Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't believe "homophobe" is in the same class of hate speech as "******". However, I understand your point.
I see no difference at all. Both are meant to intimidate in order to stifle conversation.
When two gay people have sex, do they run the risk of creating a child with horrible genetic mutations?
Use that head, Steve.
My niece's husband has a huge chance of having a child with MS, are you saying there should be a law that they couldn't marry?
No he doesn't. You are full of shit. MS has never been considered hereditary. I have a higher chance of developing it because I live in Eastern Washington than any of relatives children.
Stop being a moron, and speaking out of your ass.
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
Did I say that? Being abused doesn't make you gay, being born gay does.
But nice try bigot. Tell me again how gay people are like this man and have no honor.
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
Did I say that? I do love how you are comparing homosexuality to adultery. Keep going, everyone should know what an ignorant bigot you are.
I compared being gay to adultery? Where did I do this? Where did we even speak of adultery?
And you did say that. The only people I am bigot against is people like you, who compare homosexuality to having sex with your child and claim they have no honor because they didn't fight the urge to be gay. FYI, you compared that to adultery, not me smart one.
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
Odds are the father has sexually abused the daughter as a child. What young, heterosexual female, without "daddy" issues is attracted to men in that age range? Since this is in fact her real "daddy" something is definitely askew. I'm willing to bet the daughter is not his only victim
My sister married a man 2 years younger than my mother. She didn't have "daddy" issues, she had "sugar daddy" issues. He was already established with a home of his own, she didn't have to go through the ruff times the rest of us did. To her credit, she's still married to him and it's been over 35 years.
I think women that have "sugar daddy" issues also have "daddy" issues. Security is important to some women so I get how it could happen and work.
Personally, I don't care (in the realm of consenting adults) who screws/marries who. The number of cases of incest/polygamy are so few and far between you'd be a moron to be concerned about them.
However, an incestuous relationship between two opposite sex adults has the very real, time proven, scientific probability of producing a child with serious mental problems and physical deformities. That affects - in a very direct way - a third party and thus you would have the grounds to make a case against its legality.
Same sex intercourse - on the other hand - obviously will not produce a mentally impaired, physically disabled child and therefore there is no third party adversely affected.
.
I realize that you have an IQ of about 12, but the story is about consenting adults, retard. You morons of the fringe left have claimed for years that sex between consenting adults is fine. THIS is what you have brought about - own it.
Personally, I don't care (in the realm of consenting adults) who screws/marries who. The number of cases of incest/polygamy are so few and far between you'd be a moron to be concerned about them.
However, an incestuous relationship between two opposite sex adults has the very real, time proven, scientific probability of producing a child with serious mental problems and physical deformities. That affects - in a very direct way - a third party and thus you would have the grounds to make a case against its legality.
Same sex intercourse - on the other hand - obviously will not produce a mentally impaired, physically disabled child and therefore there is no third party adversely affected.
.
You are confused. This thread has nothing to do with gay people. Homophobe Central is where your post belongs. Get on topic.
I do love how you are comparing homosexuality to having sex with your child. Keep going, everyone should know what an ignorant bigot you are.
I realize that you have an IQ of about 12, but the story is about consenting adults, retard. You morons of the fringe left have claimed for years that sex between consenting adults is fine. THIS is what you have brought about - own it.
You are confused. This thread has nothing to do with gay people. Homophobe Central is where your post belongs. Get on topic.
Yes, I saw that you called me a ****** - however it simply revealed you as ignorant, rather than intimidating me as you planned.
I do love how you are comparing homosexuality to having sex with your child. Keep going, everyone should know what an ignorant bigot you are.
I realize that you have an IQ of about 12, but the story is about consenting adults, retard. You morons of the fringe left have claimed for years that sex between consenting adults is fine. THIS is what you have brought about - own it.
I see now. You think acceptance of the fact that gay people exist caused incest. News flash. Incest has been around just as long as being gay. They are entirely unrelated. Incest usually has a victim and is not caused by gay people being present.
Personally, I don't care (in the realm of consenting adults) who screws/marries who. The number of cases of incest/polygamy are so few and far between you'd be a moron to be concerned about them.
However, an incestuous relationship between two opposite sex adults has the very real, time proven, scientific probability of producing a child with serious mental problems and physical deformities. That affects - in a very direct way - a third party and thus you would have the grounds to make a case against its legality.
Same sex intercourse - on the other hand - obviously will not produce a mentally impaired, physically disabled child and therefore there is no third party adversely affected.
.
Actually not.
The Problem of Human Inbreeding & The Close Family Marriages ? Hatefs Voice - My Telegraph
A father and daughter mating will statistically have no impact. Cousins over 10 generations will have a heavy impact. The genetic degradation is cumulative. The Tudors had such problems because of incest over hundreds of years.
BTW, incest is abhorrent to me, but the arguments supporting homosexuality are the same for incest. It's the typical "support MY vice, but outlaw their vice" shit that always rears it's ugly head.
