DONE - GOING TO JAIL! -- Official: Some Clinton emails 'too damaging' to release'

[rightwinger]

Actually, she followed the rules and security classifications of the time she was Secretary of State

No actually 22 emails that would endanger our national security was kept on a private email account by her. As told by the Obama administration.

Subsequent reclassification is not a crime

more lies, the data was classified when it was created, it was not reclassified.

do you ever post anything that isn't a lie?

If the data was classified when created, it was marked classified when created.

Who sent known Top Secret information without markings?

OK, for the final time. It doesn't have to be marked to be classified. If I have memorized classified data and then write it down on a piece of paper its still classified data. I should mark it, and I would have. But Hillary did not either when she received it or forwarded it.

She also told a staffer to remove classified markings on some data that was marked.

Face it, moron, she is a criminal.

Again...has nothing to do with Hillary

If you memorized classified and sent it to Hillary.......YOU will be prosecuted

Where are all the republican investigations of those who sent emails to Hillary?

Admit it.......Republicans don't give a shit

 

[billyerock1991]

<snip> Older article but with relevant information on the classification process.

"Of the several thousand emails from Hillary Clinton’s private server that have been released to the public, more than 180 have been redacted, meaning they contain information deemed classified. But State Department officials decided only in the past few months that this information should be classified.

This sort of classification upgrade occasionally happens when new information comes into play that affects the sensitivity of the information.

Because the information was classified after the emails were sent, no one mishandled this information at the time by sending it over Clinton’s private server.

To send classified information electronically, the State Department has a secure, closed system. So even if Clinton had used a state.gov email address, this would not have been secure enough to transmit classified information. Procedurally, emails would get a label marking them as containing classified information.

.... The emails released so far don’t have labels marking them classified when sent, which supports Clinton’s argument.

"The fact that no emails on her personal server were marked as classified suggests that she generally was doing her classified business on the secure government servers dedicated to that purpose," she said.
...
Government agencies regularly disagree over what should be classified or not, and transparency advocates say the government overclassifies. (We talked about this at length in a previous article.) It means, though, that the inspectors general’s findings are not definitive proof that Clinton’s server contained classified information...."

Hillary Clinton's emails: classified or not? PolitiFact

there they go again making statements with out thinking classified or sensitive will be redacted ....

 

[easyt65]

RW, Hillary did not sign a legally required govt document. That's a crime. GUILTY!

Hillary lied under oath about the number of devices she used. That is Perjury. GUILTY!

Hillary's server was not configured as required by the law, was entrusted to a company whose employees did not have the security clearances or authorization required. Those are crimes. GUILTY.

Hillary failed to turn over everything required according to the law to the State Department. That is a crime. GUILTY.

Crimes that have nothing to do with specific e-mails have been identified.

...more than enough to call for a Grand Jury so THEY can decide if she should be indicted. If she truly is innocent, why not let a Grand Jury decide if an indictment is warranted? Why are liberals so frightened to allow the justice system to decide instead of partisans / politicians?

Total crap

Hillary was authorized to use her personal server. Your "crimes" are nothing but molehills

"Authorized" by whom? The only person senior to Hillary was Barak Obama. Hillary has been saying the rules allowed it, not that someone "authorized" it.

Doesn't matter how big you are you don't get to make your own security rules......even Obama

That's why Hillary is in trouble, stupid. She broke the rules.

Actually, she followed the rules and security classifications of the time she was Secretary of State

Actually she DIDN'T.

When she received her security clearance as Sect of State she received training on handling and storage of classified documents / information. She did not sign the federal document required by law acknowleding this. THAT IS A CRIME.

Her private server did not meet federally required Legal standards. THAT IS A CRIME.

Giving her server to a company not authorized and whose employees do not have proper clearances to store and maintain it BY LAW is a CRIME.

Ordering a subordinate to strip the classified markings of a document and send it via UNCLASS means, intentionally, as several of her employees say she did, IS A CRIME.

PERJURY, testifying under oath to only using 1...then 2 devices...and then it turning out to be 3...IS A CRIME.

