Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,439
- 2,290
Would not help in this case. If you run over somebody, get charged with reckless driving and convicted by a jury of your peers, (even though the conviction was kind of a consolation prize because they failed on the more serious charge) you are screwed on the civil case. No way in hell you will when with that reckless driving conviction by a jury in the mix. I hope she didn't have a paid off mortgage, cause she is soon going to be an apartment dweller. I hate it, but the chick is toast. She would have been far better off killing the asshole on her hood (who was really deserving, by the way) than injuring the one to the side by swerving to discourage him from jumping on. I have not seen any video of the swerve, but it looks like it could not be sold to the jury as a panic move while under attack of a mob in the motorway.
Could be, but I think a lot of people are sick of this shit already and have had it. They can't stack the jury with a bunch of leftist rioter supporters because both attorneys get to choose the jury. When you sue somebody, you can only sue for damages. To me it doesn't sound like he was all that badly hurt and she won't lose her house over it.