DONE - GOING TO JAIL! -- Official: Some Clinton emails 'too damaging' to release'

The last change in defintion was in 1994. before then, the definition of unemployed was:
Unemployed persons comprise all persons who did not work during the survey week, who made specific efforts to find a job within the past 4 weeks, and who were available for work during the survey week (except for temporary illness). Also included as unemployed are those who did not work at all, were available for work, and (a) were waiting to be called back to a job from which they had been laid off; or (b) were waiting to report to a new wage or salary job within 30 days.
Employment and Earnings July 1982

In 1994 it changed to
Unemployed persons. All persons who had no employment during the reference week, were available for work, except for temporary illness, and had made specific efforts to find employment some time during the 4-week period ending with the reference week. Persons who were waiting to be recalled to a job from which they had been laid off need not have been looking for work to be classified as unemployed.

So....no change eliminating people not looking for work. Apparently YOU did not look it up.


you failed your research project, try again or accept an F as your final grade.
Oh, how are you claiming I failed? I've shown my work.

because your research was flawed and biased.


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/10/donald-lambro-obama-hides-jobs-failure-by-not-coun/?page=all
Holyfuckingshit! :eusa_doh:

That article doesn't actually defend your idiocy and you're clearly too ignorant to realize that.

:eusa_doh::eusa_doh::eusa_doh:

Schmuck... you said, "they changed the way they count the unemployed to exclude those who are no longer looking for work."

Nothing's been changed. They still count folks the same way under Obama as they did before he was president. Making the 5% unumployment rate relative and relevant to what he inherited from Bush as well as the 10% unemployment rate resulting from Bush's Great Recession.

:dance:


enjoy your life in fantasy land. dance away, idiot.
why thats were all the republicans dance
 
they are, idiot. Do you live under a rock where there is no TV, radio, or newspapers?
When is the next congressional investigation?

I am sure Gowdy is rounding them up as we speak


don't need another congressional investigation, the FBI is doing it. They only question is whether the AG will bring indictments when the FBI releases its findings. You can poo poo this as much as you like, but these are very serious findings. Patreaus was convicted of much less.
No he wasn't bozo. Acquaint yourself with the words knowingly and willingly, as it pertains to the law.
You're defense is that Hillary was too stupid to realize things like our exact locations in hot zones were classified? And she never received or sent anything classified when all the email was on her system? And that deleting everything and claiming they were just personal wasn't a coverup?

Worst genuflecting I've ever seen. You guys really can put your heads up your asses.
the " State Department spokeswoman says Hillary Clinton did not break any rules by relying solely on her personal email account. Federal law allows government officials to use personal email

The law was amended in late 2014 to require that personal emails be transferred to government servers within 20 days. But that was after Clinton left office. Watchdog groups conceded that she may not have violated the text of the law, but they argue she violated the spirit of it.


it does not allow the transmission of classified data on personal servers. It does not allow the removal of classified markings. Face it, she broke the law. She will never be president. Time to move on and draft Biden, or get behind Bernie, LOL
 
The last change in defintion was in 1994. before then, the definition of unemployed was:
Unemployed persons comprise all persons who did not work during the survey week, who made specific efforts to find a job within the past 4 weeks, and who were available for work during the survey week (except for temporary illness). Also included as unemployed are those who did not work at all, were available for work, and (a) were waiting to be called back to a job from which they had been laid off; or (b) were waiting to report to a new wage or salary job within 30 days.
Employment and Earnings July 1982

In 1994 it changed to
Unemployed persons. All persons who had no employment during the reference week, were available for work, except for temporary illness, and had made specific efforts to find employment some time during the 4-week period ending with the reference week. Persons who were waiting to be recalled to a job from which they had been laid off need not have been looking for work to be classified as unemployed.

So....no change eliminating people not looking for work. Apparently YOU did not look it up.
looks like you caught fish lying again to justify his means ... now here comes the double talk from fish and a lot of childish remarks


Uh, nope.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/10/donald-lambro-obama-hides-jobs-failure-by-not-coun/?page=all
your site is and opinion pages not a factual source of information ... when are you going to learn the difference4


Ok, here's one from USA today, hardly a conservative rag.

