FBI is wrapping up e-mail investigation with no evidence Clinton willfully violated the law

[paperview]

"You always make statements but you never provide any sources."

What humongous pile of bullshit.

Anyone who is familiar with my posts knows how untrue it is, Mr. "I just joined up last week."

Go back to masturbating to Trump porn.

I'm going to make statements about you based on your responses to me, and all you are is full of conjecture and hot air. You have zero substance to your arguments. Well accept some "leaked" news stories.

I've provided you with the fucking copy of the actual signed document of Hillary Clinton that clearly states how she is supposed to handle information....and you ignore it. So if you want to continue to be ignorant that is on you.

^
Proving his idiocy, once post at a time.

Q: do you know anything at all about this story? It appears you don't.

Have a perusal of my posts on this matter. You can start with a search for drone to give you a fucking inkling of what you apparently *don't know. *

Right...and you are the one that has been arguing for pages that Hillary shouldn't be responsible for disseminating what is classified information on her own... despite the fact I have provided you with her actual signed agreement to do so.

/end conversation

She's not responsible for information classified

RETROACTIVELY

After the fact.

you doofus.

Do we need to say this a thousand more times?

Wanna make a sig bet she'll not be charged?

No, you won't. We know it, ('stead scream cover up!!!)

You know it's bogus.

And she murdered Vince Foster too.

Oh my god you are dense. Good luck staying ignorant the rest of your life.

Not up for the sig bet, eh?

 

[Skylar]

^
Proving his idiocy, once post at a time.

Q: do you know anything at all about this story? It appears you don't.

Have a perusal of my posts on this matter. You can start with a search for drone to give you a fucking inkling of what you apparently *don't know. *

Right...and you are the one that has been arguing for pages that Hillary shouldn't be responsible for disseminating what is classified information on her own... despite the fact I have provided you with her actual signed agreement to do so.

/end conversation

She's not responsible for information classified

RETROACTIVELY

After the fact.

you doofus.

Do we need to say this a thousand more times?

Wanna make a sig bet she'll not be charged?

No, you won't. We know it, ('stead scream cover up!!!)

You know it's bogus.

And she murdered Vince Foster too.

Oh my god you are dense. Good luck staying ignorant the rest of your life.

Says the poor, hapless ESL student who couldn't wrap his head around future tenses. Don't worry....we native speakers will walk you through the process.

Yep, my English is horrible but I'm a 4.0 Senior in Criminal Justice.

Where? McDonald's University?

As if you'd done an even cursory study of the topic you'd know that its extremely rare for someone to be indicted for mishandling classified information. Most of the time security clearance is simply revoked.

But you don't know that because you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about. Ask Professor Hamburglar or Provost Grimace if you want to learn more.

While all you can do is try to be a grammar Nazi that can't understand a basic principle of classified information.

This isn't a trivial point of grammar. As you're quite literally insisting that Hillary should have been able to tell the future. On every sentence of every email she ever sent.

Um, that's batshit crazy.

 

[Lewdog]

What the fuck do you mean see the future? Are you from Denver?

Laughing.....I'm clearly not dealing with a native speaker of English. See, in our language we have what's called the 'future tense'. Let me give you an example:

What is so hard to understand about the fact the Secretary of State should have a pretty good clue as to what is going to end up as classified information...

"what was going to end up classified information" is a future tense. Meaning you would have to know what was going to happen in the future to glean it.

Are you tracking with me now, chief? You're insisting that Clinton was supposed to know the future. And just 'know' what was going to be end up classified information. Um...somehow. Because you said so.

Um, slick? You're nobody. Meanwhile, the CIA indicates that they wouldn't have emails that they reviewed:

The CIA yesterday (Saturday) informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified," Cummings wrote in the letter to Gowdy. "Specifically, the CIA confirmed that ‘the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.’"

CIA Debunks Gowdy’s Allegation That Clinton Email Contained Classified CIA Source

Now why would I ignore the CIA.....and instead believe a nobody, citing himself, on what parts of the future Hillary 'should have known'?

I'm all ears. And if you need some help with English, I'm more than willing. Those tenses can be tricky for you ESL folks.

Yep, I got it. You are clearly a liberal douche.

I simply find the CIA far more credible than I do a nobody who has no idea what he's talking about.....and can't backup the silly nonsense that flop out of his mouth.

There is no rational expectation that Hillary will magically 'know' which sentences in any email she has ever written will be redacted by someone at some point for some reason. Even the CIA didn't indicate it would have redacted those statements.

