Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
apnews.com
A good precedent.Ex-prosecutor charged in Ahmaud Arbery case booked at jail
SAVANNAH, Ga. (AP) — The former prosecutor charged with misconduct for her handling of the Ahmaud Arbery case was booked at a Georgia jail on Wednesday and released.
Good to see some justice coming her way. How many other racist shits need to be targetted after this case ?
Good stuff. Get rid of this institutionalized racism all the white racists claim don't exist.Ex-prosecutor charged in Ahmaud Arbery case booked at jail
SAVANNAH, Ga. (AP) — The former prosecutor charged with misconduct for her handling of the Ahmaud Arbery case was booked at a Georgia jail on Wednesday and released.
Good to see some justice coming her way. How many other racist shits need to be targetted after this case ?
I agree that whoever let him out was a dumbass but where did they try to cover up that guys crimes?A good precedent.
Now they can book that clown that let that felon out who ran over all those people at a parade in Wisconsin.
Political arrests usually only happen in shitholes like where you live. She broke no law. Perhaps it was bad judgement, but it's within the DA's purview to make recommendations to police. Commie, why don't you come over and get some of us?Ex-prosecutor charged in Ahmaud Arbery case booked at jail
SAVANNAH, Ga. (AP) — The former prosecutor charged with misconduct for her handling of the Ahmaud Arbery case was booked at a Georgia jail on Wednesday and released.
Good to see some justice coming her way. How many other racist shits need to be targetted after this case ?
If she broke no law why was she charged with a felony?Political arrests usually only happen in shitholes like where you live. She broke no law. Perhaps it was bad judgement, but it's within the DA's purview to make recommendations to police. Commie, why don't you come over and get some of us?
He advocates the release of these animals knowing and stating that they will kill again.Why would they do that? Are you looking for an anti-martyr?
The crime is knowing full well that they'll kill again and releasing them anyway.I agree that whoever let him out was a dumbass but where did they try to cover up that guys crimes?
Looks like she did.She broke no law
So now youre claiming the person was some kind of mystic that could predict the future?The crime is knowing full well that they'll kill again and releasing them anyway.
He, and others who think like and act as he did, need to face some consequences for the carnage.
No, sorry. We don't prosecute thought crimes.The crime is knowing full well that they'll kill again and releasing them anyway.
Why would they do that? Are you looking for an anti-martyr?
Da fuq? he said he knew that they will kill again. He STATED it. But his agenda is more important than the lives of a few peons in a society he obviously hates.So now youre claiming the person was some kind of mystic that could predict the future?
It is not a thought crime and we do prosecute actions that get people killed.No, sorry. We don't prosecute thought crimes.
The DA publicly agreed and is conducting a review of why he was offered such low bail.a guy has a long criminal record over years and just attempted to murder his girlfriend behind the wheel of a car, among other crimes and social media posts; as a general rule of common sense, maybe $1000 is putting the potential value of life and liberty a little too cheap. I say this as a staunch believer in Due Process and civil liberties
Of course it is. You can't prosecute someone for thinking something. Which is precisely what you suggested. Which is why it does not and never will happen. So abandon this fantasy and move on.It is not a thought crime and we do prosecute actions that get people killed.
Show me where he stated it....in context.Da fuq? he said he knew that they will kill again. He STATED it. But his agenda is more important than the lives of a few peons in a society he obviously hates.
But that would not matter anyway. Judges don't keep people incarcerated because prosecutors insist they know the future. Because they don't actually know rhe future.Show me where he stated it....in context.
That was going to be my follow up question.But that would not matter anyway. Judges don't keep people incarcerated because prosecutors insist they know the future. Because they don't actually know rhe future.