But you keep parroting the lies....it's all you've been taught by your 'master'.

'HILLARY SAID / SAYS...'

 

[leftwinger]

Over 6 years, hundreds of thousands of emails in/out. Now they invent some new bullcrap category "not classified when sent/rec'd" and EVERY single email falls into that category? uhhh....not one classified email needed sent/rec'd over 6 years? they want us to believe 5 yrs later somebody reads 1mil emails AGAIN and decides they are classified? huh?

Kill the dept. not needed. $50bil savings. America should be fed up with SPIN LIES DECIET and coverup.

 

[easyt65]

RW, Hillary did not sign a legally required govt document. That's a crime. GUILTY!

Hillary lied under oath about the number of devices she used. That is Perjury. GUILTY!

Hillary's server was not configured as required by the law, was entrusted to a company whose employees did not have the security clearances or authorization required. Those are crimes. GUILTY.

Hillary failed to turn over everything required according to the law to the State Department. That is a crime. GUILTY.

Crimes that have nothing to do with specific e-mails have been identified.

...more than enough to call for a Grand Jury so THEY can decide if she should be indicted. If she truly is innocent, why not let a Grand Jury decide if an indictment is warranted? Why are liberals so frightened to allow the justice system to decide instead of partisans / politicians?

Total crap

Hillary was authorized to use her personal server. Your "crimes" are nothing but molehills

"Authorized" by whom? The only person senior to Hillary was Barak Obama. Hillary has been saying the rules allowed it, not that someone "authorized" it.

Doesn't matter how big you are you don't get to make your own security rules......even Obama

That's why Hillary is in trouble, stupid. She broke the rules.

Actually, she followed the rules and security classifications of the time she was Secretary of State

Actually she DIDN'T.

When she received her security clearance as Sect of State she received training on handling and storage of classified documents / information. She did not sign the federal document required by law acknowleding this. THAT IS A CRIME.

Her private server did not meet federally required Legal standards. THAT IS A CRIME.

Giving her server to a company not authorized and whose employees do not have proper clearances to store and maintain it BY LAW is a CRIME.

Ordering a subordinate to strip the classified markings of a document and send it via UNCLASS means, intentionally, as several of her employees say she did, IS A CRIME.

PERJURY, testifying under oath to only using 1...then 2 devices...and then it turning out to be 3...IS A CRIME.

But you keep parroting the lies....it's all you've been taught by your 'master'.

'HILLARY SAID / SAYS...'

 

[rightwinger]

Total crap

Hillary was authorized to use her personal server. Your "crimes" are nothing but molehills

"Authorized" by whom? The only person senior to Hillary was Barak Obama. Hillary has been saying the rules allowed it, not that someone "authorized" it.

Doesn't matter how big you are you don't get to make your own security rules......even Obama

That's why Hillary is in trouble, stupid. She broke the rules.

Actually, she followed the rules and security classifications of the time she was Secretary of State

Actually she DIDN'T.

When she received her security clearance as Sect of State she received training on handling and storage of classified documents / information. She did not sign the federal document required by law acknowleding this. THAT IS A CRIME.

Her private server did not meet federally required Legal standards. THAT IS A CRIME.

Giving her server to a company not authorized and whose employees do not have proper clearances to store and maintain it BY LAW is a CRIME.

Ordering a subordinate to strip the classified markings of a document and send it via UNCLASS means, intentionally, as several of her employees say she did, IS A CRIME.

PERJURY, testifying under oath to only using 1...then 2 devices...and then it turning out to be 3...IS A CRIME.

But you keep parroting the lies....it's all you've been taught by your 'master'.

'HILLARY SAID / SAYS...'

You want to send Hillary to jail because of not signing her classified briefing statement?

Damn...you guys are tough

 

[leftwinger]

Where are all the republican investigations of those who sent emails to Hillary?

Maybe the IT dept set up an "alias" email from beast.gov to [email protected], lacky don't know.