Hillary will be treated just like Rice and just like Powell. Get used to the idea.

You don't have to take my word for it, just read the fucking agreement I have referred to 10,000,000,000,000 times. Quit being a lazy ass who just sits back and makes assumptions.

If you have an argument to make about 'paragraph 3', make it.

You certainly couldn't make a rational argument that Hillary or any SOS was 'supposed' to be able to tell the future and 'know' which sentence out of every email they ever sent that would eventually be redacted by someone at some time for some reason.

Jesus Christ man! It says specifically there that if she comes across any information that she feels is going to be considered classified she is to treat is as classified information... that is why Obama signed an executive order for the people in the State Department to have MANDATORY training in how to recognize and handle classified information. This has been said a billion times now. She was the fucking Secretary of State, if she doesn't understand what is going to be considered classified information, and get it right at least some of the time, then there is a major problem there. So when you consider the fact that almost 3,000 emails were considered classified on her server and she didn't hand them over to the State Department when she got them, like it says in the agreement that she was supposed to, then there is the issue.

 

[Lewdog]

Right...and you are the one that has been arguing for pages that Hillary shouldn't be responsible for disseminating what is classified information on her own... despite the fact I have provided you with her actual signed agreement to do so.

/end conversation

She's not responsible for information classified

RETROACTIVELY

After the fact.

you doofus.

Do we need to say this a thousand more times?

Wanna make a sig bet she'll not be charged?

No, you won't. We know it, ('stead scream cover up!!!)

You know it's bogus.

And she murdered Vince Foster too.

Oh my god you are dense. Good luck staying ignorant the rest of your life.

Says the poor, hapless ESL student who couldn't wrap his head around future tenses. Don't worry....we native speakers will walk you through the process.

Yep, my English is horrible but I'm a 4.0 Senior in Criminal Justice.

Where? McDonald's University?

As if you'd done an even cursory study of the topic you'd know that its extremely rare for someone to be indicted for mishandling classified information. Most of the time security clearance is simply revoked.

But you don't know that because you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about. Ask Professor Hamburglar or Provost Grimace if you want to learn more.

While all you can do is try to be a grammar Nazi that can't understand a basic principle of classified information.

This isn't a trivial point of grammar. As you're quite literally insisting that Hillary should have been able to tell the future. On every sentence of every email she ever sent.

Um, that's batshit crazy.

You are extremely confused. There is a difference in telling the future and having knowledge on how to recognize potential classified information. Are you mentally challenged?

 

[Lewdog]

I'm going to make statements about you based on your responses to me, and all you are is full of conjecture and hot air. You have zero substance to your arguments. Well accept some "leaked" news stories.

I've provided you with the fucking copy of the actual signed document of Hillary Clinton that clearly states how she is supposed to handle information....and you ignore it. So if you want to continue to be ignorant that is on you.

^
Proving his idiocy, once post at a time.

Q: do you know anything at all about this story? It appears you don't.

Have a perusal of my posts on this matter. You can start with a search for drone to give you a fucking inkling of what you apparently *don't know. *

Right...and you are the one that has been arguing for pages that Hillary shouldn't be responsible for disseminating what is classified information on her own... despite the fact I have provided you with her actual signed agreement to do so.

/end conversation

She's not responsible for information classified

RETROACTIVELY

After the fact.

you doofus.

Do we need to say this a thousand more times?

Wanna make a sig bet she'll not be charged?

No, you won't. We know it, ('stead scream cover up!!!)

You know it's bogus.

And she murdered Vince Foster too.

Oh my god you are dense. Good luck staying ignorant the rest of your life.

Not up for the sig bet, eh?

Just because I think she is a lying, conniving, evil, establishment candidate, doesn't mean I think she will be indicted. I think she deserves to be 100%, but with the way the system is, I doubt it will happen. I do believe there will be some backlash when she isn't, and it will even furthermore taint Obama's legacy.

 

[Skylar]

Laughing.....I'm clearly not dealing with a native speaker of English. See, in our language we have what's called the 'future tense'. Let me give you an example:

"what was going to end up classified information" is a future tense. Meaning you would have to know what was going to happen in the future to glean it.

Are you tracking with me now, chief? You're insisting that Clinton was supposed to know the future. And just 'know' what was going to be end up classified information. Um...somehow. Because you said so.

Um, slick? You're nobody. Meanwhile, the CIA indicates that they wouldn't have emails that they reviewed:

Now why would I ignore the CIA.....and instead believe a nobody, citing himself, on what parts of the future Hillary 'should have known'?

