Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here is evidence showing a massive concrete wall.
So the concrete fell down but the "3-inch rebar" stayed up, and "they" confiscated every known photo of the core during construction. Haven't you discussed this with Mark Roberts, since he mentions your name on his web site? If so, it appears that you're just hell-bent on staying ignorant.There were 47 steel columns in the core of each tower,The perpetrators trying to prrotect the means of secrete mass murder would direct you to ask for the images they have taken and also have you refuse to recognize images which show the area where the supposed steel core columns were or that they show concrete and NO STEEL in the core.
You are exposed.
Hmmmmmmm, we see the core area of the tower very clearly. No steel core columns. However, we do see massive rebar along the line of the concrete walls.
Here is a very large piece of concrete falling into the core which is seen empty behind it.
The evidence proves you wrong.
I noticed you have no explanation for what this is if it is not concrete.
Why can't you find even one construction photo of these alleged walls out of the thousands that were taken?
Correct the infiltrators of the government that you serve with protection for their secret means of mass murder took them before 9-11. Something that is very logical. It is also logical that they would have you focus on that and ignore that you cannot show steel core columns in the core area. Which shows you are a fraud.
The "perpetrators" didn't take and couldn't have confiscated all of them, dude.[/B]
They not only got all of the construction photos showing concrete, they got the 2 hour video from PBS titled "The Engineering and Construction of the Twin Towers". Dr. Ron Larsen Ph.d, physics, cornell and former Marine Major Drew Raines III conducted a search for about 6 month and found libraries listed it, but then could not find their copies. Dr. Larsen uploaded one of his web radio shows that I co-hosted where he describes their search. Download the .mp3 here.
6/20/07 interview (documentary search update 17:50 minutes)
LCB-062007-16kb-Chris.mp3 - www.libertycalling.com
So the concrete fell down but the "3-inch rebar" stayed up, and "they" confiscated every known photo of the core during construction. Haven't you discussed this with Mark Roberts, since he mentions your name on his web site? If so, it appears that you're just hell-bent on staying ignorant.There were 47 steel columns in the core of each tower,
Hmmmmmmm, we see the core area of the tower very clearly. No steel core columns. However, we do see massive rebar along the line of the concrete walls.
Here is a very large piece of concrete falling into the core which is seen empty behind it.
The evidence proves you wrong.
I noticed you have no explanation for what this is if it is not concrete.
Correct the infiltrators of the government that you serve with protection for their secret means of mass murder took them before 9-11. Something that is very logical. It is also logical that they would have you focus on that and ignore that you cannot show steel core columns in the core area. Which shows you are a fraud.
The "perpetrators" didn't take and couldn't have confiscated all of them, dude.[/B]
They not only got all of the construction photos showing concrete, they got the 2 hour video from PBS titled "The Engineering and Construction of the Twin Towers". Dr. Ron Larsen Ph.d, physics, cornell and former Marine Major Drew Raines III conducted a search for about 6 month and found libraries listed it, but then could not find their copies. Dr. Larsen uploaded one of his web radio shows that I co-hosted where he describes their search. Download the .mp3 here.
6/20/07 interview (documentary search update 17:50 minutes)
LCB-062007-16kb-Chris.mp3 - www.libertycalling.com
So the concrete fell down but the "3-inch rebar" stayed up,
So the concrete fell down but the "3-inch rebar" stayed up,
That's a great point that I've never thought about. Chris claims that the rebar was coated with explosives. Explosives strong enough to completely pulverized 17' concrete walls yet leave the 3" diameter rebar standing 400' high.
Interesting...
So the concrete fell down but the "3-inch rebar" stayed up,
That's a great point that I've never thought about. Chris claims that the rebar was coated with explosives. Explosives strong enough to completely pulverized 17' concrete walls yet leave the 3" diameter rebar standing 400' high.
Interesting...
I see that you are working to change the subject to demolition to increase the cognitive dissonance so people might reject the evidence. That is a psyops tactic.
