Donald Trump vs. Hillary Clinton

[NotfooledbyW]

P@triot 14520099

Ah....the old tin foil hat "conspiracy" defense, uh?

Your Racist CT is that an American judge born in America cannot be fair in his courtroom because his parents were Mexican and possibly did not get naturalized as U.S. citizens.

You are all in with Trump and his racist anti-Mexican CT.

Just admit it. You don't hate Trump. How could you. You are brethren on racism.

 

[P@triot]

P@triot 14520099

Ah....the old tin foil hat "conspiracy" defense, uh?

Your Racist CT is that an American judge born in America cannot be fair in his courtroom because his parents were Mexican and possibly did not get naturalized as U.S. citizens.

You are all in with Trump and his racist anti-Mexican CT.

Just admit it. You don't hate Trump. How could you. You are brethren on racism.

 

[Vigilante]

The left has it's own LYING TALKING POINTS...we all know this!

The rest of the story: Why Trump is right about Judge Gonzalo Curiel

Worldtribune.com ^ | June 8, 2016 | Jeffrey T. Kuhner
The establishment is now looking to finish off Donald Trump. The presumptive Republican nominee is under intense criticism for his comments about the federal judge presiding over the Trump University class-action lawsuit. Our political and media elites are trying to turn this into Trump’s version of Mitt Romney’s infamous “47 percent” comment — a watershed moment that cripples the GOP candidate’s electoral viability.


Former attorney general Alberto Gonzales: Trump right to question judge’s fairness

thehill.com ^ | June 04, 2016, 12:55 pm | Mark Hensch
June 04, 2016, 12:55 pm Former attorney general: Trump right to question judge’s fairness By Mark Hensch Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales says Donald Trump is right to challenge the fairness a judge overseeing lawsuits against him. “An independent judiciary is extremely important. But that value is not the only one in play here,” Gonzales wrote in a Saturday op-ed for The Washington Post. "Equally important, if not more important from my perspective as a former judge and U.S. attorney general, is a litigant’s right to a fair trial,” he continued. “The protection of that right is a primary reason...

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Vigilante 14520456

June 04, 2016, 12:55 pm Former attorney general: Trump right to question judge’s fairness By Mark Hensch Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales says Donald Trump is right to challenge the fairness a judge overseeing lawsuits against him.

No one says Trump doesn't have a right to question a judges' fairness. That is not what Trump did. He did not go through the proper legal challenges defining the perceived unfairness. Trump made a political attack on the judge because of his Mexican heritage.

So you posted a lie Vigilante. You know what that makes you.

Had Trump told his lawyers to petition for a new judge assuming he had necessary cause, there would be no story. But you know that is not what Trump did.

 

[P@triot]

June 04, 2016, 12:55 pm Former attorney general: Trump right to question judge’s fairness By Mark Hensch Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales says Donald Trump is right to challenge the fairness a judge overseeing lawsuits against him.

No one says Trump doesn't have a right to question a judges' fairness. That is not what Trump did. He did not go through the proper legal challenges defining the perceived unfairness. Trump made a political attack on the judge because of his Mexican heritage.

So you posted a lie Vigilante. You know what that makes you.

Had Trump told his lawyers to petition for a new judge assuming he had necessary cause, there would be no story. But you know that is not what Trump did.

Oh man is that weak. Because he exercised his freedom of speech instead of quietly going through "legal channels" - that makes him racist?!? How does that work?!? Your claim is that Trump's position is perfectly fine if he does it quietly through "legal channels" but is "racist" if done through the press.

 

[P@triot]

As usual...the blood is on the hands of the liberals who facilitated this tragedy. The feelings of a few were spared so that many could be murdered.

Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. shut down an investigation into the mosque Orlando killer Omar Mir Siddique Mateen attended because it “unfairly singled out Muslims.”
Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. shut down an investigation into the mosque Orlando killer Omar Mir Siddique Mateen attended because it “unfairly singled out Muslims.”

Hillary’s State Dept. Blocked Investigation into Orlando Killer’s Mosque

 

[Faun]

Donald Trump vs. Hillary Clinton...

 

[Faun]

As usual...the blood is on the hands of the liberals who facilitated this tragedy. The feelings of a few were spared so that many could be murdered.

Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. shut down an investigation into the mosque Orlando killer Omar Mir Siddique Mateen attended because it “unfairly singled out Muslims.”
Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. shut down an investigation into the mosque Orlando killer Omar Mir Siddique Mateen attended because it “unfairly singled out Muslims.”

Hillary’s State Dept. Blocked Investigation into Orlando Killer’s Mosque

Infowars.

 

[P@triot]

Two peas in a pod here. Both of these women allow their husbands to humiliate and degrade them with serial philandering but stick around because they are all about power and money...

Roger Stone: It’s Time America Got Some Answers About Huma Abedin

 

[NotfooledbyW]

P@triot 14521129

Because he exercised his freedom of speech instead of quietly going through "legal channels" - that makes him racist?!?

No. Trump exposed himself yet again a racist by choosing his great right of freedom of speech to declare 'race' as the cause of the judge's disqualification.

You are his fellow racist for not understanding that Trump's lawyers would be laughed out of the legal process had they sought a new judge on the premise that the all Anerican Federal Judge of so many years could not try the case about fraud because his parents were Mexican.

Actually Trump's freedom of speech and the way he uses it is undermining his bid for the presidency.

His "Didn’t Go to College" white male support base has begun abandoning him. The ones that cannot be fear-mongered and race-baited:

. The single best predictor of Trump support in the GOP primary is the absence of a college degree. In an analysis of Trump's blowout win in New Hampshire, Evan Soltas determined that the factor explaining most of the variance in Trump's support in New Hampshire was education.

Who Are Donald Trump's Supporters, Really?


This poll out yesterday has some very bad news for the racist self proclaimed billionaire who wants to be President or doesn't want to be President. It's good news for America and the world, if Trump really does not actually want to be President:

. Trump's net favorable rating (favorable minus unfavorable) among non-college whites has flipped from a plus-14 in May to slightly negative minus-7 in the latest survey. Among independents, Trump's net rating has shifted from from -19 last month to -38 in the latest survey, returning him to roughly the same standing as in April (-37).

Negative views of Donald Trump just hit a new campaign high: 7 in 10 Americans


If Trump continues to lose support among high school or lower educated white males he is getting no where's near the White House and the nuclear codes.

 

[P@triot]

What an unmitigated disaster. This buffoon may have to end his candidacy before it's even time to vote. Nice going Trump supporters. Along with liberal, you managed to nominate the biggest train wreck in Republican history.

Trump entered June with just $1.3 million in the bank, while Clinton sat on $42 million war chest

 

[P@triot]

What an unmitigated disaster. This buffoon is incapable of working with people. Everyone around him is fired unless they can handle volumes of verbal abuse and agree to worship him as a god (exactly like Hitlery Clinton).

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/21/us/politics/corey-lewandowski-donald-trump.html

 

[P@triot]

A perfect snapshot of liberals in general and the Clinton's in particular...

• Bill Clinton's former lover Dolly Kyle claims the Clinton couple regularly used racial epithets in her new book, Hillary: The Other Woman

• She writes that Hillary was caught on record blurting out the terms 'stupid k*ke' and 'f*cking Jew b*stard'

• Hillary Clinton Called Disabled Children At An Easter Egg Hunt 'F***ing Retards'

• She says Bill called the Reverend Jesse Jackson a 'Goddamned n****r'

• Bill Clinton's 'three strikes' rule incarcerated 2.5 million people, including poor people of color who couldn't afford lawyers during their trials

• When Hillary moved to Arkansas, she looked down her nose at what she viewed as 'ignorant hillbillies'

What Hillary Clinton called disabled children during Easter egg hunt

 

[P@triot]

Bat......shit......crazy

 

[P@triot]

No. Trump exposed himself yet again a racist by choosing his great right of freedom of speech to declare 'race' as the cause of the judge's disqualification.

You are his fellow racist

This poll out yesterday has some very bad news for the racist self proclaimed billionaire who wants to be President.

Oops.....

 

[Faun]

Bat......shit......crazy

View attachment 79088

The HDS is strong in this one ^^^

 

[Care4all]

No. Trump exposed himself yet again a racist by choosing his great right of freedom of speech to declare 'race' as the cause of the judge's disqualification.

