Billy_Kinetta
Paladin of the Lost Hour
- Mar 4, 2013
- 52,766
- 22,205
- 2,320
So rules the SCOTUS 5-4. It's up to the states.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So they upheld the Constitution? Good! The federal government is limited to whatever powers the Constitution gives it. Beyond that, its up to the state. Correct call. It can be fought out in the state legislatures and courts where it is supposed to happen.So rules the SCOTUS 5-4. It's up to the states.
So they upheld the Constitution? Good! The federal government is limited to whatever powers the Constitution gives it. Beyond that, its up to the state. Correct call. It can be fought out in the state legislatures and courts where it is supposed to happen.So rules the SCOTUS 5-4. It's up to the states.
With any luck, Ginsberg will croak or retire and that will be one less activist judge.This is what happens when you replace judges with activists.
You've got it totally backwards.With any luck, Ginsberg will croak or retire and that will be one less activist judge.This is what happens when you replace judges with activists.
5 of them did.So they upheld the Constitution? Good! The federal government is limited to whatever powers the Constitution gives it. Beyond that, its up to the state. Correct call. It can be fought out in the state legislatures and courts where it is supposed to happen.So rules the SCOTUS 5-4. It's up to the states.
Traitor has to trait.It looks like B. Franklin was correct and saw the future. The Chief Justice of the United States and four others have continued in their quest to shrink down democracy to the level it can be drowned in a bath tub.
They might as well have gone the full monty, and joined with Russia to end this great experiment in self government.
How do y'all feel about one party government, like China and Russia?
One party government. You mean what the pundits, MSM and DNC were hoping for when prior to the 2016 election they kept crowing about how the Republican party was in its death throes and would become a dying regional party? The hope and expectation was permanent DNC rule across the board. That kind one party government like China and Russia? The "socialist" Dems have far more in common with those governments.It looks like B. Franklin was correct and saw the future. The Chief Justice of the United States and four others have continued in their quest to shrink down democracy to the level it can be drowned in a bath tub.
They might as well have gone the full monty, and joined with Russia to end this great experiment in self government.
How do y'all feel about one party government, like China and Russia?
How can you tell with your head up your ass so far?You've got it totally backwards.With any luck, Ginsberg will croak or retire and that will be one less activist judge.This is what happens when you replace judges with activists.
As usual.
It looks like B. Franklin was correct and saw the future. The Chief Justice of the United States and four others have continued in their quest to shrink down democracy to the level it can be drowned in a bath tub.
They might as well have gone the full monty, and joined with Russia to end this great experiment in self government.
How do y'all feel about one party government, like China and Russia?
One party government. You mean what the pundits, MSM and DNC were hoping for when prior to the 2016 election they kept crowing about how the Republican party was in its death throes and would become a dying regional party? The hope and expectation was permanent DNC rule across the board. That kind one party government like China and Russia? The "socialist" Dems have far more in common with those governments.