The concrete was fractured around that particular run of rebar and it fell away leaving the rebar standing. What is most revealing is that the 9-11 images and video show an absolutely empty core area.
Most importantly is that the "cause of death" determination required in due process is completely invalidated by the deception of FEMA and their lie of "steel core columns" so Americans must stand for the Constitutional rights of the 3,000 murdered by secret methods.
Here's a video of Robertson saying that Chris is full of crap:Ah yes. Chris has found another forum in which to peddle his garbage.
Hello Chris, it's me, Gamolon the agent. Sent to track you down and lead all the "lemmings" down the path of lies and deceit created by our government. To lead them away from the "truth" you say you are trying to bring to light.
As I 've brought forth in other forums, the simple fact is that your core could not have physically existed. You see, YOU say that at the lobby level of the towers, your core had walls that were 17' and 12' thick. You also say that this concrete core surrounded ALL the elevators, stairwells, a 16' wide hallway that ran the length of the core. That's about 24 local elevators, 23 express elevators included in that core. My main point in all this is that people CLEARLY entered any of the express elevators from OUTSIDE your core at the lobby level without having to pass through a 12' long tunnel cut through your core wall to get to the express elevator doors. There were 23 express elevators accessible. I have blueprints marked up of the towers that can convey this foolishness, but I cannot post links yet. Chris will no doubt claim that the blueprints are fake.
I also have talked with Leslie Robertson recently via email. He is accessible through his LERA website on the 9/11 page. Sawteen See is the contact. I had written a few emails and they were eventually forwarded to Mr. Robertson.
He basically says Chris is full of crap. If anyone is interested, I will post them.
World Trade Center Not a Demolition
The photos that show the pools of molten metal prove explosives were used.
he isnt using logicThat's a great point that I've never thought about. Chris claims that the rebar was coated with explosives. Explosives strong enough to completely pulverized 17' concrete walls yet leave the 3" diameter rebar standing 400' high.
Interesting...
I see that you are working to change the subject to demolition to increase the cognitive dissonance so people might reject the evidence. That is a psyops tactic.
The concrete was fractured around that particular run of rebar and it fell away leaving the rebar standing. What is most revealing is that the 9-11 images and video show an absolutely empty core area.
Most importantly is that the "cause of death" determination required in due process is completely invalidated by the deception of FEMA and their lie of "steel core columns" so Americans must stand for the Constitutional rights of the 3,000 murdered by secret methods.
No way Chris. If the explosives that the rebar was coated with was strong enough to pulverize a 17' concrete wall, there's now WAY the 3" diameter rebar would have stood.
Again your logic fails.
lolThe photos that show the pools of molten metal prove explosives were used.
Since when do "explosives" melt steel?
Here's a video of Robertson saying that Chris is full of crap:Ah yes. Chris has found another forum in which to peddle his garbage.
Hello Chris, it's me, Gamolon the agent. Sent to track you down and lead all the "lemmings" down the path of lies and deceit created by our government. To lead them away from the "truth" you say you are trying to bring to light.
As I 've brought forth in other forums, the simple fact is that your core could not have physically existed. You see, YOU say that at the lobby level of the towers, your core had walls that were 17' and 12' thick. You also say that this concrete core surrounded ALL the elevators, stairwells, a 16' wide hallway that ran the length of the core. That's about 24 local elevators, 23 express elevators included in that core. My main point in all this is that people CLEARLY entered any of the express elevators from OUTSIDE your core at the lobby level without having to pass through a 12' long tunnel cut through your core wall to get to the express elevator doors. There were 23 express elevators accessible. I have blueprints marked up of the towers that can convey this foolishness, but I cannot post links yet. Chris will no doubt claim that the blueprints are fake.
I also have talked with Leslie Robertson recently via email. He is accessible through his LERA website on the 9/11 page. Sawteen See is the contact. I had written a few emails and they were eventually forwarded to Mr. Robertson.
He basically says Chris is full of crap. If anyone is interested, I will post them.
