otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 36,790
- 11,803
No, no it's not.Actually it’s another laugh at lefist hysterics post.
It's just another whiner post.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, no it's not.Actually it’s another laugh at lefist hysterics post.
Two different things dipshit.The double standards and the hypocrisy of the Left is repulsive!
It's here for everyone to see!
View attachment 631291
Twitter is just fine without without the orange fuckup and his disinformation.What could Elon Musk do to worsen twitter?
They proved that they do censure conservatives and truth"They've testified again and again and again before Congress that they never censor conservative users — with this kind of tripe:
...and...
Nevertheless, there are "mistakes," lots of "mistakes":
Plus the odd "total mistake":
In this sense, they top the tobacco barons of yesteryear, who declared under oath before Congress around 1994 to some Democrat show hearing that nicotine is not addictive.
Musk may well find out the truth of Twitter's claims to probity, too — which would end the nonsense right there and could, of course, expose Twitter to shareholder lawsuits, as any corporate lie to the public would.
The other thing he may expose is scarier:
Twitter shut down the president of the United States, which, if it's controlled by the government, while the elites take the profits, it means the government itself shut Trump down. What would be the implications of that, and how the heck could this scandal be corrected? It would show the extent of the rot of the Deep State that an entity so closely connected to the federal government could carry out that kind of coup. And that presents a constitutional crisis. This kind of third-world behavior would have to be exposed by Musk — and Congress would need to stop it."
Who decides which information is disinformation?Twitter is just fine without without the orange fuckup and his disinformation.