Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Explain that to me. How does somebody making more money than you make you poorer?
Give me specifics.
repeating nonsense is just that...., how is greed possible under capitalism? If you own a business you pray your competitior gets greedy so you can drive him into bankruptcy. China just eliminated 40% of world poverty because capitalism squeezes out greed and forces people to care only about pleasing other people with goods and services that increase their standard of living at the fastest possible rate..as I said don't call me dear.bullshit !capitalism makes greed impossible. If a company is greedy a competitor can undersell him and drive him into bankruptcy. Socialism has no such regulation.......today's right wingers strongly defend corporate greed,,
dear, how is greed possible under capitalism? If you own a business you pray your competitior gets greedy so you can drive him into bankruptcy. China just eliminated 40% of world poverty because capitalism squeezes out greed and forces people to care only about pleasing other people with goods and services that increase their standard of living at the fastest possible rate..
Do you understand now?
the only thing of importance to understand about you is that you talk out your ass.
you can never be wrong as you are never right.
Do you understand now?
false! only pretentious limp dicks like you make that sort of fucking ridiculous pontification and expect not to be laughed at....Explain that to me. How does somebody making more money than you make you poorer?
Give me specifics.
a liberal is so stupid he thinks there is a fixed supply of money so that when one person acquires some that means another loses some. In fact its not a zero sum game. Everyone has more money and wealth than they had 100 years ago.
JUST DID......[
it depends on how they made "their" money.
most all billionaires by doing just that making other people poorer
Explain that to me. How does somebody making more money than you make you poorer?
Give me specifics.
only when it fits you purposes.... you are wrong, own it.yes it does ....Nope, that doesn't say "I am responsible for providing goods and services to others w/o compensation."We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.Where in the Constition does it say I am responsible for providing goods and services to others w/o compensation?
The first clause of Article I, Section 8, reads, "The Congress shall have Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States." This clause, called the General Welfare Clause or the Spending Power Clause, does not grant Congress the power to legislate for the general welfare of the country; that is a power reserved to the states through the Tenth Amendment. Rather, it merely allows Congress to spend federal money for the general welfare. The principle underlying this distinction—the limitation of federal power—eventually inspired the only important disagreement over the meaning of the clause.
According to James Madison, the clause authorized Congress to spend money, but only to carry out the powers and duties specifically enumerated in the subsequent clauses of Article I, Section 8, and elsewhere in the Constitution, not to meet the seemingly infinite needs of the general welfare. Alexander Hamilton maintained that the clause granted Congress the power to spend without limitation for the general welfare of the nation. The winner of this debate was not declared for 150 years.
want fires with that....
don't bother to rationalize that it does not mention individuals as the is very obviously implied.
Madison was correct. Hamilton was a lying scumbag.
How do they make other people poorer?it depends on how they made "their" money.Explain to me how somebody else having more money than you has ever made you poorer.
Be specific.
Get back to us next time someone steals your wallet.....I.e. thief has more money than you and now you're poorer.....
.......and, by the way, don't bother calling the cops since law enforcement is a tax-paid social program.
You didn't answer my question. Tell me how somebody having more money than you has made you poorer. I want specifics.
most all billionaires by doing just that making other people poorer
Explain that to me. How does somebody making more money than you make you poorer?
Give me specifics.
a liberal is so stupid he thinks there is a fixed supply of money so that when one person acquires some that means another loses some. In fact its not a zero sum game. Everyone has more money and wealth than they had 100 years ago.
false my statement is only confusing to low end of the gene pool types who need someone or something to blame for their own ignorance, lack of skill or luck .JUST DID......[
it depends on how they made "their" money.
most all billionaires by doing just that making other people poorer
Explain that to me. How does somebody making more money than you make you poorer?
Give me specifics.
You made a very confusing general statement that has no substance. I ask for specifics.
Show me where you are poorer because somebody else is richer. Be specific. Stop running away from the question.
By the way the real thieves are the welfare queens. I am poorer because over the years I have been forced by the filthy ass government to give them the money that I earned.
Explain that to me. How does somebody making more money than you make you poorer?
Give me specifics.
a liberal is so stupid he thinks there is a fixed supply of money so that when one person acquires some that means another loses some. In fact its not a zero sum game. Everyone has more money and wealth than they had 100 years ago.
Nobody, even a Moon Bat, is stupid enough to believe that there is a fixed amount of wealth and that if one person gets more then another person gets less.
These Moon Bats are doing nothing more than being envious. It is envy and greed on their part and they rationalize it by saying they are poorer because somebody else is richer.
you like lot of so called conservatives have no fucking clue as to what freedom means or what to do with it passed your own childish and selfish needs..only when it fits you purposes.... you are wrong, own it.yes it does ....Nope, that doesn't say "I am responsible for providing goods and services to others w/o compensation."We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
The first clause of Article I, Section 8, reads, "The Congress shall have Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States." This clause, called the General Welfare Clause or the Spending Power Clause, does not grant Congress the power to legislate for the general welfare of the country; that is a power reserved to the states through the Tenth Amendment. Rather, it merely allows Congress to spend federal money for the general welfare. The principle underlying this distinction—the limitation of federal power—eventually inspired the only important disagreement over the meaning of the clause.
