Evidence surfaces that allegations against Biden weren't "just made up"

[Coyote]

Hopeful Biden, the first rapist presidential candidate of the democrat party.

And if he wins, he will be following the Republican rapist in office.

So YOUR moral boundaries and requirements for YOUR support of another man is based on the misbehavior as you see it of Trump?
Bidens promiscuity is now acceptable?
Bidens invasion of womens personal space is now acceptable?
Biden sexually assaulting this woman is now acceptable?

All because a man you loathe sets what standards of conduct are personally acceptable to you?

I am going to give a more serious answer here because it deserves one.

You made three claims As statements of “fact”
1. Promiscuity? Based on what?
2. Accurate point, but again I will point out that he is of a different generation and from accounts I have read has always been like that. Only in the past couple of years, when he is seen as a potential candidate, does it seem to matter.
3. Something you are also saying as if it were a statement of fact when it isn’t. I will wait on what comes out of the filing of the police report.

Now, what about you? Where are your moral boundaries and are they driven by political partisanship? Look at Kavanaugh. What did you say about that? You didn’t announce the allegations as fact did you? You didn’t put forth the guilty until proven innocent allegations did you?

So what is it? Is assumption of guilt based on party affiliation? (And yes, when it came to Kavanaugh, the Dems were deplorable).

Oh, he has "always been like that".

That settles it then...

I recall that during the Kavanaugh case, every leftist was banging on the "guilty until proven innocent". And now you expect people to be charitable? Is it not a bit late? I did not hear any apologies.

I recall that as well except, not every leftist. You saw what Candy Corn posted. My feeling was not too far from that as well And I have reiterated it here.

How about you? Is it guilty until proven innocent? Is that your choice?

MeToo is now weaponized. Is that a good thing?

 

[Norman]

TDS morons are falling all over themselves to let Biden off the hook for this.

That's not what i see. What i see is a bunch of my liberal friends already saying they are not voting for him in November.

Name one in this forum.

For myself, if it comes down to him or Trump in the end, I will vote for Biden over Trump. There is no conceivable alternate candidate. When the right claims outrage...they need to realize that their own candidate is flawed in the sexual behavior department so is no moral high road.

I am viewing this as another Trump-Clinton choice. Our country may not survive another 4 years of Trump rule with our democratic institutions and values intact. Biden is boring and politically close to the center. Is that cynical? You bet. But I am seeing it as the devil’s choice and I will be keeping a close eye on the VP.

What do you mean no high-ground?

I am quite certain that someone who does not sexually harass women indeed, has a moral high-ground.

 

[Coyote]

TDS morons are falling all over themselves to let Biden off the hook for this.

That's not what i see. What i see is a bunch of my liberal friends already saying they are not voting for him in November.

Name one in this forum.

For myself, if it comes down to him or Trump in the end, I will vote for Biden over Trump. There is no conceivable alternate candidate. When the right claims outrage...they need to realize that their own candidate is flawed in the sexual behavior department so is no moral high road.

I am viewing this as another Trump-Clinton choice. Our country may not survive another 4 years of Trump rule with our democratic institutions and values intact. Biden is boring and politically close to the center. Is that cynical? You bet. But I am seeing it as the devil’s choice and I will be keeping a close eye on the VP.

What do you mean no high-ground?

I am quite certain that someone who does not sexually harass women indeed, has a moral high-ground.

Then you certainly can not be talking about Trump.

 

[Norman]

TDS morons are falling all over themselves to let Biden off the hook for this.

That's not what i see. What i see is a bunch of my liberal friends already saying they are not voting for him in November.

Name one in this forum.

For myself, if it comes down to him or Trump in the end, I will vote for Biden over Trump. There is no conceivable alternate candidate. When the right claims outrage...they need to realize that their own candidate is flawed in the sexual behavior department so is no moral high road.

I am viewing this as another Trump-Clinton choice. Our country may not survive another 4 years of Trump rule with our democratic institutions and values intact. Biden is boring and politically close to the center. Is that cynical? You bet. But I am seeing it as the devil’s choice and I will be keeping a close eye on the VP.

What do you mean no high-ground?

I am quite certain that someone who does not sexually harass women indeed, has a moral high-ground.

Then you certainly can not be talking about Trump.

Just few posts ago you were reminding us about the role of evidence.

Now you claim president Trump has sexually harassed someone, with zero evidence.

