Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
numbnutz thinks the dust cloud is concreteSo you pretend you can tell that is smoke, but cannot see this is concrete?
![]()
you mean the pointy remnants of the steel core sticking up? no, the steel core isnt concrete.
numbnutz thinks the dust cloud is concreteSo you pretend you can tell that is smoke, but cannot see this is concrete?
![]()
you mean the pointy remnants of the steel core sticking up? no, the steel core isnt concrete.
![]()
numbnutz thinks the dust cloud is concreteyou mean the pointy remnants of the steel core sticking up? no, the steel core isnt concrete.
![]()
The perpetrators want you to pretend you think it is dust so that the secret methods of mass murder might be concealed.
It is concrete left of the structural steel of the spire. On the far left is the empty core area. Proving there were no steel core columns and FEMA decieved NIST and the world about the Twin towers structural core.
anyone found pictures of the rebar cages..............
maybe they are hiding in the dust cloud that apparently isnt really dust.![]()
anyone found pictures of the rebar cages..............
maybe they are hiding in the dust cloud that apparently isnt really dust.![]()
ah come on they look like this and would be 100 stories tall.....
numbnutz thinks the dust cloud is concrete
![]()
The perpetrators want you to pretend you think it is dust so that the secret methods of mass murder might be concealed.
It is concrete left of the structural steel of the spire. On the far left is the empty core area. Proving there were no steel core columns and FEMA decieved NIST and the world about the Twin towers structural core.
can you please break out the MS Paint program and show me exactly what you are saying is the concrete core?
Considering you think "shoring trusses" exist, and exist in towers, your opinion ain't worth the text it takes to share it.
Rebar of the concrete core shear walls of WTC 1.
![]()
Look how the lie is used again and again to justify war.
http://www.youtube.com/v/9-dGHwe6COM
the pattern is christopher a brown is a fucking moronso basically you have no pictures of a concrete core. you cant show us a concrete core from all the construction pictures. you cant show us a concrete core on 9/11. you cant show us a concrete core any time in between the two.
you see a pattern here?
so basically you have no pictures of a concrete core.
the pattern is christopher a brown is a fucking moronso basically you have no pictures of a concrete core. you cant show us a concrete core from all the construction pictures. you cant show us a concrete core on 9/11. you cant show us a concrete core any time in between the two.
you see a pattern here?
yeah, and i bet they went and ripped them out of all those books published about the WTC back in the 70'd tooso basically you have no pictures of a concrete core.
Correct, because your masters, the infiltrators of the US government and perpetrators of mass murder on 9-11 TOOK THE images from the archives. Just like they TOOK the video from PBS I viewed in 1990 that makes it possible for me to identify the structural elements seen in 9-11 images.
Accordingly, I use images from 9-11 that show concrete and an EMPTY core area which proves concrete and DISPROVES the steel core columns in one move.
Here is proof the video DID exist in the PBS archives. Dr Ron Larsen Ph.d updates his search for the video on his web radio show in 2007.
http://algoxy.com/psych/audio/rl-cb6-27-07pbs.doc_1-2.mp3
yeah, and i bet they went and ripped them out of all those books published about the WTC back in the 70'd tooso basically you have no pictures of a concrete core.
Correct, because your masters, the infiltrators of the US government and perpetrators of mass murder on 9-11 TOOK THE images from the archives. Just like they TOOK the video from PBS I viewed in 1990 that makes it possible for me to identify the structural elements seen in 9-11 images.
Accordingly, I use images from 9-11 that show concrete and an EMPTY core area which proves concrete and DISPROVES the steel core columns in one move.
Here is proof the video DID exist in the PBS archives. Dr Ron Larsen Ph.d updates his search for the video on his web radio show in 2007.
http://algoxy.com/psych/audio/rl-cb6-27-07pbs.doc_1-2.mp3
you know you can buy those on amazon, right?
and since you claim mad scanning skills and know everything about ORC you should have no trouble scanning a few in
except its WRONGyeah, and i bet they went and ripped them out of all those books published about the WTC back in the 70'd tooCorrect, because your masters, the infiltrators of the US government and perpetrators of mass murder on 9-11 TOOK THE images from the archives. Just like they TOOK the video from PBS I viewed in 1990 that makes it possible for me to identify the structural elements seen in 9-11 images.
Accordingly, I use images from 9-11 that show concrete and an EMPTY core area which proves concrete and DISPROVES the steel core columns in one move.
Here is proof the video DID exist in the PBS archives. Dr Ron Larsen Ph.d updates his search for the video on his web radio show in 2007.
http://algoxy.com/psych/audio/rl-cb6-27-07pbs.doc_1-2.mp3
you know you can buy those on amazon, right?
and since you claim mad scanning skills and know everything about ORC you should have no trouble scanning a few in
That would be your job, because you have no evidence that is not misrepresented, which is easily done, meaning only 9-11 images of steel core columns are valid.
Here's mine from those type sources.
"Skyscraper". Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-869138-6.
"Modern skyscrapers such as the World Trade Center, New York, have steel and concrete hull-and-core structures. The central corea reinforced concrete towercontains lift shafts, staircases, and vertical ducts."
A scan too.
![]()
except its WRONGyeah, and i bet they went and ripped them out of all those books published about the WTC back in the 70'd too
you know you can buy those on amazon, right?
and since you claim mad scanning skills and know everything about ORC you should have no trouble scanning a few in
That would be your job, because you have no evidence that is not misrepresented, which is easily done, meaning only 9-11 images of steel core columns are valid.
Here's mine from those type sources.
"Skyscraper". Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-869138-6.
"Modern skyscrapers such as the World Trade Center, New York, have steel and concrete hull-and-core structures. The central corea reinforced concrete towercontains lift shafts, staircases, and vertical ducts."
A scan too.
![]()
and MASSIVELY so
MASSIVE EVIDENCE moron, and it has already been postedexcept its WRONGThat would be your job, because you have no evidence that is not misrepresented, which is easily done, meaning only 9-11 images of steel core columns are valid.
Here's mine from those type sources.
"Skyscraper". Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-869138-6.
"Modern skyscrapers such as the World Trade Center, New York, have steel and concrete hull-and-core structures. The central core–a reinforced concrete tower–contains lift shafts, staircases, and vertical ducts."
A scan too.
and MASSIVELY so
No evidence agent. Null post.