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-12-28-1Ajobless28_ST_N.htm
Holyfuckingshit! :eusa_doh:

That has nothing to do with how the unemployment rate is calculated.

:eusa_doh::eusa_doh::eusa_doh:

When will you start posting articles corroborating your idiocy rather than further exposing what an abject imbecile you are?
easy he's a idiot
 
they are, idiot. Do you live under a rock where there is no TV, radio, or newspapers?
When is the next congressional investigation?

I am sure Gowdy is rounding them up as we speak


don't need another congressional investigation, the FBI is doing it. They only question is whether the AG will bring indictments when the FBI releases its findings. You can poo poo this as much as you like, but these are very serious findings. Patreaus was convicted of much less.
No he wasn't bozo. Acquaint yourself with the words knowingly and willingly, as it pertains to the law.
You're defense is that Hillary was too stupid to realize things like our exact locations in hot zones were classified? And she never received or sent anything classified when all the email was on her system? And that deleting everything and claiming they were just personal wasn't a coverup?

Worst genuflecting I've ever seen. You guys really can put your heads up your asses.
the " State Department spokeswoman says Hillary Clinton did not break any rules by relying solely on her personal email account. Federal law allows government officials to use personal email

The law was amended in late 2014 to require that personal emails be transferred to government servers within 20 days. But that was after Clinton left office. Watchdog groups conceded that she may not have violated the text of the law, but they argue she violated the spirit of it.
You can't see bullshit if you fell face first into it. No, there's no law against federal employees using personal emails, they probably all have one. The problem is using it for official business.
 
When is the next congressional investigation?

I am sure Gowdy is rounding them up as we speak


don't need another congressional investigation, the FBI is doing it. They only question is whether the AG will bring indictments when the FBI releases its findings. You can poo poo this as much as you like, but these are very serious findings. Patreaus was convicted of much less.
No he wasn't bozo. Acquaint yourself with the words knowingly and willingly, as it pertains to the law.
You're defense is that Hillary was too stupid to realize things like our exact locations in hot zones were classified? And she never received or sent anything classified when all the email was on her system? And that deleting everything and claiming they were just personal wasn't a coverup?

Worst genuflecting I've ever seen. You guys really can put your heads up your asses.
the " State Department spokeswoman says Hillary Clinton did not break any rules by relying solely on her personal email account. Federal law allows government officials to use personal email

The law was amended in late 2014 to require that personal emails be transferred to government servers within 20 days. But that was after Clinton left office. Watchdog groups conceded that she may not have violated the text of the law, but they argue she violated the spirit of it.


it does not allow the transmission of classified data on personal servers. It does not allow the removal of classified markings. Face it, she broke the law. She will never be president. Time to move on and draft Biden, or get behind Bernie, LOL
sorry you don't get to say ... and you say madam president ??? better get use to it ...
 
When is the next congressional investigation?

I am sure Gowdy is rounding them up as we speak


don't need another congressional investigation, the FBI is doing it. They only question is whether the AG will bring indictments when the FBI releases its findings. You can poo poo this as much as you like, but these are very serious findings. Patreaus was convicted of much less.
No he wasn't bozo. Acquaint yourself with the words knowingly and willingly, as it pertains to the law.
You're defense is that Hillary was too stupid to realize things like our exact locations in hot zones were classified? And she never received or sent anything classified when all the email was on her system? And that deleting everything and claiming they were just personal wasn't a coverup?

Worst genuflecting I've ever seen. You guys really can put your heads up your asses.
the " State Department spokeswoman says Hillary Clinton did not break any rules by relying solely on her personal email account. Federal law allows government officials to use personal email

The law was amended in late 2014 to require that personal emails be transferred to government servers within 20 days. But that was after Clinton left office. Watchdog groups conceded that she may not have violated the text of the law, but they argue she violated the spirit of it.
You can't see bullshit if you fell face first into it. No, there's no law against federal employees using personal emails, they probably all have one. The problem is using it for official business.
you need to read the law ...
 
