Enough is enough - use RICO to restore science respect.

Wasn't there a headline or two in the last week or so warning of a coming mini ice age?

And that's good because the climate change kooks have been one ice age down since they warned one was on the way 35-40 years ago.
My, my, another ignorant ass repeating that bullshit. No, most of the papers in scientific journals, even in the '70's, stated that they believed the danger was from warming because of GHG's. No, there may have been headlines in the Weekly Globe and trash of that ilk, but not in scientific papers.
 
So now you want to criminalize dissent? How very freedom minded of you.
That's not dissent. That's lying to the mass public - the worst kind of lying.

No, the worst kind of lying is people like you fooling the masses into believing we are causing climate change.
From Joseph Fourier to Tyndall, to Svante Arrhenius, the science has been solid that an increase in GHG's create an increase in heat in the atmosphere. Evidence from the past extinctions indicates that rapid increases from GHG's caused by Trapp Volcanism caused those extinctions. We have rapidly increased the levels of both CO2 and CH4 in the atmosphere, over 40% for CO2 and over 250% for CH4.

The evidence is irrefutable that we are causing major changes in our climate. Changes that will negatively impact all of us.
 
Wasn't there a headline or two in the last week or so warning of a coming mini ice age?

And that's good because the climate change kooks have been one ice age down since they warned one was on the way 35-40 years ago.
Misinformation is rampant. That is why we need to clean up all the garbage disguised as facts. Those who create fake facts should be held accountable. Global warming is affecting the climate, so what does lying get you? So far the warming oceans are having a huge impact on the weather.

Prove it is man made and then prove how much man contributes
Were you to actually look at the evidence that the scientists present, you would see that it is already proven. Instead, you blindly accept whatever the 'Conservative' lie machine spews.
 
Corporate control of government has gone too far when scientific research is muted or severely misrepresented. Good government uses science to help determine its policies for the common good. But when corrupted individuals get into positions of power, science reports are covered up and the authors become frustrated, give up and quit, or get laid off.

Most scientists are not rich. They don't do their type of work for the money, but for the quest for knowledge. So, they don't have the legal means to protect themselves from powerful corporate interests - unless their government does it for them. Similarly, the rest of us citizens expect the same from our government.

Climate scientists have known for decades that humans are hurting our Earth's environment with emissions from our machines and processes. But their reports have been erroneously and repeatedly dismissed as invalid by corporate powers that depend on continued use of their products for their profit levels, which have been enormous. This action to dismiss real science is illegal, as is any mass misinformation passed to influence the public. Having been frustrated for too long, a group of scientists has written a letter to the White House to prosecute the corporate offenders under the RICO Act. The prosecutor for the tobacco case agrees. Exxon’s Climate Cover-Up Should Be Investigated By DOJ, Tobacco Prosecutor Says

Thom Hartmann explains the criminal evidence. Maybe at last this will restore the respect science deserves. What do you think?



One HUGE glaring error in your OP, well one of many but IMO the most important, you said: "They don't do their type of work for the money, but for the quest for knowledge." That is an absolute lie. Scientists are for sale. They always have been and always will be.


You're saying everybody's reputation is for sale. Not true!


Not everybody, but there are so few that aren't there for the money and prestige that it makes little difference. For instance, if you publish science that goes against global warming, your career is over. No one is interested in "knowledge" if it kills the cash cow. That is a fact.

Really? Not a great many millionaire scientists. But lying hacks like Limpbaugh make tens of millions.

But fools like you define the hatred of science and logic that is endemic in the rightwingnuts.
 
Corporate control of government has gone too far when scientific research is muted or severely misrepresented. Good government uses science to help determine its policies for the common good. But when corrupted individuals get into positions of power, science reports are covered up and the authors become frustrated, give up and quit, or get laid off.

Most scientists are not rich. They don't do their type of work for the money, but for the quest for knowledge. So, they don't have the legal means to protect themselves from powerful corporate interests - unless their government does it for them. Similarly, the rest of us citizens expect the same from our government.

Climate scientists have known for decades that humans are hurting our Earth's environment with emissions from our machines and processes. But their reports have been erroneously and repeatedly dismissed as invalid by corporate powers that depend on continued use of their products for their profit levels, which have been enormous. This action to dismiss real science is illegal, as is any mass misinformation passed to influence the public. Having been frustrated for too long, a group of scientists has written a letter to the White House to prosecute the corporate offenders under the RICO Act. The prosecutor for the tobacco case agrees. Exxon’s Climate Cover-Up Should Be Investigated By DOJ, Tobacco Prosecutor Says

Thom Hartmann explains the criminal evidence. Maybe at last this will restore the respect science deserves. What do you think?



One HUGE glaring error in your OP, well one of many but IMO the most important, you said: "They don't do their type of work for the money, but for the quest for knowledge." That is an absolute lie. Scientists are for sale. They always have been and always will be.


You're saying everybody's reputation is for sale. Not true!


