Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot

[Meister]

While that is sort of correct… wasn’t it a riot with a GOAL?

Riots are spontaneous acts of violence with no goal.

In this case the goal was to prevent the completion of an election.

Sounds like an insurrection then huh?

Riot with a goal? Nope, it was a demonstration that just got out of hand with the help
of some 'usual' suspects, and some 'unusual' suspects. You could probably look
at some that were in your tent, Lesh.

 

[SeaMajor7]

While that is sort of correct… wasn’t it a riot with a GOAL?

Riots are spontaneous acts of violence with no goal.

In this case the goal was to prevent the completion of an election.

Sounds like an insurrection then huh?

Surprisingly, the FBI concluded that it was not an insurrection.
Funny that, ain't it?

 

[BS Filter]

It wasn’t? What would you call attacking Capitol police and smashing your way into a building?

Of course it was an attack.

They learned from watching BLM.

 

[Marener]

Riot with a goal? Nope, it was a demonstration that just got out of hand with the help
of some 'usual' suspects, and some 'unusual' suspects. You could probably look
at some that were in your tent, Lesh.

The rioters indicated what their goal was. They were summoned to DC in pursuit of that goal.

 

[Faun]

Check the F-curve.....

None were found with merit. And the ones dismissed for standing...? Were never refiled by someone with standing.

Every case lost.

Every investigation found nothing.

To this date, three years later, there's still no proof.

Trump's own former strategist announced Trump was going to cry fraud if he lost the election -- which is exactly what Trump went on to do.

You were duped. But sadly, you're a con. That means you're too stupid to know you were duped.

 

[Faun]

Riot with a goal? Nope, it was a demonstration that just got out of hand with the help
of some 'usual' suspects, and some 'unusual' suspects. You could probably look
at some that were in your tent, Lesh.

What were they hoping to gain by rioting?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Some of the other insurrectionists have been convicted of sedition.

So, there's that.

There’s that precedent.

 

[Lesh]

Riot with a goal? Nope, it was a demonstration that just got out of hand with the help
of some 'usual' suspects, and some 'unusual' suspects. You could probably look
at some that were in your tent, Lesh.

There was clearly a goal . “stop the Steal”… stop the count…

That was the goal.

A riot with a goal/agenda sure sounds like an insurrection… especially when that agenda has o do with control of the government

 

[SeaMajor7]

None were found with merit. And the ones dismissed for standing...? Were never refiled by someone with standing.

Every case lost.

Every investigation found nothing.

To this date, three years later, there's still no proof.

Trump's own former strategist announced Trump was going to cry fraud if he lost the election -- which is exactly what Trump went on to do.

You were duped. But sadly, you're a con. That means you're too stupid to know you were duped.

"They don't think it be like it is, but it do."
OG

 

[Faun]

There was clearly a goal . “stop the Steal”… stop the count…

That was the goal.

A riot with a goal/agenda sure sounds like an insurrection… especially when that agenda has o do with control of the government

Don't forget, "hang Mike Pence!"

 

[Nostra]

Why would I do that?

You claimed it wasn’t a mostly peaceful protest, Simp.

Prove it.

 

[Lesh]

Don't forget, "hang Mike Pence!"

And “Nanceeeee… where are youuuu”

 

[Nostra]

Do you not notice the word crime in there? This wasn't a criminal court you Bingo. He wasn't held to a capital crime. He was simply disqualified because the petitioners proved he was a piece of shit insurrectionist. It takes a criminal trial to make a criminal conviction, a civil trial for a civil judgment and a hearing, or whatever this was for disqualification. Different court you dipshit.

Insurrection is a crime, Punk.

Show me where the 14th negates the 5th Amendment.

GO!

 

[bodecea]

A riot. ?

And it's goal was?

 

[bodecea]

Insurrection is a crime, Punk.

Show me where the 14th negates the 5th Amendment.

GO!

Show where the 5th negates the 14th.

 

[Nostra]

At the Ellipse...............NOT at the Capitol

Nah, most there were peaceful.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Please explain how one "engages" in some crime without being "guilty" of said crime, Dunce.

Amendment V​

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Because he wasn’t charged criminally with insurrection but rather found to have engaged in insurrection civilly.

Do you not understand the difference?

 

[Nostra]

LOL

You dumbfuck, that's in terms of a criminal charge. Trump wasn't charged criminally. Dayum, you're dumber than dirt.

Insurrection is a criminal offense, stupid.

 

[SeaMajor7]

And it's goal was?

Protesting a stolen election, duh.

 

[Nostra]

Because he wasn’t charged criminally with insurrection but rather found to have engaged in civilly.

Do you not understand the difference?

Insurrection is a criminal offense, not a civil violation, Vermin. Show me the civil code covering insurrection.