The last change in defintion was in 1994. before then, the definition of unemployed was:
Unemployed persons comprise all persons who did not work during the survey week, who made specific efforts to find a job within the past 4 weeks, and who were available for work during the survey week (except for temporary illness). Also included as unemployed are those who did not work at all, were available for work, and (a) were waiting to be called back to a job from which they had been laid off; or (b) were waiting to report to a new wage or salary job within 30 days.
Employment and Earnings July 1982

In 1994 it changed to
Unemployed persons. All persons who had no employment during the reference week, were available for work, except for temporary illness, and had made specific efforts to find employment some time during the 4-week period ending with the reference week. Persons who were waiting to be recalled to a job from which they had been laid off need not have been looking for work to be classified as unemployed.

So....no change eliminating people not looking for work. Apparently YOU did not look it up.
looks like you caught fish lying again to justify his means ... now here comes the double talk from fish and a lot of childish remarks


Uh, nope.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/10/donald-lambro-obama-hides-jobs-failure-by-not-coun/?page=all
your site is and opinion pages not a factual source of information ... when are you going to learn the difference4


Ok, here's one from USA today, hardly a conservative rag.

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-12-28-1Ajobless28_ST_N.htm
Holyfuckingshit! :eusa_doh:

That has nothing to do with how the unemployment rate is calculated.

:eusa_doh::eusa_doh::eusa_doh:

When will you start posting articles corroborating your idiocy rather than further exposing what an abject imbecile you are?


you asked for cites, I gave you 3 that refute your claims, do your own research,

here's how: google "changes in unemployment calculations" there are dozens of cites proving what I have said. Do it,
 
that is simply not true, they changed the way they count the unemployed to exclude those who are no longer looking for work. its a game and they have you fooled.
They did not, ya deranged rightard. :eusa_doh:


you are wrong, look it up.
The last change in defintion was in 1994. before then, the definition of unemployed was:
Unemployed persons comprise all persons who did not work during the survey week, who made specific efforts to find a job within the past 4 weeks, and who were available for work during the survey week (except for temporary illness). Also included as unemployed are those who did not work at all, were available for work, and (a) were waiting to be called back to a job from which they had been laid off; or (b) were waiting to report to a new wage or salary job within 30 days.
Employment and Earnings July 1982

In 1994 it changed to
Unemployed persons. All persons who had no employment during the reference week, were available for work, except for temporary illness, and had made specific efforts to find employment some time during the 4-week period ending with the reference week. Persons who were waiting to be recalled to a job from which they had been laid off need not have been looking for work to be classified as unemployed.

So....no change eliminating people not looking for work. Apparently YOU did not look it up.


you failed your research project, try again or accept an F as your final grade.
Oh, how are you claiming I failed? I've shown my work.
your work gets and F
 
don't need another congressional investigation, the FBI is doing it. They only question is whether the AG will bring indictments when the FBI releases its findings. You can poo poo this as much as you like, but these are very serious findings. Patreaus was convicted of much less.
No he wasn't bozo. Acquaint yourself with the words knowingly and willingly, as it pertains to the law.
You're defense is that Hillary was too stupid to realize things like our exact locations in hot zones were classified? And she never received or sent anything classified when all the email was on her system? And that deleting everything and claiming they were just personal wasn't a coverup?

Worst genuflecting I've ever seen. You guys really can put your heads up your asses.
the " State Department spokeswoman says Hillary Clinton did not break any rules by relying solely on her personal email account. Federal law allows government officials to use personal email

The law was amended in late 2014 to require that personal emails be transferred to government servers within 20 days. But that was after Clinton left office. Watchdog groups conceded that she may not have violated the text of the law, but they argue she violated the spirit of it.


it does not allow the transmission of classified data on personal servers. It does not allow the removal of classified markings. Face it, she broke the law. She will never be president. Time to move on and draft Biden, or get behind Bernie, LOL
sorry you don't get to say ... and you say madam president ??? better get use to it ...


Hillary Clinton will never be president, but you are free to continue worshiping her and kissing her fat corrupt ass.
 
