Federal court upholds Texas social media law, clearing way for users to sue over censorship

[PoliticalChic]

Actually, it's shitlibs who support censorship.

Conservatives and the left aren't deranged Democrat Nazis, so they support free speech.

17% of Biden Voters Would Not Have Voted for Him Had They Known ...lifenews.com › home › 17% of biden voters would not have voted for him had they known scandals liberal media censored

November 26, 2020 - Putting It All Together: Looking at all eight of these issues together, our poll found that a total of 17% of Biden’s voters told us they would have changed their vote if they had been aware of one or more of these important stories. This would have moved every one of the swing states into ...



SEVENTEEN PERCENT of Biden Voters Said They Wouldn't Have Voted ...thegatewaypundit.com› 2020 › 11 › seventeen-percent-biden-voters-said-wouldnt-voted-knew-media-censored-scandals

November 24, 2020 - A whopping 17 percent of Joe Biden’s voters said that they would not have voted for him if they were aware of various scandals that were hidden by the mainstream media. The study, conducted by The Polling Company on behalf of the Media Research Center, polled 1,750 Biden voters in seven swing ...

 

[busybee01]

If Big Tech is donating to the Dems and then they are censoring criticism of the Dems and the Dems hold the House Senate and Presidency, >>> that is government censorship.

No it is not. Social media also has property rights. The 5th circ us of appeals attempted to seize the property of social media. You are proving that you are the socialist. Only government can censor. The Supreme Court has already decided this.

 

[busybee01]

Anne Applebaum, who observes about Soviet-era suppression: “Actual censors were not always needed. Instead, a form of pervasive peer pressure convinced writers, journalists and everyone else’ to toe the party line; if they did not, they knew they risked being ejected from their jobs and shunned by their friends.”



JONATHAN TURLEY: I want to emphasize that a lot of people on the left that have said if it's not prohibited on the First Amendment, it's not a free speech issue. That's not true. The First Amendment is not the exclusive domain of free speech. What they are doing is shutting down free speech. The left has come on to a winning strategy. …. they've discovered that if they use corporations to control speech, it falls outside the First Amendment. But it's not true that what they're doing is not a free speech attack. It is. They're trying to stop people from speaking on these platforms….

Jonathan Turley: The left's success at silencing free speech would make Joe McCarthy blush​

Constitutional law expert Jonathan Turley on the left's attempt to cancel Joe Rogan and have him removed from Spotify.

www.foxnews.com

Hard to believe that Jonathan Turley is a legal expert. He would have realized that the Supreme Court has dealt with this and came to a opposite opinion. That free speech rights are not binding on private companies. That doesn't float even in a radical right wing Supreme Court.

 

[busybee01]

. Just three weeks before election day 202, Big Tech, the media, and federal law enforcement performed an act of filial obedience to the Democrats. The NYPost exploded with the Hunter Biden laptop story, exposing the payoffs to the Biden Cartel by Communist China.

“On the laptop was clear evidence that the then-vice-president was complicit in receiving questionable payments from the Chinese Communist Party and government. Its contents also established that Biden had lied when he disclaimed any involvement in—or even knowledge of—his son’s work for an allegedly corrupt Ukraine energy company, Burisma. Biden’s defenders claimed that the computer did not belong to Hunter but had been placed there by Russian intelligence to spread disinformation injurious to Biden.

The laptop even implicated Joe Biden personally. In one of his emails to a co- conspirator, Hunter said he wanted to reserve part of the payout for “the big guy.” Despite the massive national security implications of the scandal, the news was blacked out by the networks and the major newspapers until they were forced to cover it because President Trump raised the issue in a nationally televised debate. The high-tech outlets even blacked out coverage by the New York Post, the ninth largest daily newspaper in the country, because it covered the story.”

Dick Morris, “The Return”

That is nothing but a pack of lies from a lying weasel. There is absolutely no evidence of anything of the sort. We know where Biden's money came from as he has released his tax returns unlike Donald Trump. Of course you would never think of the fact that this just happens to come out a few weeks before the election.

 

[busybee01]

It is all about censorship.

And now that it has been revealed that the Biden administration was working with social media to censor viewpoints Biden and his administration don't like, you've no leg to stand on.

Biden officials pressured Facebook, Twitter to censor 'misinformation': state AGs

President Biden's administration allegedly coordinated with social media giants to suppress posts about COVID-19 that they deemed misinformation.

www.foxbusiness.com

They were not pressuring anyone. These state AGs are nothing but crooks. The Biden Administration has free speech rights as well and they have every right to urge social media companies to be responsible.

 

[westwall]

And none of that would stop me from suing the shit out of this place under the Texas ruling.

Feel free. This place is worth maybe 10,000.

Knock yourself out, moron.

 

[busybee01]

Yup.

Privately owned/maintained public spaces must allow free speech.

No they must not. They have free speech rights as well.

 

[busybee01]

Actually, it's shitlibs who support censorship.

Conservatives and the left aren't deranged Democrat Nazis, so they support free speech.

Right wing fascists do not support free speech rights.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Right wing fascists do not support free speech rights.

And to prove your claim, you're willing to censor them for as long as it takes, eh comrade?

