Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And the steel was shipped off to China as fast as they could load the ships...
two farts in a row from you Moron In the Hat.
Now if I hadnt just posted just now that would have been THREE farts in a row from you Moron In the Hat.
Interesting fun fact. Bar-B-Q grills are impervious to the power of thermate.
LiveLeak.com - Lighting a Grill with a Thermate Grenade (Volume Warning)
Another indication that the device might have been a reactor is the quantity of fallout. The fallout refers to the ppms found in the dust from the World Trade Center by the USGS. Different estimates are available for the mass of the towers and how much of that mass was steel as opposed to concrete. These estimates are very close to 200,000 tons of steel and 400,000 tons of concrete for the two Twin Towers together, total.Conservatively, we can estimate that 100,000 tons of structural concrete from each of the towers was pulverized into dust from the force of the explosions. With a minimum of 600ppm of Strontium and 1000ppm by weight of Zinc present in the dust, that translates into 60 tons of Strontium and 100 tons of Zinc in the dust. If we generously assume that as much as one third of the Uranium originally present transmuted into Strontium, this would put the original mass of Uranium present at about 470 tons, per tower. This is a staggering amount. If a lower portion of the Uranium in reactors fssioned into Strontium, then even more Uranium would have been present. How Much Uranium Is There In Nuclear Devices? This depends upon size and power alone. Taking the example of the Indian Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor, this contains 1,758 fuel subassemblies in the core; each subassembly is made up of 217 tubes or fuel pins with an outside diameter of 6.6mm, an internal diameter of 5.7mm and a length of 2.7m. This gives a volume of 6.9 x10-5m 3per pin and a total fuel volume of 26.3 m 3 in the core. The fuel used is normally an 80% - 20% mixture of Uranium Oxide and Plutonium Oxide but enriched Uranium was used on earlier FBR reactors. Lets assume we use a pure Uranium fuel, which means we are exaggerating the amount of Uranium present in an FBR, but on the other hand FBRs (there are only a handful in operation) have a smaller core than a conventional thermal reactor so this estimate will actually be lower than what we would expect in a conventional nuclear reactor.Uranium has a density of 18,950 kg m
-3. Therefore with a volume of 26.3m3 of fuel, this equates to nearly 500tons of Uranium present in the cores.These estimates may not be so far off the mark and they seem to support the view that if these explosions we're caused by reactors and not bombs that there were two reactors, and perhaps more. With one larger reactor under each tower this would account for the seismic signals and nuclear blast signatures. So the amount of fallout maybe consistent with more then one reactor.For another example we can consider the small Magnox nuclear reactor first built at Calder Hall in the UK, which went live in 1956. This contained 10,200 fuel elements, each rod of Uranium one meter long with a diameter of 25mm. The total volume of Uranium was therefore 5m3 and the total weight of Uranium fuel in the core was 95tons. This was a small reactor by modern standards but still contains over 1000 times as much Uranium as would be found in a small atomic bomb. The quantity of fallout that was measured in the World Trade Center dust is quite high and provides evidence that the explosions might have been caused by reactors yet there is equal potential that bombs were used since we arent privy to current high technology used or the infinite possibilities achieved by the nuclear research industry and the real truth is, we just dont know. We know, with conclusive data obtained from following decay paths that fission occurred in New York City on September 11th, 2001 but we dont know what type of device caused it.
