E-mails revel that Biden knew the vaccines were not working but then mandated them anyway

The vaccines were rushed into circulation aside from the normal process.

And, as I've said, we have repeatedly been lied to by the vary sources what would show the vaccines to be safe.
Gee how did I know you’d give a round about response and not answer the question?! Shocking…
Did the vaccines have scientifically tested efficacy rates?? Yes or no
 

People lost their jobs over this.

People took the jab and died from it over this.

People were denied health care over this.

Joe is a criminal.
"The Blaze"

lol

More lies from a right-wing fake news site.
 
we are the masses!
Some are more masses than others.

maxresdefault.jpg
 
The vaccines were rushed into circulation aside from the normal process.

And, as I've said, we have repeatedly been lied to by the vary sources what would show the vaccines to be safe.
.

They were never approved for any use other than emergency use, nor is Pfizer's new covid drug, "Paxlovid".

Nuremberg 2.0

.
 
.

I just had a conversation with an acquaintance who's a nurse. They're preparing to write a book about the incredible number of hospital personnel who knew how phony and dangerous the jab was and set up a network of folks who were giving saline injections to each other and then faking the paperwork so that they wouldn't get fired. I guess this was pretty widespread -- medical professionals knew better!

Hope they'll be able to publish the book successfully some day.

.
Before writing a book did those nurses become infectious desease specialists...or at least learned how to read up on serious medical studies?




RESULTS​

The trial enrolled 30,415 participants; 15,209 were assigned to receive the mRNA-1273 vaccine, and 15,206 to receive placebo. More than 96% of participants received both injections, 2.3% had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline, and the median follow-up was 5.3 months in the blinded phase. Vaccine efficacy in preventing Covid-19 illness was 93.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.0 to 94.8), with 55 confirmed cases in the mRNA-1273 group (9.6 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 7.2 to 12.5) and 744 in the placebo group (136.6 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 127.0 to 146.8). The efficacy in preventing severe disease was 98.2% (95% CI, 92.8 to 99.6), with 2 cases in the mRNA-1273 group and 106 in the placebo group, and the efficacy in preventing asymptomatic infection starting 14 days after the second injection was 63.0% (95% CI, 56.6 to 68.5), with 214 cases in the mRNA-1273 group and 498 in the placebo group. Vaccine efficacy was consistent across ethnic and racial groups, age groups, and participants with coexisting conditions. No safety concerns were identified.

CONCLUSIONS​

The mRNA-1273 vaccine continued to be efficacious in preventing Covid-19 illness and severe disease at more than 5 months, with an acceptable safety profile, and protection against asymptomatic infection was observed.
 
Before writing a book did those nurses become infectious desease specialists...or at least learned how to read up on serious medical studies?




RESULTS​

The trial enrolled 30,415 participants; 15,209 were assigned to receive the mRNA-1273 vaccine, and 15,206 to receive placebo. More than 96% of participants received both injections, 2.3% had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline, and the median follow-up was 5.3 months in the blinded phase. Vaccine efficacy in preventing Covid-19 illness was 93.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.0 to 94.8), with 55 confirmed cases in the mRNA-1273 group (9.6 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 7.2 to 12.5) and 744 in the placebo group (136.6 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 127.0 to 146.8). The efficacy in preventing severe disease was 98.2% (95% CI, 92.8 to 99.6), with 2 cases in the mRNA-1273 group and 106 in the placebo group, and the efficacy in preventing asymptomatic infection starting 14 days after the second injection was 63.0% (95% CI, 56.6 to 68.5), with 214 cases in the mRNA-1273 group and 498 in the placebo group. Vaccine efficacy was consistent across ethnic and racial groups, age groups, and participants with coexisting conditions. No safety concerns were identified.

CONCLUSIONS​

The mRNA-1273 vaccine continued to be efficacious in preventing Covid-19 illness and severe disease at more than 5 months, with an acceptable safety profile, and protection against asymptomatic infection was observed.
Apparently you’re unaware NEJM is an unreliable source. Yet another thing in the multitude of things you’re uninformed about.
Secret recording exposes "criminal" influence by Big Pharma in research published by Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine
 
Before writing a book did those nurses become infectious desease specialists...or at least learned how to read up on serious medical studies?




RESULTS​

The trial enrolled 30,415 participants; 15,209 were assigned to receive the mRNA-1273 vaccine, and 15,206 to receive placebo. More than 96% of participants received both injections, 2.3% had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline, and the median follow-up was 5.3 months in the blinded phase. Vaccine efficacy in preventing Covid-19 illness was 93.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.0 to 94.8), with 55 confirmed cases in the mRNA-1273 group (9.6 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 7.2 to 12.5) and 744 in the placebo group (136.6 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 127.0 to 146.8). The efficacy in preventing severe disease was 98.2% (95% CI, 92.8 to 99.6), with 2 cases in the mRNA-1273 group and 106 in the placebo group, and the efficacy in preventing asymptomatic infection starting 14 days after the second injection was 63.0% (95% CI, 56.6 to 68.5), with 214 cases in the mRNA-1273 group and 498 in the placebo group. Vaccine efficacy was consistent across ethnic and racial groups, age groups, and participants with coexisting conditions. No safety concerns were identified.

CONCLUSIONS​

The mRNA-1273 vaccine continued to be efficacious in preventing Covid-19 illness and severe disease at more than 5 months, with an acceptable safety profile, and protection against asymptomatic infection was observed.

.




Hope you've had your boosters.

We wouldn't want anything bad to happen to you.




.
 
You hang out with conspiracy theorists

Nope, just smart, educated people who are wise enough to think on their own instead of letting the MSM feed them information. They saw an uptick in cardio cases in their practices for those who had taken the vaccine and made an informed decision. People like you watched CNN and made a decision.
 
Nope, just smart, educated people who are wise enough to think on their own instead of letting the MSM feed them information. They saw an uptick in cardio cases in their practices for those who had taken the vaccine and made an informed decision. People like you watched CNN and made a decision.

Nutjob conspiracies
 
Nope, just smart, educated people who are wise enough to think on their own instead of letting the MSM feed them information. They saw an uptick in cardio cases in their practices for those who had taken the vaccine and made an informed decision. People like you watched CNN and made a decision.
You do know that Covid often causes cardio issues, don't you?


So how the hell would those in practice ever parse Covid or vaccine or some other factors as the root causes?

These are arguments for sandbox dwellers who don't understand what a serious medical inquiry looks like.

Serious large studies repeatedly found that vaccines are safe and effective - which is exactly why they got full FDA clearance. There is no real "debate" in the medical field on this, so take your sandbox stories somewhere else.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top