Ever notice how Liberals always win, eventually?

[rdean]

Conservatives pro slavery, liberals against slavery. Liberals win.
Conservatives trying to rewrite history by saying Lincoln was a Republican. Yea, but he wasn't a Confederate.

Conservatives anti education, liberals pro education. Blue States win.

Conservatives anti science, liberals pro science. Scientists win.

Conservatives anti gay, liberals for equal rights for gays. Now there are states even letting gays "marry". Conservatives trying to go after gays and ruin their lives. But conservatives are even losing "Big Business" support for their anti gay legislation.

Republicans trying to keep Americans from health care or trying to keep them stuck with substandard policies. Even Republican Governors are now pushing Obamacare. Only they are trying to call it by another name like 'Help those in Indiana see doctors' or some such nonsense.

When you look at disastrous GOP policies since Reagan, all we can say is "Thank God for Liberals".

 

[deltex1]

The best evidence of that is the number of Americans now losing.

 

[blackhawk]

Ever notice how the country loses when that happens?

 

[rdean]

The country is actually "recovering" from years of GOP policy. Do I have to name them? Again?

 

[Rozman]

The country is actually "recovering" from years of GOP policy. Do I have to name them? Again?

We don't have to prod you...
We know you will in....

5....
4....
3....
2....
1..............

 

[Moonglow]

Great Depression, S&L crisis, Great Recession, all started under GOP presidents...

 

[Rozman]

I feel the recovery all around me......
Or maybe not!

 

[Moonglow]

The best evidence of that is the number of Americans now losing.

somebody has to be the loser when it comes to greed...

 

[Moonglow]

I feel the recovery all around me......
Or maybe not!

Just depends where you live...

 

[The2ndAmendment]

The first thing you say is "Pro Slavery" the start this thread?

 

[Victory67]

Most societies, in the end, Progress.

 

[deltex1]

Conservatives pro slavery, liberals against slavery. Liberals win.
Conservatives trying to rewrite history by saying Lincoln was a Republican. Yea, but he wasn't a Confederate.

Conservatives anti education, liberals pro education. Blue States win.

Conservatives anti science, liberals pro science. Scientists win.

Conservatives anti gay, liberals for equal rights for gays. Now there are states even letting gays "marry". Conservatives trying to go after gays and ruin their lives. But conservatives are even losing "Big Business" support for their anti gay legislation.

Republicans trying to keep Americans from health care or trying to keep them stuck with substandard policies. Even Republican Governors are now pushing Obamacare. Only they are trying to call it by another name like 'Help those in Indiana see doctors' or some such nonsense.

When you look at disastrous GOP policies since Reagan, all we can say is "Thank God for Liberals".

I just read the content of your post. LMBBFFAO!

 

[mot1man]

To the op, you are absolutely full of shit and I don't mind pointing out.

Sent from my XT1060 using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[rdean]

The first thing you say is "Pro Slavery" the start this thread?

Well, blacks and liberals were fighting someone. Who was it they were fighting?

 

[TheOldSchool]

I'll be smoking pot on a mountain in 2 weeks. Can't wait! Fuck yea liberals

 

[deltex1]

Most societies, in the end, Progress.

And we will progress again...as soon as "the end" (as in asshole) is gone.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

The first thing you say is "Pro Slavery" the start this thread?

Well, blacks and liberals were fighting someone. Who was it they were fighting?

The same Classical Liberals (Libertarians today) that believed in the unalienable rights endowed to all persons by Nature's God were fighting slavery.

The Democrats, or [modern] liberals, that you speak of, believe in Government granted privileges, instead of God given rights. Sir Robert Filmer's Patriarcha is the predecessor of modern Authoritarian thought, the very thing which John Locke strove to overturn in his writings.

Allow me to quote from my own book:

Now we will return to Sir Robert's Patriarcha, and cast aside the involvement of religion (God) in doctrine of Divine Right. When we have removed religion, we are left with the raw embodiment of Statism, which decrees that the State is Sovereign over the people, and that the people exist at the mercy and grace of the State, thus these people are Subjects, and their rulers are Kings.
*
*****People living under this doctrine, willingly or unwillingly, possess no rights, for the State is sovereign over all things, and thus the State has unlimited rights, infinite in its power. The State will usually relegate most of its powers to the Subjects, as it would be both inconvenient and impractical to administer the entirety of its infinite power in finite Time. Thus the State must prioritize which powers it exercises, because it only has limited Time and resources to execute its authority.
*
*****The first among these priorities will be to exercise the powers required to preserve its authority. Any time the Subjects of the State use their relegated privileges to challenge the State, the State will hastily disparage that privilege among those who are resisting them, and sometimes deny the privilege completely. In times of great peril to the Kings who administer the State, they will revoke the privilege entirely among all their Subjects. Once revoked, it will never be regained by the Subjects; the State does not forgive, it does not forget, and it will never relinquish that privilege again.
*
*****In order to make sure that the people no longer continue to exercise that privilege, it will perpetually police its Subjects, for the failure to police the Subjects will result in a challenge to the authority of the State, which must not be questioned. Herein is the guiding principle behind the Police State. A government founded on the doctrine of Statism cannot guarantee its infinite sovereignty by doctrine alone, it must rely upon a compliant police or military, a Privileged class of Subjects, granted innumerable benefits and privileges that no ordinary Subject may possess (in short, a Nobility).
*
*****Recalling that the State must prioritize which powers to invoke, because the State is limited by Time, we must pay heed to the innovations of modern technology. Technology is a neutral entity; it can be used for both good and ill. The most important feature of technology, is that it allows a person or party (government) to use its Time more efficiently, allowing the person or party to accomplish more tasks in a given measure of time than previously before. As a consequence, as technology improves, the State is able to exercise additional powers, because it can use its Time more efficiently, and thus can Police its citizens even more than ever before, further reducing any perceived threats. Remember, that any government operating under the Doctrine of Statism only relegates those privileges to its Subjects that it cannot reasonable exercise in respect to its other priorities. However, once the Government has the ability to Police that right without diminishing other priorities, it will immediately revoke that privilege among its Subjects and reserve that right exclusively to itself.
*
*****So if we had to define Statism in a nutshell, it would be this: All rights are reserved to the State, and people within the State are Subjects to its Supreme Sovereignty, thus any rights that the Subjects exercise are but mere privileges, either granted by the State directly, or graced upon the Subjects by silent acquiescence. The State, being the Supreme Sovereign, may deny, disparage or revoke those privileges among any or all of its Subjects, for any or no cause. Therefore, the Subjects have no rights, but mere legal privileges.