You are his fellow racist

This poll out yesterday has some very bad news for the racist self proclaimed billionaire who wants to be President.

Oops.....

View attachment 79092

NOPE! Pres Carter did not ban Shiites, as part of sanctions for Iran holding our hostages, he banned Iranians from entering our country until hostages were released.



President Carter's remarks bore a passing resemblance to Donald Trump's proposal. However, while Carter's action involved a well-defined class of persons (Iranian citizens) being denied entry to the U.S. until a well-defined goal was achieved (the hostages were released), Trump's suggestion was ill-defined in scope and purpose: the latter advocated a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States" (which could apply to persons from any country in the world and would require making subjective estimations about their religious beliefs) "until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on" (a vague and unintelligible goal).

Carter explicitly outlined the reasons behind the issuance of sanctions (including visa cancellation for Iranian nationals) and underscored his intent to apply pressure to Iran's government release American hostages. By contrast, Trump's proposal was markedly different: not a sanction, but a security measure framed as a counterterrorism strategy, and one directed at all adherents of a particular religion (regardless of their nationalities) rather than citizens of a particular country. Moreover, Carter's sanctions occurred during a lengthy period of escalating conflict between Iran and the United States (during which U.S. hostages remained in foreign captivity), but Trump's proposal was issued in response to a mass shooting perpetrated by an American citizen and his immigrant wife.


Carter's sanctions were applied to Iranian nationals as part of a clear objective to secure the release of the U.S. hostages without military intervention, whereas Trump's suggestion applied to a far broader cross-section of visa applicants, which he described as a measure to prevent terrorist attacks. Historically, Carter's sanctions bore closer resemblance to Kennedy administration-era sanctions on Cuba [PDF, PDF] than Trump's anti-immigration plan.

Last updated: 18 June 2016


read full article here: Jimmy Carter Banned Iranian Immigrants

 

[P@triot]

NOPE! Pres Carter did not ban Shiites, as part of sanctions for Iran holding our hostages, he banned Iranians from entering our country until hostages were released.

Exactly what Trump is proposing. And for the record - I can't stand Trump. He's an epic @sshole. But he's right on this one and watching the left desperately attempt to paint him as "racist" so they can win an election even though Jimmy Carter did the exact same thing is a bit ridiculous.

Carter's sanctions were applied to Iranian nationals as part of a clear objective to secure the release of the U.S. hostages without military intervention, whereas Trump's suggestion applied to a far broader cross-section of visa applicants, which he described as a measure to prevent terrorist attacks. Historically, Carter's sanctions bore closer resemblance to Kennedy administration-era sanctions on Cuba than Trump's anti-immigration plan.

read full article here: Jimmy Carter Banned Iranian Immigrants

And Donald Trump's plan is part of a clear objective for national security. Watching liberals dance from one foot to the other in a desperate attempt to deny that passive Jimmy Carter essentially already did what Donald Trump is merely proposing is quite comical.

 

[P@triot]

The slogan's speak volumes. Hitlery Clinton is, and has always been, about Hitlery Clinton. Never have we seen a candidate so hungry for power and desperate for more money. Hitlery wakes up every single day and asks herself "what can I do for Hitlery today". Her campaign slogan "I'm with her" says it all. It's all about her in Hitlery's mind. She could care less about the United States, the Constitution, or the American people.

'I'm with you': Trump takes aim at Clinton's campaign slogan

 

[P@triot]

What a disaster. The Dumbocrats nominated the most unelectable, unqualified candidate in their history. The Republican Party could have nominated a high school dropout and would've won in a landslide. But instead, (with the help of liberals voting in Republican primaries of course), the GOP nominated the male equivalent of Hitlery Clinton. Unimaginable ego. Unquenchable thirst for power. And completely unqualified. It's an unmitigated disaster which culminated this past week in Trump firing his campaign manager (shocking, right?) and now it's looking like Hitlery Clinton is going to waltz her way into the White House thanks to the astounding stupidity of the Republican Party. Hopefully, this will be the final nail in their coffin and the Tea Party will replace them.

New Post-ABC poll: Trump’s June has been an utter disaster in every way