I'm all ears. And if you need some help with English, I'm more than willing. Those tenses can be tricky for you ESL folks.

Yep, I got it. You are clearly a liberal douche.

I simply find the CIA far more credible than I do a nobody who has no idea what he's talking about.....and can't backup the silly nonsense that flop out of his mouth.

There is no rational expectation that Hillary will magically 'know' which sentences in any email she has ever written will be redacted by someone at some point for some reason. Even the CIA didn't indicate it would have redacted those statements.

Hillary will be treated just like Rice and just like Powell. Get used to the idea.

You don't have to take my word for it, just read the fucking agreement I have referred to 10,000,000,000,000 times. Quit being a lazy ass who just sits back and makes assumptions.

If you have an argument to make about 'paragraph 3', make it.

You certainly couldn't make a rational argument that Hillary or any SOS was 'supposed' to be able to tell the future and 'know' which sentence out of every email they ever sent that would eventually be redacted by someone at some time for some reason.

Jesus Christ man! It says specifically there that if she comes across any information that she feels is going to be considered classified she is to treat is as classified information..

I'm sure at Ronald McDonald University where you're currently pulling a 4.0 in 'Hamburglar Studies', you imagining that you speak for Hillary Clinton on what she believed would be classified is actually evidence.

But in the real world, you know jack shit. And your imagination is just pseudo-legal gibberish.

There is no rational expectation that Hillary should 'know' which of any sentence of any email she has ever written would be redacted by someone, somewhere, for some reason.

For crying out loud, my little wanna-be, even the CIA indicated they wouldn't have redacted those sentences in those emails:

The CIA yesterday (Saturday) informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified," Cummings wrote in the letter to Gowdy. "Specifically, the CIA confirmed that ‘the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.’"

CIA Debunks Gowdy’s Allegation That Clinton Email Contained Classified CIA Source

But you think you know better why exactly? Laughing.....because Grimace and the Fry Guys told you so?

Why would I ignore the CIA.....and instead believe you? Remember, you're nobody.

 

[leftwinger]

I saw bloomingthong on TV. He looks like crosss between Carville and a fly. Can u say weasel? Why so many Dem look like human garbage? Like the guy always weird or smelly in 7th grade?

Wow, a bit childish of you....must be fun being able to 'play' being a child on the internets, eh....?

You don't like the look of Jewish men, huh?

I don't think he looks as you describe?

And why are you hating on him? What did he do wrong?

I suppose nothing IF he had top secret govt clearance (as u posted) prior to taking possession of govt property to store at his office. Looks like a snitch in HS. Bet he a lip licker, gasp for air as so common amongst foam at mouth America hating commie vermin. He workingbto bring USA down. Needs butt whipped.

 

[Lewdog]

Yep, I got it. You are clearly a liberal douche.

I simply find the CIA far more credible than I do a nobody who has no idea what he's talking about.....and can't backup the silly nonsense that flop out of his mouth.

There is no rational expectation that Hillary will magically 'know' which sentences in any email she has ever written will be redacted by someone at some point for some reason. Even the CIA didn't indicate it would have redacted those statements.

Hillary will be treated just like Rice and just like Powell. Get used to the idea.

You don't have to take my word for it, just read the fucking agreement I have referred to 10,000,000,000,000 times. Quit being a lazy ass who just sits back and makes assumptions.

If you have an argument to make about 'paragraph 3', make it.

You certainly couldn't make a rational argument that Hillary or any SOS was 'supposed' to be able to tell the future and 'know' which sentence out of every email they ever sent that would eventually be redacted by someone at some time for some reason.

Jesus Christ man! It says specifically there that if she comes across any information that she feels is going to be considered classified she is to treat is as classified information..

I'm sure at Ronald McDonald University where you're currently pulling a 4.0 in 'Hamburglar Studies', you imagining that you speak for Hillary Clinton on what she believed would be classified is actually evidence.

But in the real world, you know jack shit. And your imagination is just pseudo-legal gibberish.

There is no rational expectation that Hillary should 'know' which of any sentence of any email she has ever written would be redacted by someone, somewhere, for some reason.

For crying out loud, my little wanna-be, even the CIA indicated they wouldn't have redacted those sentences in those emails:

The CIA yesterday (Saturday) informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified," Cummings wrote in the letter to Gowdy. "Specifically, the CIA confirmed that ‘the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.’"

CIA Debunks Gowdy’s Allegation That Clinton Email Contained Classified CIA Source

But you think you know better why exactly? Laughing.....because Grimace and the Fry Guys told you so?