 

[leftwinger]

You want to send Hillary to jail because of not signing her classified briefing statement?

On the way in, sign for training + SAP training. On way out, sign for returning all GOVT property/email. I don't know which one she blew off? I had thought it on the way out?

 

[billyerock1991]

1) what amazes me when you read the total of age actual article hillary may have violated the law not hillary violated the law but she may have violated the law...
2) the law inquestion states clearly if a foreign country hacks her server then she will be held accountable for the email that the retrieved ... no foreign country hacked her emails ....
3) finally her private server was look at for being secure ... according to the neck world the server she use is better then the ones thats the government uses from being hacked ...

so you wing nuts are saying she's going to jail, or you say she won't go to jail because obama will protect her.. that's even funnier ... she hasn't violated any law ... that's the only reason she won't go to jail .,.. and its killing you guys ... here you have your hero trump ... who refuses to go to the fox debate because he's afraid of the fox woman news caster Megan Kelly ... he's afraid she will asking to answer the question she first ask him ... and he's your best choice !!!!!!! runs from a debate from a woman news caster with her puff questions ??? no wonder you guys are wishing hillary get convicted ... if he's afraid of Megan Kelly hell, hillary will rip him a NEW ONE

Where did you get your information that her server was never hacked? Or her server was more secure? Or the information is old so the laws don't matter? Or that Trump has the majority GOP support?

In other words, how can a guy fuck so much up in so little time?

"There never was, at any time, data belonging to the Clintons stored in Denver. Ever," said Dovetail Solutions CEO Andy Boian, who added that Clinton's server was always in a New Jersey data center. "We do not store data in any bathrooms."

Platte River Networks had no prior relationship with Hillary Clinton, said Boian, whose online biography says he served on Bill Clinton's 1992 presidential transition team.

Hillary Clinton's decision to have an employee set up a private e-mail server in her New York home in 2008 has plagued the former secretary of state's presidential campaign.



The FBI is investigating whether any of her private e-mails contained sensitive information and should have been classified — and not stored on a computer inside her house.

Private e-mail servers are unusual because they carry greater risks of getting hacked, said Scott W. Burt, president and CEO of Integro, a Denver e-mail management company.

"There are a lot of people you could hire, and they would set up (an e-mail server) and run it. That's not hard. But there's no real reason to do that," Burt said. "The main motivator is you're nervous about what is in your e-mail. It's a control thing."

Boian said Platte River had nothing to do with Clinton's private home server.

Platte River, which submitted a bid for the e-mail job, stepped in four months after Clinton left the secretary job on Feb. 1, 2013, and three months after Sidney Blumenthal, a former Clinton White House staffer, reported that his e-mail account had been hacked, exposing messages sent to Clinton.

"We were literally hired in June 2013," Boian said, "and because we use industry best practices, we had (Clinton's) server moved to a data center in New Jersey. It remained in that spot until last week," when the FBI picked it up Aug. 12.

Platte River also is not in possession of any Clinton e-mail backups, he said.

"The role of Platte River Networks was to upgrade, secure and manage the e-mail server for both the Clintons and their staff beginning June 2013. Platte River Networks is not under investigation. We were never under investigation. And we will fully comply with the FBI," he said.

Clinton did not respond to requests for comment, but she has publicly expressed regrets for using a private e-mail server for her work as secretary of state. She has handed a portion of the e-mails to the State Department but deleted others. Asked about it this week by reporters in Las Vegas, Clinton responded, "Nobody talks to me about it other than you guys," she said.



Who are they?


Platte River Networks opened in September 2002, offering information technology services to small businesses. Services included computer maintenance, virus and malware control, and emergency technical support, according to an archive of its old website.

Two years later, the company moved into a condo owned by company co-founder Treve Suazo at Ajax Lofts, 2955 Inca St., a few blocks from the South Platte River.

A year later, the company began offering cloud-based services, which makes company data available online so employees can access software and services from any device.

Today, Platte touts itself as a full-service IT management firm.

