FBI just seized the cell phone of House Freedom Caucus chair, Scott Perry, pursuant to a search warrant this afternoon....FBI just getting warmed up.

Not what? Search warrants are public record unless they are sealed by a court, which is pretty rare.


Not.

If they were made public upon issuance it would tip off other people.

Only after charges are laid on someone does that person and his/her attorney get to see the warrant in its entirety during discovery.

If nothing becomes of an investigation a FOIA can get it.
 
Who would you have take the place of a that federal law enforcement agency?
What about their technical people? .... you know the world renowned forensic experts, ballistics, the DNA experts, the forensic accounting experts, the foreign spy hunters, handwriting experts.

If you got rid of all them.....well, then, who you got in your wings?
Surely, you have thought this through. No?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Well, I'm a bit skeptical that 'assassinating' a disgraced ex-presidents is something a public forum should be openly discussing.
If it happens --if an attempt is made...it could make a poster suggesting it, say, Lord Trout, a bit of a suspect. Or at any rate someone to be interrogated.

Accordingly, Trout, maybe you should tone down the killing of ex-presidents stuff. I personally think it makes this venue appear to harbor extremist threats to America.
Is that what you are implying? Is your behavior good for the forum?

IMHO

----------------------------------------------------------------



Explain yourself, poster Trout.
The assertion you make sounds corrosive and irresponsible to my ear.
So, do you have some facts, some evidence, that you would present to, say, your local sheriff or state police, that would motivate them to begin an action against the FBI?

I ask because it kinda sorta sounds like a bit of a conspiracists fantasy. Or are you really a mature serious man with adult gravitas?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



How do you come to that conclusion?
Rather, what is a crime is beating the crap out of Capitol police who were adhering to the oath they took to protect our duly elected legislators (and their staffs) inhabiting the Capitol of the United States of America.

I was mildly sure you would have recognized the difference between legitimate protest and spraying MACE in the face of a cop or smearing your poo on the walls of Congress.

But you be you.

----------------------------------




And then there is the Yin to that Yang. Ala' Rightie/Whitie/Tightie TV/Radio/Blog media-sphere. (Do we need to name name....like Bannon's 'War Room' or Jones' 'InfoWars'?

I could be persuaded that you would have been aware of such. No?
How many of each of those do we need? How good are they really at their job.

They don’t deserve and have not earned a blanket of respect. If anything they burned that blanket.
 
Their primary function is political prosecutions.

Can you explain such a comment, poster Mike?
Why do you make such an assertion?
Do you have vetting on it?
Credible, informed sourcing?

If not, well Missouri Mike, if not......you may sound like some QAnon jackassery nutter.

I don't mean that disrespectfully, but.....that shouldn't be who you want to be recognized as ....is it?
 
You have that backward. Their primary function is political prosecutions. Their side gig is anything else they can fill their time with.
Politicians being prosecuted are few and far between.

But it raises a good question. Do you really want to live in a country where politicians aren’t subject to laws?
 
Politicians being prosecuted are few and far between.

But it raises a good question. Do you really want to live in a country where politicians aren’t subject to laws?
I want to live in a country where ALL politicians are subject to the laws.
 
Can you explain such a comment, poster Mike?
Why do you make such an assertion?
Do you have vetting on it?
Credible, informed sourcing?

If not, well Missouri Mike, if not......you may sound like some QAnon jackassery nutter.

I don't mean that disrespectfully, but.....that shouldn't be who you want to be recognized as ....is it?
What have been their biggest cases in the last 8 years? That should help you answer the question.
 
The warrant has to state what they are looking for and where they will search.

For some reason the Trump folks aren't releasing that info.


The particulars including much information is NOT given out. Only if they proceed to use that evidence in prosecution can the target and his/her attorney get the entirety of the warrant.

If they gave up anything but a basic signed paper from the magistrate in these matters it could alert others. That is how it works.

You think Trump wouldn't have released it if he had anything to release? FFS.
 
trump has been sidestepping law and order for some time. It is beginning to catch up to him.
Why do your investigations keep coming up empty? In the hildabeast case they actually had to list her crimes but then refuse to prosecute. In Trumps case they keep trying to prosecute and come up with nothing.
 
The Biden Administration has gone FULL FASCIST... The warrant was illegitimate. The officers did a smash and grab. THEY WERE NOT JUDICIOUS IN THE SEARCH> this means they were told to grab anything and run. THis was a hope and poke in an effort to find something to stop Trump from running. The "papers" they stated they were looking for were not found. This means they took things UNREALTED TO THE WARRANT> This is Armed robbery under color of law. Every single one of the agents can be charged with this crime. IF the order came from a supervisor, that supervisor and all that ordered this violation of Constitution rights can be held criminally liable.

This is blowing up in the DOJ AND FBI's faces..
It is simply amazing how little you know.
 
I want to live in a country where ALL politicians are subject to the laws.
They are!

Andrew Gillum was once a rising star in the Democratic Party and nearly beat Ron DeSantis for governor.

About a month ago he was indicted by the DoJ on 21 charges of fraud.
 
The particulars including much information is NOT given out. Only if they proceed to use that evidence in prosecution can the target and his/her attorney get the entirety of the warrant.
But the items being searched for and where they will search ARE on the warrant provided to the subject (Trump). For some reason he has decided not to say what was being searched for
You think Trump wouldn't have released it if he had anything to release? FFS.
See above. If it's stupid stuff...he could make himself look good.

Hmmm
 
They are!

Andrew Gillum was once a rising star in the Democratic Party and nearly beat Ron DeSantis for governor.

About a month ago he was indicted by the DoJ on 21 charges of fraud.
What about Pelosi's husband, Biden's son?
 
They are!

Andrew Gillum was once a rising star in the Democratic Party and nearly beat Ron DeSantis for governor.

About a month ago he was indicted by the DoJ on 21 charges of fraud.
Rob Blogoyovich...another one.
 

Forum List

Back
Top