Why would I ignore the CIA.....and instead believe you? Remember, you're nobody.

I actually go to Eastern Kentucky university which is one of the top Criminal Justice schools in the nation...

I really don't see why you are having such a difficult time grasping the fact that the Secretary of state couldn't recognize what might end up being classified. With your reasoning, President Obama's executive order was a waste of time right? So he must be an idiot because how can you expect anyone to know what might be classified? Why waste the time and money for the training?

 

[Skylar]

She's not responsible for information classified

RETROACTIVELY

After the fact.

you doofus.

Do we need to say this a thousand more times?

Wanna make a sig bet she'll not be charged?

No, you won't. We know it, ('stead scream cover up!!!)

You know it's bogus.

And she murdered Vince Foster too.

Oh my god you are dense. Good luck staying ignorant the rest of your life.

Says the poor, hapless ESL student who couldn't wrap his head around future tenses. Don't worry....we native speakers will walk you through the process.

Yep, my English is horrible but I'm a 4.0 Senior in Criminal Justice.

Where? McDonald's University?

As if you'd done an even cursory study of the topic you'd know that its extremely rare for someone to be indicted for mishandling classified information. Most of the time security clearance is simply revoked.

But you don't know that because you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about. Ask Professor Hamburglar or Provost Grimace if you want to learn more.

While all you can do is try to be a grammar Nazi that can't understand a basic principle of classified information.

This isn't a trivial point of grammar. As you're quite literally insisting that Hillary should have been able to tell the future. On every sentence of every email she ever sent.

Um, that's batshit crazy.

You are extremely confused. There is a difference in telling the future and having knowledge on how to recognize potential classified information. Are you mentally challenged?

Again, for the desperately, willfully ignorance like yourself.....even the CIA indicated there was no cause for redaction:

The CIA yesterday (Saturday) informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified," Cummings wrote in the letter to Gowdy. "Specifically, the CIA confirmed that ‘the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.’"

CIA Debunks Gowdy’s Allegation That Clinton Email Contained Classified CIA Source

But YOU know better than the CIA on what 'shoulda' been redcated? Laughing.....no, my little wanna-be. You don't.

And with even the CIA affirming that there was no expectation of redaction, why would you assume that Hillary just 'should have known' every sentence that at some future date someone would choose to redact for some reason, somewhere from any email she had ever sent to anyone?

Um, wanna-be....that's batshit crazy. There's no such expectation. You simply don't know what you're talking about.

 

[leftwinger]

I can't post a lot. U show pic. I know what i saw live TV. If this vermin she choose to go behind pres back......wow. we doomed.

 

[Lewdog]

Oh my god you are dense. Good luck staying ignorant the rest of your life.

Says the poor, hapless ESL student who couldn't wrap his head around future tenses. Don't worry....we native speakers will walk you through the process.

Yep, my English is horrible but I'm a 4.0 Senior in Criminal Justice.

Where? McDonald's University?

As if you'd done an even cursory study of the topic you'd know that its extremely rare for someone to be indicted for mishandling classified information. Most of the time security clearance is simply revoked.

But you don't know that because you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about. Ask Professor Hamburglar or Provost Grimace if you want to learn more.

While all you can do is try to be a grammar Nazi that can't understand a basic principle of classified information.

This isn't a trivial point of grammar. As you're quite literally insisting that Hillary should have been able to tell the future. On every sentence of every email she ever sent.

Um, that's batshit crazy.

You are extremely confused. There is a difference in telling the future and having knowledge on how to recognize potential classified information. Are you mentally challenged?

Again, for the desperately, willfully ignorance like yourself.....even the CIA indicated there was no cause for redaction:

The CIA yesterday (Saturday) informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified," Cummings wrote in the letter to Gowdy. "Specifically, the CIA confirmed that ‘the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.’"

CIA Debunks Gowdy’s Allegation That Clinton Email Contained Classified CIA Source

But YOU know better than the CIA on what 'shoulda' been redcated? Laughing.....no, my little wanna-be. You don't.

And with even the CIA affirming that there was no expectation of redaction, why would you assume that Hillary just 'should have known' every sentence that at some future date someone would choose to redact for some reason, somewhere from any email she had ever sent to anyone?

Um, wanna-be....that's batshit crazy. There's no such expectation. You simply don't know what you're talking about.

Well now you're just embarrassing yourself.

 

[Skylar]

Says the poor, hapless ESL student who couldn't wrap his head around future tenses. Don't worry....we native speakers will walk you through the process.