This is why people have stopped playing your stupid games. Again, the accuser has filed a police report, it's not just a baseless accusation. Biden will be dragged through mud, he will be lucky if he can't recall where he is.

 

[bripat9643]

TDS morons are falling all over themselves to let Biden off the hook for this.

That's not what i see. What i see is a bunch of my liberal friends already saying they are not voting for him in November.

Name one in this forum.

For myself, if it comes down to him or Trump in the end, I will vote for Biden over Trump. There is no conceivable alternate candidate. When the right claims outrage...they need to realize that their own candidate is flawed in the sexual behavior department so is no moral high road.

I am viewing this as another Trump-Clinton choice. Our country may not survive another 4 years of Trump rule with our democratic institutions and values intact. Biden is boring and politically close to the center. Is that cynical? You bet. But I am seeing it as the devil’s choice and I will be keeping a close eye on the VP.

ROFL! We claim hypocrisy, and we are right. Dims are the ones who specialize in expressing outrage. You have dragged Republicans through the mud time after time, and demanded that Republicans renounce whoever was in the cross hairs. Now you claim you are just practicing business as usual. Right, "usual" for a bunch of scumbag hypocrites.

 

[JoeB131]

MeToo is now weaponized. Is that a good thing?

#MeToo reminds me of LBJ's observation about the differences between Liberals and Cannibals. Cannibals don't eat their friends.

 

[bripat9643]

Hopeful Biden, the first rapist presidential candidate of the democrat party.

And if he wins, he will be following the Republican rapist in office.

So YOUR moral boundaries and requirements for YOUR support of another man is based on the misbehavior as you see it of Trump?
Bidens promiscuity is now acceptable?
Bidens invasion of womens personal space is now acceptable?
Biden sexually assaulting this woman is now acceptable?

All because a man you loathe sets what standards of conduct are personally acceptable to you?

I am going to give a more serious answer here because it deserves one.

You made three claims As statements of “fact”
1. Promiscuity? Based on what?
2. Accurate point, but again I will point out that he is of a different generation and from accounts I have read has always been like that. Only in the past couple of years, when he is seen as a potential candidate, does it seem to matter.
3. Something you are also saying as if it were a statement of fact when it isn’t. I will wait on what comes out of the filing of the police report.

Now, what about you? Where are your moral boundaries and are they driven by political partisanship? Look at Kavanaugh. What did you say about that? You didn’t announce the allegations as fact did you? You didn’t put forth the guilty until proven innocent allegations did you?

So what is it? Is assumption of guilt based on party affiliation? (And yes, when it came to Kavanaugh, the Dems were deplorable).

Oh, he has "always been like that".

That settles it then...

I recall that during the Kavanaugh case, every leftist was banging on the "guilty until proven innocent". And now you expect people to be charitable? Is it not a bit late? I did not hear any apologies.

I recall that as well except, not every leftist. You saw what Candy Corn posted. My feeling was not too far from that as well And I have reiterated it here.

How about you? Is it guilty until proven innocent? Is that your choice?

MeToo is now weaponized. Is that a good thing?

Guilty until proven innocent is the leftwing standard.

Who are you trying to kid?

#MeToo is weaponized only when a Dim is in the cross hairs?

Every time you post, all you do is expose your profound hypocrisy.

Please keep defending Biden. Republicans couldn't ask for a better opposition candidate.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

The MSM will all but ignore this new evidence.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

#MeToo -

 

[Coyote]

TDS morons are falling all over themselves to let Biden off the hook for this.

That's not what i see. What i see is a bunch of my liberal friends already saying they are not voting for him in November.

Name one in this forum.

For myself, if it comes down to him or Trump in the end, I will vote for Biden over Trump. There is no conceivable alternate candidate. When the right claims outrage...they need to realize that their own candidate is flawed in the sexual behavior department so is no moral high road.

I am viewing this as another Trump-Clinton choice. Our country may not survive another 4 years of Trump rule with our democratic institutions and values intact. Biden is boring and politically close to the center. Is that cynical? You bet. But I am seeing it as the devil’s choice and I will be keeping a close eye on the VP.

What do you mean no high-ground?

I am quite certain that someone who does not sexually harass women indeed, has a moral high-ground.

Then you certainly can not be talking about Trump.

Just few posts ago you were reminding us about the role of evidence.

