wasn't forced to sign this.

I, personally, would not have signed the legislation. I would have demanded a re-write of the legislation to include ALL HATE GROUPS, not one that singles out 1 small sub-section that supports Antifa's justification for violence and support for Antifa.

Antifa doesn't enter your consciousness if not for white supremacists acting the fool.

And....I know you use ANTIFA as another way to say "******". I see right through you.
 
America says no to white supremacists and their violent ways. Our president wasn't forced to sign this.

I, personally, would not have signed the legislation. I would have demanded a re-write of the legislation to include ALL HATE GROUPS, not one that singles out 1 small sub-section that supports Antifa's justification for violence and support for Antifa.

Your boy in the Oval Office is desperate for a win. So desperate he's dining with Chuck and Nancy now. We told you he was nothing but a sleazy real estate goon from Queens who got his own reality t.v. show and would fucking fail inside the Beltway. But you wouldn't listen.
 
Great...NOW WHEN DOES CONGRESS AUTHOR LEGISLATION CONDEMNING SELF-PROCLAIMED ANTI-AMERICAN ANARCHIST / FASCIST ANTIFA FOR TRUMP TO SIGN?


Donald Trump Signs Congressional Resolution Condemning White Supremacists in Charlottesville

"The resolution condemning the violence and describing it as a “domestic terrorist attack” was pressed by Republicans and Democrats in Congress in reaction to the controversy over the president’s remarks.

The statement specifically condemns white nationalists, white supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, and “other hate groups” but does not mention violent leftist groups like Antifa.

The resolution urges Trump to “use all available resources” to address the threats posed by white nationalist groups."



There are a few immediately noticeable problems with this article and this legislation Trump signed.

1. The legislation describes the violence in Charlottesville as 'domestic terrorism' but pretty much targets / attacks the VICTIMS of that terrorism as being the perpetrators.

Don't try to mis-interpret or twist what I am saying - the white supremacists did engage in violence in Charlottesville, but they were NOT the instigators. Antifa's leader in Charlottesville openly admitted Antifa showed up in Charlottesville with the intent to instigate the violence and did so! 'Violence had to be used to protect non-violence' was her absurd justification for physically beginning the violence against the white supremacists who were exercising their Constitutional Rights to assemble and of Free Speech, no matter how vile that speech is. Charlottesville, however, as reported, was only the 1st of repeated violent attacks by the Left / Antifa in which they used violence to strip Americans of the Constitutional Rights.

Trump was rabidly attacked by the left fro correctly declaring that 'both sides' were to blame...as it turns out, he was right.

2. Attack on the Constitution?

In other articles I saw 'experts' wondered if signing this specific legislation was an attack on the Constitution and protected rights. They pointed to the fact that the white supremacists had the Constitutional and legal right to peacefully assemble, protest, and speak, that those rights were 'infringed upon' and denied by the violent attacks by Antifa that started the violence.

Leftists learned at Berkeley that violence successfully strips Americans of their constitutional Rights and silences the voices of those who oppose the Liberal agenda. This lesson was simply taken from the Berkeley campus and local community on the road to Charlottesville and follow-on locations, where it has also successfully worked.


They argue - and I agree - that a self-identified Anti-American Anarchist fascist group using violence strip Americans of their Constitutional rights and silence the voices and opinions of others is a much larger threat to this country and Americans' Constitutional Rights than a bunch of ignorant racists exercising their constitutional Right to assemble and speak,


The follow-on legislation to this one should be one that labels Antifa what they are - terrorists / enemies of the state - and condemns their existence / actions as well....but it will never happen. Don't hold your breath as the Left supports Antifa. As long as it is not the LIBERAL Agenda / Their voices / their Rights being violated, they are ok with it.
Well shit what a waste of time if they were not willing to put in the other hate groups.
 
America says no to white supremacists and their violent ways. Our president wasn't forced to sign this.

I, personally, would not have signed the legislation. I would have demanded a re-write of the legislation to include ALL HATE GROUPS, not one that singles out 1 small sub-section that supports Antifa's justification for violence and support for Antifa.

Your boy in the Oval Office is desperate for a win. So desperate he's dining with Chuck and Nancy now. We told you he was nothing but a sleazy real estate goon from Queens who got his own reality t.v. show and would fucking fail inside the Beltway. But you wouldn't listen.


You are mistaken.
 

Forum List

Back
Top