They did not, ya deranged rightard. :eusa_doh:


you are wrong, look it up.
The last change in defintion was in 1994. before then, the definition of unemployed was:
Unemployed persons comprise all persons who did not work during the survey week, who made specific efforts to find a job within the past 4 weeks, and who were available for work during the survey week (except for temporary illness). Also included as unemployed are those who did not work at all, were available for work, and (a) were waiting to be called back to a job from which they had been laid off; or (b) were waiting to report to a new wage or salary job within 30 days.
Employment and Earnings July 1982

In 1994 it changed to
Unemployed persons. All persons who had no employment during the reference week, were available for work, except for temporary illness, and had made specific efforts to find employment some time during the 4-week period ending with the reference week. Persons who were waiting to be recalled to a job from which they had been laid off need not have been looking for work to be classified as unemployed.

So....no change eliminating people not looking for work. Apparently YOU did not look it up.


you failed your research project, try again or accept an F as your final grade.
see double talk ...if you're so sure fish about what you
are talking about how about giving a source


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/10/donald-lambro-obama-hides-jobs-failure-by-not-coun/?page=all
theres nothing there
 
They did not, ya deranged rightard. :eusa_doh:


you are wrong, look it up.
The last change in defintion was in 1994. before then, the definition of unemployed was:
Unemployed persons comprise all persons who did not work during the survey week, who made specific efforts to find a job within the past 4 weeks, and who were available for work during the survey week (except for temporary illness). Also included as unemployed are those who did not work at all, were available for work, and (a) were waiting to be called back to a job from which they had been laid off; or (b) were waiting to report to a new wage or salary job within 30 days.
Employment and Earnings July 1982

In 1994 it changed to
Unemployed persons. All persons who had no employment during the reference week, were available for work, except for temporary illness, and had made specific efforts to find employment some time during the 4-week period ending with the reference week. Persons who were waiting to be recalled to a job from which they had been laid off need not have been looking for work to be classified as unemployed.

So....no change eliminating people not looking for work. Apparently YOU did not look it up.


you failed your research project, try again or accept an F as your final grade.
Oh, how are you claiming I failed? I've shown my work.
your work gets and F


LOL, your post gets you "and F" moron
 
don't need another congressional investigation, the FBI is doing it. They only question is whether the AG will bring indictments when the FBI releases its findings. You can poo poo this as much as you like, but these are very serious findings. Patreaus was convicted of much less.
No he wasn't bozo. Acquaint yourself with the words knowingly and willingly, as it pertains to the law.
You're defense is that Hillary was too stupid to realize things like our exact locations in hot zones were classified? And she never received or sent anything classified when all the email was on her system? And that deleting everything and claiming they were just personal wasn't a coverup?

Worst genuflecting I've ever seen. You guys really can put your heads up your asses.
the " State Department spokeswoman says Hillary Clinton did not break any rules by relying solely on her personal email account. Federal law allows government officials to use personal email

The law was amended in late 2014 to require that personal emails be transferred to government servers within 20 days. But that was after Clinton left office. Watchdog groups conceded that she may not have violated the text of the law, but they argue she violated the spirit of it.
You can't see bullshit if you fell face first into it. No, there's no law against federal employees using personal emails, they probably all have one. The problem is using it for official business.
you need to read the law ...
It needs to be read to her. And will be. What moron thinks it's OK to use personal email on an unsecured server for official business, especially when you are the SECRETARY OF STATE?
 
you are wrong, look it up.
The last change in defintion was in 1994. before then, the definition of unemployed was:
Unemployed persons comprise all persons who did not work during the survey week, who made specific efforts to find a job within the past 4 weeks, and who were available for work during the survey week (except for temporary illness). Also included as unemployed are those who did not work at all, were available for work, and (a) were waiting to be called back to a job from which they had been laid off; or (b) were waiting to report to a new wage or salary job within 30 days.
Employment and Earnings July 1982

In 1994 it changed to
Unemployed persons. All persons who had no employment during the reference week, were available for work, except for temporary illness, and had made specific efforts to find employment some time during the 4-week period ending with the reference week. Persons who were waiting to be recalled to a job from which they had been laid off need not have been looking for work to be classified as unemployed.