In Dust part 1 we provide conclusive forensic evidence that ternary fission and probably quaternary fission occurred in New York City on September 11th. We have the bullet, which means there must have been a gun, but the gun disintegrated with the Twin Towers and we can now only speculate on what type of gun it was. In Dust part 2, we confirm beyond any doubt the existence of pools of molten metal and continuing high heat regenerating larger particulates that can only be accounted for as a result of nuclear activity. In Dust part 3, we examine Myeloma, Controlled Demolition and the China Syndrome. Here we will examine the evidence related to technologies that are advanced and technologies we have very little information on, but we do have some, and enough to know they exist. What do we know for certain? 1. We see fission occurring in New York City on September 11th. 2. The large amount of Zinc produced is a typical of known nuclear explosion types. 3. The speculation that hundreds of tons of Uranium may have been present based on the very high levels of Barium and Strontium found in the World Trade Center dust samples. 4. An area of 50 miles around New York City was not destroyed. When the World Trade Center was constructed, the famous metal Sculpture was commissioned from the German artist Fritz Konig. It was installed in the plaza between the towers, where it rotated once every 24 hours. Konig called it the Great Spherical Caryatid. A caryatid is a female version of Atlas, who carried the world on his shoulders. The sculpture was supposed to signify world peace through commerce. Konigs Sphere as it became known survived the destruction of the towers largely intact, can be seen in many photos taken at Ground Zero, and was re-installed in Battery Park in 2002. The original height of the sphere was 7.62 meters, which is a significant harmonic number in wave mechanics. (Konigs Sphere is pictured at Ground Zero on the next page
) In the light of what we know, that there are advanced nuclear reactor designs and advanced weapons designs, this supposedly bronze and steel metal sculpture that managed to survive pulverization by thousands of tons of falling steel and concrete, becomes an intriguing object. At first glance it looks more like a functional technical artefact then a piece of abstract modern art sculpture. It seems to have little to do with peace through commerce and more the function of a collecting device at the focus of a parabolic refactor or other type of wave concentrator. The World Trade Center Memorial After the collapse, an international competition was held to select an architectural design for a permanent memorial to mark the World Trade Center site. The winning design and a number of other entries have as their central feature a sunken pool of water covering the footprint of each tower. Visitors will descend through a passageway to the side of the pool, which they can then look at through a veil of falling water, cascading down the sides of the sunken enclosure. Water is one of the best radiation absorbers. Its used to cover the control rods in nuclear reactors because it works to protect humans from the severe radiation that would otherwise be absorbed.It is also inconspicuous. Covering the footprint of each tower with water and protecting visitors with a curtain of water is an effective way to contain at least the direct radiation emitted upwards by the remains of whatever nuclear devices may remain down there, buried 100 meters below the ground.
So, someone posts a video of who knows what and you consider it to be factual? Are you really that gullible, or is it confirmation bias?
Usually when someone dumps a black granular substance from a rifle cartridge you can assume it to be gunpowder, no?
And where is this goofy bar b q boy going to get a thermate grenade, anyway?
Your 'videos' prove nothing other than you are unwillingness to address the question I've asked.
What handheld cutting device can cut through 5 inch thick steel at a temperature so high that it leaves massive amounts of slag visible at the cut?
Your problem is denial, or more technically, cognitive dissonance http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance. Please adjust. You don't even bother to read other people's posts. In the video that eots posted, "Thermite Cutting Steele - Validated - Experimentally Demonstrated," if you had bothered to watch it, all of your questions would have been addressed. There is really no reason for you to post any further. You are being an disingenuous troll if you do.Tell me how much therm?te it would take to burn through 5 inches of steel considering Nat Geo couldn't even damage 1/2 steel with 175 pounds of it.
Then tell me how they concealed the massive amount of therm?te so that none of the office workers or maintenance crews saw it.
National Geographic couldn't cut a thinner column with 175 pounds of thermite...
What National Geographic has to say about thermite and 9/11/2001 - YouTube
... the Mythbusters couldn't cut an SUV in half with 1000 pounds of thermite... (starts at 3:00 minutes)
MythBusters-End With a Bang-Part 5 - YouTube
... yet the 9/11 perps cut 5 inch thick columns with thermite charges small enough not to be noticed??
National Geographic couldn't cut a thinner column with 175 pounds of thermite...