Yep, my English is horrible but I'm a 4.0 Senior in Criminal Justice.

Where? McDonald's University?

As if you'd done an even cursory study of the topic you'd know that its extremely rare for someone to be indicted for mishandling classified information. Most of the time security clearance is simply revoked.

But you don't know that because you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about. Ask Professor Hamburglar or Provost Grimace if you want to learn more.

While all you can do is try to be a grammar Nazi that can't understand a basic principle of classified information.

This isn't a trivial point of grammar. As you're quite literally insisting that Hillary should have been able to tell the future. On every sentence of every email she ever sent.

Um, that's batshit crazy.

You are extremely confused. There is a difference in telling the future and having knowledge on how to recognize potential classified information. Are you mentally challenged?

Again, for the desperately, willfully ignorance like yourself.....even the CIA indicated there was no cause for redaction:

The CIA yesterday (Saturday) informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified," Cummings wrote in the letter to Gowdy. "Specifically, the CIA confirmed that ‘the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.’"

CIA Debunks Gowdy’s Allegation That Clinton Email Contained Classified CIA Source

But YOU know better than the CIA on what 'shoulda' been redcated? Laughing.....no, my little wanna-be. You don't.

And with even the CIA affirming that there was no expectation of redaction, why would you assume that Hillary just 'should have known' every sentence that at some future date someone would choose to redact for some reason, somewhere from any email she had ever sent to anyone?

Um, wanna-be....that's batshit crazy. There's no such expectation. You simply don't know what you're talking about.

Well now you're just embarrassing yourself.

Laughing.....you've painted yourself into a corner, wanna-be. And you have no rational answer for this question:

With even the CIA affirming that there was no expectation of redaction, why would you assume that Hillary just 'should have known' every sentence that at some future date someone would choose to redact?

The answer is obvious: There is no such expectation. You know it. I know it.

Get used to the idea. Hillary will be treated the same as Powell, the same as Rice.

 

[Lewdog]

Yep, my English is horrible but I'm a 4.0 Senior in Criminal Justice.

Where? McDonald's University?

As if you'd done an even cursory study of the topic you'd know that its extremely rare for someone to be indicted for mishandling classified information. Most of the time security clearance is simply revoked.

But you don't know that because you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about. Ask Professor Hamburglar or Provost Grimace if you want to learn more.

While all you can do is try to be a grammar Nazi that can't understand a basic principle of classified information.

This isn't a trivial point of grammar. As you're quite literally insisting that Hillary should have been able to tell the future. On every sentence of every email she ever sent.

Um, that's batshit crazy.

You are extremely confused. There is a difference in telling the future and having knowledge on how to recognize potential classified information. Are you mentally challenged?

Again, for the desperately, willfully ignorance like yourself.....even the CIA indicated there was no cause for redaction:

The CIA yesterday (Saturday) informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified," Cummings wrote in the letter to Gowdy. "Specifically, the CIA confirmed that ‘the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.’"

CIA Debunks Gowdy’s Allegation That Clinton Email Contained Classified CIA Source

But YOU know better than the CIA on what 'shoulda' been redcated? Laughing.....no, my little wanna-be. You don't.

And with even the CIA affirming that there was no expectation of redaction, why would you assume that Hillary just 'should have known' every sentence that at some future date someone would choose to redact for some reason, somewhere from any email she had ever sent to anyone?

Um, wanna-be....that's batshit crazy. There's no such expectation. You simply don't know what you're talking about.

Well now you're just embarrassing yourself.

Laughing.....you've painted yourself into a corner, wanna-be. And you have no rational answer for this question:

With even the CIA affirming that there was no expectation of redaction, why would you assume that Hillary just 'should have known' every sentence that at some future date someone would choose to redact?

The answer is obvious: There is no such expectation. You know it. I know it.

Get used to the idea. Hillary will be treated the same as Powell, the same as Rice.

I guess you have a reading comprehension problem Mr. Grammar Nazi? I have said multiple times that it would be ok to miss some emails that might be deemed classified, but NOT 3,000 of them. You are so blinded by your liberalism that you can't use common sense anymore.

Edit: If you support Hillary you aren't really a liberal, your more of a conserva-beral. She is definitely no longer a liberal now that she is working with the Republicans to beat Trump.

 

[Skylar]

Where? McDonald's University?

As if you'd done an even cursory study of the topic you'd know that its extremely rare for someone to be indicted for mishandling classified information. Most of the time security clearance is simply revoked.

But you don't know that because you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about. Ask Professor Hamburglar or Provost Grimace if you want to learn more.