 

[busybee01]

And to prove your claim, you're willing to censor them for as long as it takes, eh comrade?

Only government can censor. Not private companies.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Feel free. This place is worth maybe 10,000.

Knock yourself out, moron.

An easy 10 grand. Plus this place all those like it get shut down. All that is left is Twitter and FB....just like you all want.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Only government can censor. Not private companies.

Not even when they work with government? LOL!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

So, magaturds are all for government intervention into private business when they don't get their way. Nothing about these deplorables is republican or conservative. This is why America hates magaturds, and they're on their own with this unconstitutional bullshit.

Hey, libtard! The courts ruled in favor of the Constitution, not against it. Of course with your limited intellect, you would see it the opposite way since you have apparently never read our Constitution, like all good libtards!

 

[westwall]

An easy 10 grand. Plus this place all those like it get shut down. All that is left is Twitter and FB....just like you all want.

You going to file the case? No lawyer will take it. No money in it.

Dummy.

 

[MinTrut]

Are you nuts?????

Just stating facts.

Nearly all of the media, government schooling, pop culture....etc are subsidiaries of the Far Left, the Democrat Party.

The Democrats aren't remotely left - they're liberal, and liberals DESPISE the left.

Wake the heck up.

Yes - I wish conservatives would.

Believing that Democrats are the left is like thinking the Nazis were Jewish.

"Over the past several decades, the progressive Left

There is no progressive left; progressives are liberals, not leftists.

has successfully fulfilled Antonio Gramsci’s famed admonition of a “long march through the institutions”. In almost every Western country, its adherents now dominate the education system, media, cultural institutions, and financial behemoths." Is this the end of progressive America?

The left has little power in most countries, and none in the United States.

 

[MinTrut]

“Say what you will about the Trump administration, but there was no attempt to muzzle free speech. Trump would out-debate his opponents and even out-shout them, but he never, ever tried to keep them from speaking.

Only the Left and the Democrats do that. Consider the ways they are attempting to rein in our free speech, and then ponder what they’d do with just one more vote in the Senate.

4. The Big Tech allies of the Democrats have refused to let Donald Trump, even when he was president of the United States, use Twitter or Facebook to communicate with the country—by censoring, flagging, and then by outright banning.”
Dick Morris, “The Return”



View attachment 698026

Big Tech is liberal, and silences both the left and conservatives.

 

[MinTrut]

. Just three weeks before election day 202, Big Tech, the media, and federal law enforcement performed an act of filial obedience to the Democrats. The NYPost exploded with the Hunter Biden laptop story, exposing the payoffs to the Biden Cartel by Communist China.

“On the laptop was clear evidence that the then-vice-president was complicit in receiving questionable payments from the Chinese Communist Party and government. Its contents also established that Biden had lied when he disclaimed any involvement in—or even knowledge of—his son’s work for an allegedly corrupt Ukraine energy company, Burisma. Biden’s defenders claimed that the computer did not belong to Hunter but had been placed there by Russian intelligence to spread disinformation injurious to Biden.

The laptop even implicated Joe Biden personally. In one of his emails to a co- conspirator, Hunter said he wanted to reserve part of the payout for “the big guy.” Despite the massive national security implications of the scandal, the news was blacked out by the networks and the major newspapers until they were forced to cover it because President Trump raised the issue in a nationally televised debate. The high-tech outlets even blacked out coverage by the New York Post, the ninth largest daily newspaper in the country, because it covered the story.”

Dick Morris, “The Return”

Liberals wanted the story suppressed, and asked Big Tech to do so.

The left, and conservatives, were appalled by this.

 

[MinTrut]

17% of Biden Voters Would Not Have Voted for Him Had They Known ...lifenews.com › home › 17% of biden voters would not have voted for him had they known scandals liberal media censored

November 26, 2020 - Putting It All Together: Looking at all eight of these issues together, our poll found that a total of 17% of Biden’s voters told us they would have changed their vote if they had been aware of one or more of these important stories. This would have moved every one of the swing states into ...



SEVENTEEN PERCENT of Biden Voters Said They Wouldn't Have Voted ...thegatewaypundit.com› 2020 › 11 › seventeen-percent-biden-voters-said-wouldnt-voted-knew-media-censored-scandals

November 24, 2020 - A whopping 17 percent of Joe Biden’s voters said that they would not have voted for him if they were aware of various scandals that were hidden by the mainstream media. The study, conducted by The Polling Company on behalf of the Media Research Center, polled 1,750 Biden voters in seven swing ...

Yup - Democrats/shitlibs support censorship.

Conservatives and the left do not.

 

[MinTrut]

No it is not. Social media also has property rights. The 5th circ us of appeals attempted to seize the property of social media. You are proving that you are the socialist. Only government can censor. The Supreme Court has already decided this.

^ Incredibly ignorant.

SCOTUS must decide.

 

[MinTrut]

Hard to believe that Jonathan Turley is a legal expert. He would have realized that the Supreme Court has dealt with this and came to a opposite opinion. That free speech rights are not binding on private companies. That doesn't float even in a radical right wing Supreme Court.

Privately owned/maintained public space must honor/permit free speech.