Not everybody, but there are so few that aren't there for the money and prestige that it makes little difference. For instance, if you publish science that goes against global warming, your career is over. No one is interested in "knowledge" if it kills the cash cow. That is a fact.

Really? Not a great many millionaire scientists. But lying hacks like Limpbaugh make tens of millions.

But fools like you define the hatred of science and logic that is endemic in the rightwingnuts.


No dumbass, that is exactly the point. They aren't millionaires, they need the money. Who gives a shit what Limbaugh makes or thinks? You? I don't.
And fools like you think that just agreeing with the left wing version of science means you know and love science. But people like me who love science, and actually know science PLUS love history and actually know history, are smart enough to know that history shows scientists are like everyone else. They need the money.

How stupid are you? Well you are stupid enough to actually think that if you believe in global warming, you automatically know science and love science. When in fact you are just a gullible idiot.
 
Wasn't there a headline or two in the last week or so warning of a coming mini ice age?

And that's good because the climate change kooks have been one ice age down since they warned one was on the way 35-40 years ago.
Misinformation is rampant. That is why we need to clean up all the garbage disguised as facts. Those who create fake facts should be held accountable. Global warming is affecting the climate, so what does lying get you? So far the warming oceans are having a huge impact on the weather.

Prove it is man made and then prove how much man contributes
Were you to actually look at the evidence that the scientists present, you would see that it is already proven. Instead, you blindly accept whatever the 'Conservative' lie machine spews.

It is NOT proven that is a lie. If you knew ANYTHING about science, or the "science" of global warming, you would know that. You don't, all you can do is tell lies.
 
So now you want to criminalize dissent? How very freedom minded of you.
That's not dissent. That's lying to the mass public - the worst kind of lying.

No, the worst kind of lying is people like you fooling the masses into believing we are causing climate change.
From Joseph Fourier to Tyndall, to Svante Arrhenius, the science has been solid that an increase in GHG's create an increase in heat in the atmosphere. Evidence from the past extinctions indicates that rapid increases from GHG's caused by Trapp Volcanism caused those extinctions. We have rapidly increased the levels of both CO2 and CH4 in the atmosphere, over 40% for CO2 and over 250% for CH4.

The evidence is irrefutable that we are causing major changes in our climate. Changes that will negatively impact all of us.

Wrong, moron. Computer models don't mean squat. Garbage in, garbage out. As far as historical records of GHG, they show that GHGs follow increases in heat, not the other way around. Man made Global Warming is a scam. That's why all of the people, politicians, and scientists have to lie, coerce, threaten, and belittle those who don't fall in line. Only brainless idiots such as you fall for it.
 
Wasn't there a headline or two in the last week or so warning of a coming mini ice age?

And that's good because the climate change kooks have been one ice age down since they warned one was on the way 35-40 years ago.
My, my, another ignorant ass repeating that bullshit. No, most of the papers in scientific journals, even in the '70's, stated that they believed the danger was from warming because of GHG's. No, there may have been headlines in the Weekly Globe and trash of that ilk, but not in scientific papers.

Well Old Fraud, your bull shit appeals to authority when their proof is fantasy models is way beyond reason.

The warming that has happened can be attributed to natural variation 100%... The empirical evidence shows it.. And you got what? Broken models?
 
Wasn't there a headline or two in the last week or so warning of a coming mini ice age?

And that's good because the climate change kooks have been one ice age down since they warned one was on the way 35-40 years ago.
My, my, another ignorant ass repeating that bullshit. No, most of the papers in scientific journals, even in the '70's, stated that they believed the danger was from warming because of GHG's. No, there may have been headlines in the Weekly Globe and trash of that ilk, but not in scientific papers.

Then why didn't it make the main stream news?

You are full of shit
 
Wasn't there a headline or two in the last week or so warning of a coming mini ice age?

And that's good because the climate change kooks have been one ice age down since they warned one was on the way 35-40 years ago.
Misinformation is rampant. That is why we need to clean up all the garbage disguised as facts. Those who create fake facts should be held accountable. Global warming is affecting the climate, so what does lying get you? So far the warming oceans are having a huge impact on the weather.

Prove it is man made and then prove how much man contributes
Were you to actually look at the evidence that the scientists present, you would see that it is already proven. Instead, you blindly accept whatever the 'Conservative' lie machine spews.

It is NOT proven that is a lie. If you knew ANYTHING about science, or the "science" of global warming, you would know that. You don't, all you can do is tell lies.

You already admitted countless times you don't give a fuck about the science you want to go way way overboard to protect the children of the future .
 
Corporate control of government has gone too far when scientific research is muted or severely misrepresented. Good government uses science to help determine its policies for the common good. But when corrupted individuals get into positions of power, science reports are covered up and the authors become frustrated, give up and quit, or get laid off.