This isn't a trivial point of grammar. As you're quite literally insisting that Hillary should have been able to tell the future. On every sentence of every email she ever sent.

Um, that's batshit crazy.

You are extremely confused. There is a difference in telling the future and having knowledge on how to recognize potential classified information. Are you mentally challenged?

Again, for the desperately, willfully ignorance like yourself.....even the CIA indicated there was no cause for redaction:

The CIA yesterday (Saturday) informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified," Cummings wrote in the letter to Gowdy. "Specifically, the CIA confirmed that ‘the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.’"

CIA Debunks Gowdy’s Allegation That Clinton Email Contained Classified CIA Source

But YOU know better than the CIA on what 'shoulda' been redcated? Laughing.....no, my little wanna-be. You don't.

And with even the CIA affirming that there was no expectation of redaction, why would you assume that Hillary just 'should have known' every sentence that at some future date someone would choose to redact for some reason, somewhere from any email she had ever sent to anyone?

Um, wanna-be....that's batshit crazy. There's no such expectation. You simply don't know what you're talking about.

Well now you're just embarrassing yourself.

Laughing.....you've painted yourself into a corner, wanna-be. And you have no rational answer for this question:

With even the CIA affirming that there was no expectation of redaction, why would you assume that Hillary just 'should have known' every sentence that at some future date someone would choose to redact?

The answer is obvious: There is no such expectation. You know it. I know it.

Get used to the idea. Hillary will be treated the same as Powell, the same as Rice.

I guess you have a reading comprehension problem Mr. Grammar Nazi? I have said multiple times that it would be ok to miss some emails that might be deemed classified, but NOT 3,000 of them. You are so blinded by your liberalism that you can't use common sense anymore.

Again, even the CIA affirmed that they would not have made those redactions. Why would you expect Hillary to 'catch' what even the CIA admitted had no reason to be classified?

Your expectations are irrational.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

"You always make statements but you never provide any sources."

What humongous pile of bullshit.

Anyone who is familiar with my posts knows how untrue it is, Mr. "I just joined up last week."

Go back to masturbating to Trump porn.

I'm going to make statements about you based on your responses to me, and all you are is full of conjecture and hot air. You have zero substance to your arguments. Well accept some "leaked" news stories.

I've provided you with the fucking copy of the actual signed document of Hillary Clinton that clearly states how she is supposed to handle information....and you ignore it. So if you want to continue to be ignorant that is on you.

Do you know when, why, and by whom that information you believe she should know how to handle was classified?

It doesn't matter......................read paragraph 3. If the information will possibly be deemed classified it is to be treated like it is classified.

It totally matters. You see, classified material would not be circulating freely around the State Dept system for months or years between multiple people if anyone thought it was classified. State has said quite clearly that none of it was marked as classified. You will say everyone should know daily what is and is not classified. I say that's bullshit standard.

Here's the problem with what you are saying, and why the State Department didn't want Hillary to set up her private server in the first place. How was the state department going to be able to review and classify her emails if they couldn't see them because they were on the private server?

AND as I said, and you continue to ignore it... read the third paragraph of her agreement...otherwise just quit arguing because you are creating a circular argument that is ignoring the prime facts.

Look dude, if your third paragraph carried any weight it would have been argued and used as grounds for prosecution a long time ago. It's not on anyone's radar but yours. What does that tell you?

Here's a question for you. Let's see if you can answer it. What percentage of those emails existed solely on the Clinton server? That is to say, whom were they addressed to? Only those on the Clinton server or were the bulk of them to state servers where there would be a record of them?

 

[Lewdog]

I'm going to make statements about you based on your responses to me, and all you are is full of conjecture and hot air. You have zero substance to your arguments. Well accept some "leaked" news stories.

I've provided you with the fucking copy of the actual signed document of Hillary Clinton that clearly states how she is supposed to handle information....and you ignore it. So if you want to continue to be ignorant that is on you.

Do you know when, why, and by whom that information you believe she should know how to handle was classified?

It doesn't matter......................read paragraph 3. If the information will possibly be deemed classified it is to be treated like it is classified.

It totally matters. You see, classified material would not be circulating freely around the State Dept system for months or years between multiple people if anyone thought it was classified. State has said quite clearly that none of it was marked as classified. You will say everyone should know daily what is and is not classified. I say that's bullshit standard.

Here's the problem with what you are saying, and why the State Department didn't want Hillary to set up her private server in the first place. How was the state department going to be able to review and classify her emails if they couldn't see them because they were on the private server?