Now you claim president Trump has sexually harassed someone, with zero evidence.

I am using the same arguments you are using on Biden. Unlike Biden though, Trump has cases in court, for example this one: Trump lawyers ask for halt in suit from woman alleging rape. So...zero evidence? It has not been thrown out of court. Let’s see what happens in court, though like the Biden case, this too was 30 years ago.

This is why people have stopped playing your stupid games. Again, the accuser has filed a police report, it's not just a baseless accusation. Biden will be dragged through mud, he will be lucky if he can't recall where he is.

Anyone can file a police report, there is no evidence required. Let’s see where it goes.

 

[bripat9643]

TDS morons are falling all over themselves to let Biden off the hook for this.

That's not what i see. What i see is a bunch of my liberal friends already saying they are not voting for him in November.

Name one in this forum.

For myself, if it comes down to him or Trump in the end, I will vote for Biden over Trump. There is no conceivable alternate candidate. When the right claims outrage...they need to realize that their own candidate is flawed in the sexual behavior department so is no moral high road.

I am viewing this as another Trump-Clinton choice. Our country may not survive another 4 years of Trump rule with our democratic institutions and values intact. Biden is boring and politically close to the center. Is that cynical? You bet. But I am seeing it as the devil’s choice and I will be keeping a close eye on the VP.

What do you mean no high-ground?

I am quite certain that someone who does not sexually harass women indeed, has a moral high-ground.

Then you certainly can not be talking about Trump.

Just few posts ago you were reminding us about the role of evidence.

Now you claim president Trump has sexually harassed someone, with zero evidence.

I am using the same arguments you are using on Biden. Unlike Biden though, Trump has cases in court, for example this one: Trump lawyers ask for halt in suit from woman alleging rape. So...zero evidence? It has not been thrown out of court. Let’s see what happens in court, though like the Biden case, this too was 30 years ago.

This is why people have stopped playing your stupid games. Again, the accuser has filed a police report, it's not just a baseless accusation. Biden will be dragged through mud, he will be lucky if he can't recall where he is.

Anyone can file a police report, there is no evidence required. Let’s see where it goes.

A lawsuit is evidence of nothing, dingbat. Anyone can file a lawsuit for any reason.

 

[bripat9643]

TDS morons are falling all over themselves to let Biden off the hook for this.

That's not what i see. What i see is a bunch of my liberal friends already saying they are not voting for him in November.

Name one in this forum.

For myself, if it comes down to him or Trump in the end, I will vote for Biden over Trump. There is no conceivable alternate candidate. When the right claims outrage...they need to realize that their own candidate is flawed in the sexual behavior department so is no moral high road.

I am viewing this as another Trump-Clinton choice. Our country may not survive another 4 years of Trump rule with our democratic institutions and values intact. Biden is boring and politically close to the center. Is that cynical? You bet. But I am seeing it as the devil’s choice and I will be keeping a close eye on the VP.

What do you mean no high-ground?

I am quite certain that someone who does not sexually harass women indeed, has a moral high-ground.

Then you certainly can not be talking about Trump.

Just few posts ago you were reminding us about the role of evidence.

Now you claim president Trump has sexually harassed someone, with zero evidence.

I am using the same arguments you are using on Biden. Unlike Biden though, Trump has cases in court, for example this one: Trump lawyers ask for halt in suit from woman alleging rape. So...zero evidence? It has not been thrown out of court. Let’s see what happens in court, though like the Biden case, this too was 30 years ago.

This is why people have stopped playing your stupid games. Again, the accuser has filed a police report, it's not just a baseless accusation. Biden will be dragged through mud, he will be lucky if he can't recall where he is.

Anyone can file a police report, there is no evidence required. Let’s see where it goes.

There are penalties for filing false police reports.

 

[Coyote]

Hopeful Biden, the first rapist presidential candidate of the democrat party.

And if he wins, he will be following the Republican rapist in office.

So YOUR moral boundaries and requirements for YOUR support of another man is based on the misbehavior as you see it of Trump?
Bidens promiscuity is now acceptable?
Bidens invasion of womens personal space is now acceptable?
Biden sexually assaulting this woman is now acceptable?

All because a man you loathe sets what standards of conduct are personally acceptable to you?

I am going to give a more serious answer here because it deserves one.