I do love how you are comparing homosexuality to having sex with your child. Keep going, everyone should know what an ignorant bigot you are.
I realize that you have an IQ of about 12, but the story is about consenting adults, retard. You morons of the fringe left have claimed for years that sex between consenting adults is fine. THIS is what you have brought about - own it.
No, it's about a man who had sex with his daughter consenting or not.
I didn't bring about comparing homosexuality to sex with your own child, you guys did that on your own.
As for my IQ, you can't even make a valid point without lying, I wouldn't comment on anyone's IQ or intelligence.
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
Personally, I don't care (in the realm of consenting adults) who screws/marries who. The number of cases of incest/polygamy are so few and far between you'd be a moron to be concerned about them.
However, an incestuous relationship between two opposite sex adults has the very real, time proven, scientific probability of producing a child with serious mental problems and physical deformities. That affects - in a very direct way - a third party and thus you would have the grounds to make a case against its legality.
Same sex intercourse - on the other hand - obviously will not produce a mentally impaired, physically disabled child and therefore there is no third party adversely affected.
.
Actually not.
The Problem of Human Inbreeding & The Close Family Marriages ? Hatefs Voice - My Telegraph
A father and daughter mating will statistically have no impact. Cousins over 10 generations will have a heavy impact. The genetic degradation is cumulative. The Tudors had such problems because of incest over hundreds of years.
BTW, incest is abhorrent to me, but the arguments supporting homosexuality are the same for incest. It's the typical "support MY vice, but outlaw their vice" shit that always rears it's ugly head.
Supporting same sex marriage isn't the same as supporting having sex with your daughter. Stop being an idiot.
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
I don't believe "homophobe" is in the same class of hate speech as "******". However, I understand your point.
I see no difference at all. Both are meant to intimidate in order to stifle conversation.
You see no difference because you are blind to your bigotry and stupidity. Homophobe is a slang term to describe someone that is afraid of gay people. It's a real condition and actual phobia. Has nothing to do with a racial slur. Are you really that stupid?
I realize that you have an IQ of about 12, but the story is about consenting adults, retard. You morons of the fringe left have claimed for years that sex between consenting adults is fine. THIS is what you have brought about - own it.
I see now. You think acceptance of the fact that gay people exist caused incest. News flash. Incest has been around just as long as being gay. They are entirely unrelated. Incest usually has a victim and is not caused by gay people being present.
No, but you when you justify gay sex with the argument "consenting adults" you open the door for all other "consenting adults." You don't have any more right to decide what is moral or immoral than I do. Hence, it's none of your business.
You are confused. This thread has nothing to do with gay people. Homophobe Central is where your post belongs. Get on topic.
Yes, I saw that you called me a ****** - however it simply revealed you as ignorant, rather than intimidating me as you planned.
I see no difference at all. Both are meant to intimidate in order to stifle conversation.
You see no difference because you are blind to your bigotry and stupidity. Homophobe is a slang term to describe someone that is afraid of gay people. It's a real condition and actual phobia. Has nothing to do with a racial slur. Are you really that stupid?
I don't know anyone who is "afraid" of homosexuals. No, he's right, the word is used to intimidate and stifle conversation. Anyone that doesn't agree with the gay lifestyle is a "homophobe".
One more time "consenting adults" it's nobody's business and you have no more right to decide what is moral than I do.
You are confused. This thread has nothing to do with gay people. Homophobe Central is where your post belongs. Get on topic.
Yes, I saw that you called me a ****** - however it simply revealed you as ignorant, rather than intimidating me as you planned.
I didn't realize I could intimidate you into misreading my post. I didn't call you anything but a bigot. You should go back and reread my post. How you arrived at a racial slur I dont know. They offer free reading classes at the library but there may be an age restriction.
You see no difference because you are blind to your bigotry and stupidity. Homophobe is a slang term to describe someone that is afraid of gay people. It's a real condition and actual phobia. Has nothing to do with a racial slur. Are you really that stupid?
I don't know anyone who is "afraid" of homosexuals. No, he's right, the word is used to intimidate and stifle conversation. Anyone that doesn't agree with the gay lifestyle is a "homophobe".
One more time "consenting adults" it's nobody's business and you have no more right to decide what is moral than I do.
No, comparing homosexuality to having sex with your child is homophobia.
Your whole argument is based on a man having sex with his daughter. Bravo.
Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.
I see no difference at all. Both are meant to intimidate in order to stifle conversation.
You see no difference because you are blind to your bigotry and stupidity. Homophobe is a slang term to describe someone that is afraid of gay people. It's a real condition and actual phobia. Has nothing to do with a racial slur. Are you really that stupid?
I don't know anyone who is "afraid" of homosexuals. No, he's right, the word is used to intimidate and stifle conversation. Anyone that doesn't agree with the gay lifestyle is a "homophobe".
One more time "consenting adults" it's nobody's business and you have no more right to decide what is moral than I do.