Most scientists are not rich. They don't do their type of work for the money, but for the quest for knowledge. So, they don't have the legal means to protect themselves from powerful corporate interests - unless their government does it for them. Similarly, the rest of us citizens expect the same from our government.

Climate scientists have known for decades that humans are hurting our Earth's environment with emissions from our machines and processes. But their reports have been erroneously and repeatedly dismissed as invalid by corporate powers that depend on continued use of their products for their profit levels, which have been enormous. This action to dismiss real science is illegal, as is any mass misinformation passed to influence the public. Having been frustrated for too long, a group of scientists has written a letter to the White House to prosecute the corporate offenders under the RICO Act. The prosecutor for the tobacco case agrees. Exxon’s Climate Cover-Up Should Be Investigated By DOJ, Tobacco Prosecutor Says

Thom Hartmann explains the criminal evidence. Maybe at last this will restore the respect science deserves. What do you think?






That's funny. They can't show a single empirical data set that supports your claim. UHI is a well known effect, however the effect that man has on global temps is little to none. Only in computer models do climatologists show any effect. I will take observed reality over computer derived science fiction any day of the week.
 
The AGWCult is a bigger fraud than Bernie Madoff and SHOULD be procecuted nder RICO
Wrong. It's the truth. You can't handle the truth.

LOL@ Truth

All of a sudden in AR5 you have to add in "Warming" that been consumed by the deep oceans just to make your numbers work

LOL
Do you think oceans can't absorb heat? Do you understand basic chemistry and physics, energy budget, etc? Do you understand any science whatsoever?

Fact remains ... this year is smashing all record books.

Global warming is real. Feel free to remain ignorant for god only knows what reason.






No, the facts are the "record" temps are five times lower than the instruments can measure. Do you not understand simple math? The claim is the record has been broken by . 038 C. The problem of course is that NOAA admits their instruments are only accurate to within .1 degree C. Do you see the problem there? I'll make it easy for you....I can make the claim that the temps DROPPED by .038 degree and be just as accurate.
 


As we see these "Globull warmers" are becoming Dangerous to us suggesting they use RICO.
wtf
 
Wasn't there a headline or two in the last week or so warning of a coming mini ice age?

And that's good because the climate change kooks have been one ice age down since they warned one was on the way 35-40 years ago.
Misinformation is rampant. That is why we need to clean up all the garbage disguised as facts. Those who create fake facts should be held accountable. Global warming is affecting the climate, so what does lying get you? So far the warming oceans are having a huge impact on the weather.

followyourleader2.png

Nasty comments produce no results. Look in the mirror.

I calls it as I see it.
 
Wasn't there a headline or two in the last week or so warning of a coming mini ice age?

And that's good because the climate change kooks have been one ice age down since they warned one was on the way 35-40 years ago.
Misinformation is rampant. That is why we need to clean up all the garbage disguised as facts. Those who create fake facts should be held accountable. Global warming is affecting the climate, so what does lying get you? So far the warming oceans are having a huge impact on the weather.

Prove it is man made and then prove how much man contributes
Were you to actually look at the evidence that the scientists present, you would see that it is already proven. Instead, you blindly accept whatever the 'Conservative' lie machine spews.

It is NOT proven that is a lie. If you knew ANYTHING about science, or the "science" of global warming, you would know that. You don't, all you can do is tell lies.

You already admitted countless times you don't give a fuck about the science you want to go way way overboard to protect the children of the future .

Never said that ever. Why the lies? Why do global warming scientists and believers have to lie all the time?
 
Corporate control of government has gone too far when scientific research is muted or severely misrepresented. Good government uses science to help determine its policies for the common good. But when corrupted individuals get into positions of power, science reports are covered up and the authors become frustrated, give up and quit, or get laid off.

Most scientists are not rich. They don't do their type of work for the money, but for the quest for knowledge. So, they don't have the legal means to protect themselves from powerful corporate interests - unless their government does it for them. Similarly, the rest of us citizens expect the same from our government.

Climate scientists have known for decades that humans are hurting our Earth's environment with emissions from our machines and processes. But their reports have been erroneously and repeatedly dismissed as invalid by corporate powers that depend on continued use of their products for their profit levels, which have been enormous. This action to dismiss real science is illegal, as is any mass misinformation passed to influence the public. Having been frustrated for too long, a group of scientists has written a letter to the White House to prosecute the corporate offenders under the RICO Act. The prosecutor for the tobacco case agrees. Exxon’s Climate Cover-Up Should Be Investigated By DOJ, Tobacco Prosecutor Says

Thom Hartmann explains the criminal evidence. Maybe at last this will restore the respect science deserves. What do you think?






That's funny. They can't show a single empirical data set that supports your claim. UHI is a well known effect, however the effect that man has on global temps is little to none. Only in computer models do climatologists show any effect. I will take observed reality over computer derived science fiction any day of the week.

The BEST study pretty well demolished your lies. And the policy statements of the AGU and GSA are unequivical in their evidence for AGW.
 

Forum List

Back
Top