It also lists Suazo, its CEO, and Brent Allshouse, its chief financial officer, as co-founders. According to industry publication CRN, Platte River expected to grow to $6 million in sales in 2014, from $4.7 million a year earlier.

But as early as 2006, Tom Welch was listed as a partner, the same title given to Suazo and Allshouse.

Welch, who now runs Colorado Cloud Consulting, declined to comment. But he told the United Kingdom's Daily Mail that Platte River Networks had retrofitted a bathroom in the loft to be the server room.



Fast growth


Before the Clinton scandal blew up, Platte River Networks welcomed attention. David DeCamillis joined the company in 2008 and, as its director of business development, became its public face, using news releases to promote industry awards and appearing on Fox31 Denver's "Good Day Colorado" as a tech expert.

In 2012, Platte River was named Ingram Micro's Rainmaker of the Western Region, an honor that California technology distributor gives its fastest-growing business partners based on revenue, peer-to-peer leadership and use of Ingram Micro's cloud services.

That same year, the company won the Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce's Small Business of the Year award. The award is vetted by the chamber and independent judges, said Abram Sloss, executive director of the chamber's small-business development center.

"We really look for companies that have a good chance for a strong uptick and have solid growth," Sloss said.

While the chamber can offer advice to members who suddenly are thrown into the media spotlight — for good or bad — Sloss said he has not heard from the company.

"Gosh, if I was the company who the Clintons hired, it'd be hard not to say, 'We are a trusted provider that one of the influential families in the United States hired,' " Sloss said.

Platte River continues to win awards and has grown. Last week, it was named, for the fourth consecutive year, to CRN's Next-Gen 250 . The list highlights companies that are " ahead of the curve" in their IT offerings.

In June, it moved to a 12,000-square-foot building at 5700 Washington St. A photo on Platte River's blog shows 30 people posing in the new building.

Platte River did not make DeCamillis, now its vice president of sales and marketing, available for comment.

But DeCamillis told The Washington Post that no one at the company had expected this kind of attention, which he said included death threats that caused the company to pull employee information from its website.

If they had, he said, "we would never have taken it on."

 

[billyerock1991]

Total crap

Hillary was authorized to use her personal server. Your "crimes" are nothing but molehills

"Authorized" by whom? The only person senior to Hillary was Barak Obama. Hillary has been saying the rules allowed it, not that someone "authorized" it.

Doesn't matter how big you are you don't get to make your own security rules......even Obama

That's why Hillary is in trouble, stupid. She broke the rules.

Actually, she followed the rules and security classifications of the time she was Secretary of State

Actually she DIDN'T.

When she received her security clearance as Sect of State she received training on handling and storage of classified documents / information. She did not sign the federal document required by law acknowleding this. THAT IS A CRIME.

Her private server did not meet federally required Legal standards. THAT IS A CRIME.

Giving her server to a company not authorized and whose employees do not have proper clearances to store and maintain it BY LAW is a CRIME.

Ordering a subordinate to strip the classified markings of a document and send it via UNCLASS means, intentionally, as several of her employees say she did, IS A CRIME.

PERJURY, testifying under oath to only using 1...then 2 devices...and then it turning out to be 3...IS A CRIME.

But you keep parroting the lies....it's all you've been taught by your 'master'.

'HILLARY SAID / SAYS...'

actually it did fit federal standards go look at plate canyon network I just posted it

 

[Flash]

[Q


Again, for all her problems, Hillary would easily beat anyone the GOP puts up. If you really think the country will elect a reality TV rodeo clown, you are deluded.

Hillary is having trouble with Mr. Silly Communist in the Moon Bat Primaries.. She couldn't even beat the uppitty Muslim Negro in 2008.

She is a lot more damaged goods now.

You Moon Bats need to think long and hard if you want this lying corrupt crook as your Party standard bearer.

All the indications now is that the FBI is going to recommend that she be indicted.

Either of two things will happen. Either the filthy ass Obama administration will try to sweep it under the rug or else she will go before the Grand Jury.

If the filthy ass Obama administration plays cover up all hell will break lose and she will lose a few million votes.