AND as I said, and you continue to ignore it... read the third paragraph of her agreement...otherwise just quit arguing because you are creating a circular argument that is ignoring the prime facts.

Look dude, if your third paragraph carried any weight it would have been argued and used as grounds for prosecution a long time ago. It's not on anyone's radar but yours. What does that tell you?

Here's a question for you. Let's see if you can answer it. What percentage of those emails existed solely on the Clinton server? That is to say, whom were they addressed to? Only those on the Clinton server or were the bulk of them to state servers where there would be a record of them?

It's not just on my radar... everything I have said has been reported by news outlets all over the place. Here is a site that list the different quotes from different sources: Clinton Violated Nondisclosure Agreement As Secretary Of State

I honestly can't answer your question, but if there was a record of her emails through the back channels of the recipients, then it wouldn't have been as a big a deal to get her servers, but as has been seen with the fact that all of the IT guy's emails suddenly gone, who knows what is actually missing.

 

[paperview]

You are extremely confused. There is a difference in telling the future and having knowledge on how to recognize potential classified information. Are you mentally challenged?

Again, for the desperately, willfully ignorance like yourself.....even the CIA indicated there was no cause for redaction:

The CIA yesterday (Saturday) informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified," Cummings wrote in the letter to Gowdy. "Specifically, the CIA confirmed that ‘the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.’"

CIA Debunks Gowdy’s Allegation That Clinton Email Contained Classified CIA Source

But YOU know better than the CIA on what 'shoulda' been redcated? Laughing.....no, my little wanna-be. You don't.

And with even the CIA affirming that there was no expectation of redaction, why would you assume that Hillary just 'should have known' every sentence that at some future date someone would choose to redact for some reason, somewhere from any email she had ever sent to anyone?

Um, wanna-be....that's batshit crazy. There's no such expectation. You simply don't know what you're talking about.

Well now you're just embarrassing yourself.

Laughing.....you've painted yourself into a corner, wanna-be. And you have no rational answer for this question:

With even the CIA affirming that there was no expectation of redaction, why would you assume that Hillary just 'should have known' every sentence that at some future date someone would choose to redact?

The answer is obvious: There is no such expectation. You know it. I know it.

Get used to the idea. Hillary will be treated the same as Powell, the same as Rice.

I guess you have a reading comprehension problem Mr. Grammar Nazi? I have said multiple times that it would be ok to miss some emails that might be deemed classified, but NOT 3,000 of them. You are so blinded by your liberalism that you can't use common sense anymore.

Again, even the CIA affirmed that they would not have made those redactions. Why would you expect Hillary to 'catch' what even the CIA admitted had no reason to be classified?

Your expectations are irrational.

He /she won't answer this.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I guess the Hillary backing Liberals have forgotten the oath she took that even if something was not marked Classified, that if it contained what could be considered Classified material, it was supposed to be handled as if it WERE Classified... well that would totally throw the whole idea of willfulness out the window. She should have known better, and been a lot more careful with how she handled information, but she chose not to. She chose not to, by skipping her meeting about how to handle information that was mandatory, and by ignoring the pleas of the IT department NOT to set up her own server.

And every one of her State department aides who handled these emails and sent them to her took the same oath and anyone from another agency that forwarded this info to the state dept aides on their UNCLASSIFIED .gov email took the same oath as well.....

Seems like there were lots and lots and lots of different hands in the gvt touching and sending these NOW classified T/S or Secret items around on an UNCLASSIFIED gvt system....

HOW does that or can that even happen? Seems like all gvt workers cleared in handling secret or top secret clearance need retraining OR things are being ''over classified'' at a later date?

I guess you have never been in a supervisor position? When the shit goes down, it always falls back on the person in charge... or at least that is how it is supposed to happen.

or, you just think this is the most horrible thing that people in gvt have ever done in the history of our government...?

And maybe the government people KNOW it is common place and happens a lot more than we think... due to not having a top level classified and secure system for State department workers to work with, outside of the UNCLASSIFIED State.gov email....

But it is even deeper than that...not just the State department..... when Senator Kerry was caught up in this mess because he sent her some classified info via unsecured email as well....

So I bet ya, all the congress critters and senators have a load of stuff that they sent that was classified after the fact via unsecure methods and personal emails, not just Senate.gov emails which is ALSO an UNCLASSIFIED email system for Senators....

whether Hillary got this top classified information on her server or the .gov email system, BOTH are UNCLASSIFIED Systems and this info should not be left on either.... dot.gov is hacked ALL THE TIME.