So....no change eliminating people not looking for work. Apparently YOU did not look it up.


you failed your research project, try again or accept an F as your final grade.
see double talk ...if you're so sure fish about what you
are talking about how about giving a source


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/10/donald-lambro-obama-hides-jobs-failure-by-not-coun/?page=all
theres nothing there


I am not responsible for your lack of computer skills.
 
No he wasn't bozo. Acquaint yourself with the words knowingly and willingly, as it pertains to the law.
You're defense is that Hillary was too stupid to realize things like our exact locations in hot zones were classified? And she never received or sent anything classified when all the email was on her system? And that deleting everything and claiming they were just personal wasn't a coverup?

Worst genuflecting I've ever seen. You guys really can put your heads up your asses.
the " State Department spokeswoman says Hillary Clinton did not break any rules by relying solely on her personal email account. Federal law allows government officials to use personal email

The law was amended in late 2014 to require that personal emails be transferred to government servers within 20 days. But that was after Clinton left office. Watchdog groups conceded that she may not have violated the text of the law, but they argue she violated the spirit of it.


it does not allow the transmission of classified data on personal servers. It does not allow the removal of classified markings. Face it, she broke the law. She will never be president. Time to move on and draft Biden, or get behind Bernie, LOL
sorry you don't get to say ... and you say madam president ??? better get use to it ...


Hillary Clinton will never be president, but you are free to continue worshiping her and kissing her fat corrupt ass.
thats you hoping
 
bill-frist-quote-i-support-term-limits-for-career-politicians-and-the.jpg
 
You're defense is that Hillary was too stupid to realize things like our exact locations in hot zones were classified? And she never received or sent anything classified when all the email was on her system? And that deleting everything and claiming they were just personal wasn't a coverup?

Worst genuflecting I've ever seen. You guys really can put your heads up your asses.
the " State Department spokeswoman says Hillary Clinton did not break any rules by relying solely on her personal email account. Federal law allows government officials to use personal email

The law was amended in late 2014 to require that personal emails be transferred to government servers within 20 days. But that was after Clinton left office. Watchdog groups conceded that she may not have violated the text of the law, but they argue she violated the spirit of it.


it does not allow the transmission of classified data on personal servers. It does not allow the removal of classified markings. Face it, she broke the law. She will never be president. Time to move on and draft Biden, or get behind Bernie, LOL
sorry you don't get to say ... and you say madam president ??? better get use to it ...


Hillary Clinton will never be president, but you are free to continue worshiping her and kissing her fat corrupt ass.
thats you hoping


nope, just being factual. better get behind Bernie or draft Biden.
 
The last change in defintion was in 1994. before then, the definition of unemployed was:
Unemployed persons comprise all persons who did not work during the survey week, who made specific efforts to find a job within the past 4 weeks, and who were available for work during the survey week (except for temporary illness). Also included as unemployed are those who did not work at all, were available for work, and (a) were waiting to be called back to a job from which they had been laid off; or (b) were waiting to report to a new wage or salary job within 30 days.
Employment and Earnings July 1982

In 1994 it changed to
Unemployed persons. All persons who had no employment during the reference week, were available for work, except for temporary illness, and had made specific efforts to find employment some time during the 4-week period ending with the reference week. Persons who were waiting to be recalled to a job from which they had been laid off need not have been looking for work to be classified as unemployed.

So....no change eliminating people not looking for work. Apparently YOU did not look it up.


you failed your research project, try again or accept an F as your final grade.
see double talk ...if you're so sure fish about what you
are talking about how about giving a source


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/10/donald-lambro-obama-hides-jobs-failure-by-not-coun/?page=all
theres nothing there


I am not responsible for your lack of computer skills.
it is you that has a problem with communication skills
 
... and not even about what that moron claims. He idiotically claimed the methodology of calculating the unemployment rate changed to lower the rate.

He's now posted 2 articles whining about how the U-6 rate should be considered and 1 article about how long term unemployment would be measured by 5 years instead of 2.

Meanwhile, his moronic claim that "they changed the way they count the unemployed to exclude those who are no longer looking for work," remains a figment of his rightwing fervent imagination.
 

Forum List

Back
Top