If it goes forward with an indictment she is probably out but if by a miracle makes it to the election she will lose millions of voters.

Not everybody in this country is as stupid as you hard core Moon Bats. Not everybody has their head up their Left Wing ass like you hard core extreme far Left Moon Bats and will vote for a corrupt lying bitch simply because she has a "D" by her name.

 

[Zander]

Let me make this simple for the partisan Democrats. The "Special Access Program" SAP is a sub-group of Top Secret. It is the most secure/secret of all government communications. Having a Top Secret security clearance is not enough to view SAP information- SAP emails require a special code be input to open. The codes change at random times.

hiLIARy's secret server had SAP emails on it. That means she knew they were classified AT THE TIME.

Bottom line =. hiLIARy is a LIAR. Contrary to her public statements, she did send and receive classified information on her unsecured home brew server. She used a private server to circumvent FOIA requirements and avoid Congressional oversight. She endangered national security.

Will she be indicted? Probably not. The Justice Dept is too corrupt and politicized.

 

[billyerock1991]

Let me make this simple for the partisan Democrats. The "Special Access Program" SAP is a sub-group of Top Secret. It is the most secure/secret of all government communications. Having a Top Secret security clearance is not enough to view SAP information- SAP emails require a special code be input to open. The codes change at random times.

hiLIARy's secret server had SAP emails on it. That means she knew they were classified AT THE TIME.

Bottom line =. hiLIARy is a LIAR. Contrary to her public statements, she did send and receive classified information on her unsecured home brew server. She used a private server to circumvent FOIA requirements and avoid Congressional oversight. She endangered national security.

Will she be indicted? Probably not. The Justice Dept is too corrupt and politicized.

and if they didn't have the SAP on it then what ??? you guys share do reach a lot ...

 

[Flash]

[

You want to send Hillary to jail because of not signing her classified briefing statement?

Damn...you guys are tough

If her only crime was not signing a document then she probably should be considered a dumb incompetent bitch but not sent to jail.

However, that is not what she is being investigated for.

She is being investigated for circumventing the government intelligence security system and mishandling classified documents, which is a crime.

The FBI investigation has also been expanded to include looking into her selling her influence to foreign countries when she was Secretary of State, which is also a crime and be the explanation of why she wanted to control her own documents instead of them being retrievable.

She also blatantly lied to the American people, which should disqualify her for consideration to be President. Her trustworthy ranking in the polls by the American people is pretty damn low because they know she is a liar.

The Moon Bats need to drop her as a candidate. She is not doing them any good.

 

[leftwinger]

"The main motivator is you're nervous about what is in your e-mail. It's a control thing."

mixing Clinton Crime Foundation business with official business.....pay to play.

and three months after Sidney Blumenthal, a former Clinton White House staffer, reported that his e-mail account had been hacked, exposing messages sent to Clinton.

If they got into Bloomingthong...........did they get into Beast?

 

[Flash]

Brian Williams was demoted and almost fired from NBC because he lied about being under fire when he wasn't.

The dumbass Moon Bats are going through the process of nominating Hillary Clinton as President when she lied about stolen valor in Bosnia.

Of course this is the same family where Bill Clinton had sex with an intern in his business office but was not fired from his job so maybe that family just thinks they are special.

 

[Flash]

This is the type of place where Hillary Clinton is going to be spending Inauguration Day, 2017.

 

[Redfish]

The left wing is working overtime to polish Hillary's turds.

yes they are, and now they all smell like shit.

nooooo you hope it does !!!!!

That's why Hillary is in trouble, stupid. She broke the rules.

Actually, she followed the rules and security classifications of the time she was Secretary of State

Horseshit.

Name the regulation she violated

The regulation against having a private server? There wasn't one

talking to you is like trying to get a frog to understand nuclear physics. your mind is simply too small to grasp the concept.

The rules regarding classified data are very clear, especially SAP data. I had a SAP clearance years ago, If I did what she did, I would be in jail today.

there you go lying to us again BWA HAHAHAHAHAHA what a loser you are

No actually 22 emails that would endanger our national security was kept on a private email account by her. As told by the Obama administration.