You made three claims As statements of “fact”
1. Promiscuity? Based on what?
2. Accurate point, but again I will point out that he is of a different generation and from accounts I have read has always been like that. Only in the past couple of years, when he is seen as a potential candidate, does it seem to matter.
3. Something you are also saying as if it were a statement of fact when it isn’t. I will wait on what comes out of the filing of the police report.

Now, what about you? Where are your moral boundaries and are they driven by political partisanship? Look at Kavanaugh. What did you say about that? You didn’t announce the allegations as fact did you? You didn’t put forth the guilty until proven innocent allegations did you?

So what is it? Is assumption of guilt based on party affiliation? (And yes, when it came to Kavanaugh, the Dems were deplorable).

Oh, he has "always been like that".

That settles it then...

I recall that during the Kavanaugh case, every leftist was banging on the "guilty until proven innocent". And now you expect people to be charitable? Is it not a bit late? I did not hear any apologies.

I recall that as well except, not every leftist. You saw what Candy Corn posted. My feeling was not too far from that as well And I have reiterated it here.

How about you? Is it guilty until proven innocent? Is that your choice?

MeToo is now weaponized. Is that a good thing?

Guilty until proven innocent is the leftwing standard.

Who are you trying to kid?

#MeToo is weaponized only when a Dim is in the cross hairs?

Nope. Not what I said. Try again.

So...tell us about “guilty until proven innocent” and how it relates to your standard when it comes to Biden? You are not, I assume a leftist.

Every time you post, all you do is expose your profound hypocrisy.

Please keep defending Biden. Republicans couldn't ask for a better opposition candidate.

look in the mirror lately?

 

[Coyote]

TDS morons are falling all over themselves to let Biden off the hook for this.

That's not what i see. What i see is a bunch of my liberal friends already saying they are not voting for him in November.

Name one in this forum.

For myself, if it comes down to him or Trump in the end, I will vote for Biden over Trump. There is no conceivable alternate candidate. When the right claims outrage...they need to realize that their own candidate is flawed in the sexual behavior department so is no moral high road.

I am viewing this as another Trump-Clinton choice. Our country may not survive another 4 years of Trump rule with our democratic institutions and values intact. Biden is boring and politically close to the center. Is that cynical? You bet. But I am seeing it as the devil’s choice and I will be keeping a close eye on the VP.

What do you mean no high-ground?

I am quite certain that someone who does not sexually harass women indeed, has a moral high-ground.

Then you certainly can not be talking about Trump.

Just few posts ago you were reminding us about the role of evidence.

Now you claim president Trump has sexually harassed someone, with zero evidence.

I am using the same arguments you are using on Biden. Unlike Biden though, Trump has cases in court, for example this one: Trump lawyers ask for halt in suit from woman alleging rape. So...zero evidence? It has not been thrown out of court. Let’s see what happens in court, though like the Biden case, this too was 30 years ago.

This is why people have stopped playing your stupid games. Again, the accuser has filed a police report, it's not just a baseless accusation. Biden will be dragged through mud, he will be lucky if he can't recall where he is.

Anyone can file a police report, there is no evidence required. Let’s see where it goes.

A lawsuit is evidence of nothing, dingbat. Anyone can file a lawsuit for any reason.

Indeed. But if it had zero merit (frivolous) tbe judge would throw it out.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

It's the daily mail.

What's next? National Enquirer?

Ad Hominem - Attacking the person making the argument, rather than the argument itself, when the attack on the person is completely irrelevant to the argument the person is making

 

[Coyote]

TDS morons are falling all over themselves to let Biden off the hook for this.

That's not what i see. What i see is a bunch of my liberal friends already saying they are not voting for him in November.

Name one in this forum.

For myself, if it comes down to him or Trump in the end, I will vote for Biden over Trump. There is no conceivable alternate candidate. When the right claims outrage...they need to realize that their own candidate is flawed in the sexual behavior department so is no moral high road.

I am viewing this as another Trump-Clinton choice. Our country may not survive another 4 years of Trump rule with our democratic institutions and values intact. Biden is boring and politically close to the center. Is that cynical? You bet. But I am seeing it as the devil’s choice and I will be keeping a close eye on the VP.

What do you mean no high-ground?

I am quite certain that someone who does not sexually harass women indeed, has a moral high-ground.

Then you certainly can not be talking about Trump.

Just few posts ago you were reminding us about the role of evidence.