What National Geographic has to say about thermite and 9/11/2001 - YouTube
... the Mythbusters couldn't cut an SUV in half with 1000 pounds of thermite... (starts at 3:00 minutes)
MythBusters-End With a Bang-Part 5 - YouTube
... yet the 9/11 perps cut 5 inch thick columns with thermite charges small enough not to be noticed??
And of course the fires started by the planes would have set off this thermite immediately. Oh wait, there were no planes...I forgot.
Carry on.
I think this is probably where the public get confused, and really it is a bizarre story. It is also what there is a separate truth movement that is sort of arcane, that most of the truth movement doesn't understand. It is called the "Pilots for Truth" movement. But it is integral for gaining a complete picture. It is instructive for us to realize that remote piloted technology was available long before drones were in common use in the middle east. but they were not used. They certainly made a great debut on 911.And of course the fires started by the planes would have set off this thermite immediately. Oh wait, there were no planes...I forgot.
Carry on.
So, someone posts a video of who knows what and you consider it to be factual? Are you really that gullible, or is it confirmation bias?
Usually when someone dumps a black granular substance from a rifle cartridge you can assume it to be gunpowder, no?
And where is this goofy bar b q boy going to get a thermate grenade, anyway?
Your 'videos' prove nothing other than you are unwillingness to address the question I've asked.
What handheld cutting device can cut through 5 inch thick steel at a temperature so high that it leaves massive amounts of slag visible at the cut?
Tell me how much therm?te it would take to burn through 5 inches of steel considering Nat Geo couldn't even damage 1/2 steel with 175 pounds of it.
Then tell me how they concealed the massive amount of therm?te so that none of the office workers or maintenance crews saw it.
I think this is probably where the public get confused, and really it is a bizarre story. It is also what there is a separate truth movement that is sort of arcane, that most of the truth movement doesn't understand. It is called the "Pilots for Truth" movement. But it is integral for gaining a complete picture. It is instructive for us to realize that remote piloted technology was available long before drones were in common use in the middle east. but they were not used. They certainly made a great debut on 911.And of course the fires started by the planes would have set off this thermite immediately. Oh wait, there were no planes...I forgot.
Carry on.
Ahh, so the passengers bought tickets to flights that didn't exist.It is not posited so much that there "were no planes," so much as that what flew into the World Trade Centers were not what we were told. Why? Well, first off, two of the planes that we were told were supposed to be flying that day, were not actually scheduled to be flying.
Ahh supposedly crashed. What happened to the passengers? Any idea?Two planes that supposedly crashed, at the time of the crash, still were in the air, AFTER the crash. All planes have transponders, things that plot where they should be, and these continued to track their location, after the crashes.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/ACARS-CONFIRMED-911-AIRCRAFT-AIRBORNE-LONG-AFTER-CRASH.html
So tell me how cars and trucks got flipped upside down, and became scorched?
National Geographic couldn't cut a thinner column with 175 pounds of thermite...
What National Geographic has to say about thermite and 9/11/2001 - YouTube
... the Mythbusters couldn't cut an SUV in half with 1000 pounds of thermite... (starts at 3:00 minutes)
MythBusters-End With a Bang-Part 5 - YouTube
... yet the 9/11 perps cut 5 inch thick columns with thermite charges small enough not to be noticed??
And of course the fires started by the planes would have set off this thermite immediately. Oh wait, there were no planes...I forgot.
Carry on.
National Geographic couldn't cut a thinner column with 175 pounds of thermite...
What National Geographic has to say about thermite and 9/11/2001 - YouTube
... the Mythbusters couldn't cut an SUV in half with 1000 pounds of thermite... (starts at 3:00 minutes)
MythBusters-End With a Bang-Part 5 - YouTube
... yet the 9/11 perps cut 5 inch thick columns with thermite charges small enough not to be noticed??
And of course the fires started by the planes would have set off this thermite immediately. Oh wait, there were no planes...I forgot.
Carry on.
Fuel fires don't burn hot enough to set them off. It takes something hotter, like magnesium. But you already knew that and are just hoping that no one else does.