Sounds familiar? NSA, NDAA ring a bell?

 

[rdean]

Just 10 years ago George Bush promised a constitutional amendment enshrining discrimination against the gays. Now they are getting married and serving in the military. Who knew?

 

[rdean]

The first thing you say is "Pro Slavery" the start this thread?

Well, blacks and liberals were fighting someone. Who was it they were fighting?

The same Classical Liberals (Libertarians today) that believed in the unalienable rights endowed to all persons by Nature's God were fighting slavery.

The Democrats, or [modern] liberals, that you speak of, believe in Government granted privileges, instead of God given rights. Sir Robert Filmer's Patriarcha is the predecessor of modern Authoritarian thought, the very thing which John Locke strove to overturn in his writings.

Allow me to quote from my own book:

Now we will return to Sir Robert's Patriarcha, and cast aside the involvement of religion (God) in doctrine of Divine Right. When we have removed religion, we are left with the raw embodiment of Statism, which decrees that the State is Sovereign over the people, and that the people exist at the mercy and grace of the State, thus these people are Subjects, and their rulers are Kings.
*
*****People living under this doctrine, willingly or unwillingly, possess no rights, for the State is sovereign over all things, and thus the State has unlimited rights, infinite in its power. The State will usually relegate most of its powers to the Subjects, as it would be both inconvenient and impractical to administer the entirety of its infinite power in finite Time. Thus the State must prioritize which powers it exercises, because it only has limited Time and resources to execute its authority.
*
*****The first among these priorities will be to exercise the powers required to preserve its authority. Any time the Subjects of the State use their relegated privileges to challenge the State, the State will hastily disparage that privilege among those who are resisting them, and sometimes deny the privilege completely. In times of great peril to the Kings who administer the State, they will revoke the privilege entirely among all their Subjects. Once revoked, it will never be regained by the Subjects; the State does not forgive, it does not forget, and it will never relinquish that privilege again.
*
*****In order to make sure that the people no longer continue to exercise that privilege, it will perpetually police its Subjects, for the failure to police the Subjects will result in a challenge to the authority of the State, which must not be questioned. Herein is the guiding principle behind the Police State. A government founded on the doctrine of Statism cannot guarantee its infinite sovereignty by doctrine alone, it must rely upon a compliant police or military, a Privileged class of Subjects, granted innumerable benefits and privileges that no ordinary Subject may possess (in short, a Nobility).
*
*****Recalling that the State must prioritize which powers to invoke, because the State is limited by Time, we must pay heed to the innovations of modern technology. Technology is a neutral entity; it can be used for both good and ill. The most important feature of technology, is that it allows a person or party (government) to use its Time more efficiently, allowing the person or party to accomplish more tasks in a given measure of time than previously before. As a consequence, as technology improves, the State is able to exercise additional powers, because it can use its Time more efficiently, and thus can Police its citizens even more than ever before, further reducing any perceived threats. Remember, that any government operating under the Doctrine of Statism only relegates those privileges to its Subjects that it cannot reasonable exercise in respect to its other priorities. However, once the Government has the ability to Police that right without diminishing other priorities, it will immediately revoke that privilege among its Subjects and reserve that right exclusively to itself.
*
*****So if we had to define Statism in a nutshell, it would be this: All rights are reserved to the State, and people within the State are Subjects to its Supreme Sovereignty, thus any rights that the Subjects exercise are but mere privileges, either granted by the State directly, or graced upon the Subjects by silent acquiescence. The State, being the Supreme Sovereign, may deny, disparage or revoke those privileges among any or all of its Subjects, for any or no cause. Therefore, the Subjects have no rights, but mere legal privileges.

Sounds familiar? NSA, NDAA ring a bell?

The reaction you get from Liberals reading such nonsense.

 

[The Rabbi]

Venezuela certainly proves that. We see how that's worked out. Sweden too.