Now you claim president Trump has sexually harassed someone, with zero evidence.

I am using the same arguments you are using on Biden. Unlike Biden though, Trump has cases in court, for example this one: Trump lawyers ask for halt in suit from woman alleging rape. So...zero evidence? It has not been thrown out of court. Let’s see what happens in court, though like the Biden case, this too was 30 years ago.

This is why people have stopped playing your stupid games. Again, the accuser has filed a police report, it's not just a baseless accusation. Biden will be dragged through mud, he will be lucky if he can't recall where he is.

Anyone can file a police report, there is no evidence required. Let’s see where it goes.

There are penalties for filing false police reports.

Indeed. And false lawsuits.

 

[Crepitus]

It's the daily mail.

What's next? National Enquirer?

Ad Hominem - Attacking the person making the argument, rather than the argument itself, when the attack on the person is completely irrelevant to the argument the person is making

The daily mail is the British equivalent of the national Enquirer. Were the enquirer listed as the source would you debate this as a serious topic?

I doubt it.

 

[pyetro]

Clip of Biden sex accuser's mother phoning into Larry King emerges

A 1993 clip has emerged alleging to show former Joe Biden staffer Tara Reade's mother Jeanette Altimus calling into Larry King about the former Vice President's alleged sexual assault of her daughter.

www.dailymail.co.uk

And low and behold CNN has removed THIS EPISODE from the play store online so wtf. Is CNN literally trying to hide evidence that this woman is telling the truth? All other episodes are for sale but this one is missing.....

Up until this point I have said that I didn't believe this woman because who waits 30 years to make an accusation right? Well here is corroboration of the incident from 27 years ago. Evidence that CNN was apparently trying to scrub.

No mention of sexual assault, no mention of Tara Reade. That's some bombshell lol.

 

[bripat9643]

Hopeful Biden, the first rapist presidential candidate of the democrat party.

And if he wins, he will be following the Republican rapist in office.

So YOUR moral boundaries and requirements for YOUR support of another man is based on the misbehavior as you see it of Trump?
Bidens promiscuity is now acceptable?
Bidens invasion of womens personal space is now acceptable?
Biden sexually assaulting this woman is now acceptable?

All because a man you loathe sets what standards of conduct are personally acceptable to you?

I am going to give a more serious answer here because it deserves one.

You made three claims As statements of “fact”
1. Promiscuity? Based on what?
2. Accurate point, but again I will point out that he is of a different generation and from accounts I have read has always been like that. Only in the past couple of years, when he is seen as a potential candidate, does it seem to matter.
3. Something you are also saying as if it were a statement of fact when it isn’t. I will wait on what comes out of the filing of the police report.

Now, what about you? Where are your moral boundaries and are they driven by political partisanship? Look at Kavanaugh. What did you say about that? You didn’t announce the allegations as fact did you? You didn’t put forth the guilty until proven innocent allegations did you?

So what is it? Is assumption of guilt based on party affiliation? (And yes, when it came to Kavanaugh, the Dems were deplorable).

Oh, he has "always been like that".

That settles it then...

I recall that during the Kavanaugh case, every leftist was banging on the "guilty until proven innocent". And now you expect people to be charitable? Is it not a bit late? I did not hear any apologies.

I recall that as well except, not every leftist. You saw what Candy Corn posted. My feeling was not too far from that as well And I have reiterated it here.

How about you? Is it guilty until proven innocent? Is that your choice?

MeToo is now weaponized. Is that a good thing?

Guilty until proven innocent is the leftwing standard.

Who are you trying to kid?

#MeToo is weaponized only when a Dim is in the cross hairs?

Nope. Not what I said. Try again.

So...tell us about “guilty until proven innocent” and how it relates to your standard when it comes to Biden? You are not, I assume a leftist.

Every time you post, all you do is expose your profound hypocrisy.

Please keep defending Biden. Republicans couldn't ask for a better opposition candidate.

look in the mirror lately?

The Dim standard is guilty until proven innocent. You'll demonstrated that beyond all doubt during the Kavanaugh hearings.

What am I hypocritical about? I'm holding you to your standard. Women should be believed, right?

 

[pyetro]

what exactly is this corroborating?

1. That she didn't just make this up
2. CNN is corrupt as fuck

Does the woman identify herself as the mother of Tara Reade? No. Sex isn't even mentioned.