According to James Madison, the clause authorized Congress to spend money, but only to carry out the powers and duties specifically enumerated in the subsequent clauses of Article I, Section 8, and elsewhere in the Constitution, not to meet the seemingly infinite needs of the general welfare. Alexander Hamilton maintained that the clause granted Congress the power to spend without limitation for the general welfare of the nation. The winner of this debate was not declared for 150 years.
want fires with that....
don't bother to rationalize that it does not mention individuals as the is very obviously implied.
Madison was correct. Hamilton was a lying scumbag.
My purpose is the same as the purpose of most of the Founding Fathers: freedom. Of course, Hamilton had a different purpose. He even wanted to setup the United States as a monarchy, so it's easy to see what his ulterior purpose was.
asked and answered. you just don't like the answer..stop repeating...How do they make other people poorer?it depends on how they made "their" money.Explain to me how somebody else having more money than you has ever made you poorer.
Be specific.
Get back to us next time someone steals your wallet.....I.e. thief has more money than you and now you're poorer.....
.......and, by the way, don't bother calling the cops since law enforcement is a tax-paid social program.
You didn't answer my question. Tell me how somebody having more money than you has made you poorer. I want specifics.
most all billionaires by doing just that making other people poorer
repeating nonsense is just that...., how is greed possible under capitalism? If you own a business you pray your competitior gets greedy so you can drive him into bankruptcy. China just eliminated 40% of world poverty because capitalism squeezes out greed and forces people to care only about pleasing other people with goods and services that increase their standard of living at the fastest possible rate..as I said don't call me dear.bullshit !capitalism makes greed impossible. If a company is greedy a competitor can undersell him and drive him into bankruptcy. Socialism has no such regulation.
dear, how is greed possible under capitalism? If you own a business you pray your competitior gets greedy so you can drive him into bankruptcy. China just eliminated 40% of world poverty because capitalism squeezes out greed and forces people to care only about pleasing other people with goods and services that increase their standard of living at the fastest possible rate..
Do you understand now?
the only thing of importance to understand about you is that you talk out your ass.
you can never be wrong as you are never right.
Do you understand now?
do you understand now?
false assumption....Explain that to me. How does somebody making more money than you make you poorer?
Give me specifics.
a liberal is so stupid he thinks there is a fixed supply of money so that when one person acquires some that means another loses some. In fact its not a zero sum game. Everyone has more money and wealth than they had 100 years ago.
Nobody, even a Moon Bat, is stupid enough to believe that there is a fixed amount of wealth and that if one person gets more then another person gets less.
These Moon Bats are doing nothing more than being envious. It is envy and greed on their part and they rationalize it by saying they are poorer because somebody else is richer.
I think you're wrong about that. All the liberal turds posting in this forum believe it. Their entire world-view is predicated on the proposition.
you like lot of so called conservatives have no fucking clue as to what freedom means or what to do with it passed your own childish and selfish needs..only when it fits you purposes.... you are wrong, own it.yes it does ....Nope, that doesn't say "I am responsible for providing goods and services to others w/o compensation."
The first clause of Article I, Section 8, reads, "The Congress shall have Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States." This clause, called the General Welfare Clause or the Spending Power Clause, does not grant Congress the power to legislate for the general welfare of the country; that is a power reserved to the states through the Tenth Amendment. Rather, it merely allows Congress to spend federal money for the general welfare. The principle underlying this distinction—the limitation of federal power—eventually inspired the only important disagreement over the meaning of the clause.
According to James Madison, the clause authorized Congress to spend money, but only to carry out the powers and duties specifically enumerated in the subsequent clauses of Article I, Section 8, and elsewhere in the Constitution, not to meet the seemingly infinite needs of the general welfare. Alexander Hamilton maintained that the clause granted Congress the power to spend without limitation for the general welfare of the nation. The winner of this debate was not declared for 150 years.
want fires with that....
don't bother to rationalize that it does not mention individuals as the is very obviously implied.
Madison was correct. Hamilton was a lying scumbag.
My purpose is the same as the purpose of most of the Founding Fathers: freedom. Of course, Hamilton had a different purpose. He even wanted to setup the United States as a monarchy, so it's easy to see what his ulterior purpose was.
proclaiming you and the founding fathers have anything in common is laughable..
[]false my statement is only confusing to low end of the gene pool types who need someone or something to blame for their own ignorance, lack of skill or luck .
throw in a heavy dose of an unearned sense of entitlement and guys like you appear.
false assumption....Explain that to me. How does somebody making more money than you make you poorer?
Give me specifics.
a liberal is so stupid he thinks there is a fixed supply of money so that when one person acquires some that means another loses some. In fact its not a zero sum game. Everyone has more money and wealth than they had 100 years ago.
Nobody, even a Moon Bat, is stupid enough to believe that there is a fixed amount of wealth and that if one person gets more then another person gets less.
These Moon Bats are doing nothing more than being envious. It is envy and greed on their part and they rationalize it by saying they are poorer because somebody else is richer.
I think you're wrong about that. All the liberal turds posting in this forum believe it. Their entire world-view is predicated on the proposition.
you and the founding fathers have anything in common is laughable..
[]false my statement is only confusing to low end of the gene pool types who need someone or something to blame for their own ignorance, lack of skill or luck .
throw in a heavy dose of an unearned sense of entitlement and guys like you appear.
You haven't given one specific example of how you are poorer because somebody else is richer, even though I have asked a half dozen times.
You have nothing. Typical for a Moon Bat.