World Trade Center Not a Demolition
Your ALSO not aware of the fact that in jan 01 they aired a special on the history channel called MODERN MARVELS where the onsite manager of the towers construction Frank Demartini says in the video-That the towers were designed that it could take a hit from an airliner.That its like an intense grid comparable to the screen netting on your door where a if you puncture the screen netting with a pencil it does absolutely nothing to the netting.
The photos that show the pools of molten metal prove explosives were used.
Since when do "explosives" melt steel?
Your ALSO not aware of the fact that in jan 01 they aired a special on the history channel called MODERN MARVELS where the onsite manager of the towers construction Frank Demartini says in the video-That the towers were designed that it could take a hit from an airliner.That its like an intense grid comparable to the screen netting on your door where a if you puncture the screen netting with a pencil it does absolutely nothing to the netting.
I believe the port authority directed Frank Demartini to not identify the concrete core because they knew that if he did the decepton planned for 9-11 would not work. Frank Demartini, actually a very good engineer, and probably a sincere patriot, died on 9-11 trying to save people.
Unfortunately he was loyal to the port authority as he had no idea that FEMA was going to misrepresent the towers core structure. With his loyalty he used an anology to the rebar grid inside the concrete shear walls of the core.
Window screen.
And it is true, or more than true because steel reinforced cast concrete using high tensile rebar is perhaps 5 times stronger than ordinary steel reinforced cast concrete.
Frank Demartini says in the video-That the towers were designed that it could take a hit from an airliner.That its like an intense grid comparable to the screen netting on your door where a if you puncture the screen netting with a pencil it does absolutely nothing to the netting.That the towers were OVERDESIGNED to take a hit from an airliner so much that he went on to say it could take MULTIPLE hits from airliners and still remain standing.
Frank Demartini says in the video-That the towers were designed that it could take a hit from an airliner.That its like an intense grid comparable to the screen netting on your door where a if you puncture the screen netting with a pencil it does absolutely nothing to the netting.That the towers were OVERDESIGNED to take a hit from an airliner so much that he went on to say it could take MULTIPLE hits from airliners and still remain standing.
Sounds like they designed it for the IMPACT not the subsequent fires. Funny how Frank didn't say how the screen would stand up after the pencil went through and if the screen caught fire.
Your ALSO not aware of the fact that in jan 01 they aired a special on the history channel called MODERN MARVELS where the onsite manager of the towers construction Frank Demartini says in the video-That the towers were designed that it could take a hit from an airliner.That its like an intense grid comparable to the screen netting on your door where a if you puncture the screen netting with a pencil it does absolutely nothing to the netting.
I believe the port authority directed Frank Demartini to not identify the concrete core because they knew that if he did the decepton planned for 9-11 would not work. Frank Demartini, actually a very good engineer, and probably a sincere patriot, died on 9-11 trying to save people.
Unfortunately he was loyal to the port authority as he had no idea that FEMA was going to misrepresent the towers core structure. With his loyalty he used an anology to the rebar grid inside the concrete shear walls of the core.
Window screen.
And it is true, or more than true because steel reinforced cast concrete using high tensile rebar is perhaps 5 times stronger than ordinary steel reinforced cast concrete.
Yeah he was a true hero.Dying while trying to save people in that tragedy.
I believe the port authority directed Frank Demartini to not identify the concrete core because they knew that if he did the decepton planned for 9-11 would not work. Frank Demartini, actually a very good engineer, and probably a sincere patriot, died on 9-11 trying to save people.
Unfortunately he was loyal to the port authority as he had no idea that FEMA was going to misrepresent the towers core structure. With his loyalty he used an anology to the rebar grid inside the concrete shear walls of the core.
Window screen.
And it is true, or more than true because steel reinforced cast concrete using high tensile rebar is perhaps 5 times stronger than ordinary steel reinforced cast concrete.
Yeah he was a true hero.Dying while trying to save people in that tragedy.
And this needed to be pointed out why? To make sure everyone in this forum aware that he was a hero for giving his to save others in case we didn't think so?
Were you just reminding us?
