FBI probe of Kavanaugh constrained by Trump WH, report finds

[playtime]

That had to have been among your more coherent posts. Just the usual, pointless waste of bandwidth.

gotcha...........

 

[martybegan]

I don't have to account for your bizarre behavior.

Read the material. If you still say that, then you are a delusional and/or dishonest cultist who doesn't have a place in any honest conversation about this.

I read the material, as you can see from my questions about exactly what would they be able to investigate beyond what already was looked at both in the background check and the hearings?

 

[martybegan]

You mean the faux investigations.

But we all knew they were fake. The Fix was in.

Bullshit.

Please tell me how could they have gotten any more information than was already found.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I read the material, as you can see from my questions about exactly what would they be able to investigate beyond what already was looked at both in the background check and the hearings?

You clearly did not and had to be corrected multiple times.

And if you had, then saying the investigation was not stonewalled was an embarrassing, dem9nstrable lie told by you in a thread where the material shows it's a lie.

This speaks to your intelligence and your character.

 

[martybegan]

i believe the fact that the WH asked that all tips re: the college frat boy were routed to said WH & not followed up on, including actual identified witness' along with anonymous ones. we'll never know the truth, because of the sloppy - one sided investigation.

Those "tips" were random bullshit.

The thing was investigated by government and the press ad nauseum. Hearings were held, testimony given.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This is what trolls do.

We can't dicuss the topic, if all the time is spent arguing over whether or not water is wet.

 

[martybegan]

why didn't the FBI interview brett or ford?

Why would they have jurisdiction to do so?

Congress let them speak at a hearing, what extra would the FBI had gotten out of it?

 

[playtime]

Those "tips" were random bullshit.

& you know that for a fact?

of course not.

The thing was investigated by government and the press ad nauseum. Hearings were held, testimony given.

why didn't the FBI interview the two main parties?

frat boy & ford? you would think THEY would have been.

 

[martybegan]

You clearly did not and had to be corrected multiple times.

And if you had, then saying the investigation was not stonewalled was an embarrassing, dem9nstrable lie told by you in a thread where the material shows it's a lie.

This speaks to your intelligence and your character.

You haven't corrected anything.

This is all you tards are doing.

 

[martybegan]

& you know that for a fact?

of course not.




why didn't the FBI interview the two main parties?

frat boy & ford? you would think THEY would have been.

The tips have the burden of evidence, not the other way around.

Because they both made sworn testimony at a congressional hearing maybe?

 

[martybegan]

This is what trolls do.

We can't dicuss the topic, if all the time is spent arguing over whether or not water is wet.

And yet you keep coming back with nothing to back your bullshit up.

 

[Hollie]

View attachment 1023793

gotcha...........

Obviously, absent cartoons you are incapable of anything that approaches thinking.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Here's another story for The Following to throw down the hole of denial.

In September 2018, as allegations of sexual misconduct against Brett M. Kavanaugh threatened his confirmation to the Supreme Court, President Donald Trump vowed that the FBI would have “free rein” to vet the claims. Trump said the FBI was “talking to everybody” and added on social media: “I want them to interview whoever they deem appropriate, at their discretion.”

The president’s comments came as a surprise to the FBI, according to a new report from a Democratic senator based on previously undisclosed correspondence between the agency and the White House. FBI officials — directed to conduct a very limited inquiry in a week’s time — requested “additional guidance” from the White House, citing the public remarks by Trump and other officials describing a freewheeling investigation. But the White House never authorized the agency to independently probe the sexual misconduct allegations, which Kavanaugh staunchly denied.

The report, which was produced by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), a Judiciary Committee member and leading critic of the Kavanaugh confirmation, and provided to The Washington Post ahead of a public release on Tuesday, provides additional evidence of the tight control exercised by the White House over the FBI investigation — despite Trump’s claims to the contrary. The report found that messages to the FBI tip line regarding Kavanaugh were forwarded directly to the White House and never probed, and that the FBI had no written protocols for the supplemental background investigation ordered by the White House.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/10/08/kavanaugh-trump-white-house-fbi-report/

It has long been understood the WH tried to narrow the scope of the FBI investigation in to Schlitz Kavanaugh. Now we have some of the details as to how it was achieved. Details some folks will no doubt not want to hear.

Good grief

 

[playtime]

Why would they have jurisdiction to do so?

alleged criminal acts investigated so an uber upholder of the law can be shown to be lawful or not.

Congress let them speak at a hearing, what extra would the FBI had gotten out of it?

well, since lying under oath to congress is a whole lot different than the FBI.

 

[playtime]

Obviously, absent cartoons who are incapable of anything that approaches thinking.

then why must you always come knocking on my door to engage?

 

[playtime]

Good grief

charly brown ... that you?

 

[Hollie]

then why must you always come knocking on my door to engage?

To confirm you're a pointless moron

 

[Lastamender]

Reuters – Bias and Credibility​

---

LEAST BIASED​

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biases sources.

• Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record.

---

Detailed Report​

Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH
Country: United Kingdom
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: News Agency
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And yet you keep coming back with nothing to back your bullshit up.

*except all the facts in the material of the topic

See? Embarrassing behavior.

 

[playtime]

To confirm you're a pointless moron

is that it? i thought it was because i give you some time when others don't bother.