Subsequent reclassification is not a crime

more lies, the data was classified when it was created, it was not reclassified.

do you ever post anything that isn't a lie?

If the data was classified when created, it was marked classified when created.

Who sent known Top Secret information without markings?

OK, for the final time. It doesn't have to be marked to be classified. If I have memorized classified data and then write it down on a piece of paper its still classified data. I should mark it, and I would have. But Hillary did not either when she received it or forwarded it.

She also told a staffer to remove classified markings on some data that was marked.

Face it, moron, she is a criminal.

you are sooooooooo full of bull shit ... none of her emails fits your criteria, or any of your criteria ... in the article it clearly say there are 22 emails that "MAY" not "ARE" but "MAY" be considered classified and you bite the carrot every time... what a loser you are ... now the law that you quote to us, Mr. ( listen to me ) classified secret agent ...it says if any of her emails have been hacked by a foreign government she will be held accountable... soMr. ( listen to me ) classified secret agent show us where she was hacked ??? oh you forgot that tiny tidbit Mr. ( listen to me ) classified secret agent

That's the point, doofus. No one knows if her server was hacked or not, THAT is the risk to national security that she created. But since we know that the Chinese and Russians have hacked into servers much more secure than hers--------------------well you finish the sentence, idiot.

you left wing fools have been duped by the Clintons for years, and you continue to allow them to make millions on your stupidity.

 

[Arianrhod]

The rubes never learn.

Oh wait. This time is different from the other hundred times they declared Obama or Hillary was going to jail for certain. Just because ... well, it is, that's why!

Can you imagine how bleak their lives must be that the only thrill left is waiting for Hillary to go to jail (and all of the lurid fantasies they entertain themselves with)? So sad, really.

 

[jknowgood]

The left wing is working overtime to polish Hillary's turds.

yes they are, and now they all smell like shit.

nooooo you hope it does !!!!!

Horseshit.

Name the regulation she violated

The regulation against having a private server? There wasn't one

talking to you is like trying to get a frog to understand nuclear physics. your mind is simply too small to grasp the concept.

The rules regarding classified data are very clear, especially SAP data. I had a SAP clearance years ago, If I did what she did, I would be in jail today.

there you go lying to us again BWA HAHAHAHAHAHA what a loser you are

more lies, the data was classified when it was created, it was not reclassified.

do you ever post anything that isn't a lie?

If the data was classified when created, it was marked classified when created.

Who sent known Top Secret information without markings?

OK, for the final time. It doesn't have to be marked to be classified. If I have memorized classified data and then write it down on a piece of paper its still classified data. I should mark it, and I would have. But Hillary did not either when she received it or forwarded it.

She also told a staffer to remove classified markings on some data that was marked.

Face it, moron, she is a criminal.

you are sooooooooo full of bull shit ... none of her emails fits your criteria, or any of your criteria ... in the article it clearly say there are 22 emails that "MAY" not "ARE" but "MAY" be considered classified and you bite the carrot every time... what a loser you are ... now the law that you quote to us, Mr. ( listen to me ) classified secret agent ...it says if any of her emails have been hacked by a foreign government she will be held accountable... soMr. ( listen to me ) classified secret agent show us where she was hacked ??? oh you forgot that tiny tidbit Mr. ( listen to me ) classified secret agent

The Obama administration says that 22 of her emails would endanger our national security. Is he lying?

if thats what he said no he's not lying ... what I'm saying is the law clearly reads if government receives a classified document and that person email is hacked, and its a unprotected server, then they can be held accountable ... the fact that they are consider classified doesn't mean she violated any law ... they only way she can be charged is if her server was hacked ...so far this hasn't been the case...

You not suppose to receive classified email on a private server. 22 of the emails are enough to threaten our national security. Also if Putin hacked those emails, he wouldn't tell us. If she becomes president he can blackmail her, and as dishonest as she is. She can be blackmailed.