For the love of GOD...she had her own private server built in the bathroom in her basement despite the IT department of the State Department telling her it was not a good idea... What is so hard to understand about that and how wrong that is? She told her underlings to send her Classified information despite it being over an unsecured network, KNOWING she wasn't supposed to.

The leftwing douche bags will defend Hillary to the bitter end. They know she's guilty as hell, but they just don't care. Getting another Democrat in the White House is all they care about.

I can't speak for everyone else, but I sure do like poking the monkeys through the cage.

 

[Markle]

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Some of Hillary Clinton’s closest aides, including her longtime adviser Huma Abedin, have provided interviews to federal investigators, as the FBI probe into the security of her private email server nears completion, U.S. officials briefed on the investigation tell CNN. The investigation is still ongoing, but so far investigators haven’t found evidence to prove that Clinton willfully violated the law the U.S. officials say.

One the e-mail investigation is over, is will be over for Donald. She will CRUSH HIM IN NOVEMBER! And you Donald supporter will deny you ever supported him. FUNNY!

True--Trump supporters are going to be wearing bags over their heads in November, and it's going to be one hell of a Hillary Clinton hangover. I doubt they'll ever admit they supported or voted for Donald Trump.

But anyone who believed these 22 emails would amount to criminal charges has got to be dumber than dirt. All along the State Department has repeatedly stated that these emails were classified (after) she received or sent them. Furthermore, Hillary Clinton has requested that the Justice department release these emails to the public, giving a smidgen of a hint, there's nothing in them to get excited about.

And if Hillary Clinton has a problem with emails so does Colin Powell and Condi Rice who have the same issues.
Rice Aides, Powell Also Got Classified Info on Personal Email Accounts

Have you lived your entire life in denial and fantasy land?

Several classified documents were handled, accidentally, by the private email ACCOUNTS of Colin Powel and Condelezza Rice. As you have been told for the umpteenth time, NEITHER had their own, private, hidden and secret server to circumvent government oversight. Most likely with the intent of being able to keep secret the payoffs being fed through their slush fund. That, as you know is the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation.

As you know too, there are over 1,000 classified documents sent through the Clinton secret server with 22 of them being ABOVE TOP SECRET. That means, in order for select member of Congress, to even view the redacted documents, they have to sign a statement that they will not disclose anything they see. They can only view the documents in a specific room and they cannot make notes.

Your ignorance, and or denial, as to the when the documents are or are not, classified is amusing. As you know, all employees, including Hillary, are trained to recognize and understand that nothing has to be marked, in any way, for a document to be classified.

All this and no one knows what was in the 30,000 emails Hillary deleted before they could be reviewed by the government.

I'm certain that you have already reviewed this bit of news too.

May 6, 2016

Kremlin War Erupts Over Release Of Top Secret Hillary Clinton Emails

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

An intriguing Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today suggests that a “war of words” has broken out between the Director of the Federal Security Service (FSB) Alexander Bortnikov and Chairwoman of the Council of Federation Valentina Matviyenko over the issue of releasing to the Western media tens-of-thousands of top secret and classified emails obtained by the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) from the private, but unsecured, computer (email server) belonging to former US Secretary of State, and present American presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton. [Note: Words appearing in quotes are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

Read more: Kremlin War Erupts Over Release Of Top Secret Hillary Clinton Emails

 

[Hutch Starskey]

^
Proving his idiocy, once post at a time.

Q: do you know anything at all about this story? It appears you don't.

Have a perusal of my posts on this matter. You can start with a search for drone to give you a fucking inkling of what you apparently *don't know. *

Right...and you are the one that has been arguing for pages that Hillary shouldn't be responsible for disseminating what is classified information on her own... despite the fact I have provided you with her actual signed agreement to do so.

/end conversation

She's not responsible for information classified

RETROACTIVELY

After the fact.

you doofus.

Do we need to say this a thousand more times?

Wanna make a sig bet she'll not be charged?

No, you won't. We know it, ('stead scream cover up!!!)

You know it's bogus.

And she murdered Vince Foster too.

Oh my god you are dense. Good luck staying ignorant the rest of your life.

Says the poor, hapless ESL student who couldn't wrap his head around future tenses. Don't worry....we native speakers will walk you through the process.

Yep, my English is horrible but I'm a 4.0 Senior in Criminal Justice. While all you can do is try to be a grammar Nazi that can't understand a basic principle of classified information.

Does the cop degree, funny, cop degree, he he, anyway, does that have a large focus on the protocols of federal agency communication classifications?